On Plurality (1900-1949)

"[...] there is a universal principle, operating in every department of nature and at every stage of evolution, which is conservative, creative and constructive. [...] I have at last fixed upon the word synergy, as the term best adapted to express its twofold character of ‘energy’ and ‘mutuality’ or the systematic and organic ‘working together’ of the antithetical forces of nature. [...] Synergy is a synthesis of work, or synthetic work, and this is what is everywhere taking place. It may be said to begin with the primary atomic collision in which mass, motion, time, and space are involved, and to find its simplest expression in the formula for force, which implies a plurality of elements, and signifies an interaction of these elements." (Lester F Ward, "Pure Sociology", 1903)

"Reduced to their most pregnant difference, empiricism means the habit of explaining wholes by parts, and rationalism means the habit of explaining parts by wholes. Rationalism thus preserves affinities with monism, since wholeness goes with union, while empiricism inclines to pluralistic views. No philosophy can ever be anything but a summary sketch, a picture of the world in abridgment, a foreshortened bird's-eye view of the perspective of events. And the first thing to notice is this, that the only material we have at our disposal for making a picture of the whole world is supplied by the various portions of that world of which we have already had experience. We can invent no new forms of conception, applicable to the whole exclusively, and not suggested originally by the parts." (William James, "A Pluralistic Universe", 1908)

"Classes and concepts may, however, also be conceived as real objects, namely classes as 'pluralities of things' or as structures consisting of a plurality of things and concepts as the properties and relations of things existing independently of our definitions and constructions. It seems to me that the assumption of such objects is quite as legitimate as the assumption of physical bodies and there is quite as much reason to believe in their existence. They are in the same sense necessary to obtain a satisfactory system of mathematics as physical bodies are necessary for a satisfactory theory of our sense perceptions." (Kurt Gödel, "The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell", 1944)

"The only possible alternative is simply to keep to immediate experience that consciousness is a singular of which the plural is unknown; that there is only one thing and that what seems to be a plurality is merely a series of different aspects of this one thing, produced by a deception (the Indian MAJA); the same illusion is produced in a gallery of mirrors, and in the same way Gaurisankar and Mt Everest turned out to be the same peak seen from different valleys." (Erwin Schrödinger, "What Is Life?", 1944)

"A set is a unity of which its elements are the constituents. It is a fundamental property of the mind to comprehend multitudes into unities. Sets are multitudes which are also unities. A multitude is the opposite of a unity. How can anything be both a multitude and a unity? Yet a set is just that. It is a seemingly contradictory fact that sets exist. It is surprising that the fact that multitudes are also unities leads to no contradictions: this is the main fact of mathematics. Thinking a plurality together seems like a triviality: and this appears to explain why we have no contradiction. But 'many things for one' is far from trivial." (Kurt Gödel)

On Plurality (-1899)

"If simple unity could be adequately perceived by the sight or by any other sense, then, there would be nothing to attract the mind towards reality any more than in the case of the finger [...] But when it is combined with the perception of its opposite, and seems to involve the conception of plurality as much as unity, then thought begins to be aroused within us, and the soul perplexed and wanting to arrive at a decision asks 'What is absolute unity?' This is the way in which the study of the one has a power of drawing and converting the mind to the contemplation of reality." (Plato, "Republic", cca. 380 BC)

"In all things which have a plurality of parts, and which are not a total aggregate but a whole of some sort distinct from the parts, there is some cause." (Aristotle, "Metaphysics", cca. 335-323 BC)

"What is one is indivisible whatever it may be, e.g. a man is one man, not many. Number on the other hand is a plurality of 'ones' and a certain quantity of them. Hence number must stop at the indivisible: for 'two' and 'three' are merely derivative terms, and so with each of the other numbers." (Aristotle, "Physics", cca. 4th-century BC)

"There can only be one wisdom. For if it were possible that there be several wisdoms, then these would have to be from one. Namely, unity is prior to all plurality." (Nicholas of Cusa, "De Pace Fidei" ["The Peace of Faith"], 1453)

"Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate."
"Plurality is never to be posited without necessity." (William of Occam,"Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi", 1495)

"The essence of the 'Truth' most glorious and mose exalted is nothing but Being His Being is not subject to defect or diminution. He is untouched by change or variation, and is exempt from plurality and multiplicity, He transcends all manifestations, and is unknowable and invisible, Every 'how' and 'why' have made their appearance through Him, but in Himself He transcends every 'how' and 'why'. Everything is perceived by Him, while he is beyond perception. They outwaid eye is too dull to behold His beauty, and the eye of the heart is dimmed by the contemplation of His perfection." (Nūr ad-Dīn 'Abd ar-Rahmān Jāmī, "Lawāih", 15th century)

"The view of things [called Pantheism] [...] - that all plurality is only apparent, that in the endless series of individuals, passing simultaneously and successively into and out of life, generation after generation, age after age, there is but one and the same entity really existing, which is present and identical in all alike; [...] Now if plurality and difference belong only to the appearance-form; if there is but one and the same Entity manifested in all living things: it follows that, when we obliterate the distinction between the ego and the non-ego, we are not the sport of an illusion. Rather are we so, when we maintain the reality of individuation, — a thing the Hindus call Maya, that is, a deceptive vision, a phantasma. The former theory we have found to be the actual source of the phaenomenon of Compassion; indeed Compassion is nothing but its translation into definite expression. This, therefore, is what I should regard as the metaphysical foundation of Ethics, and should describe it as the sense which identifies the ego with the non-ego, so that the individual directly recognises in another his own self, his true and very being. From this standpoint the profoundest teaching of theory pushed to its furthest limits may be shown in the end to harmonise perfectly with the rules of justice and loving-kindness, as exercised; and conversely, it will be clear that practical philosophers, that is, the upright, the beneficent, the magnanimous, do but declare through their acts the same truth as the man of speculation wins by laborious research [...] He who is morally noble, however deficient in mental penetration, reveals by his conduct the deepest insight, the truest wisdom; and puts to shame the most accomplished and learned genius, if the latter's acts betray that his heart is yet a stranger to this great principle, - the metaphysical unity of life." (Arthur Schopenhauer, "On the Basis of Morality", 1840)

"Even with the examples of the infinite considered so far it could not escape our notice that not all infinite multitudes are to be regarded as equal to one another in respect of their plurality, but that some of them are greater (or smaller) than others, i.e. another multitude is contained as a part in one multitude (or on the contrary one multitude occurs in another as a mere part).This also is a claim which sounds to many paradoxical." (Bernard Bolzano, "Paradoxes of the Infinite", 1851)

"But rather they are able, in spite of that relationship between them that is the same for both of them, to have a relationship of inequality in their pluralities, so that one of them can be presented as a whole, of which the other is a part. An equality of these pluralities may only be concluded if some other reason is added, such as that both multitudes have exactly the same determining grounds, e.g. they have exactly the same way of being formed." (Bernard Bolzano, "Paradoxien des Unedlichen" ["Paradoxes of the Infinite"], 1851)

"Therefore both multitudes have one and the same plurality, as one can also say, equal plurality. Obviously this conclusion becomes void as soon as the multitude of things in A is an infinite multitude, for now not only do we never reach, by counting, the last thing in A, but rather, by virtue of the definition of an infinite multitude, in itself there is no last thing in A, i.e. however many have already been designated, there are always others to designate." (Bernard Bolzano, "Paradoxien des Unedlichen" ["Paradoxes of the Infinite"], 1851)

On Plurality (1950-)

"A social system consists in a plurality of individual actors interacting with each other in a situation which has at least a physical or environmental aspect, actors who are motivated in terms of a tendency to the 'optimization of gratification' and whose relation to their situations, including each other, is defined and mediated in terms of a system of culturally structured and shared symbols." (Talcott Parsons, "The Social System", 1951)

"A social system is a mode of organization of action elements relative to the persistence or ordered processes of change of the interactive patterns of a plurality of individual actors." (Talcott Parsons, "The Social System", 1951) 

"Relativity is inherently convergent, though convergent toward a plurality of centers of abstract truths. Degrees of accuracy are only degrees of refinement and magnitude in no way affects the fundamental reliability, which refers, as directional or angular sense, toward centralized truths. Truth is a relationship." (R Buckminster Fuller, "The Designers and the Politicians", 1962)

"A set is formed by the grouping together of single objects into a whole. A set is a plurality thought of as a unit. If these or similar statements were set down as definitions, then it could be objected with good reason that they define idem per idemi or even obscurum per obscurius. However, we can consider them as expository, as references to a primitive concept, familiar to us all, whose resolution into more fundamental concepts would perhaps be neither competent nor necessary." (Felix Hausdorff, "Set Theory", 1962)

"Science is imagination in the service of the verifiable truth and that service is indeed communal. It cannot be rigidly planned. Rather, it requires freedom and courage and the plural contributions of many different kinds of people who must maintain their individuality while giving to the group." (Gerald M Edelman, [Nobel Prize] 1972)

"What is so remarkable in all these theories and doctrines is their implicit monism, the claim that behind the obvious multiplicity of the world’s appearances and, even more pertinently to our context, behind the obvious plurality of man’s faculties and abilities, there must exist a oneness - the old hen pan, 'the all is one' - either a single source or a single ruler." (Hannah Arendt, "The Life of the Mind", 1977)

"[...] the plurality that we perceive is only an appearance; it is not real." (Erwin Schrödinger, 'The Mystic Vision', 1984 )

"There are a variety of swarm topologies, but the only organization that holds a genuine plurality of shapes is the grand mesh. In fact, a plurality of truly divergent components can only remain coherent in a network. No other arrangement-chain, pyramid, tree, circle, hub-can contain true diversity working as a whole. This is why the network is nearly synonymous with democracy or the market." (Kevin Kelly, "Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems and the Economic World", 1995)

"It is part of the lore of science that the most parsimonious explanation of observed facts is to be preferred over convoluted and long-winded theories. Ptolemaic epicycles gave way to the Copernican system largely on this premise, and in general, scientific inquiry is governed by the oft-quoted dictum of the medieval cleric William of Occam that 'nunquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necesitate' , which may be paraphrased as 'choose the simplest explanation for the observed facts' ." (Edward Beltrami, "What is Random?: Chaos and Order in Mathematics and Life", 1999)

"Complementary to the principle of multidimensionality and parallel to it is the concept of plurality. Plurality of function, structure, and process, as we will see later on, is at the core of systems theory of development. It makes the high/high a possibility and choice a reality. Plurality simply maintains that systems can have multiple structures and multiple functions and be governed by multiple processes; it denies the classical view of a single structure with a single function in a single cause-and-effect relationship." (Jamshid Gharajedaghi, "Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity A Platform for Designing Business Architecture" 3rd Ed., 2011)

"Singularity refers to theories in which a particular structure, function, or process is considered fixed and/or primary in all environments. Plurality refers to theories that consider structure, function, or process to be multiple and/or variable in the same or different environments." (Jamshid Gharajedaghi, "Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity A Platform for Designing Business Architecture" 3rd Ed., 2011)

William M Bolstad - Collected Quotes

"Data almost always contain uncertainty. This uncertainty may arise from selection of the items to be measured, or it may arise from variability of the measurement process. Drawing general conclusions from data is the basis for increasing knowledge about the world, and is the basis for all rational scientific inquiry. Statistical inference gives us methods and tools for doing this despite the uncertainty in the data. The methods used for analysis depend on the way the data were gathered. It is vitally important that there is a probability model explaining how the uncertainty gets into the data." (William M Bolstad & James M Curran, "Introduction to Bayesian Statistics" 3^rd Ed., 2017)

"Independence of two events is not a property of the events themselves, rather it is a property that comes from the probabilities of the events and their intersection. This is in contrast to mutually exclusive events, which have the property that they contain no elements in common. Two mutually exclusive events each with non-zero probability cannot be independent. Their intersection is the empty set, so it must have probability zero, which cannot equal the product of the probabilities of the two events!" (William M Bolstad & James M Curran, "Introduction to Bayesian Statistics" 3^rd Ed., 2017)

"Since we cannot completely eliminate uncertainty, we need to model it. In real life when we are faced with uncertainty, we use plausible reasoning. We adjust our belief about something, based on the occurrence or nonoccurrence of something else." (William M Bolstad & James M Curran, "Introduction to Bayesian Statistics" 3^rd Ed., 2017)

"Statistics is the science that relates data to specific questions of interest. This includes devising methods to gather data relevant to the question, methods to summarize and display the data to shed light on the question, and methods that enable us to draw answers to the question that are supported by the data." (William M Bolstad & James M Curran, "Introduction to Bayesian Statistics" 3^rd Ed., 2017)

"The lack of direct control means the outside factors will be affecting the data. There is a danger that the wrong conclusions could be drawn from the experiment due to these uncontrolled outside factors. The important statistical idea of randomization has been developed to deal with this possibility. The unidentified outside factors can be 'averaged out' by randomly assigning each unit to either treatment or control group. This contributes variability to the data. Statistical conclusions always have some uncertainty or error due to variability in the data. We can develop a probability model of the data variability based on the randomization used. Randomization not only reduces this uncertainty due to outside factors, it also allows us to measure the amount of uncertainty that remains using the probability model. Randomization lets us control the outside factors statistically, by averaging out their effects." (William M Bolstad & James M Curran, "Introduction to Bayesian Statistics" 3^rd Ed., 2017)

"The goal of scientific inquiry is to gain new knowledge about the cause-and-effect relationship between a factor and a response variable. We gather data to help us determine these relationships and to develop mathematical models to explain them." (William M Bolstad & James M Curran, "Introduction to Bayesian Statistics" 3^rd Ed., 2017)

"The scientific method searches for cause-and-effect relationships between an experimental variable and an outcome variable. In other words, how changing the experimental variable results in a change to the outcome variable. Scientific modeling develops mathematical models of these relationships. Both of them need to isolate the experiment from outside factors that could affect the experimental results. All outside factors that can be identified as possibly affecting the results must be controlled." (William M Bolstad & James M Curran, "Introduction to Bayesian Statistics" 3^rd Ed., 2017)

"Variability in data solely due to chance can be averaged out by increasing the sample size. Variability due to other causes cannot be." (William M Bolstad & James M Curran, "Introduction to Bayesian Statistics" 3^rd Ed., 2017)

On Unity (Unsourced)

"As knowledge advances, science ceases to scoff at religion; and religion ceases to frown on science. The hour of mockery by the one, and of reproof by the other, is passing away. Henceforth, they will dwell together in unity and goodwill. They will mutually illustrate the wisdom, power, and grace of God. Science will adorn and enrich religion; and religion will ennoble and sanctify science." (Oliver W Holmes)

"Let us notice first of all, that every generalization implies in some measure the belief in the unity and simplicity of nature." (Henri Poincaré)

"Man’s first glance at the universe discovers only variety, diversity, multiplicity of phenomena. Let that glance be illuminated by science - by the science which brings man closer to God, - and simplicity and unity shine on all sides." (Louis Pasteur)

"Nature considered rationally, that is to say, submitted to the process of thought, is a unity in diversity of phenomena; a harmony, blending together all created things, however dissimilar in form and attributes; one great whole animated by the breath of life." (Alexander von Humboldt)

"Nature, despite her seeming diversity, is always a unity, a whole; and thus, when she manifests herself in any part of that whole, the rest must serve as a basis for that particular manifestation, and the latter must have a relationship to the rest of the system." (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe)

"Nothing has afforded me so convincing a proof of the unity of the Deity as these purely mental conceptions of numerical and mathematical science which have been by slow degrees vouchsafed to man, and are still granted in these latter times by the Differential Calculus, now superseded by the Higher Algebra, all of which must have existed in that sublimely omniscient Mind from eternity." (Mary Somerville)

"The organic unity of mathematics is inherent in the nature of this science, for mathematics is the foundation of all exact knowledge of natural phenomena." (David Hilbert)

"The story of scientific discovery has its own epic unity - a unity of purpose and endeavour - the single torch passing from hand to hand through the centuries; and the great moments of science when, after long labour, the pioneers saw their accumulated facts falling into a significant order - sometimes in the form of a law that revolutionised the whole world of thought - have an intense human interest, and belong essentially to the creative imagination of poetry." (Alfred Noyes)

"There is a fundamental error in separating the parts from the whole, the mistake of atomizing what should not be atomized. Unity and complementarity constitute reality." (Werner K Heisenberg)

"We can never achieve absolute truth, but we can live hopefully by a system of calculated probabilities. The law of probability gives to natural and human sciences - to human experience as a whole - the unity of life we seek." (Agnes Meyer)

"Whatever Nature undertakes, she can only accomplish it in a sequence. She never makes a leap. For example she could not produce a horse if it were not preceded by all the other animals on which she ascends to the horse’s structure as if on the rungs of a ladder. Thus every one thing exists for the sake of all things and all for the sake of one; for the one is of course the all as well. Nature, despite her seeming diversity, is always a unity, a whole; and thus, when she manifests herself in any part of that whole, the rest must serve as a basis for that particular manifestation, and the latter must have a relationship to the rest of the system." (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe)

On Unity (-1799)

"If simple unity could be adequately perceived by the sight or by any other sense, then, there would be nothing to attract the mind towards reality any more than in the case of the finger [...] But when it is combined with the perception of its opposite, and seems to involve the conception of plurality as much as unity, then thought begins to be aroused within us, and the soul perplexed and wanting to arrive at a decision asks 'What is absolute unity?' This is the way in which the study of the one has a power of drawing and converting the mind to the contemplation of reality." (Plato, "Republic", cca. 380 BC)

"Things are called continuous when the touching limits of each become one and the same and are contained in each other. Continuity is impossible if these extremities are two. […] Continuity belongs to things that naturally in virtue of their mutual contact form a unity. And in whatever way that which holds them together is one, so too will the whole be one." (Aristotle, "Physics", cca. 350 BC)

"A far greater glory is it to the wise to die for freedom, the love of which stands in very truth implanted in the soul like nothing else, not as a casual adjunct but an essential part of its unity, and cannot be amputated without the whole system being destroyed as a result." (Philo of Alexandria, "Every Good Man is Free", cca. 15 - 45 AD)

"And in the case of superior things like stars, we discover a kind of unity in separation. The higher we rise on the scale of being, the easier it is to discern a connection even among things separated by vast distances." (Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations". cca. 121–180 AD)

"There can only be one wisdom. For if it were possible that there be several wisdoms, then these would have to be from one. Namely, unity is prior to all plurality." (Nicholas of Cusa, "De Pace Fidei" ["The Peace of Faith"], 1453)

"The Fractions which represent the Probabilities of happening and failing, being added together, their Sum will always be equal to Unity, since the Sum of their Numerators will be equal to their common Denominator : now it being a certainty that an Event will either happen or fail, it follows that Certainty, which may be conceived under the notion of an infinitely great degree of Probability, is fitly represented by Unity." (Abraham de Moivre, "The Doctrine of Chances", 1718)

"The schema is in itself always a product of imagination. Since, however, the synthesis of imagination aims at no special intuition, but only at unity in the determination of sensibility, the schema has to be distinguished from the image." (Immanuel Kant," Critique of Pure Reason", 1781)

"Statics is the science of the equilibrium of forces. In general, force or power is the cause, whatever it may be, which induces or tends to impart motion to the body to which it is applied. The force or power must be measured by the quantity of motion produced or to be produced. In the state of equilibrium, the force has no apparent action. It produces only a tendency for motion in the body it is applied to. But it must be measured by the effect it would produce if it were not impeded. By taking any force or its effect as unity, the relation of every other force is only a ratio, a mathematical quantity, which can be represented by some numbers or lines. It is in this fashion that forces must be treated in mechanics." (Joseph-Louis de Lagrange, "Mechanique Analytique", 1788)

"Yet this is attempted by algebraists, who talk of a number less than nothing, of multiplying a negative number into a negative number and thus producing a positive number, of a number being imaginary. Hence they talk of two roots to every equation of the second order, and the learner is to try which will succeed in a given equation: they talk of solving an equation which requires two impossible roots to make it solvable: they can find out some impossible numbers, which, being multiplied together, produce unity. This is all jargon, at which common sense recoils; but, from its having been once adopted, like many other figments, it finds the most strenuous supporters among those who love to take things upon trust, and hate the labour of a serious thought." (William Frend,"The Principles of Algebra", 1796)

On Unity (1800-1849)

"Close observers of nature, however diverse their points of view, will agree that everything of a phenomenal nature must suggest either an original duality capable of being merged in unity, or an original unity capable of becoming a duality. Separating what is united and uniting what is separate is the life of nature. This is the eternal systole and diastole, the eternal synkrisis and diakrisis, the breathing in and out of the world in which we move and have our being." (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, "On Theory of Color", 1810)

"Only through blind Instinct, in which the only possible guidance of the Imperative is awanting, does the Power in Intuition remain undetermined; where it is schematised as absolute it becomes infinite; and where it is presented in a determinate form, as a principle, it becomes at least manifold. By the above-mentioned act of Intelligising, the Power liberates itself from Instinct, to direct itself towards Unity." (Johann G Fichte, "Outline of the Doctrine of Knowledge", 1810)

"Since it cannot be overlooked by the Doctrine of Knowledge that Actual Knowledge does by no means present itself as a Unity, such as is assumed above but as a multiplicity, there is consequently a second task imposed upon it, - that of setting forth the ground of this apparent Multiplicity. It is of course understood that this ground is not to be derived from any outward source, but must be shown to be contained in the essential Nature of Knowledge itself as such; - and that therefore this problem, although apparently two-fold, is yet but one and the same, - namely, to set forth the essential Nature of Knowledge." (Johann G Fichte, "Outline of the Doctrine of Knowledge", 1810)

"Mathematical analysis […] in the study of all phenomena, interprets them by the same language, as if to attest the unity and simplicity of the plan of the universe, and to make still more evident that unchangeable order which presides over all natural causes. […] There cannot be a language more universal and more simple, more free from errors and obscurities, … more worthy to express the invariable relations of all natural things." (Baron Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Fourier,"Théorie Analytique de la Chaleur", 1822)

"Caught up in the limitless maze, the fragmentation and complication of modern natural science, and yearning for the recapture of simplicity, we must forever ask ourselves: Supposing he had known nature in its present state of complexity, a basic unity withal, how would Plato have coped with it?" (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, "Maxims and Reflections", 1822)

"Its [mathematical analysis] chief attribute is clearness; it has no means for expressing confused ideas. It compares the most diverse phenomena and discovers the secret analogies which unite them. If matter escapes us, as that of air and light because of its extreme tenuity, if bodies are placed far from us in the immensity of space, if man wishes to know the aspect of the heavens at successive periods separated by many centuries, if gravity and heat act in the interior of the solid earth at depths which will forever be inaccessible, mathematical analysis is still able to trace the laws of these phenomena. It renders them present and measurable, and appears to be the faculty of the human mind destined to supplement the brevity of life and the imperfection of the senses, and what is even more remarkable, it follows the same course in the study of all phenomena; it explains them in the same language, as if in witness to the unity and simplicity of the plan of the universe, and to make more manifest the unchangeable order which presides over all natural causes." (Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Fourier, "Théorie Analytique de la Chaleur", 1822)

"There cannot be a language more universal and more simple, more free from errors and obscurities [...] more worthy to express the invariable relations of all natural things [than mathematics]. [It interprets] all phenomena by the same language, as if to attest the unity and simplicity of the plan of the universe, and to make still more evident that unchangeable order which presides over all natural causes." (Joseph Fourier, "The Analytical Theory of Heat", 1822)

"The more one reflects, the more one acknowledges that necessity governs the world. At each new progress of science ,that which seemed contingent is recognized as being necessary. Multiple relations are established between the branches that we had thought to be separate; we observe laws where we had thought there were only accidental events. We approach more and more the unity of being […]" (Sophie Germain, "Considerations sur l’etat des sciences et lettres, aux differentes epoques de leur culture", 1833)

"Unless my Algebra deceive me, Unity itself divided by Zero will give Infinity." (Thomas Carlyle, "Sartor Resartus", 1836)

"When the whole and the parts are seen at once, as mutually producing and explaining each other, as unity in multeity, there results shapeliness." (Samuel T Coleridge, "Letters", 1836)

"The system becomes more coherent as it is further extended. The elements which we require for explaining a new class of facts are already contained in our system. Different members of the theory run together, and we have thus a constant convergence to unity. In false theories, the contrary is the case." (William Whewell, "Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences", 1840)

"Nature creates unity even in the parts of a whole." (Eugène Delacroix, 1857)

On Unity (1850-1899)

"Simplicity of structure means organic unity, whether the organism be simple or complex; and hence in all times the emphasis which critics have laid upon Simplicity, though they have not unfrequently confounded it with narrowness of range." (George H Lewes, "The Principles of Success in Literature", 1865)

"As systematic unity is what first raises ordinary knowledge to the rank of science, that is, makes a system out of a mere aggregate of knowledge, architectonic is the doctrine of the scientific in our knowledge, and therefore necessarily forms part of the doctrine of method." (Immanuel Kant, "Critique of Pure Reason", 1871)

"The concept of power, which includes as a special case the concept of whole number, that foundation of the theory of number, and which ought to be considered as the most general genuine origin of sets [Moment bei Mannigfaltigkeiten], is by no means restricted to linear point sets, but can be regarded as an attribute of any well-defined collection, whatever may be the character of its elements. [...] Set theory in the conception used here, if we only consider mathematics for now and forget other applications, includes the areas of arithmetic, function theory and geometry. It contains them in terms of the concept of power and brings them all together in a higher unity. Discontinuity and continuity are similarly considered from the same point of view and are thus measured with the same measure." (Georg Cantor, "Ober unendliche, lineare Punktmannichfaltigkeiten", 1879)

"The ignoring of data is, in fact, the easiest and most popular mode of obtaining unity in one's thought." (William James, "The Sentiment of Rationality", Mind Vol. 4, 1879)

"The unity of all science consists alone in its method, not in its material." (Karl Pearson, "The Grammar of Science", 1892)

"Symmetry is evidently a kind of unity in variety, where a whole is determined by the rhythmic repetition of similar." (George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty: Being the Outlines of Aesthetic Theory", 1896)

On Unity (2000-)

"The calculus is a theory of continuous change - processes that move smoothly and that do not stop, jerk, interrupt themselves, or hurtle over gaps in space and time. The supreme example of a continuous process in nature is represented by the motion of the planets in the night sky as without pause they sweep around the sun in elliptical orbits; but human consciousness is also continuous, the division of experience into separate aspects always coordinated by some underlying form of unity, one that we can barely identify and that we can describe only by calling it continuous." (David Berlinski, "Infinite Ascent: A short history of mathematics", 2005)

"In both quantum theory and general relativity, we encounter predictions of physically sensible quantities becoming infinite. This is likely the way that nature punishes impudent theorists who dare to break her unity. […] If infinities are signs of missing unification, a unified theory will have none. It will be what we call a finite theory." (Lee Smolin, "The Trouble with Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science and What Comes Next", 2006)

"By interlinking causes, by searching always for unity in the face of superficial diversity, modern scientific explanations prize depth above breadth. A deep and narrow theory can, and often does, graduate to become a deep and broad one. A broad and shallow theory never does." (John D Barrow, "New Theories of Everything", 2007)

"A science presents us with representations of the phenomena through artifacts, both abstract, such as theories and mathematical models, and concrete such as graphs, tables, charts, and ‘table-top’ models. These representations do not form a haphazard compilation though any unity, in the range of representations made available, is visible mainly at the more abstract levels." (Bas C van Fraassen, "Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective", 2008)

"Category theory has developed classically, beginning with definitions and axioms and proceeding to a long list of theorems. Category theory is not topology (and so will not be described here), but it can be used to understand some of the relationships that exist among classes of topological spaces. It can be used to bring unity to diversity. [...] the theory of categories is not complete, it may not be completable, but it is a step forward in understanding foundational questions in mathematics." (John Tabak, "Beyond Geometry: A new mathematics of space and form", 2011)

On Unity (1975-1999)

"If physics leads us today to a world view which is essentially mystical, it returns, in a way, to its beginning, 2,500 years ago. […] Eastern thought and, more generally, mystical thought provide a consistent and relevant philosophical background to the theories of contemporary science; a conception of the world in which scientific discoveries can be in perfect harmony with spiritual aims and religious beliefs. The two basic themes of this conception are the unity and interrelation of all phenomena and the intrinsically dynamic nature of the universe. The further we penetrate into the submicroscopic world, the more we shall realize how the modern physicist, like the Eastern mystic, has come to see the world as a system of inseparable, interacting and ever-moving components with the observer being an integral part of this system." (Fritjof Capra, "The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels Between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism", 1975)

"In our very distant future we are likely to find that there is only one energy, which has manifold expressions, depending on the state of consciousness that interacts with the energy. However, we presently have a scientific foundation which has already segmented and delineated uniquely different energy characteristics as perceived by our biological senses, and by our extended instrumentation senses. Thus we must continue along the path already laid down by our scientific forebearers, until we have reached the level of consciousness where the unity can be known." (William Tiller, "New Fields, New Laws", 1977) 

"Mathematical physics represents the purest image that the view of nature may generate in the human mind; this image presents all the character of the product of art; it begets some unity, it is true and has the quality of sublimity; this image is to physical nature what music is to the thousand noises of which the air is full […]" (Théophile de Donder, 1977)

"The branch of modern science called cybernetics gives us concepts that describe the evolutionary process at both the level of intracellular structures and the level of social phenomena. The fundamental unity of the evolutionary process at all levels of organization is transformed from a philosophical view to a scientifically substantiated fact." (Valentin F Turchin, "The Phenomenon of Science: A cybernetic approach to human evolution", 1977)

"An autopoietic system is organized (defined as a unity) as a network of processes of production (transformation and destruction) of components that produces the components that: (a) through their interactions and transformations continuously regenerate and realize the network of processes (relations) that produce them and, (b) constitute it (the machine) as a concrete unity in the space in which they exist by specifying the topological domain of its realization as such a network." (Francisco Varela, "Principles of Biological Autonomy", 1979)

"Mathematics is not a branch of aesthetics. The mistake, which is common enough, probably stems from the requirement of aesthetic unity but is not identical with that unity." (J K Feibleman,"Assumptions of Grand Logics", 1979)

"An autopoietic system is organized (defined as a unity) as a network of processes of production (transformation and destruction) of components that produces the components that: (a) through their interactions and transformations continuously regenerate and realize the network of processes (relations) that produce them and, (b) constitute it (the machine) as a concrete unity in the space in which they exist by specifying the topological domain of its realization as such a network." (Francisco Varela, "Principles of Biological Autonomy", 1979)

"Autopoietic organization simply means processes interlaced in the specific form of a network of productions of components which realizing the network that produced them constitutes it as a unity." (Francisco Varela & Humberto Maturana "Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living", 1980)

"The relations that define a system as a unity, and determine the dynamics of interaction and transformations which it may undergo as such a unity constitute the organization of the machine." (Francisco Varela & Humberto Maturana "Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living", 1980)

"Analogies, metaphors, and emblems are the threads by which the mind holds on to the world even when, absentmindedly, it has lost direct contact with it, and they guarantee the unity of human experience. Moreover, in the thinking process itself they serve as models to give us our bearings lest we stagger blindly among experiences that our bodily senses with their relative certainty of knowledge cannot guide us through." (Hannah Arendt, "The Life of the Mind", 1981)

"By content, therefore, we mean the composition of all the elements of the object in their qualitative determinacy, their interaction and functioning, and the unity of the object's properties, intrinsic processes, relations, contradictions and trends of development. Content is not all that is 'contained' in an object." (Alexander Spirkin, "Dialectical Materialism", 1983)

"The unity of form and content presupposes their relative independence and the active role of the form. The modification of form involves reorganisation of the relations within the object. This process takes place in time and through contradictions." (Alexander Spirkin, "Dialectical Materialism", 1983)

"The ecological principle of unity in diversity grades into a richly mediated social principle; hence my use of the term social ecology." (Murray Bookchin, "What Is Social Ecology?" , 1984)

"The applications of knowledge, especially mathematics, reveal the unity of all knowledge. In a new situation almost anything and everything you ever learned might be applicable, and the artificial divisions seem to vanish." (Richard W Hamming, "Methods of Mathematics Applied to Calculus, Probability, and Statistics", 1985)

"Organization denotes those relations that must exist among the components of a system for it to be a member of a specific class. Structure denotes the components and relations that actually constitute a particular unity and make its organization real." (Humberto Maturana & Francisco J Varela, "The Tree of Knowledge", 1987)

"The dynamics of any system can be explained by showing the relations between its parts and the regularities of their interactions so as to reveal its organization. For us to fully understand it, however, we need not only to see it as a unity operating in its internal dynamics, but also to see it in its circumstances, i.e., in the context to which its operation connects it. This understanding requires that we adopt a certain distance for observation, a perspective that in the case of historical systems implies a reference to their origin. This can be easy, for instance, in the case of man-made machines, for we have access to every detail of their manufacture. The situation is not that easy, however, as regards living beings: their genesis and their history are never directly visible and can be reconstructed only by fragments." (Humberto Maturana & Francisco J Varela, "The Tree of Knowledge", 1987)

"Autopoietic systems, then, are not only self-organizing systems, they not only produce and eventually change their own structures; their self-reference applies to the production of other components as well. This is the decisive conceptual innovation. […] Thus, everything that is used as a unit by the system is produced as a unit by the system itself. This applies to elements, processes, boundaries, and other structures and, last but not least, to the unity of the system itself." (Niklas Luhmann, "The Autopoiesis of Social Systems", 1990)

"And you should not think that the mathematical game is arbitrary and gratuitous. The diverse mathematical theories have many relations with each other: the objects of one theory may find an interpretation in another theory, and this will lead to new and fruitful viewpoints. Mathematics has deep unity. More than a collection of separate theories such as set theory, topology, and algebra, each with its own basic assumptions, mathematics is a unified whole." (David Ruelle, "Chance and Chaos", 1991)

"Mathematics has deep unity. More than a collection of separate theories such as set theory, topology, and algebra, each with its own basic assumptions, mathematics is a unified whole. Mathematics is a great kingdom, and that kingdom belongs to those who see." (David Ruelle, "Chance and Chaos", 1991)

"The scope of Theories of Everything is infinite but bounded; they are necessary parts of a full understanding of things but they are far from sufficient to reveal everything about a Universe like ours. In the pages of this book, we have seen something of what a Theory of Everything might hope to teach us about the unity of the Universe and the way in which it may contain elements that transcend our present compartmentalized view of Nature's ingredients. But we have also learnt that there is more to Everything than meets the eye. Unlike many others that we can imagine, our world contains prospective elements. Theories of Everything can make no impression upon predicting these prospective attributes of reality; yet, strangely, many of these qualities will themselves be employed in the human selection and approval of an aesthetically acceptable Theory of Everything. There is no formula that can deliver all truth, all harmony, all simplicity. No Theory of Everything can ever provide total insight. For, to see through everything, would leave us seeing nothing at all." (John D Barrow, "New Theories of Everything", 1991)

"The unity of mathematics is due to the logical relation between different mathematical theories. The physical theories, by contrast, need not be logically coherent; they have unity because they describe the same physical reality." (David Ruelle, "Chance and Chaos", 1991)

"Every culture has a shared pattern of thinking. It is the cement that holds a culture together, gives it unity. A culture's characteristic way of thinking is imbedded in its concept of the nature of reality, its world view. […] A change of world view not only brings about profound cultural changes, but also is responsible for what historians call a ‘change of age’. An age is a period of time in which the prevailing world view has remained relatively unchanged." (Russell L Ackoff,"Re-Creating the Corporation", 1999)

On Unity (1950-1974)

"Data have an ephemeralness, a rhapsodic spontaneity, a nakedness so utterly at variance with the orderly instincts that pervade our being and with the given unity of our own experience as to be unfit for use in the building of reality. The constructs, on the other hand, are foot-loose, subjective, and altogether too fertile with logical implication to serve in their indiscriminate totality as material for the real world. They do, however, contain the solid logical substance which a stable reality must contain." (Henry Margenau ,"The Nature of Physical Reality: A Philosophy of Modern Physics", 1950)

"We cannot define truth in science until we move from fact to law. And within the body of laws in turn, what impresses us as truth is the orderly coherence of the pieces. They fit together like the characters of a great novel, or like the words of a poem. Indeed, we should keep that last analogy by us always, for science is a language, and like a language it defines its parts by the way they make up a meaning. Every word in a sentence has some uncertainty of definition, and yet the sentence defines its own meaning and that of its words conclusively. It is the internal unity and coherence of science which gives it truth, and which makes it a better system of prediction than any less orderly language." (Jacob Bronowski, "The Common Sense of Science", 1953)

"This continuity of effort is particularly important in mathematics. It is needed to realize the promise of unity which modern mathematics holds. In no science does it appear truer than- in mathematics that the relatively unexplained universe of known facts can be unified by theories of a general character, built of the bricks of current techniques, if only there could rise enough men of talent with a sense of values that would hold them to their task to the very end." (Marston Morse, "Science in the Modern World", Mathematics Magazine Vol. 28 (4), 1955)

"The progress of science is the discovery at each step of a new order which gives unity to what had seemed unlike." (Jacob Bronowski, "Science and Human Values", 1956)

"We can never achieve absolute truth but we can live hopefully by a system of calculated probabilities. The law of probability gives to natural and human sciences - to human experience as a whole - the unity of life we seek." (Agnes E Meyer, "Education for a New Morality", 1957)

"There is beauty in discovery. There is mathematics in music, a kinship of science and poetry in the description of nature, and exquisite form in a molecule. Attempts to place different disciplines in different camps are revealed as artificial in the face of the unity of knowledge. All illiterate men are sustained by the philosopher, the historian, the political analyst, the economist, the scientist, the poet, the artisan, and the musician." (Glenn T Seaborg, 1958)

"Physics is to be regarded not so much as the study of something a priori given, but rather as the development of methods of ordering and surveying human experience. In this respect our task must be to account for such experience in a manner independent of individual subjective judgement and therefor objective in the sense that it can be unambiguously communicated in ordinary human language." (Niels Bohr, "The Unity of Human Knowledge", 1960)

"For Science in its totality, the ultimate goal is the creation of a monistic system in which - on the symbolic level and in terms of the inferred components of invisibility and intangibly fine structure — the world’s enormous multiplicity is reduced to something like unity, and the endless successions of unique events of a great many different kinds get tidied and simplified into a single rational order. Whether this goal will ever be reached remains to be seen. Meanwhile we have the various sciences, each with its own system coordinating concepts, its own criterion of explanation." (Aldous Huxley, "Literature and Science", 1963)

"The 'underlying unity' might mean that everything is made out of the same stuff, and therefore obeys the same equations. That sounds like a good explanation, but let us think. The electrostatic potential, the diffusion of neutrons, heat flow - are we really dealing with the same stuff? Can we really imagine that the electrostatic potential is physically identical to the temperature, or to the density of particles? [...] The displacement of a membrane is certainly not like a temperature. Why, then, is there 'an underlying unity'? [...] Is it possible that this is the clue? That the thing which is common to all the phenomena is the space, the framework into which the physics is put? As long as things are reasonably smooth in space, then the important things that will be involved will be the rates of change of quantities with position in space. That is why we always get an equation with a gradient. [...] What is common to all our problems is that they involve space. "  (Richard Feynman, "Lecture Notes on Physics" Vol. 3, 1964)

"Why are the equations from different phenomena so similar? We might say: ‘It is the underlying unity of nature.’ But what does that mean? What could such a statement mean? It could mean simply that the equations are similar for different phenomena; but then, of course, we have given no explanation. The underlying unity might mean that everything is made out of the same stuff, and therefore obeys the same equations." (Richard P Feynman,"Lecture Notes on Physics", Vol. III, 1964)

On Unity (1925-1949)

"A poem therefore is to be defined as a structure of words whose sound constitutes a rhythmical unity, complete in itself, irrefragable, unanalyzable, completing its symbolic references within the ambit of its sound effects." (Herbert Read, "What is a Poem", 1926)

"It seems to be the impression among students that mathematical physics consists in deriving a large number of partial differential equations and then solving them, individually, by an assortment of special mutually unrelated devices. It has not been made clear that there is any underlying unity of method and one has often been left entirely in the dark as to what first suggested a particular device to the mind of its inventor." (Arthur G Webster, "Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical Physics", 1927)

"The force acting on the pendulum is proportional to its active mass, its inertia is proportional to its passive mass, so that the period will depend on the ratio of the passive and the active mass. Consequently the fact that the period of all these different pendulums was the same, proves that this ratio is a constant, and can be made equal to unity by a suitable choice of units, i. e., the inertial and the gravitational mass are the same." (Willem de Sitter, "The Astronomical Aspect of the Theory of Relativity", 1933)

"Science is a system of statements based on direct experience, and controlled by experimental verification. Verification in science is not, however, of single statements but of the entire system or a sub-system of such statements." (Rudolf Carnap, "The Unity of Science", 1934)

"We shall walk together on this path of life, for all things are a part of the universe, and are connected with each other to form one whole unity." (Maria Montessori, "To Educate the Human Potential", 1947)

"As the complexity of the structure of matter became revealed through research, its basic simplicity, unity, and dependability became equally evident. So we now see ourselves in a world governed by natural laws instead of by capricious deities and devils. This does not necessarily mean that God has been ruled out of the picture, but it does mean that the architect and engineer of the universe is a far different type of being from the gods assumed by the ancients, and that man lives and dies in a world of logical system and orderly performance." (Karl T Compton, cca. 1930–1949)

On Unity (1900-1924)

"Let us notice first of all, that every generalization implies in some measure the belief in the unity and simplicity of nature." (Jules H Poincaré, "Science and Hypothesis", 1901)

"For if society lacks the unity that derives from the fact that the relationships between its parts are exactly regulated, that unity resulting from the harmonious articulation of its various functions assured by effective discipline and if, in addition, society lacks the unity based upon the commitment of men's wills to a common objective, then it is no more than a pile of sand that the least jolt or the slightest puff will suffice to scatter." (Émile Durkheim, 1903)    

"From that time, the universe has steadily become more complex and less reducible to a central control. With as much obstinacy as though it were human, it has insisted on expanding its parts; with as much elusiveness as though it were feminine, it has evaded the attempt to impose on it a single will. Modern science, like modern art, tends, in practice, to drop the dogma of organic unity. Some of the mediaeval habit of mind survives, but even that is said to be yielding before the daily evidence of increasing and extending complexity. The fault, then, was not in man, if he no longer looked at science or art as an organic whole or as the expression of unity. Unity turned itself into complexity, multiplicity, variety, and even contradiction." (Henry Adams, "Mont Saint Michel and Chartres", 1904)

"Let us notice first of all, that every generalization implies in some measure the belief in the unity and simplicity of nature." (Jules H Poincaré, "Science and Hypothesis", 1905)

"Mathematicians attach great importance to the elegance of their methods and their results. This is not pure dilettantism. What is it indeed that gives us the feeling of elegance in a solution, in a demonstration? It is the harmony of the diverse parts, their symmetry, their happy balance; in a word it is all that introduces order, all that gives unity, that permits us to see clearly and to comprehend at once both the ensemble and the details." (Henri Poincaré,"The Future of Mathematics", Monist Vol. 20, 1910)

"It is the harmony of the diverse parts, their symmetry, their happy balance; in a word it is all that introduces order, all that gives unity, that permits us to see clearly and to comprehend at once both the ensemble and the details." (Henri Poincaré, "The Future of Mathematics", Monist Vol. 20, 1910)

"What is a philosophy? It Is an answer satisfactory to the reason to all the great problems of life. That is what is meant by philosophy. It must satisfy the reason, and it must show the unity underlying the endless diversity of the facts that science observes." (Annie Besant, "The Immediate Future", 1911)

"Theoretical philosophy aimed to discover the unity of experience, namely, in the form of some universal explanation. It strived to yield a world picture, one which is harmoniously integral and completely understandable." (Alexander Bogdanov, "Tektology: The Universal Organizational Science" Vol. I, 1913)

"There is an intellectual function in us which demands unity, connection and intelligibility from any material, whether of perception or thought, that comes within its grasp; and if, as a result of special circumstances, it is unable to establish a true connection, it does not hesitate to fabricate a false one." (Sigmund Freud, 1913-1914)

"Anything at all that can be the object of scientific thought becomes dependent on the axiomatic method, and thereby indirectly on mathematics, as soon as it is ripe for the formation of a theory. By pushing ahead to ever deeper layers of axioms [...] we become ever more conscious of the unity of our knowledge. In the sign of the axiomatic method, mathematics is summoned to a leading role in science." (David Hilbert, "Axiomatisches Denken", 1917)

"By intuition is frequently understood perception, or the knowledge of actual reality, the apprehension of something as real. […] Intuition is the undifferentiated unity of the perception of the real and of the simple image of the possible." (Benedetto Croce, "The Essence of Æsthetic", 1921)

"True artistic experience is never passive, for the spectator is obliged to participate, as it were, in the continuous or discontinuous variations of proportions, positions, lines and planes. Moreover, he must see clearly how this play of repeated or non-repeated changes may give rise to a new harmony of relations which will constitute the unity of the work. Every part becomes organized into a whole with the other parts. All the parts contribute to the unity of the composition, none of them assuming a dominant place in the whole." (Theo van Doesburg, 'Grundbegriffe der neuen Gestaltenden Kunst', 1921-23)

"For tektology the unity of experience is not 'discovered', but actively created by organizational means: ‘philosophers wanted to explain the world, but the main point is it change it’ said the greater precursor of organizational science, Karl Marx. The explanation of organizational forms and methods by tektology is directed not to a contemplation of their unity, but to a practical mastery over them." (Alexander Bogdanov, "Tektology: The Universal Organizational Science", 1922)

"The story of scientific discovery has its own epic unity - a unity of purpose and endeavour - the single torch passing from hand to hand through the centuries; and the great moments of science when, after long labour, the pioneers saw their accumulated facts falling into a significant order - sometimes in the form of a law that revolutionised the whole world of thought - have an intense human interest, and belong essentially to the creative imagination of poetry." (Alfred Noyes, "Watchers of the Sky", 1922)

Gerald J Whitrow - Collected Quotes

"In classical physics, most of the fundamental laws of nature were concerned either with the stability of certain configurations of bodies, e.g. the solar system, or else with the conservation of certain properties of matter, e.g. mass, energy, angular momentum or spin. The outstanding exception was the famous Second Law of Thermodynamics, discovered by Clausius in 1850. This law, as usually stated, refers to an abstract concept called entropy, which for any enclosed or thermally isolated system tends to increase continually with lapse of time. In practice, the most familiar example of this law occurs when two bodies are in contact: in general, heat tends to flow from the hotter body to the cooler. Thus, while the First Law of Thermodynamics, viz. the conservation of energy, is concerned only with time as mere duration, the Second Law involves the idea of trend." (Gerald J Whitrow, "The Structure of the Universe: An Introduction to Cosmology", 1949)

"Space-time is curved in the neighborhood of material masses, but it is not clear whether the presence of matter causes the curvature of space-time or whether this curvature is itself responsible for the existence of matter." (Gerald J Whitrow, "The Structure of the Universe: An Introduction to Cosmology", 1949)

"We have assumed that the laws of nature must be capable of expression in a form which is invariant for all possible transformations of the space-time co-ordinates." (Gerald J Whitrow, "The Structure of the Universe: An Introduction to Cosmology", 1949)

"The basic objection to attempts to deduce the unidirectional nature of time from concepts such as entropy is that they are attempts to reduce a more fundamental concept to a less fundamental one." (Gerald J Whitrow, "The Natural Philosophy of Time", 1961)

"[Time is not] a mysterious illusion of the intellect. [...] It is an essential feature of the universe." (Gerald J Whitrow, "The Natural Philosophy of Time", 1961)

"Our conscious appreciation of the fact that one event follows another is of a different kind from our awareness of either event separately. If two events are to be represented as occurring in succession, then - paradoxically - they must also be thought of simultaneously." (Gerald J Whitrow, "The Natural Philosophy of Time", 1961)

"Language itself inevitably introduced an element of permanence into the world. For, although speech itself is transitory, the conventionalized sound symbols of language transcended time." (Gerald J Whitrow, "Time in History: Views of Time from Prehistory to the Present Day", 1988)

"Man must have been conscious of memories and purposes long before he made any explicit distinction between past, present, and future." (Gerald J Whitrow, "Time in History: Views of Time from Prehistory to the Present Day", 1988)

"The development of rational thought actually seems to have impeded man's appreciation for the significance of time. [...] Belief that the ultimate reality is timeless is deeply rooted in human thinking, and the origin of rational investigation of the world was the search for permanent factors that lie behind the ever-changing pattern of events." (Gerald J Whitrow, "Time in History: Views of Time from Prehistory to the Present Day", 1988)

On Discovery (Unsourced)

"A great discovery is not a terminus, but an avenue leading to regions hitherto unknown. We climb to the top of the peak and find that it reveals to us another higher than any we have yet seen, and so it goes on. The additions to our knowledge of physics made in a generation do not get smaller or less fundamental or less revolutionary, as one generation succeeds another. The sum of our knowledge is not like what mathematicians call a convergent series […] where the study of a few terms may give the general properties of the whole. Physics corresponds rather to the other type of series called divergent, where the terms which are added one after another do not get smaller and smaller, and where the conclusions we draw from the few terms we know, cannot be trusted to be those we should draw if further knowledge were at our disposal." (Sir Joseph J Thomson, [letter to G P Thomson], 1930)

"All great insights and discoveries are not only usually thought by several people at the same time, they must also be re-thought in that unique effort to truly say the same thing about the same thing." (Martin Heidegger)

"In signs, one sees an advantage for discovery that is greatest when they express the exact nature of a thing briefly and, as it were, picture it; then indeed, the labor of thought is wonderfully diminished” (Gottfried W Leibniz)

"It is notorious that the same discovery is frequently made simultaneously and quite independently, by different persons. […] It would seem, that discoveries are usually made when the time is ripe for them - that is to say, when the ideas from which they naturally flow are fermenting in the minds of many men." (Sir Francis Galton)

"It is the truth alone that we desire to know and what a joy there is in discovering it." (Carl W Scheele)

"The interpreter of the wonders of nature is experience. It never misleads us, only our grasp can do it with us. Until we can establish a general rule, we must accept the help of experience. Although nature begins with the cause, and with the experiment, we must do it inversely, we must discover the cause with experiments." (Leonardo da Vinci)

On Simultaneity V: Machines

"The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles. (Alan M Turing, "Computing Machinery and Intelligence", Mind Vol. 59, 1950)

"Instead of having a single control unit sequencing the operations of the machine in series (except for certain subsidiary operations as certain input and output functions) as is now done, the idea is to decentralize control with several different control units capable of directing various simultaneous operations and interrelating them when appropriate." (John F Nash, "Parallel Control", 1954)

"At the other far extreme, we find many systems ordered as a patchwork of parallel operations, very much as in the neural network of a brain or in a colony of ants. Action in these systems proceeds in a messy cascade of interdependent events. Instead of the discrete ticks of cause and effect that run a clock, a thousand clock springs try to simultaneously run a parallel system. Since there is no chain of command, the particular action of any single spring diffuses into the whole, making it easier for the sum of the whole to overwhelm the parts of the whole. What emerges from the collective is not a series of critical individual actions but a multitude of simultaneous actions whose collective pattern is far more important. This is the swarm model." (Kevin Kelly, "Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems and the Economic World", 1995)

"The acquisition of information is a flow from noise to order - a process converting entropy to redundancy. During this process, the amount of information decreases but is compensated by constant re- coding. In the recoding the amount of information per unit increases by means of a new symbol which represents the total amount of the old. The maturing thus implies information condensation. Simultaneously, the redundance decreases, which render the information more difficult to interpret." (Lars Skyttner, "General Systems Theory: Ideas and Applications", 2001)

"Machines can pool their resources, intelligence, and memories. Two machines - or one million machines - can join together to become one and then become separate again. Multiple machines can do both at the same time: become one and separate simultaneously. Humans call this falling in love, but our biological ability to do this is fleeting and unreliable." (Ray Kurzweil, "The Singularity is Near", 2005)

"When a machine manages to be simultaneously meaningful and surprising in the same rich way, it too compels a mentalistic interpretation. Of course, somewhere behind the scenes, there are programmers who, in principle, have a mechanical interpretation. But even for them, that interpretation loses its grip as the working program fills its memory with details too voluminous for them to grasp." (Ray Kurzweil, "The Singularity is Near", 2005)

On Simultaneity IV: Complex Systems

"[Disorganized complexity] is a problem in which the number of variables is very large, and one in which each of the many variables has a behavior which is individually erratic, or perhaps totally unknown. However, in spite of this helter-skelter, or unknown, behavior of all the individual variables, the system as a whole possesses certain orderly and analyzable average properties. [...] [Organized complexity is] not problems of disorganized complexity, to which statistical methods hold the key. They are all problems which involve dealing simultaneously with a sizable number of factors which are interrelated into an organic whole. They are all, in the language here proposed, problems of organized complexity." (Warren Weaver, "Science and Complexity", American Scientist Vol. 36, 1948)

"One might think one could measure a complex dynamical variable by measuring separately its real and pure imaginary parts. But this would involve two measurements or two observations, which would be alright in classical mechanics, but would not do in quantum mechanics, where two observations in general interfere with one another - it is not in general permissible to consider that two observations can be made exactly simultaneously, and if they are made in quick succession the first will usually disturb the state of the system and introduce an indeterminacy that will affect the second." (Ernst C K Stückelberg, "Quantum Theory in Real Hilbert Space", 1960)

"My presentation of a general theory of living systems will employ two sorts of spaces in which they may exist, physical or geographical space and conceptual or abstract space [...] The characteristics and constraints of physical space affect the action of all concrete systems, living and nonliving [...] Physical space is a common space because it is the only space in which all concrete systems, living and nonliving, exist (though some may exist in other spaces simultaneously). Physical space is shared by all scientific observers, and all scientific data must be collected in it. This is equally true for natural science and behavioral science." (James G Miller, "Living Systems", 1978)

"If we want to solve problems effectively [...] we must keep in mind not only many features but also the influences among them. Complexity is the label we will give to the existence of many interdependent variables in a given system. The more variables and the greater their interdependence, the greater the system's complexity. Great complexity places high demands on a planner's capacity to gather information, integrate findings, and design effective actions. The links between the variables oblige us to attend to a great many features simultaneously, and that, concomitantly, makes it impossible for us to undertake only one action in a complex system." (Dietrich Dorner, "The Logic of Failure: Recognizing and Avoiding Error in Complex Situations", 1989)

"[…] it would seem that randomness and order are both inevitable parts of any description of reality. When we try to understand some particular phenomenon we are, in effect, banishing disorder. Before a piece of mathematics is understood it stands as a random collection of data. After it is understood, it is ordered, manageable. […] Both properties - the randomness and the order - are present simultaneously. This is what should be called complexity. Complexity is ordered randomness." (William Byers, "How Mathematicians Think: Using Ambiguity, Contradiction, and Paradox to Create mathematics", 2007)

"Bounded rationality simultaneously constrains the complexity of our cognitive maps and our ability to use them to anticipate the system dynamics. Mental models in which the world is seen as a sequence of events and in which feedback, nonlinearity, time delays, and multiple consequences are lacking lead to poor performance when these elements of dynamic complexity are present. Dysfunction in complex systems can arise from the misperception of the feedback structure of the environment. But rich mental models that capture these sources of complexity cannot be used reliably to understand the dynamics. Dysfunction in complex systems can arise from faulty mental simulation-the misperception of feedback dynamics. These two different bounds on rationality must both be overcome for effective learning to occur. Perfect mental models without a simulation capability yield little insight; a calculus for reliable inferences about dynamics yields systematically erroneous results when applied to simplistic models." (John D Sterman, "Business Dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world", 2000)

"[…] it would seem that randomness and order are both inevitable parts of any description of reality. When we try to understand some particular phenomenon we are, in effect, banishing disorder. Before a piece of mathematics is understood it stands as a random collection of data. After it is understood, it is ordered, manageable. […] Both properties - the randomness and the order - are present simultaneously. This is what should be called complexity. Complexity is ordered randomness." (William Byers, "How Mathematicians Think: Using Ambiguity, Contradiction, and Paradox to Create mathematics", 2007)

"Cellular Automata (CA) are discrete, spatially explicit extended dynamic systems composed of adjacent cells characterized by an internal state whose value belongs to a finite set. The updating of these states is made simultaneously according to a common local transition rule involving only a neighborhood of each cell." (Ramon Alonso-Sanz, "Cellular Automata with Memory", 2009)

"In the network society, the space of flows dissolves time by disordering the sequence of events and making them simultaneous in the communication networks, thus installing society in structural ephemerality: being cancels becoming." (Manuel Castells, "Communication Power", 2009)

On Simultaneity III: Time

"Can each of them have a different time, and must there be more than one time running simultaneously? Surely not. For a time that is both equal and simultaneous is one and the same time, and even those that are not simultaneous are one in kind; for if there were dogs and horses, and seven of each, the number would be the same." (Aristotle, "Physics", 4th century BC)

"Further, if simultaneity in time, and not being before or after, means coinciding and being in the very ‘now’ wherein they coincide, then." (Aristotle, "Physics", 4th century BC)

"It is established that every continuum has further parts, and not so many parts finite in number that there are not further parts, and has all its parts actually and simultaneously, and therefore every continuum has simultaneously and actually infinitely many parts." (Gregory of Rimini [Gregorii Ariminensis], "Lectura super primum et secundum sententiarum", cca. 1350)

"There is a very different relationship between [...] space and duration. For we do not ascribe various durations to the different parts of space, but say that all endure together. The moment of duration is the same at Rome and at London, on the Earth and on the stars, and throughout the heavens. And just as we understand any moment of duration to be diffused throughout all spaces, according to its kind, without any thought of its parts, so it is no more contradictory that Mind also, according to its kind, can be diffused through space without any thought of its parts." (Isaac Newton, De Gravitatione et Aequipondio Fluridorum, cca. 1664-1668) 

"Just as space existed before the world was created and even now there exists an infinite space beyond the world (with which God coexists) [...] so time exists before the world and simultaneously with the world (prius mundo et simul cum mundo)." (Isaac Barrow, "Lectiones Geometricae", 1672)

"Not at all as far as its absolute, intrinsic nature is concerned. [,,,] Whether things run or stand still, whether we sleep or wake, time flows in its even tenor (aequo tenore tempus labitur). Even if all the stars would have remained at the places where they had been created, nothing would have been lost to time (nihil inde quicquam tempori decessisset). The temporal relations of earlier, afterwards, and simultaneity, even in that tranquil state, would have had their proper existence (prius, posterius, simul etiam in illo transquillo statu fuisset in se)."  (Isaac Barrow, "Lectiones Geometricae", 1672)

"Time absolutely is quantity, admitting in some manner the chief affections of quantity, equality, inequality, and proportion; nor do I believe there is anyone but allows that those things existed equal times, which rose and perished simultaneously." (Isaac Barrow, "Lectiones Geometricae", 1672)

"If a plurality of states of things is assumed to exist which involves no opposition to each other, they are said to exist simultaneously. Thus we deny that what occurred last year and this year are simultaneous, for they involve incompatible states of the same thing.  If one of two states which are not simultaneous involves a reason for the other, the former is held to be prior, the latter posterior. My earlier state involves a reason for the existence of my later state. And since my prior state, by reason of the connection between all things, involves the prior state of other things as well, it also involves a reason for the later state of these other things and is thus prior to them. Therefore whatever exists is either simultaneous with other existences or prior or posterior." (Gottfried W Leibniz, "Initium rerum Mathematicarum metaphysica", 1715)

"Time is the order of existence of those things which are not simultaneous. Thus time is the universal order of changes when we do not take into consideration the particular kinds of change. Duration is magnitude of time. If the magnitude of time is diminished uniformly and continuously, time disappears into moment, whose magnitude is zero. Space is the order of coexisting things, or the order of existence for things which are simultaneous." (Gottfried W Leibniz, "Initium rerum Mathematicarum metaphysica", 1715)

"In the same way, this should also happen with regard to time, namely, that between a preceding continuous time & the next following there should be a single instant, which is the indivisible boundary of either. There cannot be two instants, as we intimated above, contiguous to one another; but between one instant & another there must always intervene some interval of continuous time divisible indefinitely. In the same way, in any quantity which lasts for a continuous interval of time, there must be obtained a series of magnitudes of such a kind that to each instant of time there is its corresponding magnitude; & this magnitude connects the one that precedes with the one that follows it, & differs from the former by some definite magnitude. Nay even in that class of quantities, in which we cannot have two magnitudes at the same time, this very point can be deduced far more clearly, namely, that there cannot be any sudden change from one to another. For at that instant, when the sudden change should take place, & the series be broken by some momentary definite addition, two -magnitudes would necessarily be obtained, namely, the last of the first series & the first of the next. Now this very point is still more clearly seen in those states of things, in which on the one hand there must be at any instant some state so that at no time can the thing be without some state of the kind, whilst on the other hand it can never have two states of the kind simultaneously." (Roger J Boscovich, "Philosophiae Naturalis Theoria Redacta Ad Unicam Legera Virium in Natura Existentium, 1758)

"The difficulty of bringing idea and experience into relation with one another makes itself very painfully felt in all investigation of nature. The idea is independent of space and time. Research is limited in space and time. Hence in the idea simultaneous and successive features are most intimately linked, whereas these are always separated in experience; and to think of a process of nature as simultaneous and successive at once, in accordance with the idea, makes our heads spin. The understanding is unable to conceive of those sense data as jointly present which experience transmitted to it one at a time. Thus, the contradiction between ideation and perception remains forever unresolved." (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, "Doubt and Resignation", 1820)

"Men have very good means of knowing in some cases, and of imagining in other cases, the distance between the points of space simultaneously occupied by the centres of two balls; if, at least, we be content to waive the difficulty as to imperfection of our means of ascertaining or specifying, or clearly idealising, simultaneity at distant places. For this we do commonly use signals by sound, by light, by electricity, by connecting wires or bars, or by various other means. The time required in the transmission of the signal involves an imperfection in human powers of ascertaining simultaneity of occurrences in distant places. It seems, however, probably not to involve any difficulty of idealising or imagining the existence of simultaneity." (James Thomson, "On the law of inertia, the principle of chronometry and the principle of absolute clinural rest, and of absolute rotation",” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 12, 1884)

"Time is the supreme illusion. It is but the inner prism by which we decompose being and life, the mode under which we perceive successively what is simultaneous in idea." (Henri-Frédéric Amiel, [journal entry] 1893)

"[...] if another way of measuring time would be adopted, the experiments on which Newton’s law is founded would none the less have the same meaning. Only the enunciation of the law would be different, because it would be translated into another language. [...] Time should be so defined that the equations of mechanics may be as simple as possible. In other words, there is not one way of measuring time more true than another; that which is generally adopted is only more convenient. Of two watches, we have no right to say that the one goes true, the other wrong; we can only say that it is advantageous to conform to the indications of the first." (Henri Poincaré, "La mesure du temps", 1898)

"I designate the following duplex thesis: any general attributive term - such as  the adjective ‘simultaneous’ and the abstract noun ‘simultaneity’ - (1) has ‘meaning’ only if its definition formulates some practicable method by which the applicability of the term in question to a given subject of discourse can be experimentally determined, i.e., describes some event capable of being directly observed at first hand under exactly determinable conditions, which event shall serve as the criterion for such applicability; and (2) the occurrence of such event, under the conditions set forth in the definition, is the meaning, and the whole meaning of the term." (Arthur O Lovejoy, 1930)

"[...] even in a temporal description of nature given by a relational theory of time. However, a theory, like the special theory of relativity, that denies the existence of an infinitely fast causal chain, deprives the concept of absolute simultaneity of its physical meaning even within a single inertial system. [...]  But since the metrical concept of velocity presupposes that we know the meaning of a transit time and since such a time, in turn, depends on a prior criterion of clock synchronization or simultaneity, we must first formulate the limiting property of electromagnetic chains [the fastest causal chain] without using the concept of simultaneity of noncoincident events." (Adolf Grünbaum, "Logical and philosophical foundations of the special theory of relativity", American Journal of Physics 23, 1955)

"The uncertainty principle refers to the degree of indeterminateness in the possible present knowledge of the simultaneous values of various quantities with which the quantum theory deals; it does not restrict, for example, the exactness of a position measurement alone or a velocity measurement alone." (Werner Heisenberg, "The Uncertainty Principle", [in James R Newman, "The World of Mathematics" Vol. II], 1956)

“The fundamental meaning of the Now is that of a universal simultaneity [...] it contains the whole world-wide extent of the simultaneous" (Eugen Fink, "Zur Ontologischen Frühgeschichte von Raum-Zeit-Bewegung", 1957)

"Synchronistic phenomena prove the simultaneous occurrence of meaningful equivalences in heterogenous, causally unrelated processes; in other words, they prove that a content perceived by an observer can, at the same time, be represented by an outside event, without any causal connection. From this it follows either that the psyche cannot be localized in time, or that space is relative to the psyche." (Carl G Jung, "The structure and dynamics of the psyche", 1960)

"The ‘relativity’ of the new theory - one of the most solidly verified theories in the entire range of physics - is chiefly, therefore, a relativity of simultaneity." (Ernan McMullin, "Simultaneity", 1967)

"According to the special theory there is a finite limit to the speed of causal chains, whereas classical causality allowed arbitrarily fast signals. Foundational studies […] soon revealed that this departure from classical causality in the special theory is intimately related to its most dramatic consequences: the relativity of simultaneity, time dilation, and length contraction. By now it had become clear that these kinematical effects are best seen as consequences of Minkowski space-time, which in turn incorporates a nonclassical theory of causal structure. However, it has not widely been recognized that the converse of this proposition is also true: the causal structure of Minkowski space-time contains within itself the entire geometry (topological and metrical structure) of Minkowski space-time." (John A. Winnie," The Causal Theory of Space-Time", 1977)

"It is hard to overestimate the impact of Einstein’s definition of distant simultaneity on philosophy in this century, set, as the words were, in the context of a highly successful theory of physics." (Graham Nerlich, "Simultaneity and convention in special relativity", 1982)

“If an event takes some time, while it happens, the now so to speak cuts through it, dividing that part of it which is already gone from that which is still to come. Two events which are thus cleaved by the same now are said to be simultaneous. Simultaneity, defined in this way, is evidently reflexive and symmetric, but it is not transitive. [...] However, if we conceive simultaneity as a relation between (idealized) durationless events we automatically ensure that it is transitive and hence an equivalence." (Roberto Torretti, Relativity and Geometry, 1983)

"There are many difficulties in application of [the games] theory to the real world. [...] In general, competitors are not in complete opposition. As a matter of fact often they don't even have the same objectives. This difficulty can often be circumvented by using a different objective, 'games of survival'. Secondly, a decision is seldom made once. This motivated the study of multistage games [...]. Finally, decisions are not usually made simultaneously. Recognition of this fact leads to 'games of protocol' [...]. Games of protocol can also be used to handle processes involving three or more people." (Richard E Bellman, "Eye of the Hurricane: An Autobiography", 1984)

"Much of what the universe had been, was, and would be, Newton had disclosed, was the outcome of an infinity of material particles all pulling on one another simultaneously. If the result of all that gravitational tussling had appeared to the Greeks to be a cosmos, it was simply because the underlying equation describing their behavior had itself turned out to be every bit a cosmos-orderly, beautiful, and decent." (Michael Guillen, "Five Equations That Changed the World", 1995)

"By means of a revision of the concept of simultaneity in a shapable form I arrived at the special relativity theory." (Albert Einstein)

On Simultaneity I: Mathematics

"The method of successive approximations is often applied to proving existence of solutions to various classes of functional equations; moreover, the proof of convergence of these approximations leans on the fact that the equation under study may be majorised by another equation of a simple kind. Similar proofs may be encountered in the theory of infinitely many simultaneous linear equations and in the theory of integral and differential equations. Consideration of semiordered spaces and operations between them enables us to easily develop a complete theory of such functional equations in abstract form." (Leonid V Kantorovich, "On one class of functional equations", 1936)

"This abstracting of common experience is one of the principal sources of the utility of mathematics and the secret of its scientific power. The world that impinges on the senses of all but introverted solipsists is too intricate for any exact description yet imagined by human beings. By abstracting and simplifying the evidence of the senses, mathematics brings the worlds of science and daily life into focus with our myopic comprehension, and makes possible a rational description of our experiences which accords remarkably well with observation." (Eric T Bell, "The Development of Mathematics", 1940)

"The theory [of categories] also emphasizes that, whenever new abstract objects are constructed in a specified way out of given ones, it is advisable to regard the construction of the corresponding induced mappings on these new objects as an integral part of their definition. The pursuit of this program entails a simultaneous consideration of objects and their mappings (in our terminology, this means the consideration not of individual objects but of categories). This emphasis on the specification of the type of mappings employed gives more insight onto the degree of invariance of the various concepts involved." (Samuel Eilenberg & Saunders Mac Lane, "A general theory of natural equivalences", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 58, 1945)

"Proof serves many purposes simultaneously […] Proof is respectability. Proof is the seal of authority. Proof, in its best instance, increases understanding by revealing the heart of the matter. Proof suggests new mathematics […] Proof is mathematical power, the electric voltage of the subject which vitalizes the static assertions of the theorems." (Reuben Hersh, "The Mathematical Experience", 1981)

"People have amazing facilities for sensing something without knowing where it comes from (intuition); for sensing that some phenomenon or situation or object is like something else (association); and for building and testing connections and comparisons, holding two things in mind at the same time (metaphor). These facilities are quite important for mathematics. Personally, I put a lot of effort into ‘listening’ to my intuitions and associations, and building them into metaphors and connections. This involves a kind of simultaneous quieting and focusing of my mind. Words, logic, and detailed pictures rattling around can inhibit intuitions and associations." (William P Thurston, "On proof and progress in mathematics", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society Vol. 30 (2), 1994)

"While mathematicians now recognize that there is some freedom in the choice of the axioms one uses, not any set of statements can serve as a set of axioms. In particular, every set of axioms must be logically consistent, which is another way of saying that it should not be possible to prove a particular statement simultaneously true and false using the given set of axioms. Also, axioms should always be logically independent - that is, no axiom should be a logical consequence of the others. A statement that is a logical consequence of some of the axioms is a theorem, not an axiom." (John Tabak, "Beyond Geometry: A new mathematics of space and form", 2011)

"Fractals' simultaneous chaos and order, self-similarity, fractal dimension and tendency to scalability distinguish them from any other mathematically drawable figures previously conceived." (Mehrdad Garousi, "The Postmodern Beauty of Fractals", Leonardo Vol. 45 (1), 2012)

"One trick to seeing beauty in mathematics is to nurture this sense of 'odd as it may seem' while at the same time understanding the subject well enough to know that oddities arise despite our attempts to set the subject on a simple, straightforward footing." (David Perkins, "Calculus and Its Origins", 2012)

"Abstraction is indeed an essential element of concept formation and mathematics is the discipline that has investigated the process of abstraction in greater depth than anywhere else. [...] Mathematics is simultaneously the most abstract and the most concrete of disciplines." (William Byers, "Deep Thinking: What Mathematics Can Teach Us About the Mind", 2015)

On Simultaneity II: Cognition

"Every word instantly becomes a concept precisely insofar as it is not supposed to serve as a reminder of the unique and entirely individual original experience to which it owes its origin; but rather, a word becomes a concept insofar as it simultaneously has to fit countless more or less similar cases - which means, purely and simply, cases which are never equal and thus altogether unequal. Every concept arises from the equation of unequal things. Just as it is certain that one leaf is never totally the same as another, so it is certain that the concept 'leaf' is formed by arbitrarily discarding these individual differences and by forgetting the distinguishing aspects." (Friedrich Nietzsche, "On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense", 1873)

"Language is a system of interdependent terms in which the value of each term results solely from the simultaneous presence of the others." (Ferdinand de Saussure, "Course in general linguistics", 1915)

"Thought is prior to language and consists in the simultaneous presentation to the mind of two different images." (Thomas E Hulme, "Notes on Language and Style", 1929)

"A conflict is to be characterized psychologically as a situation in which oppositely directed, simultaneously acting forces of approximately equal strength work upon the individual." (Kurt Lewin, "A Dynamic Theory of Personality", 1935)

"To us […] the only acceptable point of view appears to be the one that recognizes both sides of reality - the quantitative and the qualitative, the physical and the psychical - as compatible with each other, and can embrace them simultaneously […] It would be most satisfactory of all if physis and psyche (i.e., matter and mind) could be seen as complementary aspects of the same reality." (Wolfgang Pauli', "The Influence of Archetypal Ideas on the Scientific Theories of Kepler", [Lecture at the Psychological Club of Zurich], 1948)

"Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects. From this point of view, the present universally used system of concepts in which particles and waves appear simultaneously, can be completely justified. The latest research on nuclei and elementary particles has led us, however, to limits beyond which this system of concepts itself does not appear to suffice. The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road." (Max Born, "The Statistical Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics", [Nobel lecture] 1954)

"Our conscious appreciation of the fact that one event follows another is of a different kind from our awareness of either event separately. If two events are to be represented as occurring in succession, then - paradoxically - they must also be thought of simultaneously." (Gerald J Whitrow, "The Natural Philosophy of Time", 1961)

"They [archetypes] are, at the same time, both images and emotions. One can speak of an archetype only when these two aspects are simultaneous. When there is merely the image, then there is simply a word picture of little consequence. But by being charged with emotion, the image gains numinosity (or psychic energy); it becomes dynamic, and consequences of some kind must flow from it." (Carl G Jung,"Man and His Symbols", 1964)

"People have amazing facilities for sensing something without knowing where it comes from (intuition); for sensing that some phenomenon or situation or object is like something else (association); and for building and testing connections and comparisons, holding two things in mind at the same time (metaphor). These facilities are quite important for mathematics. Personally, I put a lot of effort into ‘listening’ to my intuitions and associations, and building them into metaphors and connections. This involves a kind of simultaneous quieting and focusing of my mind. Words, logic, and detailed pictures rattling around can inhibit intuitions and associations." (William P Thurston, "On proof and progress in mathematics", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society Vol. 30 (2), 1994)

"Nothing stimulates great minds to work on enriching knowledge with such force as the posing of difficult but simultaneously interesting problems." (John Bernoulli)