David Bohm - Collected Quotes

"The principle of complementarity states that no single model is possible which could provide a precise and rational analysis of the connections between these phenomena [before and after measurement]. In such a case, we are not supposed, for example, to attempt to describe in detail how future phenomena arise out of past phenomena. Instead, we should simply accept without further analysis the fact that future phenomena do in fact somehow manage to be produced, in a way that is, however, necessarily beyond the possibility of a detailed description. The only aim of a mathematical theory is then to predict the statistical relations, if any, connecting the phenomena." (David Bohm, "A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables", 1952)

"Indeed, the laws of chance are just as necessary as the causal laws themselves." (David Bohm, "Causality and Chance in Modern Physics", 1957)

"We have reversed the usual classical notion that the independent 'elementary parts' of the world are the fundamental reality, and that the various systems are merely particular contingent forms and arrangements of these parts. Rather, we say that inseparable quantum interconnectedness of the whole universe is the fundamental reality, and that relatively independent behaving parts are merely particular and contingent forms within this whole." (David Bohm, "On the Intuitive Understanding of Nonlocality as Implied by Quantum Theory", Foundations of Physics Vol 5 (1), 1975)

“Man's general way of thinking of the totality, i.e. his general world view, is crucial for overall order of the human mind itself. If he thinks of the totality as constituted of independent fragments, then that is how his mind will tend to operate, but if he can include everything coherently and harmoniously in an overall whole that is undivided, unbroken and without border (for every border is a division or break) then his mind will tend to move in a similar way, and from this will flow an orderly action within the whole.” (David Bohm, “Wholeness and the Implicate Order”, 1980)

"My suggestion is that at each state the proper order of operation of the mind requires an overall grasp of what is generally known, not only in formal logical, mathematical terms, but also intuitively, in images, feelings, poetic usage of language, etc." (David Bohm,"Wholeness and the Implicate Order? ", 1980) 

"The prevailing trend in modern physics is thus much against any sort of view giving primacy to [...] undivided wholeness of flowing movement. Indeed, those aspects of relativity theory and quantum theory which do suggest the need for such a view tend to be de-emphasized and in fact hardly noticed by most physicists, because they are regarded largely as features of the mathematical calculus and not as indications of the real nature of things." (David Bohm, "Wholeness and the Implicate Order?", 1980)

"Although science literally means ‘knowledge’, the scientific attitude is concerned much more with rational perception through the mind and with testing such perceptions against actual fact, in the form of experiments and observations." (David Bohm & F David Peat, "Science, Order, and Creativity", 1987)

"We haven't worked on ways to develop a higher social intelligence […] We need this higher intelligence to operate socially or we're not going to survive. […] If we don't manage things socially, individual high intelligence is not going to make much difference. [...] Ordinary thought in society is incoherent - it is going in all sorts of directions, with thoughts conflicting and canceling each other out. But if people were to think together in a coherent way, it would have tremendous power." (David Bohm, "New Age Journal", 1989)

𝚿On Quantum Mechanics (2010-)

"[...] according to the quantum theory, randomness is a basic trait of reality, whereas in classical physics it is a derivative property, though an equally objective one. Note, however, that this conclusion follows only under the realist interpretation of probability as the measure of possibility. If, by contrast, one adopts the subjectivist or Bayesian conception of probability as the measure of subjective uncertainty, then randomness is only in the eye of the beholder." (Mario Bunge, "Matter and Mind: A Philosophical Inquiry", 2010)

"The objectivist view is that probabilities are real aspects of the universe - propensities of objects to behave in certain ways - rather than being just descriptions of an observer’s degree of belief. For example, the fact that a fair coin comes up heads with probability 0.5 is a propensity of the coin itself. In this view, frequentist measurements are attempts to observe these propensities. Most physicists agree that quantum phenomena are objectively probabilistic, but uncertainty at the macroscopic scale - e.g., in coin tossing - usually arises from ignorance of initial conditions and does not seem consistent with the propensity view." (Stuart J Russell & Peter Norvig, "Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach", 2010)

"Quantum theory may be formulated using Hilbert spaces over any of the three associative normed division algebras: the real numbers, the complex numbers and the quaternions. Indeed, these three choices appear naturally in a number of axiomatic approaches. However, there are internal problems with real or quaternionic quantum theory. Here we argue that these problems can be resolved if we treat real, complex and quaternionic quantum theory as part of a unified structure. Dyson called this structure the ‘three-fold way’ […] This three-fold classification sheds light on the physics of time reversal symmetry, and it already plays an important role in particle physics." (John C Baez, "Division Algebras and Quantum Theory", 2011)

"The invariance of physical laws with respect to position or orientation (i.e., the symmetry of space) gives rise to conservation laws for linear and angular momentum. Sometimes the implications of symmetry invariance are far more complicated or sophisticated than might at first be supposed; the invariance of the forces predicted by electromagnetic theory when measurements are made in observation frames moving uniformly at different speeds (inertial frames) was an important clue leading Einstein to the discovery of special relativity. With the advent of quantum mechanics, considerations of angular momentum and spin introduced new symmetry concepts into physics. These ideas have since catalyzed the modern development of particle theory." (George B Arfken et al, "Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A comprehensive guide", 2013)

"Ironically, conventional quantum mechanics itself involves a vast expansion of physical reality, which may be enough to avoid Einstein Insanity. The equations of quantum dynamics allow physicists to predict the future values of the wave function, given its present value. According to the Schrödinger equation, the wave function evolves in a completely predictable way. But in practice we never have access to the full wave function, either at present or in the future, so this 'predictability' is unattainable. If the wave function provides the ultimate description of reality - a controversial issue!" (Frank Wilczek, "Einstein’s Parable of Quantum Insanity", 2015)

"[…] the role that symmetry plays is not confined to material objects. Symmetries can also refer to theories and, in particular, to quantum theory. For if the laws of physics are to be invariant under changes of reference frames, the set of all such transformations will form a group. Which transformations and which groups depends on the systems under consideration." (William H Klink & Sujeev Wickramasekara, "Relativity, Symmetry and the Structure of Quantum Theory I: Galilean quantum theory", 2015)

"Random means without reason - unpredictable - lawless. That little word random describes a key difference between ordinary classical mechanics and quantum mechanics. […] In classical physics only ignorance of the fine details or lack of control over them causes statistical randomness […] In principle, though not in practice, randomness is absent from classical physics." (Hans C von Baeyer, "QBism: The future of quantum physics", 2016)

"Euler’s formula - although deceptively simple - is actually staggeringly conceptually difficult to apprehend in its full glory, which is why so many mathematicians and scientists have failed to see its extraordinary scope, range, and ontology, so powerful and extensive as to render it the master equation of existence, from which the whole of mathematics and science can be derived, including general relativity, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces! It’s not called the God Equation for nothing. It is much more mysterious than any theistic God ever proposed." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)

"Complex numbers seem to be fundamental for the description of the world proposed by quantum mechanics. In principle, this can be a source of puzzlement: Why do we need such abstract entities to describe real things? One way to refute this bewilderment is to stress that what we can measure is essentially real, so complex numbers are not directly related to observable quantities. A more philosophical argument is to say that real numbers are no less abstract than complex ones, the actual question is why mathematics is so effective for the description of the physical world." (Ricardo Karam, "Why are complex numbers needed in quantum mechanics? Some answers for the introductory level", American Journal of Physics Vol. 88 (1), 2020)

"It is particularly helpful to use complex numbers to model periodic phenomena, especially to operate with phase differences. Mathematically, one can treat a physical quantity as being complex, but address physical meaning only to its real part. Another possibility is to treat the real and imaginary parts of a complex number as two related" (real) physical quantities. In both cases, the structure of complex numbers is useful to make calculations more easily, but no physical meaning is actually attached to complex variables." (Ricardo Karam, "Why are complex numbers needed in quantum mechanics? Some answers for the introductory level", American Journal of Physics Vol. 88" (1), 2020) 

"What is essentially different in quantum mechanics is that it deals with complex quantities" (e.g. wave functions and quantum state vectors) of a special kind, which cannot be split up into pure real and imaginary parts that can be treated independently. Furthermore, physical meaning is not attached directly to the complex quantities themselves, but to some other operation that produces real numbers" (e.g. the square modulus of the wave function or of the inner product between state vectors)." (Ricardo Karam, "Why are complex numbers needed in quantum mechanics? Some answers for the introductory level", American Journal of Physics Vol. 88 (1), 2020)

𝚿On Quantum Mechanics (1950-1974)

"Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects. From this point of view, the present universally used system of concepts in which particles and waves appear simultaneously, can be completely justified. The latest research on nuclei and elementary particles has led us, however, to limits beyond which this system of concepts itself does not appear to suffice. The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road." (Max Born, "The Statistical Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics", [Nobel lecture] 1954)

"[...] in quantum mechanics, we are not dealing with an arbitrary renunciation of a more detailed analysis of atomic phenomena, but with a recognition that such an analysis is to principle excluded." (Niels Bohr, "Atomic Theory and Human Knowledge", 1958)

"One might think one could measure a complex dynamical variable by measuring separately its real and pure imaginary parts. But this would involve two measurements or two observations, which would be alright in classical mechanics, but would not do in quantum mechanics, where two observations in general interfere with one another - it is not in general permissible to consider that two observations can be made exactly simultaneously, and if they are made in quick succession the first will usually disturb the state of the system and introduce an indeterminacy that will affect the second." (Ernst C K Stückelberg, "Quantum Theory in Real Hilbert Space", 1960) 

"[…] to the unpreoccupied mind, complex numbers are far from natural or simple and they cannot be suggested by physical observations. Furthermore, the use of complex numbers is in this case not a calculational trick of applied mathematics but comes close to being a necessity in the formulation of quantum mechanics." (Eugene Wigner, "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences", 1960) 

"It is widely believed that only those who can master the latest quantum mathematics can understand anything of what is happening. That is not so, provided one takes the long view, for no one can see far ahead. Against a historical background, the layman can understand what is involved, for example, in the fascinating challenge of continuity and discontinuity expressed in the antithesis of field and particle." (Lancelot L Whyte, "Essay on Atomism: From Democritus to 1960", 1961)

"It has been generally believed that only the complex numbers could legitimately be used as the ground field in discussing quantum-mechanical operators. Over the complex field, Frobenius' theorem is of course not valid; the only division algebra over the complex field is formed by the complex numbers themselves. However, Frobenius' theorem is relevant precisely because the appropriate ground field for much of quantum mechanics is real rather than complex." (Freeman Dyson, "The Threefold Way. Algebraic Structure of Symmetry Groups and Ensembles in Quantum Mechanics", Journal of Mathematical Physics Vol. 3, 1962)

"By far the most important consequence of the conceptual revolution brought about in physics by relativity and quantum theory lies not in such details as that meter sticks shorten when they move or that simultaneous position and momentum have no meaning, but in the insight that we had not been using our minds properly and that it is important to find out how to do so." (Percy W Bridgman, "Quo Vadis",[in Gerald Holton (ed.), "Science and the Modern Mind"] 1971)

"Theoretical physicists live in a classical world, looking out into a quantum-mechanical world. The latter we describe only subjectively, in terms of procedures and results in our classical domain." (John S Bell, "Introduction to the hidden-variable question", 1971)

𝚿On Quantum Mechanics (Unsourced)

"For those who are not shocked when they first come across quantum theory cannot possibly have understood it." (Niels Bohr) 

"I hesitated to think it might be wrong, but I knew that it was rotten. That is to say, one has to find some decent way of expressing whatever truth there is in it." (John S. Bell) 

"[…] if one really understood the central point and its necessity in the construction of the world, one ought to be able to state it in one clear, simple sentence. Until we see the quantum principle with this simplicity we can well believe that we do not know the first thing about the universe, about ourselves, and about our place in the universe." (John A Wheeler)

"The mathematics of quantum mechanics is straightforward, but making the connection between the mathematics and an intuitive picture of the physical world is very hard." (Claude N. Cohen-Tannoudji)

"The world is not as real as we think. […] My personal opinion is that the world is even weirder than what quantum physics tells us." (Anton Zeilinger) 

"Those who are not shocked when they first come across quantum mechanics cannot possibly have understood it." (Niels Bohr)

"Our understanding of quantum mechanics is troubled by the problem of measurement and the problem of nonlocality. [...] It seems to me unlikely that either problem can be solved without a solution to the other, and therefore without a deep adjustment of space-time theory and quantum mechanics to each other." (Abner Shimony)

"String theory is extremely attractive because gravity is forced upon us. All known consistent string theories include gravity, so while gravity is impossible in quantum field theory as we have known it, it is obligatory in string theory." (Edward Witten)

"Quantum mechanics is the weirdest invention of mankind, but also one of the most beautiful. And the beauty of the mathematics underlying the quantum theory implies that we have found something very significant." (Anton Zeilinger)

"What you can show using physics, forces this universe to continue to exist. As long as you're using general relativity and quantum mechanics you are forced to conclude that God exists." (Frank Tipler)

𝚿On Quantum Mechanics (1975-1999)

"Quantum mechanics and relativity, taken together, are extraordinarily restrictive, and they therefore provide us with a great logical machine. We can explore with our minds any number of possible universes consisting of all kinds of mythical particles and interactions, but all except a very few can be rejected on a priori grounds because they are not simultaneously consistent with special relativity and quantum mechanics. Hopefully in the end we will find that only one theory is consistent with both and that theory will determine the nature of our particular universe." (Steven Weinberg, "The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe", 1977) 

"The 'complete description' that quantum theory claims the wave function to be is a description of physical reality (as in physics). No matter what we are feeling, or thinking about, or looking at, the wave function describes as completely as possible where and when we are doing it. [...] Since the wave function is thought to be a complete description of physical reality and since that which the wave function describes is idea-like as well as matter-like, then physical reality must be both idea-like and matter-like. In other words, the world cannot be as it appears. Incredible as it sounds, this is the conclusion of the orthodox view of quantum mechanics." (Gary Zukav, "The Dancing Wu Li Masters", 1979)

"The conceptual framework of quantum mechanics, supported by massive volumes of experimental data, forces contemporary physicists to express themselves in a manner that sounds, even to the uninitiated, like the language of mystics." (Gary Zukav, "The Dancing Wu Li Masters", 1979)

"The new physics tells us that an observer cannot observe without altering what he sees. Observer and observed are interrelated in a real and fundamental sense. The exact nature of this interrelation is not clear, but there is a growing body of evidence that the distinction between the 'in here' and the 'out there' is illusion." (Gary Zukav, "The Dancing Wu Li Masters", 1979)

"There is another fundamental difference between the old physics and the new physics. The old phvsics assumes that there is an external world which exists apart from us. It further assumes that we can observe measure and speculate about the external world without changing it. According to the old physics the external world is indifferent to us and to our needs. [...] The new physics, quantum mechanics, tells us clearly that it is not possible to observe reality without changing it. If we observe a certain particle collision experiment, not only do we have no way of proving that the result would have been the same if we had not been watching it, all that we know indicates that it would not have been the same, because the result that we got was affected by the fact that we were looking for it." (Gary Zukav, "The Dancing Wu Li Masters", 1979)

"The phenomena of the subatomic world are so complex that it is by no means certain whether a complete, self-consistent theory will ever be constructed, but one can envisage a series of partly successful models of smaller scope. Each of them would be intended to cover only a part of the observed phenomena and would contain some unexplained aspects, or parameters, but the parameters of one model might be explained by another. Thus more and more phenomena could gradually be covered with ever increasing accuracy by a mosaic of interlocking models whose net number of unexplained parameters keeps decreasing." (Fritjof Capra, "The Turning Point: Science, Society, and the Turning Culture", 1982)

"[…] our present picture of physical reality, particularly in relation to the nature of time, is due for a grand shake up - even greater, perhaps, than that which has already been provided by present-day relativity and quantum mechanics." (Roger Penrose, "The Emperor’s New Mind", 1989)

"There are at least three (overlapping) ways that mathematics may contribute to science. The first, and perhaps the most important, is this: Since the mathematical universe of the mathematician is much larger than that of the physicist, mathematicians are able to go beyond existing frameworks and see geometrical or analytic structures unavailable to tie physicist. Instead of using the particular equations used previously to describe reality, a mathematician has at his disposal an unused world of differential equations, to be studied with no a priori constraints. New scientific phenomena, new discoveries, may thus generated. Understanding of the present knowledge may be deepened via the corresponding deductions. [...] The second way [...] has to do with the consolidation of new physical ideas. One may express this as the proof of consistency of physical theories. [...] mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics with Hilbert space, its operator theory, and corresponding differential equations. [...] The third way [...] is by describing reality in mathematical terms, or by simply constructing a mathematical model." (Steven Smale, "What is chaos?", 1990)

"There is a seeming paradox: the more the indeterminism, the more the control. This is obvious in the physical sciences. Quantum physics takes for granted that nature is at bottom irreducibly stochastic. Precisely that discovery has immeasurably enhanced our ability to interfere with and alter the course of nature." (Ian Hacking, "The Taming of Chance", 1990)

"Quantum mechanics taught that a particle was not a particle but a smudge, a traveling cloud of possibilities […]" (James Gleick, "Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, Epilogue", 1992)

"While many questions about quantum mechanics are still not fully resolved, there is no point in introducing needless mystification where in fact no problem exists. Yet a great deal of recent writing about quantum mechanics has done just that." (Murray Gell-Mann,"The Quark and the Jaguar", 1994) 

"And of course the space the wave function live in, and (therefore) the space we live in, the space in which any realistic understanding of quantum mechanics is necessarily going to depict the history of the world as playing itself out […] is configuration-space. And whatever impression we have to the contrary (whatever impression we have, say, of living in a three-dimensional space, or in a four dimensional spacetime) is somehow flatly illusory." (David Albert, "Elementary Quantum Metaphysics", 1996)

𝚿On Quantum Mechanics (2000-2009)

"It is intriguing that any of the various new expansions and associated observations relevant to the critical zeros arise from the fi eld of quantum theory, feeding back, as it were, into the study of the Riemann zeta function. But the feedback of which we speak can move in the other direction, as techniques attendant on the Riemann zeta function apply to quantum studies." (Jonathan M Borwein et al, "Computational Strategies for the Riemann Zeta Function", Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics Vol. 121, 2000) 

"Statistical mechanics is the science of predicting the observable properties of a many-body system by studying the statistics of the behaviour of its individual constituents, be they atoms, molecules, photons etc. It provides the link between macroscopic and microscopic states. […] classical thermodynamics. This is a subject dealing with the very large. It describes the world that we all see in our daily lives, knows nothing about atoms and molecules and other very small particles, but instead treats the universe as if it were made up of large-scale continua. […] quantum mechanics. This is the other end of the spectrum from thermodynamics; it deals with the very small. It recognises that the universe is made up of particles: atoms, electrons, protons and so on. One of the key features of quantum mechanics, however, is that particle behaviour is not precisely determined (if it were, it would be possible to compute, at least in principle, all past and future behaviour of particles, such as might be expected in a classical view). Instead, the behaviour is described through the language of probabilities." (A Mike Glazer & Justin S Wark, "Statistical Mechanics: A survival guide", 2001)

"To describe how quantum theory shapes time and space, it is helpful to introduce the idea of imaginary time. Imaginary time sounds like something from science fiction, but it is a well-defined mathematical concept: time measured in what are called imaginary numbers. […] Imaginary numbers can then be represented as corresponding to positions on a vertical line: zero is again in the middle, positive imaginary numbers plotted upward, and negative imaginary numbers plotted downward. Thus imaginary numbers can be thought of as a new kind of number at right angles to ordinary real numbers. Because they are a mathematical construct, they don't need a physical realization […]" (Stephen W Hawking, "The Universe in a Nutshell", 2001)

"A theory makes certain predictions and allows calculations to be made that can be tested directly through experiments and observations. But a theory such as superstrings talks about quantum objects that exist in a multidimensional space and at incredibly short distances. Other grand unified theories would require energies close to those experienced during the creation of the universe to test their predictions." (F David Peat, "From Certainty to Uncertainty", 2002)

"Quantum theory introduced uncertainty into physics; not an uncertainty that arises out of mere ignorance but a fundamental uncertainty about the very universe itself. Uncertainty is the price we pay for becoming participators in the universe. Ultimate knowledge may only be possible for ethereal beings who lie outside the universe and observe it from their ivory towers." (F David Peat, "From Certainty to Uncertainty", 2002)

"The quantum world is in a constant process of change and transformation. On the face of it, all possible processes and transformations could take place, but nature’s symmetry principles place limits on arbitrary transformation. Only those processes that do not violate certain very fundamental symmetry principles are allowed in the natural world." (F David Peat, "From Certainty to Uncertainty", 2002)

"One reason for the importance of Riemannian manifolds is that they are generalizations of Euclidean geometry - general enough but not too general. They are still close enough to Euclidean geometry to have a Laplace operator. This is the key to quantum mechanics, heat and waves. The various generalizations of Riemannian manifold [...] do not have a simple natural unambiguous choice of such an operator. [...] Another reason for the prominence of Riemannian manifolds is that the maximal compact subgroup of the general linear group is the orthogonal group. So the least restriction we can make on any geometric structure so that it 'rigidifies' always adds a Riemannian geometry. Moreover, any geometric structure will always permit such a 'rigidification'. [...] Similarly, if we were to pick out a submanifold of the tangent bundle of some manifold, distinguishing tangent vectors, in such a manner that in each tangent space, any two lines could be brought to one another, or any two planes, etc., then the maximal symmetry group we could come up with in a single tangent space which was not the whole general linear group would be the orthogonal group of a Riemannian metric. So Riemannian geometry is the 'least' structure, or most symmetrical one, we can pick, at first order." (Marcel Berger, "A Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry", 2003)

"Some areas of human knowledge ever since its origin had shaken our understanding of the universe from time to time. While this is more true about physics, it is true about mathematics as well. The birth of topology as analysis situs meaning rubbersheet geometry had a similar impact on our traditional knowledge of analysis. Indeed, topology had enough energy and vigour to give birth to a new culture of mathematical approach. Algebraic topology added a new dimension to that. Because quantum physicists and applied mathematicians had noted wonderful interpretations of many physical phenomena through algebraic topology, they took immense interest in the study of topology in the twentieth century." (D Chatterjee, "Topology: General & Algebraic", 2003)

"Group theory is a powerful tool for studying the symmetry of a physical system, especially the symmetry of a quantum system. Since the exact solution of the dynamic equation in the quantum theory is generally difficult to obtain, one has to find other methods to analyze the property of the system. Group theory provides an effective method by analyzing symmetry of the system to obtain some precise information of the system verifiable with observations." (Zhong-Qi Ma, Xiao-Yan Gu, "Problems and Solutions in Group Theory for Physicists", 2004)

"Quantum-mechanical effects appear in physical systems that are exceedingly small. A small system means very tiny objects with very tiny amounts of energy, moving around over very short time intervals. Quantum effects show up dramatically once we arrive at length scales the size of the atom, about one ten-thousandth of a millionth of a meter. In fact, we simply cannot understand an atom without quantum mechanics. This is not to say that nature itself suddenly 'switches off'' classical mechanics and 'switches on' quantum mechanics when we enter this new submicroscopic realm. Quantum mechanics is always valid and always holds true at all scales of nature. Rather, quantum effects gradually become more and more pronounced as we descend into the world of atoms. Quantum mechanics is the ultimate set of rules, as far as we know, that governs how nature works" (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"The inner mysteries of quantum mechanics require a willingness to extend one’s mental processes into a strange world of phantom possibilities, endlessly branching into more and more abstruse chains of coupled logical networks, endlessly extending themselves forward and even backwards in time." (John C Ward, "Memoirs of a Theoretical Physicist", 2004)

"More generally an axiomatic projective space has a lattice of projective linear subspaces, the incidence relation ⊂, intersection and linear span, and suitable axioms. It is best not to insist a priori that the dimension of the space or its projective linear subspaces is specified. The most important case is the infinite dimensional case, which von Neumann used to give axiomatic foundations to quantum mechanics, when dimensions of projective linear subspaces can take values in R or the value ∞." (Miles Reid & Balazs Szendröi, "Geometry and Topology", 2005)

"Quantum physics, in particular particle and string theory, has proven to be a remarkable fruitful source of inspiration for new topological invariants of knots and manifolds. With hindsight this should perhaps not come as a complete surprise. Roughly one can say that quantum theory takes a geometric object (a manifold, a knot, a map) and associates to it a (complex) number, that represents the probability amplitude for a certain physical process represented by the object." (Robbert Dijkgraaf, "Mathematical Structures", 2005)

"String theory was not invented to describe gravity; instead it originated in an attempt to describe the strong interactions, wherein mesons can be thought of as open strings with quarks at their ends. The fact that the theory automatically described closed strings as well, and that closed strings invariably produced gravitons and gravity, and that the resulting quantum theory of gravity was finite and consistent is one of the most appealing aspects of the theory." (David Gross, "Einstein and the Search for Unification", 2005)

"We divide math up into separate areas (analysis, mechanics, algebra, geometry, electromagnetism, number theory, quantum mechanics, etc.) to clarify the study of each part; but the equally valuable activity of integrating the components into a working whole is all too often neglected. Without it, the stated aim of ‘taking something apart to see how it ticks’ degenerates imperceptibly into ‘taking it apart to ensure it never ticks again’." (Miles Reid & Balazs Szendröi, "Geometry and Topology", 2005)

"Moonshine is interested in the correlation functions of a class of extremely symmetrical and well-behaved quantum field theories called rational conformal field theories - these theories are so special that their correlation functions can be computed exactly and perturbation is not required." (Terry Gannon, "Moonshine Beyond the Monster: The Bridge Connecting Algebra, Modular Forms and Physics", 2006)

"Moonshine is profoundly connected with physics (namely conformal field theory and string theory). String theory proposes that the elementary particles (electrons, photons, quarks, etc.) are vibrational modes on a string of length about 10^−33 cm. These strings can interact only by splitting apart or joining together – as they evolve through time, these (classical) strings will trace out a surface called the world-sheet. Quantum field theory tells us that the quantum quantities of interest (amplitudes) can be perturbatively computed as weighted averages taken over spaces of these world-sheets. Conformally equivalent world-sheets should be identified, so we are led to interpret amplitudes as certain integrals over moduli spaces of surfaces. This approach to string theory leads to a conformally invariant quantum field theory on two-dimensional space-time, called conformal field theory (CFT). The various modular forms and functions arising in Moonshine appear as integrands in some of these genus-1 (‘1-loop’) amplitudes: hence their modularity is manifest." (Terry Gannon, "Moonshine Beyond the Monster: The Bridge Connecting Algebra, Modular Forms and Physics", 2006)

"Briefly stated, the orthodox formulation of quantum theory asserts that, in order to connect adequately the mathematically described state of a physical system to human experience, there must be an abrupt intervention in the otherwise smoothly evolving mathematically described state of that system." (Henry P Stapp, "Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer", 2007)

"The existing general descriptions of quantum theory emphasize puzzles and paradoxes in a way that tend to make non-physicists leery of using in any significant away the profound changes in our understanding of both man and nature wrought by the quantum revolution. Yet in the final analysis quantum mechanics is more understandable than classical mechanics because it is more deeply in line with our common sense ideas about our role in nature than the ‘automaton’ notion promulgated by classical physics." (Henry P Stapp, "Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer", 2007)

"The standard big bang model doesn’t explain the smoothness and flatness of the universe, so it’s been embellished by an additional component: inflation. A minuscule fraction of a second after the big bang, the universe was propelled into an exponential expansion that increased its size from a proton to a grapefruit. […] Moreover, if we accept the theory that the universe emerged from a quantum seed and exponentially expanded in the big bang, there is the possibility that other regions of space-time exist, remote in time or space from our universe. Due to the random nature of quantum processes, these parallel universes could have wildly different properties. This extravagant concept is called the multiverse." (Chris Impey, "The Living Cosmos: Our search for life in the universe", 2007)

"In Dirac’s interpretation of the vacuum, if one electron in this sea were missing, it would leave a hole. The absence of a negatively charged electron with energy that is negative relative to sea-level, will appear as a positively charged particle with positive energy, namely with all the attributes of what was later called a positron. This was a strange idea, and quantum mechanics is still strange eighty years later; it was only in its infancy when Dirac made his proposal, which was a piece of radical genius." (Frank Close, "Antimatter", 2009)

"Schrodinger’s equation also explained why the orbital motion of electrons in atoms caused the spectral lines to multiply in magnetic fields. However, it gave no explanation for the electron’s own intrinsic ‘spin’. This known property of the electron had no place in Schrodinger’s theory. A more complete quantum mechanics, one that incorporated spin and applied at relativistic speeds, waited to be discovered." (Frank Close, "Antimatter", 2009)

𝚿On Quantum Mechanics (-1949)

"The very nature of the quantum theory [...] forces us to regard the space-time coordination and the claim of causality, the union of which characterizes the classical theories, as complementary but exclusive features of the description, symbolizing the idealization of observation and description, respectively." (Niels Bohr, "Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature: Four Essays", 1934)

"There is thus a possibility that the ancient dream of philosophers to connect all Nature with the properties of whole numbers will some day be realized. To do so physics will have to develop a long way to establish the details of how the correspondence is to be made. One hint for this development seems pretty obvious, namely, the study of whole numbers in modern mathematics is inextricably bound up with the theory of functions of a complex variable, which theory we have already seen has a good chance of forming the basis of the physics of the future. The working out of this idea would lead to a connection between atomic theory and cosmology." (Paul A M Dirac, [Lecture delivered on presentation of the James Scott prize] 1939)

"The great revelation of the quantum theory was that features of discreteness were discovered in the Book of Nature, in a context in which anything other than continuity seemed to be absurd according to the views held until then." (Erwin Schrödinger, "What is Life?", 1944) 

"[In quantum mechanics] we have the paradoxical situation that observable events obey laws of chance, but that the probability for these events itself spreads according to laws which are in all essential features causal laws." (Max Born, "Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance", 1949)

Alexander L Fradkov - Collected Quotes

"A great deal of the results in many areas of physics are presented in the form of conservation laws, stating that some quantities do not change during evolution of the system. However, the formulations in cybernetical physics are different. Since the results in cybernetical physics establish how the evolution of the system can be changed by control, they should be formulated as transformation laws, specifying the classes of changes in the evolution of the system attainable by control function from the given class, i.e., specifying the limits of control." (Alexander L Fradkov, "Cybernetical Physics: From Control of Chaos to Quantum Control", 2007)

"A typical control goal when controlling chaotic systems is to transform a chaotic trajectory into a periodic one. In terms of control theory it means stabilization of an unstable periodic orbit or equilibrium. A specific feature of this problem is the possibility of achieving the goal by means of an arbitrarily small control action. Other control goals like synchronization and chaotization can also be achieved by small control in many cases." (Alexander L Fradkov, "Cybernetical Physics: From Control of Chaos to Quantum Control", 2007)

"Chaotic system is a deterministic dynamical system exhibiting irregular, seemingly random behavior. Two trajectories of a chaotic system starting close to each other will diverge after some time (such an unstable behavior is often called 'sensitive dependence on initial conditions'). Mathematically, chaotic systems are characterized by local instability and global boundedness of the trajectories. Since local instability of a linear system implies unboundedness (infinite growth) of its solutions, chaotic system should be necessarily nonlinear, i.e., should be described by a nonlinear mathematical model." (Alexander L Fradkov, "Cybernetical Physics: From Control of Chaos to Quantum Control", 2007)

"Systematic usage of the methods of modern control theory to study physical systems is a key feature of a new research area in physics that may be called cybernetical physics. The subject of cybernetical physics is focused on studying physical systems by means of feedback interactions with the environment. Its methodology heavily relies on the design methods developed in cybernetics. However, the approach of cybernetical physics differs from the conventional use of feedback in control applications (e.g., robotics, mechatronics) aimed mainly at driving a system to a prespecified position or a given trajectory." (Alexander L Fradkov, "Cybernetical Physics: From Control of Chaos to Quantum Control", 2007)

"The methodology of feedback design is borrowed from cybernetics (control theory). It is based upon methods of controlled system model’s building, methods of system states and parameters estimation (identification), and methods of feedback synthesis. The models of controlled system used in cybernetics differ from conventional models of physics and mechanics in that they have explicitly specified inputs and outputs. Unlike conventional physics results, often formulated as conservation laws, the results of cybernetical physics are formulated in the form of transformation laws, establishing the possibilities and limits of changing properties of a physical system by means of control." (Alexander L Fradkov, "Cybernetical Physics: From Control of Chaos to Quantum Control", 2007)

"The term synchronization in scientific colloquial use means coordination or agreement in time of two or several processes or objects. For example, it may be coincidence or closeness of the observable variables for two or several systems. Synchronization may also manifest itself as correlated in time changes of some quantitative characteristics of the systems." (Alexander L Fradkov, "Cybernetical Physics: From Control of Chaos to Quantum Control", 2007)

Freeman J Dyson - Collected Quotes

"The reason why new concepts in any branch of science are hard to grasp is always the same; contemporary scientists try to picture the new concept in terms of ideas which existed before." (Freeman J Dyson, "Innovation in Physics" , Scientific American, 1958)

"It has been generally believed that only the complex numbers could legitimately be used as the ground field in discussing quantum-mechanical operators. Over the complex field, Frobenius' theorem is of course not valid; the only division algebra over the complex field is formed by the complex numbers themselves. However, Frobenius' theorem is relevant precisely because the appropriate ground field for much of quantum mechanics is real rather than complex." (Freeman Dyson, "The Threefold Way. Algebraic Structure of Symmetry Groups and Ensembles in Quantum Mechanics" , Journal of Mathematical Physics Vol. 3, 1962)

"For a physicist mathematics is not just a tool by means of which phenomena can be calculated, it is the main source of concepts and principles by means of which new theories can be created." (Freeman J Dyson, "Mathematics in the Physical Sciences", Scientific American, 1964)

"Mathematical intuition is more often conservative than revolutionary, more often hampering than liberating." (Freeman J Dyson, "Mathematics in the Physical Sciences", Scientific American Vol,. 211 (3), 1964)

"The trouble with group theory is that it leaves so much unexplained that one would like to explain. It isolates in a beautiful way those aspects of nature that can be understood in terms of abstract symmetry alone. It does not offer much hope of explaining the messier facts of life, the numerical values of particle lifetimes and interaction strengths - the great bulk of quantitative experimental data that is now waiting for explanation. The process of abstraction seems to have been too drastic, so that many essential and concrete features of the real world have been left out of consideration. Altogether group theory succeeds just because its aims are modest. It does not try to explain everything, and it does not seem likely that it will grow into a complete or comprehensive theory of the physical world." (Freeman J Dyson, "Mathematics in the Physical Sciences", Scientific American Vol. 211 (3), 1964)

"A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible. There are no prima donnas in engineering." (Freeman J Dyson, "Disturbing the Universe", 1979)

"In the long run, qualitative changes always outweigh quantitative ones. Quantitative predictions of economic and social trends are made obsolete by qualitative changes in the rules of the game. Quantitative predictions of technological progress are made obsolete by unpredictable new inventions. I am interested in the long run, the remote future, where quantitative predictions are meaningless. The only certainty in that remote future is that radically new things will be happening." (Freeman J Dyson, "Disturbing the Universe", 1979)

"I have found a universe growing without limit in richness and complexity, a universe of life surviving forever and making itself known to its neighbors across unimaginable gulfs of space and time. Whether the details of my calculations turn out to be correct or not, there are good scientific reasons for taking seriously the possibility that life and intelligence can succeed in molding this universe of ours to their own purposes." (Freeman J Dyson, "Infinite in All Directions", 1988)

"If it should turn out that the whole of physical reality can be described by a finite set of equations, I would be disappointed. I would feel that the Creator had been uncharacteristically lacking in imagination." (Freeman J Dyson, "Infinite in All Directions", 1988)

"The principle of maximum diversity operates both at the physical and at the mental level. It says that the laws of nature and the initial conditions are such as to make the universe as interesting as possible.  As a result, life is possible but not too easy. Always when things are dull, something new turns up to challenge us and to stop us from settling into a rut. Examples of things which make life difficult are all around us: comet impacts, ice ages, weapons, plagues, nuclear fission, computers, sex, sin and death.  Not all challenges can be overcome, and so we have tragedy. Maximum diversity often leads to maximum stress. In the end we survive, but only by the skin of our teeth." (Freeman J Dyson, "Infinite in All Directions", 1988)

"Theoretical physicists are accustomed to living in a world which is removed from tangible objects by two levels of abstraction. From tangible atoms we move by one level of abstraction to invisible fields and particles. A second level of abstraction takes us from fields and particles to the symmetry-groups by which fields and particles are related. The superstring theory takes us beyond symmetry-groups to two further levels of abstraction. The third level of abstraction is the interpretation of symmetry-groups in terms of states in ten-dimensional space-time. The fourth level is the world of the superstrings by whose dynamical behavior the states are defined." (Freeman J Dyson, "Infinite in All Directions", 1988)

"The bottom line for mathematicians is that the architecture has to be right. In all the mathematics that I did, the essential point was to find the right architecture. It's like building a bridge. Once the main lines of the structure are right, then the details miraculously fit. The problem is the overall design." (Freeman J Dyson, [interview] 1994)

"I see some parallels between the shifts of fashion in mathematics and in music. In music, the popular new styles of jazz and rock became fashionable a little earlier than the new mathematical styles of chaos and complexity theory. Jazz and rock were long despised by classical musicians, but have emerged as art-forms more accessible than classical music to a wide section of the public. Jazz and rock are no longer to be despised as passing fads. Neither are chaos and complexity theory. But still, classical music and classical mathematics are not dead. Mozart lives, and so does Euler. When the wheel of fashion turns once more, quantum mechanics and hard analysis will once again be in style." (Freeman J Dyson, "Book Review of ‘Nature’s Numbers’", The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 103 (7), 1996)

"The total disorder in the universe, as measured by the quantity that physicists call entropy, increases steadily steadily as we go from past to future. On the other hand, the total order in the universe, as measured by the complexity and permanence of organized structures, also increases steadily as we go from past to future." (Freeman J Dyson, [Page-Barbour lecture], 2004)

"The progress of science requires the growth of understanding in both directions, downward from the whole to the parts and upward from the parts to the whole." (Freeman J Dyson, "The Scientist As Rebel", 2006)

"The total disorder in the universe, as measured by the quantity that physicists call entropy, increases steadily as we go from past to future. On the other hand, the total order in the universe, as measured by the complexity and permanence of organized structures, also increases steadily as we go from past to future." (Freeman J Dyson, "A Many-Colored Glass: Reflections on the Place of Life in the Universe", 2007)

"Recreational mathematics is a splendid hobby which young and old can equally enjoy. The popularity of Sudoku shows that an aptitude for recreational mathematics is widespread in the population. From Sudoku it is easy to ascend to mathematical pursuits that offer more scope for imagination and originality." (Freeman Dyson, 2011)

"The whole point of science is that most of it is uncertain. That’s why science is exciting–because we don’t know. Science is all about things we don’t understand. The public, of course, imagines science is just a set of facts. But it’s not. Science is a process of exploring, which is always partial. We explore, and we find out things that we understand. We find out things we thought we understood were wrong. That’s how it makes progress." (Freeman Dyson,  [interview] 2014)

"A model is done when nothing else can be taken out." (Freeman J Dyson)

"Much of the history of science, like the history of religion, is a history of struggles driven by power and money. And yet, this is not the whole story. Genuine saints occasionally play an important role, both in religion and science. For many scientists, the reward for being a scientist is not the power and the money but the chance of catching a glimpse of the transcendent beauty of nature." (Freeman J Dyson)

"It often happens that understanding of the mathematical nature of an equation is impossible without a detailed understanding of its solution." (Freeman J Dyson)

"One factor that has remained constant through all the twists and turns of the history of physics is the decisive importance of the mathematical imagination." (Freeman J Dyson)

Henry P Stapp - Collected Quotes

"A long-range correlation between observables has the interesting property that the equation of motion which governs the propagation of this effect is precisely the equation of motion of a freely moving particle." (Henry P Stapp, "S-Matrix Interpretation of Quantum Theory", 1970)

 "[...] an elementary particle is not an independently existing, unanalyzable entity. It is, in essence a set of relationships that reach outward to other things."  (Henry P Stapp, "S-Matrix Interpretation of Quantum Theory", 1970)

"If the attitude of quantum mechanics is correct, in the strong sense that a description of the substructure underlying experience more complete than the one it provides is not possible, then there is no substantive physical world, in the usual sense of this term. The conclusion here is not the weak conclusion that there may not be a substantive physical world but rather that there definitely is not a substantive physical world." (Henry P Stapp, "S-Matrix Interpretation of Quantum Theory", 1970)

"[the physical world, according to quantum mechanics, is] not a structure built out oi independently existing unanalyzable entities, but lather a web of relationships between elements whose meanings arise wholly from their relationships to the whole." (Henry P Stapp, "S-Matrix Interpretation of Quantum Theory", 1970)

"Our beliefs about ourselves in relation to the world around us are the roots of our values, and our values determine not only our immediate actions, but also, over the course of time, the form of our society. Our beliefs are increasingly determined by science." (Henry P Stapp, "Mind, Matter and Quantum Mechanics", 1993)

"[…] according to the new conception, the physically described world is built not out of bits of matter, as matter was understood in the nineteenth century, but out of objective tendencies - potentialities - for certain discrete, whole actual events to occur. Each such event has both a psychologically described aspect, which is essentially an increment in knowledge, and also a physically described aspect, which is an action that abruptly changes the mathematically described set of potentialities to one that is concordant with the increase in knowledge. This coordination of the aspects of the theory that are described in physical/mathematical terms with aspects that are described in psychological terms is what makes the theory practically useful." (Henry P Stapp, "Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer", 2007)

"Briefly stated, the orthodox formulation of quantum theory asserts that, in order to connect adequately the mathematically described state of a physical system to human experience, there must be an abrupt intervention in the otherwise smoothly evolving mathematically described state of that system." (Henry P Stapp, "Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer", 2007)

"Science is not only the enterprise of harnessing nature to serve the practical needs of humankind. It is also part of man’s unending search for knowledge about the universe and his place within it." (Henry P Stapp, "Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer", 2007)

"The existing general descriptions of quantum theory emphasize puzzles and paradoxes in a way that tend to make non-physicists leery of using in any significant away the profound changes in our understanding of both man and nature wrought by the quantum revolution. Yet in the final analysis quantum mechanics is more understandable than classical mechanics because it is more deeply in line with our common sense ideas about our role in nature than the ‘automaton’ notion promulgated by classical physics." (Henry P Stapp, "Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer", 2007)

String Theory III

"String theory promises to take a further step beyond that taken by Einstein's picture of force subsumed within curved space and time geometry. Indeed, string theory contains Einstein's theory of gravitation within itself. Loops of string behave like the exchange particles of the gravitational forces, or 'gravitons' as they are called in the point-particle picture of things. But it has been argued that it must be possible to extract even the geometry of space and time from the characteristics of the strings and their topological properties. At present, it is not known how to do this and we merely content ourselves with understanding how strings behave when they sit in a background universe of space and time." (John D. Barrow, "Theories of Everything: The Quest for Ultimate Explanation", 1991)

"A five-dimensional space is not a strange deformation of ordinary space, one that only mathematicians can see, but a place where numbers are collected in ordered sets. When string theorists talk of the eleven dimensions required by their latest theory, they are not encouraging one another to search for eight otherwise familiar spatial dimensions that have somehow become lost. They are saying only that for their purposes, eleven numbers are needed to specify points. Where they are is no one’s business." (David Berlinski, "Infinite Ascent: A short history of mathematics", 2005) 

"One could also question whether we are looking for a single overarching mathematical structure or a combination of different complementary points of view. Does a fundamental theory of Nature have a global definition, or do we have to work with a series of local definitions, like the charts and maps of a manifold, that describe physics in various 'duality frames'. At present string theory is very much formulated in the last kind of way." (Robbert Dijkgraaf, "Mathematical Structures", 2005)

"Quantum physics, in particular particle and string theory, has proven to be a remarkable fruitful source of inspiration for new topological invariants of knots and manifolds. With hindsight this should perhaps not come as a complete surprise. Roughly one can say that quantum theory takes a geometric object (a manifold, a knot, a map) and associates to it a (complex) number, that represents the probability amplitude for a certain physical process represented by the object." (Robbert Dijkgraaf, "Mathematical Structures", 2005)

"String theory was not invented to describe gravity; instead it originated in an attempt to describe the strong interactions, wherein mesons can be thought of as open strings with quarks at their ends. The fact that the theory automatically described closed strings as well, and that closed strings invariably produced gravitons and gravity, and that the resulting quantum theory of gravity was finite and consistent is one of the most appealing aspects of the theory." (David Gross, "Einstein and the Search for Unification", 2005)

"Like many a maturing beauty, string theory has gotten rich in relationships, complicated, hard to handle and widely influential. Its tentacles have reached so deeply into so many areas in theoretical physics, it’s become almost unrecognizable, even to string theorists." (K C Cole, "The Strange Second Life of String Theory", Quanta Magazine", 2016) [source] 

"String theory today looks almost fractal. The more closely people explore any one corner, the more structure they find. Some dig deep into particular crevices; others zoom out to try to make sense of grander patterns. The upshot is that string theory today includes much that no longer seems stringy. Those tiny loops of string whose harmonics were thought to breathe form into every particle and force known to nature (including elusive gravity) hardly even appear anymore on chalkboards at conferences." (K C Cole, "The Strange Second Life of String Theory", Quanta Magazine", 2016) [source]

📊On Statistics: Statistical Tools Ich - Dices

"God's dice always have a lucky roll." (Sophocles, 5th century BC)

"[...] to repeat the same throw ten thousand times with the dice would be impossible, whereas to make it once or twice is comparatively easy." (Aristotle, "On the Heavens", cca. 350 BC)

"Four dice are cast and a Venus throw results-that is chance; but do you think it would be chance, too, if in one hundred casts you made one hundred Venus throws? It is possible for paints flung at rando mon a canvas to form the outline of a face; but do you imagine that an accidental scattering of pigments could produce the beautiful portrait of Venus of Cos? Suppose that a hog should form a letter 'A' on the ground with its snout; is that a reason for believing that it could write out Ennius's poem The Andromche?" (Marcus Tullius Cicero, cca. 44 BC)

"Is it possible, then, for any man to apprehend in advance occurrences for which no cause or reason can be assigned? What do we mean when we employ such terms as luck, fortune, accident, turn of the die, except that we are seeking to describe events which happened and came to pass in such a way that they either might not have happened and come to pass at all or might have happened and come to pass under quite different circumstances? How then can an event be anticipated and predicted which occurs fortuitously and as a result of blind chance and of the spinning of Fortune's wheel?" (Marcus Tullius Cicero, "De Divinatione", 44 BC)

"The law of large numbers is noted in events which are attributed to pure chance since we do not know their causes or because they are too complicated. Thus, games, in which the circumstances determining the occurrence of a certain card or certain number of points on a die infinitely vary, can not be subjected to any calculus. If the series of trials is continued for a long time, the different outcomes nevertheless appear in constant ratios. Then, if calculations according to the rules of a game are possible, the respective probabilities of eventual outcomes conform to the known Jakob Bernoulli theorem. However, in most problems of contingency a prior determination of chances of the various events is impossible and, on the contrary, they are calculated from the observed result." (Siméon-Denis Poisson, "Researches into the Probabilities of Judgements in Criminal and Civil Cases", 1837)

"A perfect equity adjusts its balance in all parts of life. The dice of God are always loaded. The world looks like a multiplication-table, or a mathematical equation, which, turn it how you will, balances itself." (Ralph W Emerson, "Compensation", 1841)

"Without doubt, matter is unlimited in extent, and, in this sense, infinite; and the forces of Nature mould it into an innumerable number of worlds. Would it be at all astonishing if, from the universal dice-box, out of an innumberable number of throws, there should be thrown out one world infinitely perfect? Nay, does not the calculus of probabilities prove to us that one such world out of an infinite number, must be produced of necessity?" (Philippe Buchez & William B Greene, "Remarks on the Science of History: Followed by an a priori autobiography", 1849)

"As an instrument for selecting at random, I have found nothing superior to dice. It is most tedious to shuffle cards thoroughly be- tween each successive draw, and the method of mixing and stirring up marked balls in a bag is more tedious still. A teetotum or some form of roulette is preferable to these, but dice are better than all. When they are shaken and tossed in a basket, they hurtle so variously against one another and against the ribs of the basket-work that they tumble wildly about, and their positions at the outset afford no perceptible clue to what they will be after even a single good shake and toss." (Francis Galton, Nature vol. 42, 1890) 

"A throw of the dice will never abolish chance." (Stéphane Mallarmé, 1897)

"If the world may be thought of as a certain definite quantity of force and as a certain definite number of centers of force—and every other representation remains indefinite and therefore useless—it follows that, in the great dice game of existence, it must pass through calculable number of combinations. In infinite time, every possible combination would at some time or another be realized; more: it would be realized an infinite number of times. And since between every combination and its next recurrence all other possible combinations would have to take place, and each of these combination conditions of the entire sequence of combinations in the same series, a circular movement of absolutely identical series is thus demonstrated: the world as a circular movement that has already repeated itself infinitely often and plays its game in infinitum. This conception is not simply a mechanistic conception; for if it were that, it would not condition an infinite recurrence of identical cases, but a final state. Because the world has not reached this, mechanistic theory must be considered an imperfect and merely provisional hypothesis." (Friedrich Nietzsche, "The Will to Power", [notes written 1883-1888] 1901)

"Quantum mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The theory says a lot, but does not really bring us any closer to the secret of the "old one." I, at any rate, am convinced that He does not throw dice." (Albert Einstein, [Letter to Max Born] 1926)

"It seems hard to sneak a look at God's cards. But that He plays dice and uses 'telepathic' methods [...] is something that I cannot believe for a single moment." (Albert Einstein, [Letter to Cornel Lanczos] 1942)

"You believe in the God who plays dice, and I in complete law and order in a world that objectively exists, and which I, in a wildly speculative way, am trying to capture. [...] Even the great initial success of the quantum theory does not make me believe in the fundamental dice-game, although I am well aware that our younger colleagues interpret this as a consequence of senility. No doubt the day will come when we will see whose instinctive attitude was the correct one." (Albert Einstein, [Letter to Max Born] 1944)

"If God has made the world a perfect mechanism, He has at least conceded so much to our imperfect intellect that in order to predict little parts of it, we need not solve innumerable differential equations, but can use dice with fair success." (Max Born, "Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist", 1949)

"In the game of heads and tails, if head comes up a hundred times in a row then this appears to us extraordinary, because after dividing the nearly infinite number of combinations that can arise in a hundred throws into regular sequences, or those in which we observe a rule that is easy to grasp, and into irregular sequences, the latter are incomparably more numerous." (Pierre-Simon Laplace, "A Philosophical Essay on Probability Theories", 1951)

"The picture of scientific method drafted by modern philosophy is very different from traditional conceptions. Gone is the ideal of a universe whose course follows strict rules, a predetermined cosmos that unwinds itself like an unwinding clock. Gone is the ideal of the scientist who knows the absolute truth. The happenings of nature are like rolling dice rather than like revolving stars; they are controlled by probability laws, not by causality, and the scientist resembles a gambler more than a prophet. He can tell you only his best posits - he never knows beforehand whether they will come true. He is a better gambler, though, than the man at the green table, because his statistical methods are superior. And his goal is staked higher - the goal of foretelling the rolling dice of the cosmos. If he is asked why he follows his methods, with what title he makes his predictions, he cannot answer that he has an irrefutable knowledge of the future; he can only lay his best bets. But he can prove that they are best bets, that making them is the best he can do - and if a man does his best, what else can you ask of him?" (Hans Reichenbach, "The Rise of Scientific Philosophy", 1951)

"We must emphasize that such terms as 'select at random', 'choose at random', and the like, always mean that some mechanical device, such as coins, cards, dice, or tables of random numbers, is used." (Frederick Mosteller et al, "Principles of Sampling", Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 49 (265), 1954)

"Consideration of particle emission from black holes would seem to suggest that God not only plays dice, but also sometimes throws them where they cannot be seen." (Stephen Hawking, "The Quantum Mechanics of Black Holes", Scientific American, 1977)

"Not only does God play dice with the world - He does not let us see what He has rolled." (Stanisław Lem, "Imaginary Magnitude", 1981)

"Specialists [...] are slowly coming to the realization that the universe is biased and leans to the left. [...] Many scientists have come to believe that this odd state of affairs has somethittg to do with the weak nuclear force. It seems that the weak force tends to impart a left-handed spin to electrons, and this effect may bias some kinds of molecular synthesis to the left. [...] But scientific speculation of this ilk leads to a deeper question. Was it purely a matter of chance that left-handedness became the preferred direction in our universe, or is there some reason behind it? Did the sinister bent of existence that scientists have observed stem from a roll of the dice, or is God a semiambidextrous southpaw?" (Malcolm W Browne, 1986)

"[In statistics] you have the fact that the concepts are not very clean. The idea of probability, of randomness, is not a clean mathematical idea. You cannot produce random numbers mathematically. They can only be produced by things like tossing dice or spinning a roulette wheel. With a formula, any formula, the number you get would be predictable and therefore not random. So as a statistician you have to rely on some conception of a world where things happen in some way at random, a conception which mathematicians don’t have." (Lucien LeCam, [interview] 1988)

"Combinatorics, a sort of glorified dice-throwing." (Robert Kanigel, "The Man Who Knew Infinity: A Life of the Genius Ramanujan", 1991)

"Nature is never perfectly symmetric. Nature's circles always have tiny dents and bumps. There are always tiny fluctuations, such as the thermal vibration of molecules. These tiny imperfections load Nature's dice in favour of one or other of the set of possible effects that the mathematics of perfect symmetry considers to be equally possible." (Ian Stewart & Martin Golubitsky, "Fearful Symmetry: Is God a Geometer?", 1992)

"It is true that every aspect of the roll of dice may be suspect: the dice themselves, the form and texture of the surface, the person throwing them. If we push the analysis to its extreme, we may even wonder what chance has to do with it at all. Neither the course of the dice nor their rebounds rely on chance; they are governed by the strict determinism of rational mechanics. Billiards is based on the same principles, and it has never been considered a game of chance. So in the final analysis, chance lies in the clumsiness, the inexperience, or the naiveté of the thrower - or in the eye of the observer." (Ivar Ekeland, "The Broken Dice, and Other Mathematical Tales of Chance", 1993)

"Whether we shuffle cards or roll dice, chance is only a result of our human lack of deftness: we don't have enough control to immobilize a die at will or to individually direct the cards in a deck. The comparison is an important one nonetheless, and highlights the limits of this method of creating chance - it doesn't matter who rolls the dice, but we wouldn't let just anyone shuffle the cards." (Ivar Ekeland, "The Broken Dice, and Other Mathematical Tales of Chance", 1993)

"So Einstein was wrong when he said, 'God does not play dice'. Consideration of black holes suggests, not only that God does play dice, but that he sometimes confuses us by throwing them where they can't be seen." (Stephen Hawking, 1994)

"Yet, Einstein's theories are also not the last word: quantum theory and relativity are inconsistent, and Einstein himself, proclaiming that 'God does not play dice!', rejected the basic reliance of quantum theory on chance events, and looked forward to a theory which would be deterministic. Recent experiments suggest that this view of Einstein's conflicts with his other deeply held beliefs about the nature of the physical universe. Certain it is that somewhere, beyond physicists' current horizons, are even more powerful theories of how the world is." (David Wells, "You Are a Mathematician: A wise and witty introduction to the joy of numbers", 1995)

"In systems such as contemporary society, evolution is always a promise and devolution is always a threat. No system comes with a guarantee of ongoing evolution. The challenge is real. To ignore it is to play dice with all we have. To accept it is not to play God - it is to become an instrument of whatever divine purpose infuses the universe." (Ervin László, "The systems view of the world", 1996)

"[...] an apparently random universe could be obeying every whim of a deterministic deity who chooses how the dice roll; a universe that has obeyed perfect mathematical laws for the last ten billion years could suddenly start to play truly random dice. So the distinction is about how we model the system, and what point of view seems most useful, rather than about any inherent feature of the system itself." (Ian Stewart, "Does God Play Dice: The New Mathematics of Chaos", 1997)

"Chaos teaches us that anybody, God or cat, can play dice deterministically, while the naïve onlooker imagines that something random is going on." (Ian Stewart, "Does God Play Dice: The New Mathematics of Chaos", 1997)

"Indeed a deterministic die behaves very much as if it has six attractors, the steady states corresponding to its six faces, all of whose basins are intertwined. For technical reasons that can't quite be true, but it is true that deterministic systems with intertwined basins are wonderful substitutes for dice; in fact they're super-dice, behaving even more ‘randomly’ - apparently - than ordinary dice. Super-dice are so chaotic that they are uncomputable. Even if you know the equations for the system perfectly, then given an initial state, you cannot calculate which attractor it will end up on. The tiniest error of approximation – and there will always be such an error - will change the answer completely." (Ian Stewart, "Does God Play Dice: The New Mathematics of Chaos", 1997)

"Perhaps God can play dice, and create a universe of complete law and order, in the same breath." (Ian Stewart, "Does God Play Dice: The New Mathematics of Chaos", 1997)

"Simple laws may not produce simple behaviour. Deterministic laws can produce behaviour that appears random. Order can breed its own kind of chaos. The question is not so much whether God plays dice, but how God plays dice.", 1997)

"The chance events due to deterministic chaos, on the other hand, occur even within a closed system determined by immutable laws. Our most cherished examples of chance - dice, roulette, coin-tossing - seem closer to chaos than to the whims of outside events. So, in this revised sense, dice are a good metaphor for chance after all. It's just that we've refined our concept of randomness. Indeed, the deterministic but possibly chaotic stripes of phase space may be the true source of probability." (Ian Stewart, "Does God Play Dice: The New Mathematics of Chaos", 1997)

"From the moment we first roll a die in a children’s board game, or pick a card (any card), we start to learn what probability is. But even as adults, it is not easy to tell what it is, in the general way." (David Stirzaker, "Probability and Random Variables: A Beginner’s Guide", 1999)

"[...] the chance of a head (or a double six) is just a chance. The whole point of probability is to discuss uncertain eventualities before they occur. After this event, things are completely different. As the simplest illustration of this, note that even though we agree that if we ¯ip a coin and roll two dice then the chance of a head is greater than the chance of a double six, nevertheless it may turn out that the coin shows a tail when the dice show a double six." (David Stirzaker, "Probability and Random Variables: A Beginner’s Guide", 1999)

"[…] we would like to observe that the butterfly effect lies at the root of many events which we call random. The final result of throwing a dice depends on the position of the hand throwing it, on the air resistance, on the base that the die falls on, and on many other factors. The result appears random because we are not able to take into account all of these factors with sufficient accuracy. Even the tiniest bump on the table and the most imperceptible move of the wrist affect the position in which the die finally lands. It would be reasonable to assume that chaos lies at the root of all random phenomena." (Iwo Bialynicki-Birula & Iwona Bialynicka-Birula, "Modeling Reality: How Computers Mirror Life", 2004)

"Random number generators do not always need to be symmetrical. This misconception of assuming equal likelihood for each outcome is fostered in a restricted learning environment, where learners see only such situations (that is, dice, coins and spinners). It is therefore very important for learners to be aware of situations where the different outcomes are not equally likely (as with the drawing-pins example)." (Alan Graham, "Developing Thinking in Statistics", 2006)

"There is no such thing as randomness. No one who could detect every force operating on a pair of dice would ever play dice games, because there would never be any doubt about the outcome. The randomness, such as it is, applies to our ignorance of the possible outcomes. It doesn’t apply to the outcomes themselves. They are 100% determined and are not random in the slightest. Scientists have become so confused by this that they now imagine that things really do happen randomly, i.e. for no reason at all." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)

"God may not play dice with the universe, but something strange is going on with the prime numbers." (Paul Erdos)

"God plays dice with the universe, but they’re loaded dice. And the main objective of physics now is to find out by what rules were they loaded and how can we use them for our own ends." (Joseph Ford)

"I shall never believe that God plays dice with the world." (Albert Einstein)

"The perfect die does not lose its usefulness or justification by the fact that real dice fail to live up to it." (William Feller)

John S Bell - Collected Quotes

"To know the quantum mechanical state of a system implies, in general, only statistical restrictions on the results of measurements. It seems interesting to ask if this statistical element be thought of as arising, as in classical statistical mechanics, because the states in question are averages over better defined states for which individually the results would be quite determined. These hypothetical 'dispersion free' states would be specified not only by the quantum mechanical state vector but also by additional 'hidden variables' - 'hidden' because if states with prescribed values of these variables could actually be prepared, quantum mechanics would be observably inadequate." (John S Bell, "On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics" [in "Reviews of Modern Physics"], 1966)

"Theoretical physicists live in a classical world, looking out into a quantum-mechanical world. The latter we describe only subjectively, in terms of procedures and results in our classical domain." (John S Bell, "Introduction to the hidden-variable question", 1971)

"The concept of 'measurement' becomes so fuzzy on reflection that it is quite surprising to have it appearing in physical theory at the most fundamental level [...] does not any analysis of measurement require concepts more fundamental than measurement? And should not the fundamental theory be about these more fundamental concepts?" (John S Bell, "Quantum Mechanics for Cosmologists" [in "Quantum Gravity"], 1981)

"It can be argued that in trying to see behind the formal predictions of quantum theory we are just making trouble for ourselves. Was not precisely this the lesson that had to be learned before quantum mechanics could be constructed, that it is futile to try to see behind the observed phenomena?" (John S Bell, "Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiments" [in "Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics"], 1987)

"The first charge against 'measurement', in the fundamental axioms of quantum mechanics, is that it anchors there the shifty split of the world into 'system' and 'apparatus'. A second charge is that the word comes loaded with meaning from everyday life, meaning which is entirely inappropriate in the quantum context." (John S Bell, "Against 'mesurement'", 1990)

"The idea that elimination of coherence, in one way or another, implies the replacement of 'and' by 'or', is a very common one among solvers of the 'measurement problem." (John S Bell, "Against 'measurement'", 1990)

"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum and relativity theories requires not just technical developments but radical conceptual renewal." (John S Bell)

Hans C von Baeyer - Collected Quotes

"As every bookie knows instinctively, a number such as reliability - a qualitative rather than a quantitative measure - is needed to make the valuation of information practically useful." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"Both induction and deduction, reasoning from the particular and the general, and back again from the universal to the specific, form the essence to scientific thinking." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"Entropy is not about speeds or positions of particles, the way temperature and pressure and volume are, but about our lack of information." (Hans C von Baeyer," Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"If quantum communication and quantum computation are to flourish, a new information theory will have to be developed." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"If the intensity of the material world is plotted along the horizontal axis, and the response of the human mind is on the vertical, the relation between the two is represented by the logarithmic curve. Could this rule provide a clue to the relationship between the objective measure of information, and our subjective perception of it?" (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"If you don't understand something, break it apart; reduce it to its components. Since they are simpler than the whole, you have a much better chance of understanding them; and when you have succeeded in doing that, put the whole thing back together again." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)"

"In fact, an information theory that leaves out the issue of noise turns out to have no content." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"Nowhere is the difference between either/or and both/and more clearly apparent than in the context of information." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"Paradox is the sharpest scalpel in the satchel of science. Nothing concentrates the mind as effectively, regardless of whether it pits two competing theories against each other, or theory against observation, or a compelling mathematical deduction against ordinary common sense." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"The smell of subjectivity clings to the mechanical definition of complexity as stubbornly as it sticks to the definition of information." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"The solution of the Monty Hall problem hinges on the concept of information, and more specifically, on the relationship between added information and probability." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"This is not what I thought physics was about when I started out: I learned that the idea is to explain nature in terms of clearly understood mathematical laws; but perhaps comparisons are the best we can hope for." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"We don't know what energy is, any more than we know what information is, but as a now robust scientific concept we can describe it in precise mathematical terms, and as a commodity we can measure, market, regulate and tax it." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"Eventually, mechanical models failed too. They were duly abandoned, and replaced by much more abstract mathematical models. Compared to their predecessors, mathematical models are Spartan affairs. They consist of equations and formulas without the texture, the color, the visual detail - without the rich appeal - of their mechanical relatives. […] But what a mathematical model lacks in charm, it more than makes up for in generality and predictive power." (Hans C von Baeyer, "QBism: The future of quantum physics", 2016)

"Quantum theory can be thought of as the science of constructing wavefunctions and extracting predictions of measurable outcomes from them. […] The wavefunction is a little bit like a map - the best possible kind of map. It encodes all that can be said about a quantum system." (Hans C von Baeyer, "QBism: The future of quantum physics", 2016)

"Random means without reason - unpredictable - lawless. That little word random describes a key difference between ordinary classical mechanics and quantum mechanics. […] In classical physics only ignorance of the fine details or lack of control over them causes statistical randomness […] In principle, though not in practice, randomness is absent from classical physics." (Hans C von Baeyer, "QBism: The future of quantum physics", 2016)

"The aim of physics is not merely to tell a convincing story about every object and every event in the material universe but to produce a single epic, a coherent theory for describing nature." (Hans C von Baeyer, "QBism: The future of quantum physics", 2016)

"The goal of physics is to explain the workings of the nonliving world. At first, philosophers described the properties of real objects: the wandering of planets across the night sky, the formation of ice, or the sound of a lyre. When attention turned to things that couldn’t be seen or measured so easily, physicists invented mechanical models to take the place of real things." (Hans C von Baeyer, "QBism: The future of quantum physics", 2016)

On Manifolds V (Geometry III)

"Whereas the conception of space and time as a four-dimensional manifold has been very fruitful for mathematical physicists, its effect in the field of epistemology has been only to confuse the issue. Calling time the fourth dimension gives it an air of mystery. One might think that time can now be conceived as a kind of space and try in vain to add visually a fourth dimension to the three dimensions of space. It is essential to guard against such a misunderstanding of mathematical concepts. If we add time to space as a fourth dimension it does not lose any of its peculiar character as time. [...] Musical tones can be ordered according to volume and pitch and are thus brought into a two dimensional manifold. Similarly colors can be determined by the three basic colors red, green and blue… Such an ordering does not change either tones or colors; it is merely a mathematical expression of something that we have known and visualized for a long time. Our schematization of time as a fourth dimension therefore does not imply any changes in the conception of time. [...] the space of visualization is only one of many possible forms that add content to the conceptual frame. We would therefore not call the representation of the tone manifold by a plane the visual representation of the two dimensional tone manifold." (Hans Reichenbach, "The Philosophy of Space and Time", 1928)

"The sequence of numbers which grows beyond any stage already reached by passing to the next number is a manifold of possibilities open towards infinity, it remains forever in the status of creation, but is not a closed realm of things existing in themselves. That we blindly converted one into the other is the true source of our difficulties […]" (Hermann Weyl, "Mathematics and Logic", 1946)

"The first attempts to consider the behavior of so-called 'random neural nets' in a systematic way have led to a series of problems concerned with relations between the 'structure' and the 'function' of such nets. The 'structure' of a random net is not a clearly defined topological manifold such as could be used to describe a circuit with explicitly given connections. In a random neural net, one does not speak of 'this' neuron synapsing on 'that' one, but rather in terms of tendencies and probabilities associated with points or regions in the net." (Anatol Rapoport, "Cycle distributions in random nets", The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 10(3), 1948)

"The main object of study in differential geometry is, at least for the moment, the differential manifolds, structures on the manifolds (Riemannian, complex, or other), and their admissible mappings. On a manifold the coordinates are valid only locally and do not have a geometric meaning themselves." (Shiing-Shen Chern, "Differential geometry, its past and its future", 1970)

"[...] a manifold is a set M on which 'nearness' is introduced (a topological space), and this nearness can be described at each point in M by using coordinates. It also requires that in an overlapping region, where two coordinate systems intersect, the coordinate transformation is given by differentiable transition functions." (Kenji Ueno & Toshikazu Sunada, "A Mathematical Gift, III: The Interplay Between Topology, Functions, Geometry, and Algebra", Mathematical World Vol. 23, 1996)

"It is commonly said that the study of manifolds is, in general, the study of the generalization of the concept of surfaces. To some extent, this is true. However, defining it that way can lead to overshadowing by 'figures' such as geometrical surfaces." (Kenji Ueno & Toshikazu Sunada, "A Mathematical Gift, III: The Interplay Between Topology, Functions, Geometry, and Algebra", Mathematical World Vol. 23, 1996)

"One could also question whether we are looking for a single overarching mathematical structure or a combination of different complementary points of view. Does a fundamental theory of Nature have a global definition, or do we have to work with a series of local definitions, like the charts and maps of a manifold, that describe physics in various 'duality frames'. At present string theory is very much formulated in the last kind of way." (Robbert Dijkgraaf, "Mathematical Structures", 2005)

"Quantum physics, in particular particle and string theory, has proven to be a remarkable fruitful source of inspiration for new topological invariants of knots and manifolds. With hindsight this should perhaps not come as a complete surprise. Roughly one can say that quantum theory takes a geometric object (a manifold, a knot, a map) and associates to it a (complex) number, that represents the probability amplitude for a certain physical process represented by the object." (Robbert Dijkgraaf, "Mathematical Structures", 2005)

"The primary aspects of the theory of complex manifolds are the geometric structure itself, its topological structure, coordinate systems, etc., and holomorphic functions and mappings and their properties. Algebraic geometry over the complex number field uses polynomial and rational functions of complex variables as the primary tools, but the underlying topological structures are similar to those that appear in complex manifold theory, and the nature of singularities in both the analytic and algebraic settings is also structurally very similar." (Raymond O Wells Jr, "Differential and Complex Geometry: Origins, Abstractions and Embeddings", 2017)

"Therefore one has taken everywhere the opposite road, and each time one encounters manifolds of several dimensions in geometry, as in the doctrine of definite integrals in the theory of imaginary quantities, one takes spatial intuition as an aid. It is well known how one gets thus a real overview over the subject and how only thus are precisely the essential points emphasized." (Bernhard Riemann)

Eliezer S Yudkowsky - Collected Quotes

"Our sole responsibility is to produce something smarter than we are; any problems beyond that are not ours to solve." (Eliezer S Yudkowsky, "Staring into the Singularity", 1996)

"There are no hard problems, only problems that are hard to a certain level of intelligence. Move the smallest bit upwards, and some problems will suddenly move from 'impossible' to 'obvious'. Move a substantial degree upwards, and all of them will become obvious. Move a huge distance upwards [...]" (Eliezer S Yudkowsky, "Staring into the Singularity", 1996)

"A model does not always predict all the features of the data. Nature has no privileged tendency to present me with solvable challenges." (Eliezer S Yudkowsky, "A Technical Explanation of Technical Explanation", 2005)

"In the laws of probability theory, likelihood distributions are fixed properties of a hypothesis. In the art of rationality, to explain is to anticipate. To anticipate is to explain." (Eliezer S. Yudkowsky, "A Technical Explanation of Technical Explanation", 2005)

"Reality dishes out experiences using probability, not plausibility." (Eliezer S Yudkowsky, "A Technical Explanation of Technical Explanation", 2005)

"But ignorance exists in the map, not in the territory. If I am ignorant about a phenomenon, that is a fact about my own state of mind, not a fact about the phenomenon itself. A phenomenon can seem mysterious to some particular person. There are no phenomena which are mysterious of themselves. To worship a phenomenon because it seems so wonderfully mysterious, is to worship your own ignorance." (Eliezer S Yudkowsky, "Mysterious Answers To Mysterious Questions" 2007)

"The important graphs are the ones where some things are not connected to some other things. When the unenlightened ones try to be profound, they draw endless verbal comparisons between this topic, and that topic, which is like this, which is like that; until their graph is fully connected and also totally useless." (Eliezer S Yudkowsky,  "Mysterious Answers to Mysterious Questions", 2007)

"The strength of a theory is not what it allows, but what it prohibits; if you can invent an equally persuasive explanation for any outcome, you have zero knowledge." (Eliezer S Yudkowsky, "An Alien God", 2007)

"If I am ignorant about a phenomenon, that is a fact about my state of mind, not a fact about the phenomenon; to worship a phenomenon because it seems so wonderfully mysterious, is to worship your own ignorance; a blank map does not correspond to a blank territory, it is just somewhere we haven’t visited yet [...]" (Eliezer S Yudkowsky, "Joy in the Merely Real", 2008)

"[...] part of the rationalist ethos is binding yourself emotionally to an absolutely lawful reductionistic universe - a universe containing no ontologically basic mental things such as souls or magic - and pouring all your hope and all your care into that merely real universe and its possibilities, without disappointment." (Eliezer S Yudkowsky, "Mundane Magic", 2008)

"There are no surprising facts, only models that are surprised by facts; and if a model is surprised by the facts, it is no credit to that model." (Eliezer S Yudkowsky, "Quantum Explanations", 2008)