On Number Theory (-1849)

"[…] in the science of numbers ought to be preferred as an acquisition before all others, because of its necessity and because of the great secrets and other mysteries which there are in the properties of numbers. All sciences partake of it, and it has need of none." (Boethius, cca. 6th century)

"The properties of the numbers known today have been mostly discovered by observation, and discovered long before their truth has been confirmed by rigid demonstrations. There are even many properties of the numbers with which we are well acquainted, but which we are not yet able to prove; only observations have led us to their knowledge. Hence we see that in the theory of numbers, which is still very imperfect, we can place our highest hopes in observations." (Leonhard Euler, "Specimen de usu observationum in mathesi pura" ["Example of the use of observation in pure mathematics"], cca. 1753)

"There is scarcely any one who states purely arithmetical questions, scarcely any who understands them. Is this not because arithmetic has been treated up to this time geometrically rather than arithmetically? This certainly is indicated by many works ancient and modern. Diophantus himself also indicates this. But he has freed himself from geometry a little more than others have, in that he limits his analysis to rational numbers only; nevertheless the Zetcica of Vieta, in which the methods of Diophantus are extended to continuous magnitude and therefore to geometry, witness the insufficient separation of arithmetic from geometry. Now arithmetic has a special domain of its own, the theory of numbers. This was touched upon but only to a slight degree by Euclid in his Elements, and by those who followed him it has not been sufficiently extended, unless perchance it lies hid in those books of Diophantus which the ravages of time have destroyed. Arithmeticians have now to develop or restore it. To these, that I may lead the way, I propose this theorem to be proved or problem to be solved. If they succeed in discovering the proof or solution, they will acknowledge that questions of this kind are not inferior to the more celebrated ones from geometry either for depth or difficulty or method of proof: Given any number which is not a square, there also exists an infinite number of squares such that when multiplied into the given number and unity is added to the product, the result is a square." (Pierre de Fermat, [Letter to Frénicle] 1657)

"In the Theory of Numbers it happens rather frequently that, by some unexpected luck, the most elegant new truths spring up by induction.” (Carl F Gauss, Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, published in 1801)

"Number theory is revealed in its entire simplicity and natural beauty when the field of arithmetic is extended to the imaginary numbers" (Carl F Gauss, "Disquisitiones arithmeticae" ["Arithmetical Researches"], 1801)

Mathematics, Numbers and More…

“It is not of the essence of mathematics to be conversant with the ideas of number and quantity. Whether as a general habit of mind it would be desirable to apply symbolic processes to moral argument, is another question.” (George Boole, “An Investigation of the Laws of Thought”, 1854)

“The purely formal sciences, logic and mathematics, deal with such relations which are independent of the definite content, or the substance of the objects, or at least can be. In particular, mathematics involves those relations of objects to each other that involve the concept of size, measure, number.” (Hermann Hankel, “Theorie der Complexen Zahlensysteme”, 1867)

“Mathematics is the science of the functional laws and transformations which enable us to convert figured extension and rated motion into number.” (George Holmes Howison, “The Departments of Mathematics, and their Mutual Relations”, Journal of Speculative Philosophy Vol. 5, No. 2, 1871)

“It may be surprising to see emotional sensibility invoked apropos of mathematical demonstrations which, it would seem, can interest only the intellect. This would be to forget the feeling of mathematical beauty, of the harmony of numbers and forms, of geometric elegance. This is a true esthetic feeling that all real mathematicians know, and surely it belongs to emotional sensibility.” (Henri Poincaré, 1913)

“Mathematics is the science of number and space. It starts from a group of self-evident truths and by infallible deduction arrives at incontestable conclusions […] the facts of mathematics are absolute, unalterable, and eternal truths.” (E Russell Stabler, “An Interpretation and Comparison of Three Schools of Thought in the Foundations of Mathematics”, The Mathematics Teacher, Vol 26, 1935)

“The harmony of the world is made manifest in Form and Number, and the heart and soul and all the poetry of Natural Philosophy are embodied in the concept of mathematical beauty.” (Sir D’Arcy W Thompson, “On Growth and Form”, 1951)

“Mathematics, springing from the soil of basic human experience with numbers and data and space and motion, builds up a far-flung architectural structure composed of theorems which reveal insights into the reasons behind appearances and of concepts which relate totally disparate concrete ideas.” (Saunders MacLane, “Of Course and Courses”The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol 61, No 3, 1954)

“Just as mathematics aims to study such entities as numbers, functions, spaces, etc., the subject matter of metamathematics is mathematics itself.” (Frank C DeSua, “Mathematics: A Non-Technical Exposition”, American Scientist, 3 Jul 1954)

Bridging the Gap: Science vs Divinity

“That deep emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God.” (Albert Einstein)

“Nothing in the universe is contingent, but all things are conditioned to exist and operate in a particular manner by the necessity of the divine nature.” (Baruch Spinoza)

“What you can show using physics, forces this universe to continue to exist. As long as you're using general relativity and quantum mechanics you are forced to conclude that God exists.” (Frank Tipler)

"The equations of physics have in them incredible simplicity, elegance and beauty. That in itself is sufficient to prove to me that there must be a God who is responsible for these laws and responsible for the universe" (Paul Davies, 1984)

“In our study of natural objects we are approaching the thoughts of the Creator, reading his conceptions, interpreting a system that is His and not ours.”​ (Louis Agassiz)

“What one man calls God, another calls the laws of physics.” (Nikola Tesla)

“Nature does not consist entirely, or even largely, of problems designed by a Grand Examiner to come out neatly in finite terms, and whatever subject we tackle the first need is to overcome timidity about approximating.” (Sir Harold Jeffreys & Bertha S Jeffreys, “Methods of Mathematical Physics”, 1946)

"The idea of a universal mind or Logos would be, I think, a fairly plausible inference from the present state of scientific theory." (Arthur Eddington)

"Such properties seem to run through the fabric of the natural world like a thread of happy coincidences. But there are so many odd coincidences essential to life that some explanation seems required to account for them." (Sir Fred Hoyle)

"I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who would deny the advances of science." (Wernher von Braun)

On Extrema II (Extrema in Context)

“As in mathematics, when there is no maximum nor minimum, in short nothing distinguished, everything is done equally, or when that is not nothing at all is done: so it may be said likewise in respect of perfect wisdom, which is no less orderly than mathematics, that if there were not the best (optimum) among all possible worlds, God would not have produced any.” (Gottfried W Leibniz, “Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God and Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil”, 1710)

“For since the fabric of the universe is most perfect and the work of a most wise Creator, nothing at all takes place in the universe in which some rule of maximum or minimum does not appear.” (Leonhard Euler, “De Curvis Elasticis”, 1744)

“Like a great poet, Nature produces the greatest results with the simplest means.” (Heinrich Heine)

“The triumph of a theory is to embrace the greatest number and the greatest variety of facts.” (Charles A Wurtz, “A History of Chemical Theory from the Age of Lavoisier to the Present Time”, 1869) 

“It is the constant aim of the mathematician to reduce all his expressions to their lowest terms, to retrench every superfluous word and phrase, and to condense the Maximum of meaning into the Minimum of language.” (James J Sylvester, 1877)

“In pure mathematics the maximum of detachment appears to be reached: the mind moves in an infinitely complicated pattern, which is absolutely free from temporal considerations. Yet this very freedom – the essential condition of the mathematician’s activity – perhaps gives him an unfair advantage. He can only be wrong – he cannot cheat.” (Kytton Strachey, “Portraits in Miniature”, 1931)

“[…] science, properly interpreted, is not dependent on any sort of metaphysics. It merely attempts to cover a maximum of facts by a minimum of laws.” (Herbert Feigl, “Naturalism and Humanism”, American Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1949)

“The concept of the ‘singleness of the superlative’ is simple: no problem in dynamics can be properly formulated in terms of more than one superlative, whether the superlative in question is stated as a minimum or as a maximum (e.g., a minimum expenditure of work can also be stated as a maximum economy of work). If the problem has more than one superlative, the problem itself becomes completely meaningless and indeterminate.” (George Kingsley Zipf, “Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction of Human Ecology”, 1949)

“To a considerable degree science consists in originating the maximum amount of information with the minimum expenditure of energy. Beauty is the cleanness of line in such formulations along with symmetry, surprise, and congruence with other prevailing beliefs.” (Edward O Wilson, “Biophilia”, 1984)

“The main goal of physics is to describe a maximum of phenomena with a minimum of variables.” (CERN Courier)

On Numbers: On Prime Numbers (1800-1899)

"The problem of distinguishing prime numbers from composite numbers and of resolving the latter into their prime factors is known to be one of the most important and useful in arithmetic. […] The dignity of the science itself seems to require that every possible means be explored for the solution of a problem so elegant and so celebrated.” (Carl Friedrich Gauss, "Disquisitiones Arithmeticae”, 1801)

“The difference of two square numbers is always a product, and divisible both by the sum and by the difference of the roots of those two squares; consequently the difference of two squares can never be a prime number.” (Leonhard Euler, “Elements of Algebra”, 1810)

"It is greatly to be lamented that this virtue of the real numbers [the ordinary integers], to be decomposable into prime factors, always the same ones [...] does not also belong to the complex numbers [complex integers]; were this the case, the whole theory [...] could easily be brought to its conclusion. For this reason, the complex numbers we have been considering seem imperfect, and one may well ask whether one ought not to look for another kind which would preserve the analogy with the real numbers with respect to such a fundamental property." (Ernst E Kummer, 1844)

"It is possible to express the laws of thermodynamics in the form of independent principles, deduced by induction from the facts of observation and experiment, without reference to any hypothesis as to the occult molecular operations with which the sensible phenomena may be conceived to be connected; and that course will be followed in the body of the present treatise. But, in giving a brief historical sketch of the progress of thermodynamics, the progress of the hypothesis of thermic molecular motions cannot be wholly separated from that of the purely inductive theory." (William J M Rankine, "A Manual of the Steam Engine and Other Prime Movers", 1859)

"It always seems to me absurd to speak of a complete proof, or of a theorem being rigorously demonstrated. An incomplete proof is no proof, and a mathematical truth not rigorously demonstrated is not demonstrated at all." (James J Sylvester, "On certain inequalities related to prime numbers", Nature Vol. 38, 1888)

"I think it would be desirable that this form of word [mathematics] should be reserved for the applications of the science, and that we should use mathematic in the singular to denote the science itself, in the same way as we speak of logic, rhetoric, or" (own sister to algebra) music." (James J Sylvester, Collected Mathematical Papers, 1869)

"One can divide the entire circumference of the lemniscate into m equal parts by ruler and compass alone if m is of the form 2^n or a prime of the form 2^n + 1, or if m is a product of numbers of these two kinds. This theorem, as one sees, is exactly the same as the theorem of Gauss for the circle." (Niels H Abel, "Euvres completes de Niels Henrik Abel", 1881)

"It always seems to me absurd to speak of a complete proof, or of a theorem being rigorously demonstrated. An incomplete proof is no proof, and a mathematical truth not rigorously demonstrated is not demonstrated at all." (James J Sylvester, On certain inequalities related to prime numbers", Nature Vol. 38, 1888)

"Mature knowledge regards logical clearness as of prime importance: only logically clear images does it test as to correctness; only correct images does it compare as to appropriateness. By pressure of circumstances the process is often reversed. Images are found to be suitable for a certain purpose; are next tested as to their correctness ; and only in the last place purged of implied contradictions." (Heinrich Hertz, "The Principles of Mechanics Presented in a New Form", 1894)

"The analogy between the results of the theory of algebraic functions of one variable and those of the theory of algebraic numbers suggested to me many years ago the idea of replacing the decomposition of algebraic numbers, with the help of ideal prime factors, by a more convenient procedure that fully corresponds to the expansion of an algebraic function in power series in the neighborhood of an arbitrary point." (Richard Dedekind, "New foundations of the theory of algebraic numbers", 1899)

On Numbers: On Prime Numbers (1500-1799)

“Since primes are the basic building blocks of the number universe from which all the other natural numbers are composed, each in its own unique combination, the perceived lack of order among them looked like a perplexing discrepancy in the otherwise so rigorously organized structure of the mathematical world.” (H Peter Aleff, “Prime Passages to Paradise” [Prima Porta ad Paradisum"], cca. 1604) 

"[…] I think I am able to prove that there are no even numbers which are perfect apart from those of Euclid; and that there are no odd perfect numbers, unless they are composed of a single prime number, multiplied by a square whose root is composed of several other prime number. But I can see nothing which would prevent one from finding numbers of this sort. For example, if 22021 were prime, in multiplying it by 9018009 which is a square whose root is composed of the prime numbers 3, 7, 11, 13, one would have 198585576189, which would be a perfect number. But, whatever method one might use, it would require a great deal of time to look for these numbers […]" (René Descartes, [a letter to Marin Mersenne] 1638)

"And this proposition is generally true for all progressions and for all prime numbers; the proof of which I would send to you, if I were not afraid to be too long." (Pierre de Fermat, [letter] 1640)

"For in those days I was in the prime of my age for invention & minded Mathematicks & Philosophy more then at any time since." (Isaac Newton, 1165-66)

"Mathematicians have tried in vain to this day to discover some order in the sequence of prime numbers, and we have reason to believe that it is a mystery into which the mind will never penetrate." (Leonhard Euler, "Institutiones calculi differentialis" ["Institutions of Differential Calculus"], 1755)

"Till now the mathematicians tried in vain to discover some order in the sequence of the prime numbers and we have every reason to believe that there is some mystery which the human mind shall never penetrate. To convince oneself, one has only to glance at the tables of the primes, which some people took the trouble to compute beyond a hundred thousand, and one perceives that there is no order and no rule. This is so much more surprising as the arithmetic gives us definite rules with the help of which we can continue the sequence of the primes as far as we please, without noticing, however, the least trace of order." (Leonhard Euler, "Letters of Euler on different subjects in physics and philosophy. Addressed to a German princess, 1768)

"When we have grasped the spirit of the infinitesimal method, and have verified the exactness of its results either by the geometrical method of prime and ultimate ratios, or by the analytical method of derived functions, we may employ infinitely small quantities as a sure and valuable means of shortening and simplifying our proofs." (Joseph-Louis de Lagrange, "Mechanique Analytique", 1788)

On Numbers: On Prime Numbers (-1499)

“A prime number is one (which is) measured by a unit alone.” (Euclid, “The Elements”, Book VII, cca 300 BC)

"If as many numbers as we please beginning from a unit be set out continuously in double proportion, until the sum of all becomes a prime, and if the sum multiplied into the last make some number, the product will be perfect." (Euclid,"Elements", cca 300 BC)

“Numbers prime to one another are those which are measured by a unit alone as a common measure.” (Euclid, “The Elements”, Book VII, cca 300 BC)

"Two unequal numbers being set out, and the less being continually subtracted in tum from the greater, if the number which is left never measures the one before it until an unit is left, the original numbers will be prime to one another." (Euclid, Book VII, cca 300 BC)

"There exists an elegant and sure method of generating these numbers, which does not leave out any perfect numbers and which does not include any that are not; and which is done in the following way. First set out in order the powers of two in a line, starting from unity, and proceeding as far as you wish: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096; and then they must be totalled each time there is a new term, and at each totaling examine the result, if you find that it is prime and non-composite, you must multiply it by the quantity of the last term that you added to the line, and the product will always be perfect. If, otherwise, it is composite and not prime, do not multiply it, but add on the next term, and again examine the result, and if it is composite leave it aside, without multiplying it, and add on the next term. If, on the other hand, it is prime, and non-composite, you must multiply it by the last term taken for its composition, and the number that results will be perfect, and so on as far as infinity." (Nicomachus of Gerasa,"Introductio Arithmetica", cca. 100 AD)

"Numbers are called prime which can be divided by no number; they are seen to be not ‘divisible’ by the monad but ‘composed’ of it: take, for example, the numbers live, seven, eleven, thirteen, seventeen, and others like them. No number can divide these numbers into integers. So, they are called `prime,' since they arise from no number and are not divisible into equal proportions. Arising in themselves, they beget other numbers from themselves, since even numbers are begotten from odd numbers, but an odd number cannot be begotten from even numbers. Therefore, prime numbers must of necessity be regarded as beautiful." (Martianus Capella, cca. 400 AD)

"Number is divided into even and odd. Even number is divided into the following: evenly even, evenly uneven, and unevenly uneven. Odd number is divided into the following: prime and incomposite, composite, and a third intermediate class" (mediocris) which in a certain way is prime and incomposite but in another way secondary and composite." (Isidore of Seville, Etymologies, Book III, cca. 600

On Numbers: The Infinity in Numbers

“When the consequences of either assumption are the same, we should always assume that things are finite rather than infinite in number, since in things constituted by nature that which is infinite and that which is better ought, if possible, to be present rather than the reverse […]” (Aristotle)

“But of all other ideas, it is number, which I think furnishes us with the clearest and most distinct idea of infinity we are capable of.” (John Locke)

"For any number there exists a corresponding even number which is its double. Hence the number of all numbers is not greater than the number of even numbers, that is, the whole is not greater than the part." (Gottfried W Leibniz)

“I regard the whole of arithmetic as a necessary, or at least natural, consequence of the simplest arithmetical act, that of counting, and counting itself as nothing else than the successive creation of the infinite series of positive integers in which each individual is defined by the one immediately preceding […]” (Richard Dedekind, “On Continuity and Irrational Numbers”, 1872)

 “If you can take away some of the terms of a collection, without diminishing the number of terms, then there is an infinite number of terms in the collection.” (Bertrand Russell)

"The prototype of all infinite processes is repetition. […] Our very concept of the infinite derives from the notion that what has been said or done once can always be repeated.” (Tobias Dantzig, “Number: The Language of Science”, 1930)

“The sequence of numbers which grows beyond any stage already reached by passing to the next number is a manifold of possibilities open towards infinity, it remains forever in the status of creation, but is not a closed realm of things existing in themselves. That we blindly converted one into the other is the true source of our difficulties […]” (Hermann Weyl, “Mathematics and Logic”, 1946)

"[…] infinity is not a large number or any kind of number at all; at least of the sort we think of when we say 'number'. It certainly isn't the largest number that could exist, for there isn't any such thing." (Isaac Asimov)

"Each act of creation could be symbolized as a particular product of infinity and zero. From each such product could emerge a particular entity of which the appropriate symbol was a particular number." (Srinivasa Ramanujan)

“Mathematics is the only infinite human activity. It is conceivable that humanity could eventually learn everything in physics or biology. But humanity certainly won't ever be able to find out everything in mathematics, because the subject is infinite. Numbers themselves are infinite.” (Paul Erdős)

The Arithmetic behind Numbers

"[Arithmetic] has a very great and elevating effect, compelling the soul to reason about abstract numbers, and rebelling against the introduction of visible or tangible objects into the argument." (Plato)

 “Arithmetic has for its object the properties of number in the abstract. In algebra, viewed as a science of operations, order is the predominating idea. The business of geometry is with the evolution of the properties of space, or of bodies viewed as existing in space.” (James J Sylvester, “A Probationary Lecture on Geometry”, 1844)

"The mathematical phenomenon always develops out of simple arithmetic, so useful in everyday life, out of numbers, those weapons of the gods; the gods are there, behind the wall, at play with numbers." (Le Corbusier)

“I regard the whole of arithmetic as a necessary, or at least natural, consequence of the simplest arithmetical act, that of counting, and counting itself as nothing else than the successive creation of the infinite series of positive integers in which each individual is defined by the one immediately preceding […]” (Richard Dedekind, “On Continuity and Irrational Numbers”, 1872)

“Arithmetic must be discovered in just the same sense in which Columbus discovered the West Indies, and we no more create numbers than he created the Indians.” (Bertrand Russell, “The Principles of Mathematics”, 1903)

“Arithmetic does not present to us that feeling of continuity which is such a precious guide; each whole number is separate from the next of its kind and has in a sense individuality; each in a manner is an exception and that is why general theorems are rare in the theory of numbers; and that is why those theorems which may exist are more hidden and longer escape those who are searching for them.” (Henri Poincaré, “Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution”, 1909)

“The way to enable a student to apprehend the instrumental value of arithmetic is not to lecture him on the benefit it will be to him in some remote and uncertain future, but to let him discover that success in something he is interested in doing depends on ability to use numbers.” (John Dewey, “Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education”, 1916)

“In other words, without a theory, a plan, the mere mechanical manipulation of the numbers in a problem does not necessarily make sense just because you are using Arithmetic!” (Lillian R Lieber, “The Education of T.C. MITS”, 1944)

“For it is true, generally speaking, that mathematics is not a popular subject, even though its importance may be generally conceded. The reason for this is to be found in the common superstition that mathematics is but a continuation, a further development, of the fine art of arithmetic, of juggling with numbers.” (David Hilbert, “Anschauliche Geometrie”, 1932)

“Arithmetic, then, means dealing logically with certain facts that we know, about numbers, with a view to arriving at knowledge which as yet we do not possess.” (Anonymous)

On Numbers: Defining Numbers

“Number is the bond of the eternal continuance of things.” (Plato)

“Measure, time and number are nothing but modes of thought or rather of imagination.” (Baruch Spinoza, [Letter to Ludvicus Meyer] 1663)

"[…] if number is merely the product of our mind, space has a reality outside our mind whose laws we cannot a priori completely prescribe" (Carl F Gauss, 1830)

"Numbers are intellectual witnesses that belong only to mankind, and by whose means we can achieve an understanding of words." (Honore de Balzac)

"Numbers constitute the only universal language." (Nathanael West, “Miss Lonelyhearts”, 1933)

“[…] there are terms which cannot be defined, such as number and quantity. Any attempt at a definition would only throw difficulty in the student’s way, which is already done in geometry by the attempts at an explanation of the terms point, straight line, and others, which are to be found in treatise on that subject.” (Augustus de Morgan, “On the Study and Difficulties of Mathematics”, 1943)

“Numbers have neither substance, nor meaning, nor qualities. They are nothing but marks, and all that is in them we have put into them by the simple rule of straight succession.” (Hermann Weyl, “Mathematics and the Laws of Nature”, 1959)

“[…] numbers are free creations of the human mind; they serve as a means of apprehending more easily and more sharply the difference of things.” (Richard Dedekind, “Essays on the Theory of Numbers”, 1963)

“Numbers are not just counters; they are elements in a system.” (Scott Buchanan, “Poetry and Mathematics”, 1975)

“Number is therefore the most primitive instrument of bringing an unconscious awareness of order into consciousness.” (Marie-Louise von Frany, “Creation Myths”, 1995)

Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

On Numbers: The Power of Numbers II

“All things which can be known have number; for it is not possible that without number anything can be either conceived or known.” (Philolaus)

“Whenever a man can get hold of numbers, they are invaluable: if correct, they assist in informing his own mind, but they are still more useful in deluding the minds of others. Numbers are the masters of the weak, but the slaves of the strong.” (Charles Babbage, “Passages From the Life of a Philosopher”, 1864)

“Although he may not always recognize his bondage, modern man lives under a tyranny of numbers.” (Nicholas Eberstadt)

“Words and numbers are of equal value, for, in the cloak of knowledge, one is warp and the other woof. It is no more important to count the sands than it is to name the stars.” (Norton Juster, “The Phantom Tollbooth”, 1989)

“Numbers, in fact, are the atoms of the universe, combining with everything else.” (Calvin C Clawson, Mathematical Mysteries: The Beauty and Magic of Numbers”, 1996)

“There is no inquiry which is not finally reducible to a question of Numbers; for there is none which may not be conceived of as consisting in the determination of quantities by each other, according to certain relations.” (Auguste Comte)

“Numbers have undoubted powers to beguile and benumb, but critics must probe behind numbers to the character of arguments and the biases that motivate them.” (Stephen Jay Gould, “An Urchin in the Storm: Essays About Books and Ideas”, 1987)

“[…] a single number has more genuine and permanent value than an expensive library full of hypotheses.” (Robert Mayer, [Letter to Griesinger], 1844)

“Numbers have souls, and you can’t help but get involved with them in a personal way.” (Paul Auster, “The Music of Chance”, 1990)

“You can be moved to tears by numbers - provided they are encoded and decoded fast enough.” (Richard Dawkins, “River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life”, 1995)

Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

On Numbers: The Power of Numbers I

"The qualities of number appear to lead to the apprehension of truth." (Plato)

"Wherever there is number, there is beauty." (Diadochus Proclus)

"All was numbers." (Pythagoras)

"Number is the ruler of forms and ideas, and the cause of gods and demons." (Pythagoras)

"Number was the substance of all things." (Pythagoras)

"Number rules the universe." (Pythagoras)

"Take from all things their number and all shall perish." (Saint Isidore of Seville)

"The God that reigns in Olympus is Number Eternal." (Carl Gustav Jacobi)

"All mathematical forms have a primary subsistence in the soul so that prior to the sensible she contains self-motive numbers." (Thomas Taylor)

"Numbers are the sources of form and energy in the world. They are dynamic and active even among themselves […] almost human in their capacity for mutual influence." (Theon of Symyma)

Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

On Numbers: God and Numbers

“[…] the knowledge we have of the Mathematicks, hath no reason to elate us; since by them we know but numbers, and figures, creatures of our own, and are yet ignorant of our Maker’s.” (Joseph Glanvill, “The Vanity of Dogmatizing”, 1661)

 “The laws of thought, and especially of number, must hold good in heaven, whether it is a place or a state of mind; for they are independent of any particular sphere of existence, essential to Being itself, to God’s being as well as ours, laws of His mind before we learned them. The multiplication table will hold good in heaven […]” (Hilda P Hudson)

“Since we are assured that the all-wise Creator has observed the most exact proportions of number, weight and measure in the make of all things, the most likely way therefore to get any insight into the nature of those parts of the Creation which come within our observation must in all reason be to number, weigh and measure.” (Stephen Hales, “Vegetable Staticks”, 1961)

"God made the natural numbers. all else is the work of man." (Leopold Kronecker)

“It is a right, yes a duty, to search in cautious manner for the numbers, sizes, and weights, the norms for everything [God] has created. For He himself has let man take part in the knowledge of these things […] For these secrets are not of the kind whose research should be forbidden; rather they are set before our eyes like a mirror so that by examining them we observe to some extent the goodness and wisdom of the Creator.” (Johannes Kepler)

"God may not play dice with the universe, but something strange is going on with the prime numbers." (Paul Erdős)

“We know that there is an infinite, and we know not its nature. As we know it to be false that numbers are finite, it is therefore true that there is a numerical infinity. But we know not of what kind; it is untrue that it is even, untrue that it is odd; for the addition of a unit does not change its nature; yet it is a number, and every number is odd or even (this certainly holds of every finite number). Thus we may quite well know that there is a God without knowing what He is.” (Blaise Pascal, “Pensées”, 1670)

“Uneven numbers are the god’s delight” (Virgil)

“What else can the human mind hold besides numbers and magnitudes? These alone we apprehend correctly, and if piety permits to say so, our comprehension is in this case of the same kind as God’s, at least insofar as we are able to understand it in this mortal life.” (Johannes Kepler)

"The God that reigns in Olympus is Number Eternal.” (Carl Gustav Jacobi)

"God created everything by number, weight and measure.” (Sir Isaac Newton)

"Number is the ruler of forms and ideas, and the cause of gods and demons." (Pythagoras)

Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

On Complex Numbers III

"[geometrical representation of complex numbers] completely established the intuitive meaning of complex numbers, and more is not needed to admit these quantities into the domain of arithmetic." (Carl F Gauss, 1831) 

“Nearly fifty years had passed without any progress on the question of analytic representation of an arbitrary function, when an assertion of Fourier threw new light on the subject. Thus a new era began for the development of this part of Mathematics and this was heralded in a stunning way by major developments in mathematical Physics.” (Bernhard Riemann, 1854)

"I recall my own emotions: I had just been initiated into the mysteries of the complex number. I remember my bewilderment: here were magnitudes patently impossible and yet susceptible of manipulations which lead to concrete results. It was a feeling of dissatisfaction, of restlessness, a desire to fill these illusory creatures, these empty symbols, with substance. Then I was taught to interpret these beings in a concrete geometrical way. There came then an immediate feeling of relief, as though I had solved an enigma, as though a ghost which had been causing me apprehension turned out to be no ghost at all, but a familiar part of my environment." (Tobias Dantzig, “The Two Realities”, 1930)

“[…] imaginary numbers made their own way into arithmetical calculation without the approval, and even against the desires of individual mathematicians, and obtained wider circulation only gradually and the extent to which they showed themselves useful.” (Felix Klein, “Elementary Mathematics from an Advanced Standpoint”, 1945)

“The sweeping development of mathematics during the last two centuries is due in large part to the introduction of complex numbers; paradoxically, this is based on the seemingly absurd notion that there are numbers whose squares are negative.” (Emile Borel, 1952)

"For centuries [the concept of complex numbers] figured as a sort of mystic bond between reason and imagination.” (Tobias Dantzig)

"The whole apparatus of the calculus takes on an entirely different form when developed for the complex numbers." (Keith Devlin) "There can be very little of present-day science and technology that is not dependent on complex numbers in one way or another." (Keith Devlin)

 “[…] to the unpreoccupied mind, complex numbers are far from natural or simple and they cannot be suggested by physical observations. Furthermore, the use of complex numbers is in this case not a calculational trick of applied mathematics but comes close to being a necessity in the formulation of quantum mechanics.” (Eugene Wigner, “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences”, 1960)

“Nothing in our experience suggests the introduction of [complex numbers]. Indeed, if a mathematician is asked to justify his interest in complex numbers, he will point, with some indignation, to the many beautiful theorems in the theory of equations, of power series, and of analytic functions in general, which owe their origin to the introduction of complex numbers. The mathematician is not willing to give up his interest in these most beautiful accomplishments of his genius.” (Eugene P Wigner, “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences”, Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13 (1), 1960) 

“The letter ‘i’ originally was meant to suggest the imaginary nature of this number, but with the greater abstraction of mathematics, it came to be realized that it was no more imaginary than many other mathematical constructs. True, it is not suitable for measuring quantities, but it obeys the same laws of arithmetic as do the real numbers, and, surprisingly enough, it makes the statement of various physical laws very natural.” (John A Paulos, “Beyond Numeracy”, 1991)

"The only reason that we like complex numbers is that we don't like real numbers." (Bernd Sturmfels)

See also:
5 Books 10 Quotes: Complex Numbers
Complex Numbers IV
Complex Numbers II
Complex Numbers I