On Counting (2020-)

"Statisticians are sometimes dismissed as bean counters. The sneering term is misleading as well as unfair. Most of the concepts that matter in policy are not like beans; they are not merely difficult to count, but difficult to define. Once you’re sure what you mean by 'bean', the bean counting itself may come more easily. But if we don’t understand the definition, then there is little point in looking at the numbers. We have fooled ourselves before we have begun." (Tim Harford, "The Data Detective: Ten easy rules to make sense of statistics", 2020)

"The whole discipline of statistics is built on measuring or counting things. […] it is important to understand what is being measured or counted, and how. It is surprising how rarely we do this. Over the years, as I found myself trying to lead people out of statistical mazes week after week, I came to realize that many of the problems I encountered were because people had taken a wrong turn right at the start. They had dived into the mathematics of a statistical claim - asking about sampling errors and margins of error, debating if the number is rising or falling, believing, doubting, analyzing, dissecting - without taking the ti- me to understand the first and most obvious fact: What is being measured, or counted? What definition is being used?" (Tim Harford, "The Data Detective: Ten easy rules to make sense of statistics", 2020)

"There are many ways for error to creep into facts and figures that seem entirely straightforward. Quantities can be miscounted. Small samples can fail to accurately reflect the properties of the whole population. Procedures used to infer quantities from other information can be faulty. And then, of course, numbers can be total bullshit, fabricated out of whole cloth in an effort to confer credibility on an otherwise flimsy argument. We need to keep all of these things in mind when we look at quantitative claims. They say the data never lie - but we need to remember that the data often mislead." (Carl T Bergstrom & Jevin D West, "Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World", 2020)

"Mathematicians extract a shape’s homology from its chain complex, which provides structured data about the shape’s component parts and their boundaries - exactly what you need to describe holes in every dimension. […] The definition of homology is rigid enough that a computer can use it to find and count holes, which helps establish the rigor typically required in mathematics. It also allows researchers to use homology for an increasingly popular pursuit: analyzing data." (Kelsey Houston-Edwards, "How Mathematicians Use Homology to Make Sense of Topology", Quanta Magazine, 2021)

"Adjusting scale is an important practice in data visualization. While the log transform is versatile, it doesn’t handle all situations where skew or curvature occurs. For example, at times the values are all roughly the same order of magnitude and the log transformation has little impact. Another transformation to consider is the square root transformation, which is often useful for count data." (Sam Lau et al, "Learning Data Science: Data Wrangling, Exploration, Visualization, and Modeling with Python", 2023)

"With qualitative data, the bar plot serves a similar role to the histogram. The bar plot gives a visual presentation of the “popularity” or frequency of different groups. However, we cannot interpret the shape of the bar plot in the same way as a histogram. Tails and symmetry do not make sense in this setting. Also, the frequency of a category is represented by the height of the bar, and the width carries no information. The two bar charts that follow display identical information about the number of breeds in a category; the only difference is in the width of the bars. In the extreme, the rightmost plot eliminates the bars entirely and represents each count by a single dot." (Sam Lau et al, "Learning Data Science: Data Wrangling, Exploration, Visualization, and Modeling with Python", 2023)

On Counting (1990-1999)

"Mosaic displays represent the counts in a contingency table by tiles whose size is proportional to the cell count. This graphical display for categorical data generalizes readily to multiway tables."  (Michael Friendly, "Mosaic Displays for Loglinear Models", Proceedings of the Statistical Graphics, 1992)

"Nature is like a work by Bach or Beethoven, often starting with a central theme and making countless variations on it that are scattered throughout the symphony. By this criterion, it appears that strings are not fundamental concepts in nature." (Michio Kaku, "Hyperspace", 1995)

"Combinatorics is special. Most mathematical topics which can be covered in a lecture course build towards a single, well-defined goal, such as the Prime Number Theorem. Even if such a clear goal doesn’t exist, there is a sharp focus (e.g. finite groups). By contrast, combinatorics appears to be a collection of unrelated puzzles chosen at random. Two factors contribute to this. First, combinatorics is broad rather than deep. Second, it is about techniques rather than results. [...] Combinatorics could be described as the art of arranging objects according to specified rules. We want to know, first, whether a particular arrangement is possible at all, and if so, in how many different ways it can be done. If the rules are simple, the existence of an arrangement is clear, and we concentrate on the counting problem. But for more involved rules, it may not be clear whether the arrangement is possible at all." (Peter J Cameron, "Combinatorics: topics, techniques, algorithms", 1995)

"Graph theory is typical of much modern mathematics. Its subject matter is not traditional, and it is not a development from traditional theories. Its applications are not traditional either. […] Graph theory is not concerned with continuous quantities. It often involves counting, but in integers, not measuring using fractions. Graph theory is an example of discrete mathematics. Graphs are put together in pieces, in chunks, rather like Meccano or Lego, or a jigsaw puzzle." (David Wells, "You Are a Mathematician: A wise and witty introduction to the joy of numbers", 1995)

"However mathematics starts, whether it is in counting and measuring in everyday life, or in puzzles and riddles, or in scientific queries about projectiles, floating bodies, levers and balances, or magnetic lines of force, it eventually becomes detached from its roots and develops a life of its own. It becomes more powerful, because it can be applied not just to the situations in which it originated but to all other comparable situations. It also becomes more abstract, and more game-like." (David Wells, "You Are a Mathematician: A wise and witty introduction to the joy of numbers", 1995)

"Mirror symmetry is concerned with counting the number of holomorphic curves on Calabi-Yau manifolds, i.e. compact Kähler manifolds X with trivial canonical bundle KX." (Robbert Dijkgraaf, "Mirror symmetry and elliptic curves" [in Robert Dijkgraaf et al (Eds), "The moduli space of curves", Progress in Mathematics vol. 129] 1995) 

"Swarm systems generate novelty for three reasons: (1) They are 'sensitive to initial conditions' - a scientific shorthand for saying that the size of the effect is not proportional to the size of the cause - so they can make a surprising mountain out of a molehill. (2) They hide countless novel possibilities in the exponential combinations of many interlinked individuals. (3) They don’t reckon individuals, so therefore individual variation and imperfection can be allowed. In swarm systems with heritability, individual variation and imperfection will lead to perpetual novelty, or what we call evolution." (Kevin Kelly, "Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems and the Economic World", 1995)

"The theory of probability can define the probabilities at the gaming casino or in a lottery - there is no need to spin the roulette wheel or count the lottery tickets to estimate the nature of the outcome - but in real life relevant information is essential. And the bother is that we never have all the information we would like. Nature has established patterns, but only for the most part. Theory, which abstracts from nature, is kinder: we either have the information we need or else we have no need for information." (Peter L Bernstein, "Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk", 1996)

"Rather mathematicians like to look for patterns, and the primes probably offer the ultimate challenge. When you look at a list of them stretching off to infinity, they look chaotic, like weeds growing through an expanse of grass representing all numbers. For centuries mathematicians have striven to find rhyme and reason amongst this jumble. Is there any music that we can hear in this random noise? Is there a fast way to spot that a particular number is prime? Once you have one prime, how much further must you count before you find the next one on the list? These are the sort of questions that have tantalized generations." (Marcus du Sautoy, "The Music of the Primes", 1998))

"The discovery of complex numbers was the last in a sequence of discoveries that gradually filled in the set of all numbers, starting with the positive integers (finger counting) and then expanding to include the positive rationals and irrational reals, negatives, and then finally the complex." (Paul J Nahin, "An Imaginary Tale: The History of √-1", 1998)

On Counting (1925-1949)

"Numbers are not just counters; they are elements in a system." (Scott Buchanan, "Poetry and Mathematics", 1929)

"We take cognizance of all this and learn it without regard for the things. Numbers are the most familiar form of the mathematical because, in our usual dealing with things, when we calculate or count, numbers are the closest to that which we recognize in things without deriving it from them. For this reason numbers are the most familiar form of the mathematical. In this way, this most familiar mathematical becomes mathematics. But the essence of the mathematical does not lie in number as purely delimiting the pure ‘how much’, but vice versa. Because number has such a nature, therefore, it belongs to the learnable in the sense of mathesis." (Martin Heidegger, "Modern Science, Metaphysics and Mathematics", 1936)

"In earlier times they had no statistics and so they had to fall back on lies. Hence the huge exaggerations of primitive literature, giants, miracles, wonders! It's the size that counts. They did it with lies and we do it with statistics: but it's all the same." (Stephen Leacock, "Model memoirs and other sketches from simple to serious", 1939)

"Statistics is the branch of scientific method which deals with the data obtained by counting or measuring the properties of populations of natural phenomena. In this definition 'natural phenomena' includes all the happenings of the external world, whether human or not " (Sir Maurice G Kendall,"Advanced Theory of Statistics", Vol. 1, 1943)

"Mathematics is one component of any plan for liberal education. Mother of all the sciences, it is a builder of the imagination, a weaver of patterns of sheer thought, an intuitive dreamer, a poet. The study of mathematics cannot be replaced by any other activity that will train and develop man's purely logical faculties to the same level of rationality. Through countless dimensions, riding high the winds of intellectual adventure and filled with the zest of discovery, the mathematician tracks the heavens for harmony and eternal verity. There is not wholly unexpected surprise, but surprise nevertheless, that mathematics has direct application to the physical world about us. For mathematics, in a wilderness of tragedy and change, is a creature of the mind, born to the cry of humanity in search of an invariant reality, immutable in substance, unalterable with time. Mathematics is an infinity of flexibles forcing pure thought into a cosmos. It is an arc of austerity cutting realms of reason with geodesic grandeur. Mathematics is crystallized clarity, precision personified, beauty distilled and rigorously sublimated. The life of the spirit is a life of thought; the ideal of thought is truth; everlasting truth is the goal of mathematics." (Cletus O Oakley, "Mathematics", The American Mathematical Monthly, 1949)

On Counting (2010-2019)

"Zero is such a weird idea, having 'something' represent 'nothing', and it eluded the Romans. Complex numbers are similar - it’s a new way of thinking. But both zero and complex numbers make math much easier. If we never adopted strange, new number systems, we’d still be counting on our fingers." (Kalid Azal, "Math,Better Explained", 2011)

"[…] humans make mistakes when they try to count large numbers in complicated systems. They make even greater errors when they attempt - as they always do - to reduce complicated systems to simple numbers." (Zachary Karabell, "The Leading Indicators: A short history of the numbers that rule our world", 2014)

"The taming of chance created mathematical probability. [...] Probability is not one of a kind; it was born with three faces: frequency, physical design, and degrees of belief. [...] in the first of its identities, probability is about counting. [...] Second, probability is about constructing. For example, if a die is constructed to be perfectly symmetrical, then the probability of rolling a six is one in six. You don’t have to count. [...] Probabilities by design are called propensities. Historically, games of chance were the prototype for propensity. These risks are known because people crafted, not counted, them. [...] Third, probability is about degrees of belief. A degree of belief can be based on anything from experience to personal impression." (Gerd Gigerenzer, "Risk Savvy: How to make good decisions", 2014)

"Moreover, there is still another important observation that seems to be essential for the idea to group objects into a set: This is the human ability to recognize similarities in different objects. Usually, a collection, or group, consists of objects that somehow belong together, objects that share a common property. While a mathematical set could also be a completely arbitrary collection of unrelated objects, this is usually not what we want to count. We count coins or hours or people, but we usually do not mix these categories." (Alfred S Posamentier & Bernd Thaller, "Numbers: Their tales, types, and treasures", 2015)

"The act of counting is governed by five principles. They describe the conditions and prerequisites that make counting possible. We call them the 'BOCIA' principles - from the words Bijection, Ordinality, Cardinality, Invariance, and Abstraction." (Alfred S Posamentier & Bernd Thaller, "Numbers: Their tales, types, and treasures", 2015)

"The invariance principle states that the result of counting a set does not depend on the order imposed on its elements during the counting process. Indeed, a mathematical set is just a collection without any implied ordering. A set is the collection of its elements - nothing more." (Alfred S Posamentier & Bernd Thaller, "Numbers: Their tales, types, and treasures", 2015)

"When we extend the system of natural numbers and counting to embrace infinite cardinals, the larger system need not have all of the properties of the smaller one. However, familiarity with the smaller system leads us to expect certain properties, and we can become confused when the pieces don’t seem to fit. Insecurity arose when the square of a complex number violated the real number principle that all squares are positive. This was resolved when we realised that the complex numbers cannot be ordered in the same way as their subset of reals." (Ian Stewart & David Tall, "The Foundations of Mathematics" 2nd Ed., 2015)

"Keep in mind that a weighted average may be different than a simple (non- weighted) average because a weighted average - by definition - counts certain data points more heavily. When you’re thinking about an average, try to determine if it’s a simple average or a weighted average. If it’s weighted, ask yourself how it’s being weighted, and see which data points count more than others." (John H Johnson & Mike Gluck, "Everydata: The misinformation hidden in the little data you consume every day", 2016)

"Often a yes/no problem in mathematics becomes more interesting when it turns into a counting problem. One reason for this is that counting may introduce more structure, or a finer structure, into the data or the conceptual framework of the problem. Similarly, sometimes the counting problem becomes more interesting if it can be turned into a group theory problem. Sometimes, the yes/no problem has an obvious answer but the counting problem still yields a fascinating and beautiful theory. Another reason to solve counting problems is that we are more naturally interested in a more precise and more quantitative question than the simple binary puzzle that we began with. Of course, only with success in achieving an interesting answer will we be satisfied with the more complex approach." (Avner Ash & Robert Gross, "Summing It Up : From one plus one to modern number theory", 2016)

"Statistics, because they are numbers, appear to us to be cold, hard facts. It seems that they represent facts given to us by nature and it’s just a matter of finding them. But it’s important to remember that people gather statistics. People choose what to count, how to go about counting, which of the resulting numbers they will share with us, and which words they will use to describe and interpret those numbers. Statistics are not facts. They are interpretations. And your interpretation may be just as good as, or better than, that of the person reporting them to you." (Daniel J Levitin, "Weaponized Lies", 2017)

"Boltzmann has shown that entropy exists because we describe the world in a blurred fashion. He has demonstrated that entropy is precisely the quantity that counts how many are the different configurations that our blurred vision does not distinguish between. Heat, entropy, and the lower entropy of the past are notions that belong to an approximate, statistical description of nature. The difference between past and future is deeply linked to this blurring." (Carlo Rovelli, "The Order of Time", 2018)

On Counting (2000-2009)

"Arithmetic and number theory study patterns of number and counting. Geometry studies patterns of shape. Calculus allows us to handle patterns of motion. Logic studies patterns of reasoning. Probability theory deals with patterns of chance. Topology studies patterns of closeness and position." (Keith Devlin, "The Math Gene: How Mathematical Thinking Evolved And Why Numbers Are Like Gossip", 2000)

"Ordinary numbers have immediate connection to the world around us; they are used to count and measure every sort of thing. Adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing all have simple interpretations in terms of the objects being counted and measured. When we pass to complex numbers, though, the arithmetic takes on a life of its own. Since -1 has no square root, we decided to create a new number game which supplies the missing piece. By adding in just this one new element √-1. we created a whole new world in which everything arithmetical, miraculously, works out just fine." (David Mumford, Caroline Series & David Wright, "Indra’s Pearls: The Vision of Felix Klein", 2002)

"Probably the first clear insight into the deep nature of control […] was that it is not about pulling levers to produce intended and inexorable results. This notion of control applies only to trivial machines. It never applies to a total system that includes any kind of probabilistic element - from the weather, to people; from markets, to the political economy. No: the characteristic of a non-trivial system that is under control, is that despite dealing with variables too many to count, too uncertain to express, and too difficult even to understand, something can be done to generate a predictable goal. Wiener found just the word he wanted in the operation of the long ships of ancient Greece. At sea, the long ships battled with rain, wind and tides - matters in no way predictable. However, if the man operating the rudder kept his eye on a distant lighthouse, he could manipulate the tiller, adjusting continuously in real-time towards the light. This is the function of steersmanship. As far back as Homer, the Greek word for steersman was kubernetes, which transliterates into English as cybernetes." (Stafford Beer, "What is cybernetics?", Kybernetes, 2002)

"Be careful about infinity: we want an infinite number of geometrically distinct geodesics. As a kinematic motion, running twice along a periodic geodesic is different from running only once, but it is not geometrically distinct. For example when working on counting functions one should be careful to distinguish between the counting function for geometric periodic geodesics and that for parameterized ones. The question is difficult because the standard ways to prove existence of periodic geodesics consider them as motions." (Marcel Berger, "A Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry", 2003)

"Any statistic based on more than a guess requires some sort of counting. Definitions specify what will be counted. Measuring involves deciding how to go about counting. We cannot begin counting until we decide how we will identify and count instances of a social problem. [...] Measurement involves choices. [...] Often, measurement decisions are hidden." (Joel Best, "Damned Lies and Statistics: Untangling Numbers from the Media, Politicians, and Activists", 2001)

"Every number has its limitations; every number is a product of choices that inevitably involve compromise. Statistics are intended to help us summarize, to get an overview of part of the world’s complexity. But some information is always sacrificed in the process of choosing what will be counted and how. Something is, in short, always missing. In evaluating statistics, we should not forget what has been lost, if only because this helps us understand what we still have." (Joel Best, "More Damned Lies and Statistics: How numbers confuse public issues", 2004)

"Good statistics are not only products of people counting; the quality of statistics also depends on people’s willingness and ability to count thoughtfully and on their decisions about what, exactly, ought to be counted so that the resulting numbers will be both accurate and meaningful." (Joel Best, "More Damned Lies and Statistics: How numbers confuse public issues", 2004)

"In much the same way, people create statistics: they choose what to count, how to go about counting, which of the resulting numbers they share with others, and which words they use to describe and interpret those figures. Numbers do not exist independent of people; understanding numbers requires knowing who counted what, why they bothered counting, and how they went about it." (Joel Best, "More Damned Lies and Statistics: How numbers confuse public issues", 2004)

"Statistics depend on collecting information. If questions go unasked, or if they are asked in ways that limit responses, or if measures count some cases but exclude others, information goes ungathered, and missing numbers result. Nevertheless, choices regarding which data to collect and how to go about collecting the information are inevitable." (Joel Best, "More Damned Lies and Statistics: How numbers confuse public issues", 2004)

"When people use statistics, they assume - or, at least, they want their listeners to assume - that the numbers are meaningful. This means, at a minimum, that someone has actually counted something and that they have done the counting in a way that makes sense. Statistical information is one of the best ways we have of making sense of the world’s complexities, of identifying patterns amid the confusion. But bad statistics give us bad information." (Joel Best, "More Damned Lies and Statistics: How numbers confuse public issues", 2004)

"With four outcomes and two players, a 2 × 2 game is completely described by eight numbers. An array with eight numbers is just an address in an 8-dimensional Cartesian payoff space, and there are uncountably many 2 × 2 games, each fully described by an 8-number address." (David Robinson & David Goforth, "The Topology of the 2×2 Games: A New Periodic Table", 2005)

"Although it is not difficult to count the holes in a real pretzel in your hand, prior to eating it, when a surface pops out of an abstract mathematical construction it can be very difficult to figure out its properties, such as how many holes it has. The cohomology groups can help us to do so." (Avner Ash & Robert Gross, "Fearless Symmetry: Exposing the hidden patterns of numbers", 2006)

"Histograms use area to represent counts of a distribution. This makes them somewhat related to barcharts and mosaic plots, although the number or the width of the bins of a histogram is not determined a priori and the bins are drawn without gaps between them reflecting the continuous scale of the data. Whereas barcharts and mosaic plots show the exact distribution of the sample, a histogram is always just one approximation to the distribution of the data. Sometimes histograms are also used as crude density estimators for some 'true', but usually unknown, underlying distribution for the data. There are much better density estimation methods that produce smooth distribution displays." (Antony Unwin et al [in "Graphics of Large Datasets: Visualizing a Million"], 2006)

"The definition of homeomorphism was motivated by the idea of preserving the general shape or configuration of a geometric figure. Since path components are significant characteristics of a space, it is certainly reasonable that a homeomorphism will preserve the decomposition of a space into path components. […] Suppose we are given two geometric figures that we suspect are not topologically equivalent. If both of the figures are path-connected, counting components will not distinguish the spaces. However, we might be able to remove a special subset of one of the figures and count the number of components of the remainder. If no comparable set can be removed from the other space to leave the same number of components, we will then know that the two spaces are not homeomorphic." (Robert Messer & Philip Straffin, "Topology Now!", 2006)

"[myth:] Counting can be done without error. Usually, the counted number is an integer and therefore without (rounding) error. However, the best estimate of a scientifically relevant value obtained by counting will always have an error. These errors can be very small in cases of consecutive counting, in particular of regular events, e.g., when measuring frequencies." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"Euclid sharply distinguished between number and magnitude, associating the former with the operation of counting and the latter with a line segment. So, for Euclid, only integers were numbers; even the notion of fractions as numbers had not yet been conceived of. He represented a whole number n by a line segment that was n times the chosen unit line segment. However, the opposite procedure of distinguishing all line segments by labeling them with numerals representing counting numbers was not possible. Obviously, this one-way correspondence of counting number with magnitude implies that the latter concept was more general than the former. The sharp distinction between counting number and magnitude, made by Euclid, was an impediment to the development of the concept of number." (Venzo de Sabbata & Bidyut K Datta, "Geometric Algebra and Applications to Physics", 2007)

"In the binary digital world of computers, all information is reduced to sequences of zeros and ones. But there’s a space between zero and one, between the way the machine counts and thinks and the way we count and think." (Scott Rosenberg, "Dreaming in Code", 2007

"A little ingenuity is involved, but once a couple of tricks are learnt, it is not hard to show many sets of numbers are countable, which is the term we use to mean that the set can be listed in the same fashion as the counting numbers. Otherwise a set is called uncountable." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"Mathematicians call them twin primes: pairs of prime numbers that are close to each other, almost neighbors, but between them there is always an even number that prevents them from truly touching. […] If you go on counting, you discover that these pairs gradually become rarer, lost in that silent, measured space made only of ciphers. You develop a distressing presentiment that the pairs encountered up until that point were accidental, that solitude is the true destiny. Then, just when you’re about to surrender, you come across another pair of twins, clutching each other tightly." (Paolo Giordano,"The Solitude of prime numbers", 2008)

"The rationals therefore also form a countable set, as do the euclidean numbers, and indeed if we consider the set of all numbers that arise from the rationals through taking roots of any order, the collection produced is still countable. We can even go beyond this: the collection of all algebraic numbers, which are those that are solutions of ordinary polynomial equations∗ form a collection that can, in principle, be arrayed in an infinite list: that is to say it is possible, with a little more crafty argument, to describe a systematic listing that sweeps them all out." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"There are various ways in which one can try to define combinatorics. None is satisfactory on its own, but together they give some idea of what the subject is like. A first definition is that combinatorics is about counting things. [...] Combinatorics is sometimes called ‘discrete mathematics’ because it is concerned with ‘discrete’ as opposed to ‘continuous’ structures. Roughly speaking, an object is discrete if it consists of points that are isolated from each other and continuous if you can move from one point to another without making sudden jumps. [...] There is a close affinity between combinatorics and theoretical computer science (which deals with the quintessentially discrete structure of sequences of 0s and 1s), and combinatorics is sometimes contrasted with analysis, though in fact there are several connections between the two. A third definition is that combinatorics is concerned with mathematical structures that have ‘few constraints’. This idea helps to explain why number theory, despite the fact that it studies (among other things) the distinctly discrete set of all positive integers, is not considered a branch of combinatorics." (Timothy Gowers, June Barrow-Green & Imre Leader, "The Princeton Companion to Mathematics", 2008)

"The problem of identifying the subset of good moves is much more complicated than simply counting the total number of possibilities and falls completely into the domain of strategy and tactics of chess as a game." (Diego Rasskin-Gutman, "Chess Metaphors: Artificial Intelligence and the Human Mind", 2009)

On Counting (1975-1989)

"Numbers are not just counters; they are elements in a system." (Scott Buchanan,"Poetry and Mathematics", 1975)

"Concepts form the basis for any science. These are ideas, usually somewhat vague" (especially when first encountered), which often defy really adequate definition. The meaning of a new concept can seldom be grasped from reading a one-paragraph discussion. There must be time to become accustomed to the concept, to investigate it with prior knowledge, and to associate it with personal experience. Inability to work with details of a new subject can often be traced to inadequate understanding of its basic concepts." (William C Reynolds & Harry C Perkins, "Engineering Thermodynamics", 1977)

"Numbers are the product of counting. Quantities are the product of measurement. This means that numbers can conceivably be accurate because there is a discontinuity between each integer and the next. Between two and three there is a jump. In the case of quantity there is no such jump, and because jump is missing in the world of quantity it is impossible for any quantity to be exact. You can have exactly three tomatoes. You can never have exactly three gallons of water. Always quantity is approximate." (Gregory Bateson, "Number is Different from Quantity", CoEvolution Quarterly, 1978)

"Automation is certainly one way to improve the leverage of all types of work. Having machines to help them, human beings can create more output. But in both widget manufacturing and administrative work, something else can also increase the productivity of the black box. This is called work simplification. To get leverage this way, you first need to create a flow chart of the production process as it exists. Every single step must be shown on it; no step should be omitted in order to pretty things up on paper. Second, count the number of steps in the flow chart so that you know how many you started with. Third, set a rough target for reduction of the number of steps." (Andrew S Grove, "High Output Management", 1983)

"Combinatorics can be classified into three types: enumerative, existential, and constructive. Enumerative combinatorics deals with the counting of combinatorial objects. Existential combinatorics studies the existence or nonexistence of combinatorial configurations. Constructive combinatorics deals with methods for actually finding specific configurations" (as opposed to merely demonstrating their existence theoretically). [...] In constructive combinatorics, the problem is usually one of finding a solution efficiently, [...] using a reasonable length of time." (George Pólya, Robert E Tarjan & Donald R Woods, "Notes on Introductory Combinatorics", 1983)

"The logarithm is an extremely powerful and useful tool for graphical data presentation. One reason is that logarithms turn ratios into differences, and for many sets of data, it is natural to think in terms of ratios. […] Another reason for the power of logarithms is resolution. Data that are amounts or counts are often very skewed to the right; on graphs of such data, there are a few large values that take up most of the scale and the majority of the points are squashed into a small region of the scale with no resolution." (William S. Cleveland, "Graphical Methods for Data Presentation: Full Scale Breaks, Dot Charts, and Multibased Logging", The American Statistician Vol. 38 (4) 1984)

"Combinatorics is an honest subject. No adèles, no sigma-algebras. You count balls in a box, and you either have the right number or you haven’t. You get the feeling that the result you have discovered is forever, because it’s concrete. Other branches of mathematics are not so clear-cut. Functional analysis of infinite-dimensional spaces is never fully convincing: you don’t get a feeling of having done an honest day’s work. Don’t get the wrong idea - combinatorics is not just putting balls into boxes. Counting finite sets can be a highbrow undertaking, with sophisticated techniques." (Gian-Carlo Rota, "Mathematics, Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence", Los Alamos Science No. 12, 1985)

"Recognition of the idea that a programming language should have a precise mathematical meaning or semantics dates from the early 1960s. The mathematics provides a secure, unambiguous, precise and stable specification of the language to serve as an agreed interface between its users and its implementors. Furthermore, it gives the only reliable grounds for a claim that different implementations are implementations of the same language. So mathematical semantics are as essential to the objective of language standardisation as measurement and counting are to the standardisation of nuts and bolts." (C Anthony R Hoare, "Communicating Sequential Processes", 1985)

"[zero is] A mysterious number, which started life as a space on a counting board, turned into a written notice that a space was present, that is to say that something was absent, then confused medieval mathematicians who could not decide whether it was really a number or not, and achieved its highest status in modern abstract mathematics in which numbers are defined anyway only by their properties, and the properties of zero are at least as clear, and rather more substantial, than those of many other numbers." (David Wells, "The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Numbers", 1986)

"Indeed, it is hard to see how mathematics could exist without the notion of infinity, for the very first thing a child learns about mathematics - how to count - is based on the tacit assumption that every integer has a successor. The notion of a straight line, so fundamental in geometry, is based on a similar assumption - that we can, at least in principle, extend a line indefinitely in both directions. Even in such seemingly 'finite' branches of mathematics as probability, the notion of infinity plays a subtle role: when we toss a coin ten times, we may get five 'heads' and five 'tails', or we may get six 'heads' and four 'tails', or in fact any other outcome; but when we say that the probability of getting 'heads' or 'tails' is even, we tacitly assume that an infinite number of tosses would produce an equal outcome." (Eli Maor, "To Infinity and Beyond: A Cultural History of the Infinite", 1987)

On Counting (1950-1974)

"Statistical method consists of two main operations; counting and analysis. [...] The statistician has no use for information that cannot be expressed numerically, nor generally speaking, is he interested in isolated events or examples. The term 'data  is itself plural and the statistician is concerned with the analysis of aggregates. " (Alfred R Ilersic, "Statistics", 1959)

"We are terribly clever people, we moderns: we bend Nature to our will in countless ways. We move mountains, we make caves, fly at speeds no other organism can achieve and tap the power of the atom. We are terribly clever. The essentially religious feeling of subserviency to a power greater than ourselves comes hard to us clever people. But by our intelligence we are now beginning to make out the limits of our cleverness, the impotence principles that say what can and cannot be. In an operational sense, we are experiencing a return to a religious orientation toward the world." (Garrett Hardin, "Nature and Man’s Fate", 1959)

"[Statistics] is concerned with things we can count. In so far as things, persons, are unique or ill-defi ned, statistics are meaningless and statisticians silenced; in so far as things are similar and definite - so many workers over 25, so many nuts and bolts made during December - they can be counted and new statistical facts are born." (Maurice S Bartlett, "Essays on Probability and Statistics", 1962)

"Statistics is the branch of scientific method which deals with the data obtained by counting or measuring the properties of populations of natural phenomena." (Sir Maurice G Kendall & Alan Stuart,"The Advanced Theory of Statistics", 1963)

"A set is countable if it is either finite or its members can be arranged in an infinite sequence; or, what is the same, there is a 1-1 map from the set into the positive integers.(Richard L Bishop & Samuel I Goldberg, "Tensor Analysis on Manifolds", 1968)

"Broadly speaking combinatorial analysis is now taught in two parts which I will label: The first classical, the second important. Classical combinatorics is concerned with counting problems. [...] As a mathematician, I like classical combinatorics. It is full of interesting devices: permutations, combinations, generating functions, amusing identities, etc. Relevant, it is not, except as a possible supplement to a basic course in probability. [...] Classical combinatorics is sometimes useful in preventing people from using an exhaustive procedure on the computer such as listing all combinations or examining all the cases. [...] The part of combinatorial analysis which I have labeled ‘important’ is concerned with selecting the best combination out of all the combinations. This is what linear programming is all about." (George B Dantzig, "On the relation of operations research to mathematics", [panel talk before AMS], 1971)

"For a long time the aim of combinatorial analysis was to count the different ways of arranging objects under given circumstances. Hence, many of the traditional problems of analysis or geometry which are concerned at a certain moment with finite structures, have a combinatorial character. Today, combinatorial analysis is also relevant to problems of existence, estimation and structuration, like all other parts of mathematics, but exclusively for finite sets." (Louis Comtet, "Advanced Combinatorics", 1974)

"Science gets most of its information by the process of reductionism, exploring the details, then the details of the details, until all the smallest bits of the structure, or the smallest parts of the mechanism, are laid out for counting and scrutiny. Only when this is done can the investigation be extended to encompass the whole organism or the entire system. So we say. Sometimes it seems that we take a loss, working this way." (Lewis Thomas, "The Medusa and the Snail: More Notes of a Biology Watcher", 1974)

On Counting (1900-1924)

"Great numbers are not counted correctly to a unit, they are estimated; and we might perhaps point to this as a division between arithmetic and statistics, that whereas arithmetic attains exactness, statistics deals with estimates, sometimes very accurate, and very often sufficiently so for their purpose, but never mathematically exact." (Arthur L Bowley, "Elements of Statistics", 1901)

"[…] statistics is the science of the measurement of the social organism, regarded as a whole, in all its manifestations." (Sir Arthur L Bowley,"Elements of Statistics", 1901)

"Statistics may rightly be called the science of averages. […] Great numbers and the averages resulting from them, such as we always obtain in measuring social phenomena, have great inertia. […] It is this constancy of great numbers that makes statistical measurement possible. It is to great numbers that statistical measurement chiefly applies." (Sir Arthur L Bowley,"Elements of Statistics", 1901)

"Statistics may, for instance, be called the science of counting. Counting appears at first sight to be a very simple operation, which any one can perform or which can be done automatically; but, as a matter of fact, when we come to large numbers, e.g., the population of the United Kingdom, counting is by no means easy, or within the power of an individual; limits of time and place alone prevent it being so carried out, and in no way can absolute accuracy be obtained when the numbers surpass certain limits." (Sir Arthur L Bowley,"Elements of Statistics", 1901)

"Everyone knows what a curve is, until he has studied enough mathematics to become confused through the countless number of possible exceptions. […] A curve is the totality of points, whose coordinates are functions of a parameter which may be differentiated as often as may be required." (Felix Klein, "Elementar Mathematik vom hoheren Standpunkte aus" Vol. 2, 1909)

"It is well to notice in this connection [the mutual relations between the results of counting and measuring] that a natural law, in the statement of which measurable magnitudes occur, can only be understood to hold in nature with a certain degree of approximation; indeed natural laws as a rule are not proof against sufficient refinement of the measuring tools." (Luitzen E J Brouwer, "Intuitionism and Formalism", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 20, 1913)

On Counting (-1899)

"The objection we are dealing with argues from the standpoint of an agent that presupposes time and acts in time, but did not institute time. Hence the question about 'why God's eternal will produces an effect now and and not earlier' presupposes that time exists; for 'now' and 'earlier' are segments of time. With regard to the universal production of things, among which time is also to be counted, we should not ask, 'Why now and not earlier?' Rather we should ask: 'Why did God wish this much time to intervene?' And this depends on the divine will, which is perfectly free to assign this or any other quantity to time. The same may be noted with respect to the dimensional quantity of the world. No one asks why God located the material world in such and such a place rather than higher up or lower down or in some other position; for there is no place outside the world. The fact that God portioned out so much quantity to the world that no part of it would be beyond the place occupied in some other locality, depends on the divine will. However, although there was no time prior to the world and no place outside the world, we speak as if there were. Thus we say that before the world existed there was nothing except God, and that there is no body lying outside the world. But in thus speaking of 'before' and 'outside,' we have in mind nothing but time and place as they exist in our imagination." (Thomas Aquinas, "Compendium Theologiae" ["Compendium of Theology"], cca. 1265 [unfinished])

"The existence of an actual infinite multitude is impossible. For any set of things one considers must be a specific set. And sets of things are specified by the number of things in them. Now no number is infinite, for number results from counting through a set of units. So no set of things can actually be inherently unlimited, nor can it happen to be unlimited." (St. Thomas Aquinas, "Summa Theologica", cca. 1266-1273)

"I could be bounded in a nutshell, and count myself a king of infinite space." (William Shakespeare,"Hamlet", cca. 1600)

"A problem was posed to me about an island in the city of Königsberg, surrounded by a river spanned by seven bridges, and I was asked whether someone could traverse the separate bridges in a connected walk in such a way that each bridge is crossed only once. I was informed that hitherto no-one had demonstrated the possibility of doing this, or shown that it is impossible. This question is so banal, but seemed to me worthy of attention in that not geometry, nor algebra, nor even the art of counting was sufficient to solve it. In view of this, it occurred to me to wonder whether it belonged to the geometry of position, which Leibniz had once so much longed for. And so, after some deliberation, I obtained a simple, yet completely established, rule with whose help one can immediately decide for all examples of this kind, with any number of bridges in any arrangement, whether or not such a round trip is possible […]" (Leonard Euler, [letter to Giovanni Marinoni] 1736)

"Our general arithmetic, so far surpassing in extent the geometry of the ancients, is entirely the creation of modern times. Starting originally from the notion of absolute integers, it has gradually enlarged its domain. To integers have been added fractions, to rational quantities the irrational, to positive the negative .and to the real the imaginary. This advance, however, has always been made at first with timorous and hesitating step. The early algebraists called the negative roots of equations false roots, and these are indeed so when the problem to which they relate has been stated in such a form that the character of the quantity sought allows of no opposite. But just as in general arithmetic no one would hesitate to admit fractions, although there are so many countable things where a fraction has no meaning, so we ought not to deny to, negative numbers the rights accorded to positive simply because innumerable things allow no opposite. The reality of negative numbers is sufficiently justified since in innumerable other cases they find an adequate substratum. This has long been admitted, but the imaginary quantities - formerly and occasionally now, though improperly, called impossible-as opposed to real quantities are still rather tolerated than fully naturalized, and appear more like an empty play upon symbols to which a thinkable substratum is denied unhesitatingly by those who would not depreciate the rich contribution which this play upon symbols has made to the treasure of the relations of real quantities." (Carl F Gauss, "Theoria residuorum biquadraticorum, Commentatio secunda", Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen, 1831)

"God puts his finger in the other scale, And up we bounce, a bubble. Nought is great Nor small, with God; for none but he can make The atom imperceptible, and none But he can make a world; he counts the orbs, He counts the atoms of the universe, And makes both equal; both are infinite. " (Philip James Bailey, "Festus", 1845)

"Therefore both multitudes have one and the same plurality, as one can also say, equal plurality. Obviously this conclusion becomes void as soon as the multitude of things in A is an infinite multitude, for now not only do we never reach, by counting, the last thing in A, but rather, by virtue of the definition of an infinite multitude, in itself there is no last thing in A, i.e. however many have already been designated, there are always others to designate." (Bernard Bolzano, "Paradoxien des Unedlichen" ["Paradoxes of the Infinite"], 1851)

"The dominant principle which characterizes my graphic tables and my figurative maps is to make immediately appreciable to the eye, as much as possible, the proportions of numeric results. […] Not only do my maps speak, but even more, they count, they calculate by the eye." (Chatles D Minard, "Des tableaux graphiques et des cartes figuratives", 1862)

"I regard the whole of arithmetic as a necessary, or at least natural, consequence of the simplest arithmetical act, that of counting, and counting itself as nothing else than the successive creation of the infinite series of positive integers in which each individual is defined by the one immediately preceding […]" (Richard Dedekind,"On Continuity and Irrational Numbers", 1872)

"Definite portions of a manifoldness, distinguished by a mark or by a boundary, are called Quanta. Their comparison with regard to quantity is accomplished in the case of discrete magnitudes by counting, in the case of continuous magnitudes by measuring. Measure consists in the superposition of the magnitudes to be compared; it therefore requires a means of using one magnitude as the standard for another. In the absence of this, two magnitudes can only be compared when one is a part of the other; in which case also we can only determine the more or less and not the how much. The researches which can in this case be instituted about them form a general division of the science of magnitude in which magnitudes are regarded not as existing independently of position and not as expressible in terms of a unit, but as regions in a manifoldness." (Bernhard Riemann, "On the Hypotheses which lie at the Bases of Geometry", 1873)

"Every word instantly becomes a concept precisely insofar as it is not supposed to serve as a reminder of the unique and entirely individual original experience to which it owes its origin; but rather, a word becomes a concept insofar as it simultaneously has to fit countless more or less similar cases - which means, purely and simply, cases which are never equal and thus altogether unequal. Every concept arises from the equation of unequal things. Just as it is certain that one leaf is never totally the same as another, so it is certain that the concept 'leaf' is formed by arbitrarily discarding these individual differences and by forgetting the distinguishing aspects." (Friedrich Nietzsche, "On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense", 1873)

Peter M Higgins - Collected Quotes

"A little ingenuity is involved, but once a couple of tricks are learnt, it is not hard to show many sets of numbers are countable, which is the term we use to mean that the set can be listed in the same fashion as the counting numbers. Otherwise a set is called uncountable." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"Algebraic symbols carry a universality of interpretation that allows them to be manipulated in a way that words cannot. Indeed, this was the key breakthrough that allowed mathematics to flourish in a way that was not possible until the advent of algebra. All higher mathematics relies on constant use of algebraic manipulation and would be impossible without it." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"For mathematics to be applicable in any sense at all we need to be able to do something with it. In practice this nearly always means developing forms of calculation, and this imperative channels its practitioners into algebraic manipulations of one form or another and ultimately into producing numbers. To the modern mind, this might seem natural and inevitable." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"If we refused to use complex numbers out of stubbornness disguised as some kind of bogus philosophical objection, a solution to a whole range of important problems would remain forever out of reach.[...] The plane of the complex numbers is the natural arena of discourse for much if not most of mathematics." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"Nonetheless, some hesitation persisted. After all, the very word imaginary betrays ambivalence, and suggests that in our heart of hearts we do not believe these numbers exist. On the other hand, by calling every number representable by a decimal expansion real, we are making the psychological distinction more stark. Indeed the adjective imaginary is a somewhat unfortunate one - although an intriguing name, some students’ perceptions are so colored by the word that they consequently fail to come to grips with the idea." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"Perhaps the greatest legacy of the solution of the cubic was the arrival, without invitation, of the imaginary number i into the world of mathematics." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"Since they represent so natural a sequence, it is almost irresistible to search for patterns among the primes. There are however no genuinely useful formulas for prime numbers. That is to say there is no rule that allows you to generate all prime numbers or even to calculate a sequence that consists entirely of different primes." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"The beauty of the complex plane is that we may finally carry out all our mathematical work in a single number arena. However, although there may be no pressing mathematical difficulty that is driving us further, we can ask the question whether or not it is possible to go beyond the complex plane into some larger realm of number." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"The importance of continued fractions in approximation of irrationals by rationals is that the so called convergents of the fraction, which are the rational approximations of the original number that result from truncating the representation at some point and working out the corresponding rational number, are the best approximation possible in the sense that any better approximation will have a larger denominator than that of the convergents." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"The rationals therefore also form a countable set, as do the euclidean numbers, and indeed if we consider the set of all numbers that arise from the rationals through taking roots of any order, the collection produced is still countable. We can even go beyond this: the collection of all algebraic numbers, which are those that are solutions of ordinary polynomial equations∗ form a collection that can, in principle, be arrayed in an infinite list: that is to say it is possible, with a little more crafty argument, to describe a systematic listing that sweeps them all out." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"The simple algebraic numbers, like √2, seem closest in nature to the rationals, while we might expect that non-algebraic numbers, the transcedentals, to live apart and not to have close rational neighbors. Surprisingly, the opposite is true. On the one hand, it can be proved that any irrational number that can be well-approximated by rationals (in a sense that can be made precise) must be transcendental. Indeed this affords one of the standard techniques for showing that a number is transcendental." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"[...] the use of complex numbers reveals a connection between the exponential, or power function and the seemingly unrelated trigonometric functions. Without passing through the portal offered by the square root of minus one, the connection may be glimpsed, but not understood. The so-called hyperbolic functions arise from taking what are known as the even and odd parts of the exponential function."  (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"[...] transcendental numbers, those numbers that lie beyond those that arise through euclidean geometry and ordinary algebraic equations. [...] The transcendentals are the numbers that fill the huge void between the more familiar algebraic numbers and the collection of all decimal expansions: to use an astronomical comparison, the transcendentals are the dark matter of the number world." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"Transcendental numbers then are numerous but exceedingly slippery. As a rule of thumb, a number that arises in mathematics is almost always transcendental unless it is obvious that it is not. However, showing that a particular number is transcendental can be exceedingly difficult. Number theory throws up endless problems of this kind where everyone feels sure what the answer must be but at the same time no-one has any real idea how it could ever by proved." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

The Infinite and Its Difficulties II

“The existence of an actual infinite multitude is impossible. For any set of things one considers must be a specific set. And sets of things are specified by the number of things in them. Now no number is infinite, for number results from counting through a set of units. So no set of things can actually be inherently unlimited, nor can it happen to be unlimited.” (Thomas Aquinas, “Summa theologia”, 13th century) 

"[Paradoxes of the infinite arise] only when we attempt, with our finite minds, to discuss the infinite, assigning to it those properties which we give to the finite and limited; but this […] is wrong, for we cannot speak of infinite quantities as being the one greater or less than or equal to another.” (Galileo Galilei, "Two New Sciences", 1638)

“Infinities and indivisibles transcend our finite understanding, the former on account of their magnitude, the latter because of their smallness; Imagine what they are when combined. In spite of this men cannot refrain from discussing them.” (Galileo Galilei, "Two New Sciences", 1638)

“Whatever we imagine is finite. Therefore, there is no idea or conception of anything we call finite. No man can have in his mind an image of infinite magnitude; nor conceive infinite swiftness, infinite time, or infinite force, or inmate power.” (Thomas Hobbes, "Of Man", 1658)

“Man is equally incapable of seeing the nothingness from which he emerges and the infinity in which he is engulfed.” (Blaise Pascal, "Pensées", 1670)

“Often I have considered the fact that most of the difficulties which block the progress of students trying to learn analysis stem from this: that although they understand little of ordinary algebra, still they attempt this more subtle art. From this it follows not only that they remain on the fringes, but in addition they entertain strange ideas about the concept of the infinite, which they must try to use." (Leonhard Euler, "Introduction to Analysis of the Infinite", 1748)

 “A great deal of misunderstanding is avoided if it be remembered that the terms infinity, infinite, zero, infinitesimal must be interpreted in connexion with their context, and admit a variety of meanings according to the way in which they are defined.” (George B Mathews, “Theory of Numbers”, 1892)

“Like children who are not permitted to do certain things, we are not permitted by nature to think in terms of infinity.” (Robert Tuttle Morris, “Microbes and Men”, 1916)

 "The infinite in mathematics is always unruly unless it is properly treated."  (Edward Kasner & James Newman, “Mathematics and the Imagination”, 1940)

“I am incapable of conceiving infinity, and yet I do not accept finity.” (Simone de Beauvoir, “La Vieillesse”, 1970)

5 Books 10 Quotes V: On Complex Numbers IV

Ian Stewart, "Why Beauty Is Truth: The History of Symmetry", 2007
	“A complex number is just a pair of real numbers, manipulated according to a short list of simple rules. Since a pair of real numbers is surely just as ‘real’ as a single real number, real and complex numbers are equally closely related to reality, and ‘imaginary’ is misleading.”
“The complex numbers extend the real numbers by throwing in a new kind of number, the square root of minus one. But the price we pay for being able to take square roots of negative numbers is the loss of order. The complex numbers are a complete system but are spread out across a plane rather than aligned in a single orderly sequence.”
David Mumford, Caroline Series & David Wright, "Indra’s Pearls: The Vision of Felix Klein", 2002
	“Complex numbers are really not as complex as you might expect from their name, particularly if we think of them in terms of the underlying two dimensional geometry which they describe. Perhaps it would have been better to call them 'nature's numbers'. Behind complex numbers is a wonderful synthesis between two dimensional geometry and an elegant arithmetic in which every polynomial equation has a solution.”
“Ordinary numbers have immediate connection to the world around us; they are used to count and measure every sort of thing. Adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing all have simple interpretations in terms of the objects being counted and measured. When we pass to complex numbers, though, the arithmetic takes on a life of its own. Since -1 has no square root, we decided to create a new number game which supplies the missing piece. By adding in just this one new element √-1. we created a whole new world in which everything arithmetical, miraculously, works out just fine.”
Paul J Nahin, "An Imaginary Tale: The History of √-1", 1998
	“The discovery of complex numbers was the last in a sequence of discoveries that gradually filled in the set of all numbers, starting with the positive integers (finger counting) and then expanding to include the positive rationals and irrational reals, negatives, and then finally the complex.”
“When we try to take the square root of -1 (a real number), for example, we suddenly leave the real numbers, and so the reals are not complete with respect to the square root operation. We don’t have to be concerned that something like that will happen with the complex numbers, however, and we won’t have to invent even more exotic numbers (the ‘really complex’!) Complex numbers are everything there is in the two-dimensional plane.”
Jerry R Muir Jr., “Complex Analysis: A Modern First Course in Function Theory”, 2015
	“Complex analysis should never be underestimated as simply being calculus with complex numbers in place of real numbers and is distinguished from being so at every possible opportunity.”
“The upgrade from the real numbers to the complex numbers has both algebraic and analytic motivation. The real numbers are not algebraically complete, meaning there are polynomial equations such as x^2 = −1 with no solutions. The incorporation of  √-1 […] is a direct response to this.”
Tobias Dantzig, “Number: The Language of Science”, 1930
	“[…] extensions beyond the complex number domain are possible only at the expense of the principle of permanence. The complex number domain is the last frontier of this principle. Beyond this either the commutativity of the operations or the rôle which zero plays in arithmetic must be sacrificed.”
“And so it was that the complex number, which had its origin in a symbol for a fiction, ended by becoming an indispensable tool for the formulation of mathematical ideas, a powerful instrument for the solution of intricate problems, a means for tracing kinships between remote mathematical disciplines.” Previous Post <<||>> Next Post See also: More Quotes on Complex Numbers III More Quotes on Complex Numbers II More Quotes on Complex Numbers I Complex Numbers

On Numbers: The Infinity in Numbers

“When the consequences of either assumption are the same, we should always assume that things are finite rather than infinite in number, since in things constituted by nature that which is infinite and that which is better ought, if possible, to be present rather than the reverse […]” (Aristotle)

“But of all other ideas, it is number, which I think furnishes us with the clearest and most distinct idea of infinity we are capable of.” (John Locke)

"For any number there exists a corresponding even number which is its double. Hence the number of all numbers is not greater than the number of even numbers, that is, the whole is not greater than the part." (Gottfried W Leibniz)

“I regard the whole of arithmetic as a necessary, or at least natural, consequence of the simplest arithmetical act, that of counting, and counting itself as nothing else than the successive creation of the infinite series of positive integers in which each individual is defined by the one immediately preceding […]” (Richard Dedekind, “On Continuity and Irrational Numbers”, 1872)

 “If you can take away some of the terms of a collection, without diminishing the number of terms, then there is an infinite number of terms in the collection.” (Bertrand Russell)

"The prototype of all infinite processes is repetition. […] Our very concept of the infinite derives from the notion that what has been said or done once can always be repeated.” (Tobias Dantzig, “Number: The Language of Science”, 1930)

“The sequence of numbers which grows beyond any stage already reached by passing to the next number is a manifold of possibilities open towards infinity, it remains forever in the status of creation, but is not a closed realm of things existing in themselves. That we blindly converted one into the other is the true source of our difficulties […]” (Hermann Weyl, “Mathematics and Logic”, 1946)

"[…] infinity is not a large number or any kind of number at all; at least of the sort we think of when we say 'number'. It certainly isn't the largest number that could exist, for there isn't any such thing." (Isaac Asimov)

"Each act of creation could be symbolized as a particular product of infinity and zero. From each such product could emerge a particular entity of which the appropriate symbol was a particular number." (Srinivasa Ramanujan)

“Mathematics is the only infinite human activity. It is conceivable that humanity could eventually learn everything in physics or biology. But humanity certainly won't ever be able to find out everything in mathematics, because the subject is infinite. Numbers themselves are infinite.” (Paul Erdős)

On Numbers: Defining Numbers

“Number is the bond of the eternal continuance of things.” (Plato)

“Measure, time and number are nothing but modes of thought or rather of imagination.” (Baruch Spinoza, [Letter to Ludvicus Meyer] 1663)

"[…] if number is merely the product of our mind, space has a reality outside our mind whose laws we cannot a priori completely prescribe" (Carl F Gauss, 1830)

"Numbers are intellectual witnesses that belong only to mankind, and by whose means we can achieve an understanding of words." (Honore de Balzac)

"Numbers constitute the only universal language." (Nathanael West, “Miss Lonelyhearts”, 1933)

“[…] there are terms which cannot be defined, such as number and quantity. Any attempt at a definition would only throw difficulty in the student’s way, which is already done in geometry by the attempts at an explanation of the terms point, straight line, and others, which are to be found in treatise on that subject.” (Augustus de Morgan, “On the Study and Difficulties of Mathematics”, 1943)

“Numbers have neither substance, nor meaning, nor qualities. They are nothing but marks, and all that is in them we have put into them by the simple rule of straight succession.” (Hermann Weyl, “Mathematics and the Laws of Nature”, 1959)

“[…] numbers are free creations of the human mind; they serve as a means of apprehending more easily and more sharply the difference of things.” (Richard Dedekind, “Essays on the Theory of Numbers”, 1963)

“Numbers are not just counters; they are elements in a system.” (Scott Buchanan, “Poetry and Mathematics”, 1975)

“Number is therefore the most primitive instrument of bringing an unconscious awareness of order into consciousness.” (Marie-Louise von Frany, “Creation Myths”, 1995)

Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

On Statistics: Some Historical Definitions (1901-1950)

"[…] statistics is the science of the measurement of the social organism, regarded as a whole, in all its manifestations." (Sir Arthur L Bowley, "Elements of Statistics", 1901)

"Statistics may rightly be called the science of averages. […] Great numbers and the averages resulting from them, such as we always obtain in measuring social phenomena, have great inertia. […] It is this constancy of great numbers that makes statistical measurement possible. It is to great numbers that statistical measurement chiefly applies." (Sir Arthur L Bowley, "Elements of Statistics", 1901)

"Statistics may, for instance, be called the science of counting. Counting appears at first sight to be a very simple operation, which any one can perform or which can be done automatically; but, as a matter of fact, when we come to large numbers, e.g., the population of the United Kingdom, counting is by no means easy, or within the power of an individual; limits of time and place alone prevent it being so carried out, and in no way can absolute accuracy be obtained when the numbers surpass certain limits." (Sir Arthur L Bowley, "Elements of Statistics", 1901)

"[...] statistics is the science that, through calculation, leads to an understanding of the characteristics of human societies, and its purpose is the study of masses through the enumeration of the units that compose them." (Armand Julin, "Summary for a Course of Statistics, General and Applied, 1910)

"The science of Statistics is the method of judging collective, natural or social phenomenon from the results obtained from the analysis or enumeration or collection of estimates." (Willford I King, "The Elements of Statistical Method", 1912)

"By Statistics we mean aggregate of facts affected to a marked extent by multiplicity of factors [...] and placed in relation to each other." (Horace Secrist, "An Introduction to Statistical Methods", 1917)

"Statistics may be defined as numerical statements of facts by means of which large aggregates are analyzed, the relations of individual units to their groups are ascertained, comparisons are made between groups, and continuous records are maintained for comparative purposes." (Melvin T Copeland. "Statistical Methods" [in: Harvard Business Studies, Vol. III, Ed. by Melvin T Copeland, 1917])

"Statistics may be regarded as (i) the study of populations, (ii) as the study of variation, and (iii) as the study of methods of the reduction of data." (Sir Ronald A Fisher, "Statistical Methods for Research Worker", 1925)

"Statistics is a scientific discipline concerned with collection, analysis, and interpretation of data obtained from observation or experiment. The subject has a coherent structure based on the theory of Probability and includes many different procedures which contribute to research and development throughout the whole of Science and Technology." (Egon Pearson, 1936)

"[Statistics] is both a science and an art. It is a science in that its methods are basically systematic and have general application; and an art in that their successful application depends to a considerable degree on the skill and special experience of the statistician, and on his knowledge of the field of application, e.g. economics." (Leonard H C Tippett, "Statistics", 1943)

"Statistics is the branch of scientific method which deals with the data obtained by counting or measuring the properties of populations of natural phenomena. In this definition 'natural phenomena' includes all the happenings of the external world, whether human or not " (Sir Maurice G Kendall, "Advanced Theory of Statistics", Vol. 1, 1943)

"To some people, statistics is ‘quartered pies, cute little battleships and tapering rows of sturdy soldiers in diversified uniforms’. To others, it is columns and columns of numerical facts. Many regard it as a branch of economics. The beginning student of the subject considers it to be largely mathematics." (The Editors, "Statistics, The Physical Sciences and Engineering", The American Statistician, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1948) [Link]

Further definitions:
1800-1900
1951-2000
2001- …

On Statistics: What is Statistics?

“Statistics is a science which ought to be honourable, the basis of many most important sciences; but it is not to be carried on by steam, this science, any more than others are; a wise hand is requisite for carrying it on. Conclusive facts are inseparable from unconclusive except by a head that already understands and knows.” (Thomas Carlyle, “Critical and Miscellaneous Essays”, 1838)

“To some people, statistics is ‘quartered pies, cute little battleships and tapering rows of sturdy soldiers in diversified uniforms’. To others, it is columns and columns of numerical facts. Many regard it as a branch of economics. The beginning student of the subject considers it to be largely mathematics.” (The Editors, “Statistics, The Physical Sciences and Engineering”, The American Statistician, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1948)

"Statistics is that branch of mathematics which deals with the accumulation and analysis of quantitative data." (David B MacNeil, "Modern Mathematics for the Practical Man", 1963)

“Statistics is the branch of scientific method which deals with the data obtained by counting or measuring the properties of populations of natural phenomena.” (Sir Maurice G Kendall & Alan Stuart, “The Advanced Theory of Statistics”, 1963)

“Statistics may be defined as the discipline concerned with the treatment of numerical data derived from groups of individuals.” (Peter Armitage, “Statistical Methods in Medical Research”, 1971)

“[…] statistics is the science that deals with distributions and proportions in actual (large but finite) classes (also called ‘populations’, ‘aggregates’, ‘ensembles’) of actual things.” (Bas C van Frassen, “The Scientic Image”, 1980)

“We provisionally define statistics as the study of how information should be employed to reflect on, and give guidance for action in, a practical situation involving uncertainty.” (Vic Barnett, “Comparative Statistical Inference” 2nd Ed., 1982)

“[Statistics] is the technology of extracting meaning from data.” (David J Hand, “Statistics: A Very Short Introduction”, 2008)

“[Statistics] is the technology of handling uncertainty.” (David J Hand, “Statistics: A Very Short Introduction”, 2008)

“[…] statistics is the key discipline for predicting the future or for making inferences about the unknown, or for producing convenient summaries of data.” (David J Hand, “Statistics: A Very Short Introduction”, 2008)

“[Statistics: used with a plural verb] facts or data, either numerical or nonnumerical, organized and summarized so as to provide useful and accessible information about a particular subject.” (Neil A Weiss, "Introductory Statistics" 10th Ed., 2017)

“[Statistics: used with a singular verb] the science of organizing and summarizing numerical or nonnumerical information.” (Neil A Weiss, "Introductory Statistics" 10th Ed., 2017)

“Statistics is the science of finding relationships and actionable insights from data.” (Nate Silver)

“Statistics is the science, the art, the philosophy, and the technique of making inferences from the particular to the general.” (John W Tukey)