"Newton started out from another principle; and one can say that the metaphysics of this great mathematician on the calculus of fluxions is very exact and illuminating, even though he allowed us only an imperfect glimpse of his thoughts. He never considered the differential calculus as the study of infinitely small quantities, but as the method of first and ultimate ratios, that is to say, the method of finding the limits of ratios. Thus this famous author has never differentiated quantities but only equations; in fact, every equation involves a relation between two variables and the differentiation of equations consists
merely in finding the limit of the ratio of the finite differences of the two quantitiescontained in the equation." (Jean LeRond D'Alembert, "Differentiel" ["Differentials", 1754)
"What concerns us most here is the metaphysics of the differential calculus. This metaphysics, of which so much has been written, is even more important and perhaps more difficult to explain than the rules of this calculus themselves: various mathematicians, among them Rolle, who were unable to accept the assumption concerning infinitely small quantities, have rejected it entirely, and have held that the principle was false and capable of leading to error. Yet in view of the fact that all results obtained by means of ordinary Geometry can be established similarly and much more easily by means of the differential calculus, one cannot help concluding that, since this calculus yields reliable, simple, and exact methods, the principles on which it depends must also be simple and certain." (Jean LeRond D'Alembert, "Differentiel" ["Differentials", 1754)
"No other person can judge better of either [the merits of a writer and the merits of his works] than himself; for none have had access to a closer or more deliberate examination of them. It is for this reason, that in proportion that the value of a work is intrinsic, and independent of opinion, the less eagerness will the author feel to conciliate the suffrages of the public. Hence that inward satisfaction, so pure and so complete, which the study of geometry yields. The progress which an individual makes in this science, the degree of eminence which he attains in it, all this may be measured with the same rigorous accuracy as the methods about which his thoughts are employed. It is only when we entertain some doubts about the justness of our own standard, that we become anxious to relieve ourselves from our uncertainty, by comparing it with the standard of another. Now, in all matters which fall under the cognizance of taste, this standard is necessarily somewhat variable; depending on a sort of gross estimate, always a little arbitrary, either in whole or in part; and liable to continual alteration in its dimensions, from negligence, temper, or caprice. In consequence of these circumstances I have no doubt, that if men lived separate from each other, and could in such a situation occupy themselves about anything but self-preservation, they would prefer the study of the exact sciences to the cultivation of the agreeable arts. It is chiefly on account of others, that a man aims at excellence in the latter, it is on his own account that he devotes himself to the former. In a desert island, accordingly, I should think that a poet could scarcely be vain; whereas a geometrician might still enjoy the pride of discovery." (Jean le Rond D’Alembert, "Essai sur les Gens Lettres", 1764)
"One must admit that it is not a simple matter to accurately outline the idea of negative numbers, and that some capable people have added to the confusion by their inexact pronouncements. To say that the negative numbers are below nothing is to assert an unimaginable thing.” (Jean le Rond d'Alembert, "Negatif”, Encyclopédie [1751 – 1772])
"[…] the algebraic rules of operation with negative numbers are generally admitted by everyone and acknowledged as exact, whatever idea we may have about this quantities. " (Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Encyclopédie, [1751 – 1772])
"Thus, metaphysics and mathematics are, among all the sciences that belong to reason, those in which imagination has the greatest role.” (Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Encyclopédie, [1751 – 1772])
"Geometrical truths are in a way asymptotes to physical truths, that is to say, the latter approach the former indefinitely near without ever reaching them exactly.” (Jean le Rond d’Alembert)
"The imagination in a mathematician who creates makes no less difference than in a poet who invents […]." (Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Encyclopedie, [1751 – 1772])
"To someone who could grasp the universe from one unified viewpoint, the entire creation would appear as a unique fact and a great truth.” (Jean le Rond d'Alembert)
"We shall content ourselves with the remark that if mathematics (as is asserted with sufficient reason) only make straight the minds which are without bias, so they only dry up and chill the minds already prepared for this operation by nature.” (Jean le Rond d'Alembert)
"One must admit that it is not a simple matter to accurately outline the idea of negative numbers, and that some capable people have added to the confusion by their inexact pronouncements. To say that the negative numbers are below nothing is to assert an unimaginable thing.” (Jean le Rond d'Alembert, "Negatif”, Encyclopédie [1751 – 1772])
"[…] the algebraic rules of operation with negative numbers are generally admitted by everyone and acknowledged as exact, whatever idea we may have about this quantities. " (Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Encyclopédie, [1751 – 1772])
"Thus, metaphysics and mathematics are, among all the sciences that belong to reason, those in which imagination has the greatest role.” (Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Encyclopédie, [1751 – 1772])
"Geometrical truths are in a way asymptotes to physical truths, that is to say, the latter approach the former indefinitely near without ever reaching them exactly.” (Jean le Rond d’Alembert)
"The imagination in a mathematician who creates makes no less difference than in a poet who invents […]." (Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Encyclopedie, [1751 – 1772])
"To someone who could grasp the universe from one unified viewpoint, the entire creation would appear as a unique fact and a great truth.” (Jean le Rond d'Alembert)
"We shall content ourselves with the remark that if mathematics (as is asserted with sufficient reason) only make straight the minds which are without bias, so they only dry up and chill the minds already prepared for this operation by nature.” (Jean le Rond d'Alembert)
No comments:
Post a Comment