On Category Theory (2000-)

"What was clearly useful was the use of diagrams to prove certain results either in algebraic topology, homological algebra or algebraic geometry. It is clear that doing category theory, or simply applying category theory, implies manipulating diagrams: constructing the relevant diagrams, chasing arrows by going via various paths in diagrams and showing they are equal, etc. This practice suggests that diagram manipulation, or more generally diagrams, constitutes the natural syntax of category theory and the category-theoretic way of thinking. Thus, if one could develop a formal language based on diagrams and diagrams manipulation, one would have a natural syntactical framework for category theory. However, moving from the informal language of categories which includes diagrams and diagrammatic manipulations to a formal language based on diagrams and diagrammatic manipulations is not entirely obvious." (Jean-Pierre Marquis, "From a Geometrical Point of View: A Study of the History and Philosophy of Category Theory", 2009)

"Category theory has developed classically, beginning with definitions and axioms and proceeding to a long list of theorems. Category theory is not topology (and so will not be described here), but it can be used to understand some of the relationships that exist among classes of topological spaces. It can be used to bring unity to diversity. [...] the theory of categories is not complete, it may not be completable, but it is a step forward in understanding foundational questions in mathematics." (John Tabak, "Beyond Geometry: A new mathematics of space and form", 2011)

"Category theory studies relationships between things and builds on this in various ways: characterising things by what properties they have, finding the pond in which things are the biggest fish, putting things in context, expressing subtle notions of things being ‘more or less the same’." (Eugenia Cheng, "Beyond Infinity: An Expedition to the Outer Limits of Mathematics", 2017)

"In category theory there is always a tension between the idealism and the logistics. There are many structures that naturally want to have infinite dimensions, but that is too impractical, so we try and think about them in the context of just a finite number of dimensions and struggle with the consequences of making these logistics workable."(Eugenia Cheng, "Beyond Infinity: An Expedition to the Outer Limits of Mathematics", 2017)

"This is how category theory arose, as a new piece of maths to study maths. In a way category theory is an ultimate abstraction. To study the world abstractly you use science; to study science abstractly you use maths; to study maths abstractly you use category theory. Each step is a further level of abstraction. But to study category theory abstractly you use category theory." (Eugenia Cheng, "Beyond Infinity: An Expedition to the Outer Limits of Mathematics", 2017)

On Category Theory (1975-1999)

"The point is simply that when explaining the general notion of structure and of particular kinds of structures such as groups, rings, categories, etc., we implicitly presume as understood the ideas of operation and collection." (Solomon Feferman, "Categorical foundations and foundations of category theory", 1975)

"A theory is a category with certain operations (defined up to isomorphism) [...] The notion of theory is thus 'intrinsic', i.e., independent of a particular presentation via formal languages and axiomatic systems. In this sense, categorical logic may be viewed as 'synthetic' or 'intrinsic' logic by opposition to the usual 'analytic', 'formal' logic." (André Joyal & Gonyalo E Reyes, "Forcing and generic models in categorical logic", 1977)

"But the question automatically arises as to exactly why, in introducing ordinary mathematical notions into the theory, one must make a detour through the somewhat opaque notion of discrete category. It is difficult to see how this can be explained except by appeal to the notion of 'unstructured' category, i.e. set." (John L Bell, "Category theory and the foundations of mathematics", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32(4), 1981)

"But this seems to me highly dubious, for it is surely the case that the unstructured notion of class is epistemically prior to any more highly structured notion such as category: in order to understand what a category is, you first have to know what a class is." (John L Bell, "Category theory and the foundations of mathematics", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32(4), 1981)

"[…] it would be technically possible to give a purely category-theoretic account of all mathematical notions expressible within axiomatic set theory, and so formally possible for category theory to serve as a foundation for mathematics insofar as axiomatic set theory does." (John L Bell, "Category theory and the foundations of mathematics", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32(4), 1981)

"It is a remarkable empirical fact that mathematics can be based on set theory. More precisely, all mathematical objects can be coded as sets (in the cumulative hierarchy built by transfinitely iterating the power set operation, starting with the empty set). And all their crucial properties can be proved from the axioms of set theory. (. . . ) At first sight, category theory seems to be an exception to this general phenomenon. It deals with objects, like the categories of sets, of groups etc. that are as big as the whole universe of sets and that therefore do not admit any evident coding as sets. Furthermore, category theory involves constructions, like the functor category, that lead from these large categories to even larger ones. Thus, category theory is not just another field whose set-theoretic foundation can be left as an exercise. An interaction between category theory and set theory arises because there is a real question: What is the appropriate set-theoretic foundation for category theory?" (Andreas Blass, "The interaction between category theory and set theory", 1983)

"We consider forcing over categories as a way of constructing objects by geometric approximation, including a construction of a generic model of a geometric theory as its special case." (Andrej Scedrov, "Forcing and Classifying Topoi", Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society Vol. 48, 1984)

"Symmetries of a geometric object are traditionally described by its automorphism group, which often is an object of the same geometric class (a topological space, an algebraic variety, etc.). Of course, such symmetries are only a particular type of morphisms, so that Klein’s Erlanger program is, in principle, subsumed by the general categorical approach." (Yuri I Manin, "Topics in Noncommutative Geometry", 1991)

"[…] categorical logic is, to a great degree, autonomous, even in matters syntactical. ([203], 54.)" (Michael Makkai, "Generalized sketches as a framework for completeness theorems", Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 115(1), 1997)

☰On Number Theory (2000-)

"The seeming absence of any ascertained organizing principle in the distribution or the succession of the primes had bedeviled mathematicians for centuries and given Number Theory much of its fascination. Here was a great mystery indeed, worthy of the most exalted intelligence: since the primes are the building blocks of the integers and the integers the basis of our logical understanding of the cosmos, how is it possible that their form is not determined by law? Why isn't 'divine geometry' apparent in their case?" (Apostolos Doxiadis, "Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture", 2000)

"Beyond the theory of complex numbers, there is the much greater and grander theory of the functions of a complex variable, as when the complex plane is mapped to the complex plane, complex numbers linking themselves to other complex numbers. It is here that complex differentiation and integration are defined. Every mathematician in his education studies this theory and surrenders to it completely. The experience is like first love." (David Berlinski, "Infinite Ascent: A short history of mathematics", 2005)

"Imaginary numbers are not imaginary and the theory of complex numbers is no more complex than the theory of real numbers." (Mordechai Ben-Ari, "Just a Theory: Exploring the Nature of Science", 2005)

"We divide math up into separate areas (analysis, mechanics, algebra, geometry, electromagnetism, number theory, quantum mechanics, etc.) to clarify the study of each part; but the equally valuable activity of integrating the components into a working whole is all too often neglected. Without it, the stated aim of ‘taking something apart to see how it ticks’ degenerates imperceptibly into ‘taking it apart to ensure it never ticks again’." (Miles Reid & Balazs Szendröi, "Geometry and Topology", 2005)

"Transcendental numbers then are numerous but exceedingly slippery. As a rule of thumb, a number that arises in mathematics is almost always transcendental unless it is obvious that it is not. However, showing that a particular number is transcendental can be exceedingly difficult. Number theory throws up endless problems of this kind where everyone feels sure what the answer must be but at the same time no-one has any real idea how it could ever by proved." (Peter M. Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"There are highly symmetric tiling patterns in hyperbolic geometry. For each of them, we can construct complex functions that repeat the same values on every tile. These are known as modular functions, and they are natural generalisations of elliptic functions. Hyperbolic geometry is a very rich subject, and the range of tiling patterns is much more extensive than it is for the Euclidean plane. So complex analysts started thinking seriously about non-Euclidean geometry. A profound link between analysis and number theory then appeared. Modular functions do for elliptic curves what trigonometric functions do for the circle." (Ian Stewart, "Symmetry: A Very Short Introduction", 2013)

"The significance of Fourier’s theorem to music cannot be overstated: since every periodic vibration produces a musical sound" (provided, of course, that it lies within the audible frequency range), it can be broken down into its harmonic components, and this decomposition is unique; that is, every tone has one, and only one, acoustic spectrum, its harmonic fingerprint. The overtones comprising a musical tone thus play a role somewhat similar to that of the prime numbers in number theory: they are the elementary building blocks from which all sound is made." (Eli Maor, "Music by the Numbers: From Pythagoras to Schoenberg", 2018)

"While number theory looks for patterns in sequences of numbers, dynamical systems actually produce sequences of numbers [...]. The two merge when mathematicians look for number-theoretic patterns hidden in those sequences." (Kelsey Houston-Edwards, "Mathematicians Set Numbers in Motion to Unlock Their Secrets", Quanta Magazine, 2021)

☰On Number Theory (1975-1999)

"The theory of number is the epipoem of mathematics." (Scott Buchanan, "Poetry and Mathematics", 1975)

"[Number theory] produces, without effort, innumerable problems which have a sweet, innocent air about them, tempting flowers; and yet […] number theory swarms with bugs, waiting to bite the tempted flower-lovers who, once bitten, are inspired to excesses of effort!" (Barry Mazur, "Number Theory as Gadfly", The American Mathematical Monthly, Volume 98, 1991)

"[…] number theory […] is a field of almost pristine irrelevance to everything except the wondrous demonstration that pure numbers, no more substantial than Plato’s shadows, conceal magical laws and orders that the human mind can discover after all." (Sharon Begley, "New Answer for an Old Question", Newsweek, 5 July, 1993)

"Number theory [...] is a field of almost pristine irrelevance to everything except the wondrous demonstration that pure numbers, no more substantial than Plato's shadows, conceal magical laws and orders that the human mind can discover after all." (Sharon Begley, "New Answer for an Old Question", Newsweek, 1993)

"At first glance the theory of numbers is deprived of any geometricity. But this is actually not the case. At the contemporary stage of development of computers it has become possible to explain to a wide range of readers that visual geometry helps not only to illustrate some abstract situations from the number theory, but sometimes also to solve new problems." (Anatolij Fomenko, "Visual Geometry and Topology", 1994)

"Modem geometry and topology take a special place in mathematics because many of the objects they deal with are treated using visual methods. […] Each mathematician has his own system of concepts of the intrinsic geometry of his (specific) mathematical world and visual images which he associated with some or other abstract concepts of mathematics (including algebra, number theory, analysis, etc.). It is noteworthy that sometimes one and the same abstraction brings about the same visual picture in different mathematicians, but these pictures born by imagination are in most cases very difficult to represent graphically, so to say, to draw." (Anatolij Fomenko, "Visual Geometry and Topology", 1994)

"Number theory is so difficult, albeit so fascinating, because mathematicians try to examine additive creations under a multiplicative light." (William Dunham, 1994)

"To some extent the beauty of number theory seems to be related to the contradiction between the simplicity of the integers and the complicated structure of the primes, their building blocks. This has always attracted people." (Andreas Knauf, "Number Theory, Dynamical Systems and Statistical Mechanics", 1998)

☰On Number Theory (1950-1974)

"On the basis of what has been proved so far, it remains possible that there may exist (and even be empirically discoverable) a theorem-proving machine which in fact is equivalent to mathematical intuition, but cannot be proved to be so, nor even be proved to yield only correct theorems of finitary number theory." (Kurt Gödel, 1951)

"The theory of numbers is particularly liable to the accusation that some of its problems are the wrong sort of questions to ask. I do not myself think the danger is serious; either a reasonable amount of concentration leads to new ideas or methods of obvious interest, or else one just leaves the problem alone. ‘Perfect numbers’ certainly never did any good, but then they never did any particular harm." (John E Littlewood, "A Mathematician’s Miscellany", 1953)

"The mathematical theory of continuity is based, not on intuition, but on the logically developed theories of number and sets of points." (Carl B Boyer, "The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development", 1959)

"The modern era has uncovered for combinatorics a wide range of fascinating new problems. These have arisen in abstract algebra, topology, the foundations of mathematics, graph theory, game theory, linear programming, and in many other areas. Combinatorics has always been diversified. During our day this diversification has increased manifold. Nor are its many and varied problems successfully attacked in terms of a unified theory. Much of what we have said up to now applies with equal force to the theory of numbers. In fact, combinatorics and number theory are sister disciplines. They share a certain intersection of common knowledge, and each genuinely enriches the other." (Herbert J Ryser, "Combinatorial Mathematics", 1963)

"No branch of number theory is more saturated with mystery than the study of prime numbers: those exasperating, unruly integerst hat refuse to be divided evenly by any integers except themselves and 1. Some problems concerning primes are so simple that a child can understand them and yet so deep and far from solved that many mathematicians now suspect they have no solution. Perhaps they are ‘undecidable’. Perhaps number theory, like quantum mechanics, has its own uncertainty principle that makes it necessary, in certain areas, to abandon exactness for probabilistic formulations." (Martin Gardner, "The remarkable lore of the prime numbers", Scientific American, 1964)

☰On Number Theory (1925-1949)

"Number theory is useful, since one can graduate with it." (Edmund Landau, "Vorlesungen über Zahlentheorie", ["Lectures on Number Theory"], 1927)

"Roughly it amounts to this: mathematical analysis as it works today must make use of irrational numbers (such as the square root of two); the sense if any in which such numbers exist is hazy. Their reputed mathematical existence implies the disputed theories of the infi nite. The paradoxes remain. Without a satisfactory theory of irrational numbers, among other things, Achilles does not catch up with the tortoise, and the earth cannot turn on its axis. But as Galileo remarked, it does. It would seem to follow that something is wrong with our attempts to compass the infinite." (Eric T Bell, "Debunking Science", 1930)

"The theory of numbers is the last great uncivilized continent of mathematics. It is split up into innumerable countries, fertile enough in themselves, but all the more or less indifferent to one another’s welfare and without a vestige of a central, intelligent government. If any young Alexander is weeping for a new world to conquer, it lies before him." (Eric T Bell, "The Queen of the Sciences", 1931)

"No one has yet discovered any warlike purpose to be served by the theory of numbers or relativity, and it seems unlikely that anyone will do so for many years." (Godfrey H Hardy, "A Mathematician's Apology", 1941)

"The theory of numbers, more than any other branch of mathematics, began by being an experimental science. Its most famous theorems have all been conjectured, sometimes a hundred years or more before they were proved; and they have been suggested by the evidence of a mass of computations." (Godfrey H Hardy, "A Mathematician's Apology", 1941)

On Number Theory(1920-1929)

"The function of a mathematician, then, is simply to observe the facts about his own intricate system of reality, that astonishingly beautiful complex of logical relations which forms the subject-matter of his science, as if he were an explorer looking at a distant range of mountains, and to record the results of his observations in a series of maps, each of which is a branch of pure mathematics. […] Among them there perhaps none quite so fascinating, with quite the astonishing contrasts of sharp outline and shade, as that which constitutes the theory of numbers." (Godfrey H. Hardy, "The Theory of Numbers", Nature 1922)

"It is not surprising that the greatest mathematicians have again and again appealed to the arts in order to find some analogy to their own work. They have indeed found it in the most varied arts, in poetry, in painting, and in sculpture, although it would certainly seem that it is in music, the most abstract of all the arts, the art of number and of time, that we find the closest analogy." (Havelock Ellis, "The Dance of Life", 1923)

"Revolution is everywhere, in everything. It is infinite. There is no final revolution, no final number. The social revolution is only one of an infinite number of numbers; the law of revolution is not a social law, but an immeasurably greater one. It is a cosmic, universal law - like the laws of the conservation of energy and of the dissipation of energy" (entropy)." (Yevgeny Zamiatin, "On Literature, Revolution, Entropy, and Other Matters", 1923)"

"It is not surprising that the greatest mathematicians have again and again appealed to the arts in order to find some analogy to their own work. They have indeed found it in the most varied arts, in poetry, in painting, and in sculpture, although it would certainly seem that it is in music, the most abstract of all the arts, the art of number and of time, that we find the closest analogy." (Havelock Ellis, "The Dance of Life", 1923)

"Revolution is everywhere, in everything. It is infinite. There is no final revolution, no final number. The social revolution is only one of an infinite number of numbers; the law of revolution is not a social law, but an immeasurably greater one. It is a cosmic, universal law - like the laws of the conservation of energy and of the dissipation of energy" (entropy)." (Yevgeny Zamiatin, "On Literature, Revolution, Entropy, and Other Matters", 1923)

"Number knows no limitations, either from the side of the infinitely great or from the side of the infinitely small, and the facility it offers for generalization is too great for us not to be tempted by it." (Émile Borel, "Space and Time", 1926)

"The fundamental laws of chemistry which are well known to you and which are laws of discontinuity" (discontinuity between chemical species, and discontinuous variation according to the 'multiple proportions' in the composition of species made from the same simple bodies) then become immediately clear: they are imposed solely by the condition that the molecule constituting a compound contains a necessarily whole number of atoms of each of the simple bodies combined in this compound." (Jean-Baptiste Perrin, "Discontinuous Structure of Matter", [Nobel lecture] 1926)

"Number theory is useful, since one can graduate with it." (Edmund Landau, "Vorlesungen über Zahlentheorie", ["Lectures on Number Theory"], 1927)

"The mystery that clings to numbers, the magic of numbers, may spring from this very fact, that the intellect, in the form of the number series, creates an infinite manifold of well distinguishable individuals. Even we enlightened scientists can still feel it e.g. in the impenetrable law of the distribution of prime numbers." (Hermann Weyl, "Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science", 1927)

"The difference between commensurable and incommensurable in its strict sense" (and hence also the concept of irrational number) belongs solely to precision mathematics." (Felix Klein, "Elementary Mathematics from a Higher Standpoint" Vol III: "Precision Mathematics and Approximation Mathematics", 1928)

"Numbers are not just counters; they are elements in a system." (Scott Buchanan, "Poetry and Mathematics", 1929)

On Information Theory II

"If quantum communication and quantum computation are to flourish, a new information theory will have to be developed." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"In fact, an information theory that leaves out the issue of noise turns out to have no content." (Hans Christian von Baeyer, "Information, The New Language of Science", 2003)

"But, really, mathematics is not religion; it cannot be founded on faith. And what was most important, the methods yielding such remarkable results in the hands of the great masters began to lead to errors and paradoxes when employed by their less talented students. The masters were kept from error by their perfect mathematical intuition, that subconscious feeling that often leads to the right answer more quickly than lengthy logical reasoning. But the students did not possess this intuition […]" (Naum Ya. Vilenkin, "Stories about Sets", 1968) 

"The mathematical theory of information [...] is solely concerned with the ‘surprise’ aspect of information. There are two reasons for this. Firstly, information theory was originally developed within the context of communication engineering, where it was only the surprise factor that was of relevance. Secondly, ‘meaning’ has so far proved too difficult a concept to develop mathematically. The consequence of this is that we should be aware that ‘information’ [...] has the restricted technical meaning of ‘measure of surprise’." (David Applebaum," Probability and Information: An Integrated Approach", 2008)

"Cognitive psychology has followed a different direction, considering intelligence as a set of mental representations and a series of processes that operate on these representations that allows the individual to adapt to the changing conditions of the environment. This type of approach is connected with information theory. The intelligent mind operates by processing information that it collects from the environment, and the better and faster this information is processed, the more intelligence is demonstrated." (Diego Rasskin-Gutman, "Chess Metaphors: Artificial Intelligence and the Human Mind", 2009)

"Information Theory is a mathematical treatment of what is left after the meanings have been removed from a Communication." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"In an information economy, entrepreneurs master the science of information in order to overcome the laws of the purely physical sciences. They can succeed because of the surprising power of the laws of information, which are conducive to human creativity. The central concept of information theory is a measure of freedom of choice. The principle of matter, on the other hand, is not liberty but limitation - it has weight and occupies space." (George Gilder, "Knowledge and Power: The Information Theory of Capitalism and How it is Revolutionizing our World", 2013)

"[…] the term 'information', as used in information theory, has nothing to do with meaning. It is a measure of the order, or nonrandomness, of a signal; and the main concern of information theory is the problem of how to get a message, coded as a signal, through a noisy channel." (Fritjof Capra, "The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision", 2014)

"Information theory leads to the quantification of the information content of the source, as denoted by entropy, the characterization of the information-bearing capacity of the communication channel, as related to its noise characteristics, and consequently the establishment of the relationship between the information content of the source and the capacity of the channel. In short, information theory provides a quantitative measure of the information contained in message signals and help determine the capacity of a communication system to transfer this information from source to sink over a noisy channel in a reliable fashion." (Ali Grami, "Information Theory", 2016)

"In information theory this notion, introduced by Claude Shannon, is used to express unpredictability of information content. For instance, if a data set containing n items was divided into k groups each comprising n i items, then the entropy of such a partition is H = p 1 log( p 1 ) + … + p k log( p k ), where p i = n i / n . In case of two alternative partitions, the mutual information is a measure of the mutual dependence between these partitions." (Slawomir T Wierzchon, "Ensemble Clustering Data Mining and Databases", 2018) 

On Physics: On Relativity Theory (1925-1949)

"The generalized theory of relativity has furnished still more remarkable results. This considers not only uniform but also accelerated motion. In particular, it is based on the impossibility of distinguishing an acceleration from the gravitation or other force which produces it. Three consequences of the theory may be mentioned of which two have been confirmed while the third is still on trial: (1) It gives a correct explanation of the residual motion of forty-three seconds of arc per century of the perihelion of Mercury. (2) It predicts the deviation which a ray of light from a star should experience on passing near a large gravitating body, the sun, namely, 1".7. On Newton's corpuscular theory this should be only half as great. As a result of the measurements of the photographs of the eclipse of 1921 the number found was much nearer to the prediction of Einstein, and was inversely proportional to the distance from the center of the sun, in further confirmation of the theory. (3) The theory predicts a displacement of the solar spectral lines, and it seems that this prediction is also verified" (Albert A Michelson, "Studies in Optics", 1927)

"[When thinking about the new relativity and quantum theories] I have felt a homesickness for the paths of physical science where there are more or less discernible handrails to keep us from the worst morasses of foolishness." (Arthur S Eddington, "The Nature of the Physical World", 1928)

"The meaning of relativity [...] has been widely misunderstood. Philosophers play with the word, like a child with a doll. Relativity, as I see it, merely denotes that certain physical and mechanical facts, which have been regarded as positive and permanent, are relative with regard to certain other facts in the sphere of physics and mechanics. It does not mean that everything in life is mischievously topsy-turvy." (Albert Einstein [in George Sy Viereck, "What Life Means to Einstein", The Saturday Evening Post, 1929]) 

"[...] the most outstanding achievement of twentieth-century physics is not the theory of relativity with its welding together of space and time, or the theory of quanta with its present apparent negation of the laws of causation, or the dissection of the atom with the resultant discovery that things are not what they seem; it is the general recognition that we are not yet in contact with ultimate reality." (James H Jeans, "The Mysterious Universe", 1930) 

"There is another side to the theory of relativity. [...]×the development of science is in the direction to make it less subjective, to separate more and more in the observed facts that which belongs to the reality behind the phenomena, the absolute, from the subjective element, which is introduced by the observer, the relative. Einstein's theory is a great step in that direction. We can say that the theory of relativity is intended to remove entirely the relative and exhibit the pure absolute." (Willem de Sitter, "Relativity and Modern Theories of the Universe", Kosmos, 1932)

"The final results [of work on the theory of relativity] appear almost simple; any intelligent undergraduate can understand them without much trouble. But the years of searching in the dark for a truth that one feels, but cannot express; the intense effort and the alternations of confidence and misgiving, until one breaks through to clarity and understanding, are only known to him who has himself experienced them." (Albert Einstein,"The Origins of the General Theory of Relativity", [Concluding remark of George Gibson lecture at the University of Glasgow] 1933)

"Two points should be specially emphasized in connection with the general theory of relativity. First, it is a purely physical theory, invented to explain empirical physical facts, especially the identity of gravitational and inertial mass, and to coordinate and harmonize different chapters of physical theory, especially mechanics and electromagnetic theory. It has nothing metaphysical about it. Its importance from a metaphysical or philosophical point of view is that it aids us to distinguish in the observed phenomena what is absolute, or due to the reality behind the phenomena, from what is relative, i.e. due to the observer.S econd, it is a pure generalization, or abstraction, like Newton's system of mechanics and law of gravitation. It contains no hypothesis, as contrasted with the atomic theory or the theory of quanta, which are based on hypothesis. It may be considered as the logical sequence and completion of Newton's Principia. The science of mechanics was founded by Archimedes, who had a clear conception of the relativity of motion, and may be called the first relativist. Galileo, who was inspired by the reading of the works of Archimedes, took the subject up where his great predecessor had left it. His fundamental discovery is the law of inertia, which is the backbone of Newton's classical system of mechanics, and retains the same central position in Einstein's relativistic system. Thus one continuous line of thought can be traced through the development of our insight into the mechanical processes of nature... characterized by the sequence [...] Archimedes, Galileo, Newton, Einstein." (Willem de Sitter, "The Astronomical Aspect of the Theory of Relativity", 1933)

"The fundamental presuppositions of classical physics, which led to the scientific picture of the 19th century, had been challenged for the first time by Einstein’s special relativity." (Werner K Heisenberg, 1934)

"We know, since the theory of relativity at least, that empirical sciences are to some degree free in defining dynamical concepts or even in assuming laws, and that only a system as a whole which includes concepts, coordinating definitions, and laws can be said to be either true or false, to be adequate or inadequate to empirical facts. This 'freedom', however, is a somewhat doubtful gift. The manifold of possibilities implies uncertainty, and such uncertainty can become rather painful in a science as young as psychology, where nearly all concepts are open and unsettled. As psychology approaches the state of a logically sound science, definitions cease to be an arbitrary matter. They become far-reaching decisions which presuppose the mastering of the conceptual problems but which have to be guided entirely by the objective facts." (Kurt Lewin, "Principles of topological psychology", 1936)

"The modern theory of relativity, on its mathematical side, is merely an elaboration of Riemann's analysis." (Julian L Coolidge, "A History of Geometrical Methods", 1940)

"Then the theory of relativity came and explained the cause of the failure. Electric action requires time to travel from one point of space to another, the simplest instance of this being the finite speed of travel of light […] Thus electromagnetic action may be said to travel through space and time jointly. But by filling space and space alone [excluding time] with an ether, the pictorial representations had all supposed a clear-cut distinction between space and time." (James H Jeans, "Physics and Philosophy", 1942)

"But Einstein came along and took space and time out of the realm of stationary things and put them in the realm of relativity - giving the onlooker dominion over time and space, because time and space are modes by which we think and not conditions in which we live." (Dimitri Marianoff & Palma Wayne, "Einstein: An Intimate Study of a Great Man", 1944)

"Not the state of rest, but the states of uniform translation form an objectively distinguished class of motions, and this puts an end to the substantial ether. Finally, and fourthly, the general relativity theory re-endows this metric world structure with the capacity of reacting to the forces of matter. Thus, in a sense, the circle is closed." (Hermann Weyl, "Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science" II, 1949

"The field equation may [...] be given a geometrical foundation, at least to a first approximation, by replacing it with the requirement that the mean curvature of the space vanish at any point at which no heat is being applied to the medium - in complete analogy with […] the general theory of relativity by which classical field equations are replaced by the requirement that the Ricci contracted curvature tensor vanish." (Howard P Robertson, "Geometry as a Branch of Physics", 1949)

"We may sum up as follows: According to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, an ether exists. Space without an ether is inconceivable." (Albert Einstein, "The World as I See It", 1949) 

⚛On Physics: On Relativity Theory (1975-1999)

"According to the special theory there is a finite limit to the speed of causal chains, whereas classical causality allowed arbitrarily fast signals. Foundational studies […] soon revealed that this departure from classical causality in the special theory is intimately related to its most dramatic consequences: the relativity of simultaneity, time dilation, and length contraction. By now it had become clear that these kinematical effects are best seen as consequences of Minkowski space-time, which in turn incorporates a nonclassical theory of causal structure. However, it has not widely been recognized that the converse of this proposition is also true: the causal structure of Minkowski space-time contains within itself the entire geometry (topological and metrical structure) of Minkowski space-time." (John A. Winnie," The Causal Theory of Space-Time", 1977)

"Quantum mechanics and relativity, taken together, are extraordinarily restrictive, and they therefore provide us with a great logical machine. We can explore with our minds any number of possible universes consisting of all kinds of mythical particles and interactions, but all except a very few can be rejected on a priori grounds because they are not simultaneously consistent with special relativity and quantum mechanics. Hopefully in the end we will find that only one theory is consistent with both and that theory will determine the nature of our particular universe." (Steven Weinberg, "The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe", 1977) 

"The ‘eyes of the mind’ must be able to see in the phase space of mechanics, in the space of elementary events of probability theory, in the curved four-dimensional space-time of general relativity, in the complex infinite dimensional projective space of quantum theory. To comprehend what is visible to the ‘actual eyes’, we must understand that it is only the projection of an infinite dimensional world on the retina." (Yuri I Manin, "Mathematics and Physics", 1981)

"The prevailing trend in modern physics is thus much against any sort of view giving primacy to [...] undivided wholeness of flowing movement. Indeed, those aspects of relativity theory and quantum theory which do suggest the need for such a view tend to be de-emphasized and in fact hardly noticed by most physicists, because they are regarded largely as features of the mathematical calculus and not as indications of the real nature of things." (David Bohm, "Wholeness and the Implicate Order?", 1981)

"The theory of relativity does, however, force us to change fundamentally our ideas of space and time. We must accept that time is not completely separate from and independent of space, but is combined with it to form an object called space-time." (Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes", 1988)

"Quantum field theory, which was born just fifty years ago from the marriage of quantum mechanics with relativity, is a beautiful but not very robust child." (Steven Weinberg, "Conceptual Foundations of the Unified Theory of Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions", [Nobel Lecture] 1989)

"Theoretical physicists accept the need for mathematical beauty as an act of faith.… For example, the main reason why the theory of relativity is so universally accepted is its mathematical beauty." (Paul A M Dirac,"Methods in Theoretical Physics", 1989)

"All the implications of special relativity [...] have been con firmed by direct experiments. There are still people who believe it is “just a theory.” But they are wrong." (Paul C W Davies & John Gribbin, "The Matter Myth: Dramatic Discoveries That Challenge Our Understanding of Physical Reality", 1992)

"Our theories are very esoteric - necessarily so, because we are forced to develop these theories using a language, the language of mathematics, that has not become part of the general equipment of the educated public. Physicists generally do not like the fact that our theories arc so eso teric. On the other hand, I have occasionally heard artists talk proudly about their work being accessible only to a band of cognoscenti and justify this attitude by quoting the example of physical theories like general relativity that also can be understood only by initiates. Artists like physicists may not always be able to make themselves understood by the general public, but esotericism for its own sake is just silly." (Steven Weinberg, "Dreams of a Final Theory: The Scientist’s Search for the Ultimate Laws of Nature", 1992)

"Einstein was thus faced with the following apparent problem. Either give up the principle of relativity, which appears to make physics possible by saying that the laws of physics are independent of where you measure them, as long as you are in a state of uniform motion; or give up Maxwell’s beautiful theory of electromagnetism and electromagnetic waves. In a truly revolutionary move, he chose to give up neither. [...] It is a testimony to his boldness and creativity not that he chose to throw out existing laws that clearly worked, but rather that he found a creative way to live within their framework. So creative, in fact, that it sounds nuts." (Lawrence M Krauss, "Fear of Physics: A Guide for the Perplexed", 1993)

"Quantum mechanics - the theory that explains phenomena on the size of atoms - is right. It is also so conceptually weird that physicists to this day feel uncomfortable with it." (Tony Rothman, "Instant Physics: From Aristotle to Einstein, and Beyond", 1995)

"Relativity theory, of course, does not find that truth depends on the point of view of the observer but, on the contrary, reformulates the laws of physics so that they hold good for all observers, no matter how they move or where they stand. Its central meaning is that the most valued truths in science are independent of the point of view. [...] Einstein did not prove the work of Newton wrong; he provided a larger setting within which some limitations, contradictions, and asymmetries in the earlier physics disappeared." (Gerald Holton, Einstein, History, and Other Passions: The Rebellion Against Science at the End of the Twentieth Century, 1995)

"Use of the term 'model' makes it easier to keep in mind this distinction between theory and reality. By its very nature a model cannot include all the details of the reality it seeks to represent, for then it would be just as hard to comprehend and describe as the reality we want to model. At best, our model should give a reasonable picture of some small part of reality. It has to be a simple (even crude) description; and we must always be ready to scrap or improve a model if it fails in this task of accurate depiction. That having been said, old models are often still useful. The theory of relativity supersedes the Newtonian model, but all engineers use Newtonian mechanics when building bridges or motor cars, or probing the solar system." (David Stirzaker, "Probability and Random Variables: A Beginner’s Guide", 1999)

"What makes writing relativity so tricky is this: Built into ordinary language — in its use of tenses, for example - are many implicit assumptions about the nature of temporal relations that we now know to be false. Most importantly, we have known since 1905 that when you say that two events in different places happen at the same time you are not referring to anything inherent in the events themselves. You are merely adopting a conventional way of locating them that can differ from other equally valid conventional assignments of temporal order which do not have the events happening at the same time." (N David Mermin, "Writing Physics", 1999)

⚛On Physics: On Relativity Theory (1900-1924)

"By laying down the relativity postulate from the outset, sufficient means have been created for deducing henceforth the complete series of Laws of Mechanics from the principle of conservation of energy (and statements concerning the form of the energy) alone." (Hermann Minkowski, "The Fundamental Equations for Electromagnetic Processes in Moving Bodies", 1907)

"The most important result of a general character to which the special theory has led is concerned with the conception of mass. Before the advent of relativity, physics recognized two conservation laws of fundamental importance, namely, the law of conservation of energy and the law of the conservation of mass; these two fundamental laws appeared to be quite independent of each other. By means of the theory of relativity they have been united into one law." (Albert Einstein, 1920)

"The discovery of Minkowski […] is to be found […] in the fact of his recognition that the four-dimensional space-time continuum of the theory of relativity, in its most essential formal properties, shows a pronounced relationship to the three-dimensional continuum of Euclidean geometrical space. In order to give due prominence to this relationship, however, we must replace the usual time co-ordinate t by an imaginary magnitude, √-1*ct, proportional to it. Under these conditions, the natural laws satisfying the demands of the (special) theory of relativity assume mathematical forms, in which the time co-ordinate plays exactly the same role as the three space-coordinates. Formally, these four co-ordinates correspond exactly to the three space co-ordinates in Euclidean geometry." (Albert Einstein,"Relativity: The Special and General Theory", 1920)

"The relativity theory of physics reduces everything to relations; that is to say, it is structure, not material, which counts. The structure cannot be built up without material; but the nature of the material is of no importance." (Arthur S Eddington, "Space, Time and Gravitation: An Outline of the General Relativity Theory", 1920)

"There is something attractive in presenting the evolution of a sequence of ideas in as brief a form as possible, and yet with a completeness suffi cient to preserve throughout the continuity of development. We shall endeavor to do this for the Theory of Relativity, and to show that the whole ascent is composed of small, almost self-evident steps of thought." (Albert Einstein, "A Brief Outline of the Development of the Theory of Relativity Nature Vol. 106 (2677) 1921)

"A material particle upon which no force acts moves, according to the principle of inertia, uniformly in a straight line. In the four-dimensional continuum of the special theory of relativity (with real time co-ordinate) this a real straight line. The natural, that is, the simplest, generalization of the straight line which is meaningful in the system of concepts of the general (Riemannian) theory of invariants is that of the straightest, or geodesic, line."(Albert Einstein, "The Meaning of Relativity", 1922)

"Before the development of the theory of relativity it was known the principle of energy and momentum could be expressed in a differential form for the electromagnetic field. The four-dimensional formulation of these principles leads to an important conception, that of the energy tensor, which is important of the further development of the theory of relativity." (Albert Einstein, "The Meaning of Relativity", 1922)

"Einstein's theory of relativity has advanced our ideas of the structure of the cosmos a step further. It is as if a wall which separated us from Truth has collapsed. Wider expanses and greater depths are now exposed to the searching eye of knowledge, regions of which we had not even a presentiment. It has brought us much nearer to grasping the plan that underlies all physical happening." (Hermann Weyl, "Space, Time, Matter", 1922)

"In the realm of physics it is perhaps only the theory of relativity which has made it quite clear that the two essences, space and time, entering into our intuition, have no place in the world constructed by mathematical physics. Colours are thus 'really' not even æther-vibrations, but merely a series of values of mathematical functions in which occur four independent parameters corresponding to the three dimensions of space, and the one of time." (Hermann Weyl, "Space, Time, Matter", 1922)

"Science derives its conclusions by the laws of logic from our sense perceptions, Thus it does not deal with the real world, of which we know nothing, but with the world as it appears to our senses. […] All our sense perceptions are limited by and attached to the conceptions of time and space. […] Modern physics has come to the same conclusion in the relativity theory, that absolute space and absolute time have no existence, but, time and space exist only as far as things or events fill them, that is, are forms of sense perception." (Charles P. Steinmetz, "Religion and Modern Science", The Christian Register 1922)

"The numerical side of the theory of relativity is derived from the failure of all attempts to detect the relative motion of matter and ether." (Herbert Dingle, "Relativity for All", 1922)

"The present revolution of scientific thought follows in natural sequence on the great revolutions at earlier epochs in the history of science. Einstein’s special theory of relativity, which explains the indeterminateness of the frame of space and time, crowns the work of Copernicus who first led us to give up our insistence on a geocentric outlook on nature; Einstein's general theory of relativity, which reveals the curvature or non-Euclidean geometry of space and time, carries forward the rudimentary thought of those earlier astronomers who first contemplated the possibility that their existence lay on something which was not flat. These earlier revolutions are still a source of perplexity in childhood, which we soon outgrow; and a time will come when Einstein’s amazing revelations have likewise sunk into the commonplaces of educated thought." (Arthur S Eddington, "The Theory of Relativity and its Influence on Scientific Thought", 1922)

"The theory of relativity is intimately connected with the theory of space and time. I shall therefore begin with a brief investigation of the origin of our ideas of space and time, although in doing so I know that I introduce a controversial subject. The object of all science, whether natural science or psychology, is to co-ordinate our experiences and to bring them into a logical system. How are our customary ideas of space and time related to the character of our experience?" (Albert Einstein, "The Meaning of Relativity", 1922)

"Results of measurements are the subject-matter of physics; and the moral of the theory of relativity is that we can only comprehend what the physical quantities stand for if we first comprehend what they are." (Arthur S Eddington, "The Mathematical Theory of Relativity", 1923)

"By means of a revision of the concept of simultaneity in a shapable form I arrived at the special relativity theory.” (Albert Einstein, 1924) 

⚛On Physics: On Relativity Theory (1950-1974)

 "In the realm of physics it is perhaps only the theory of relativity which has made it quite clear that the two essences, space and time, entering into our intuition, have no place in the world constructed by mathematical physics. Colours are thus 'really' not even æther-vibrations, but merely a series of values of mathematical functions in which occur four independent parameters corresponding to the three dimensions of space, and the one of time." (Hermann Weyl, "Space, Time, Matter", 1952)

"The theory of relativity is a fine example of the fundamental character of the modern development of theoretical science. The initial hypotheses become steadily more abstract and remote from experience. On the other hand, it gets nearer to the grand aim of all science, which is to cover the greatest possible number of empirical facts by logical deduction from the smallest possible number of hypotheses or axioms." (Albert Einstein, 1954)

"[...] even in a temporal description of nature given by a relational theory of time. However, a theory, like the special theory of relativity, that denies the existence of an infinitely fast causal chain, deprives the concept of absolute simultaneity of its physical meaning even within a single inertial system. [...]  But since the metrical concept of velocity presupposes that we know the meaning of a transit time and since such a time, in turn, depends on a prior criterion of clock synchronization or simultaneity, we must first formulate the limiting property of electromagnetic chains [the fastest causal chain] without using the concept of simultaneity of noncoincident events." (Adolf Grünbaum, "Logical and philosophical foundations of the special theory of relativity", American Journal of Physics 23, 1955)

"Within the field of modern physics the theory of relativity has played a very important role. It was in this theory that the necessity for a change in the fundamental principles of physics was recognized for the first time." (Werner K Heisenberg, [Gifford Lecture, delivered at the University of St Andrews, 1955/56]) 

"By the widening of the transformation group in general relativity the idea of distinguished inertial coordinate systems could also be eliminated by Einstein as inconsistent with the group-theoretical properties of the theory. Without this general critical attitude, which abandoned naive visualizations in favour of a conceptual analysis of the correspondence between observational data and the mathematical quantities in a theoretical formalism, the establishment of the modern form of quantum theory would not have been possible." (Wolfgang Pauli, 1956)

"I consider the theory of relativity to be an example showing how a fundamental scientific discovery, sometimes even against the resistance of its creator, gives birth to further fruitful developments, following its own autonomous course." (Wolfgang Pauli, 1956)

"Understanding mathematical logic, or the theory of relativity, is not an indispensable attribute of the cultured mind. But if one wishes to learn anything about these subjects, one must learn something. It is necessary to master the rudiments of the language, to practice a technique, to follow step by step a characteristic sequence of reasoning and to see a problem through from beginning to end." (James R Newman, "The World of Mathematics” Vol. I, 1956)

"I believe the coordinate-free approach fosters the cultivation of intuition, a scarce commodity in relativity because the phenomena this theory is intended to describe are as yet rather remote from our daily experience." (Walter Noll, "Euclidean Geometry and Minkowskian Chronometry", The American Mathematical Monthly, 1964)

"Anyone who studies relativity without understanding how to use simple space-time diagrams is as much inhibited as a student of functions of a complex variable who does not understand the Argads diagram." (John L Synge, "Relativity: The Special Theory", 1965) 

"The ‘relativity’ of the new theory - one of the most solidly verified theories in the entire range of physics - is chiefly, therefore, a relativity of simultaneity." (Ernan McMullin, "Simultaneity", 1967)

"In science [...] it is impossible to open up new territory unless one is prepared to leave the safe anchorage of established doctrine and run the risk of a hazardous leap forward. With his relativity theory, Einstein had abandoned the concept of simultaneity, which was part of the solid ground of tra ditional physics, and, in so doing, outraged many leading physicists and philosophers and turned them into bitter opponents. In general, scientific progress calls for no more than the absorption and elaboration of new ideas - and this is a call most scientists are happy to heed." (Werner K Heisenberg, "Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations", 1969) 

"Many cumbersome developments in the standard treatments of mechanics can be simplified and better understood when formulated with modern conceptual tools, as in the well-known case of the use of the 'universal' definition of tensor products of vector spaces to simplify some of the notational excesses of tensor analysis as traditionally used in relativity theory" (Saunders Mac Lane, "Hamiltonian Mechanics and Geometry", The American Mathematical Monthly Vol. 77 (6), 1970)

"By far the most important consequence of the conceptual revolution brought about in physics by relativity and quantum theory lies not in such details as that meter sticks shorten when they move or that simultaneous position and momentum have no meaning, but in the insight that we had not been using our minds properly and that it is important to find out how to do so." (Percy W Bridgman, "Quo Vadis",[in Gerald Holton (ed.), "Science and the Modern Mind"] 1971)

On Theorizing

"Observation is so wide awake, and facts are being so rapidly added to the sum of human experience, that it appears as if the theorizer would always be in arrears, and were doomed forever to arrive at imperfect conclusion; but the power to perceive a law is equally rare in all ages of the world, and depends but little on the number of facts observed." (Henry D Thoreau, "A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers", 1862)

“It is a capital mistake to theorize before you have all the evidence. It biases the judgment.” (Sir Arthur C Doyle, “A Study in Scarlet”, 1887)

“It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.” (Sir Arthur C Doyle, “The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes”, 1892)

"Until a scientific theory yields confident forecasts you know it is unsound and tentative; it is mere theorizing, as evanescent as art talk or the phantoms politicians talk about." (Herbert G Wells, [Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution] 1902)

"Science is neither philosophy, nor religion, nor art; it is the totality of positive knowledge, as closely knit as possible; it is as different from its practical applications on the one hand, as it is from idle theorizing and blind faith on the other. It behooves us to make no extravagant claims for it, and to be as humble as we can." (George Sarton, "The History of Science and the New Humanism", 1928)

"It is not enough to observe, experiment, theorize, calculate and communicate; we must also argue, criticize, debate, expound, summarize, and otherwise transform the information that we have obtained individually into reliable, well established, public knowledge." (John M Ziman, "Information, Communication, Knowledge", Nature Vol. 224 (5217), 1969)

"The verb 'to theorize' is now conjugated as follows: 'I built a model; you formulated a hypothesis; he made a conjecture'." (John Ziman, "Reliable Knowledge", 1978) 

"[…] there is an external world which can in principle be exhaustively described in scientific language. The scientist, as both observer and language-user, can capture the external facts of the world in propositions that are true if they correspond to the facts and false if they do not. Science is ideally a linguistic system in which true propositions are in one-to-one relation to facts, including facts that are not directly observed because they involve hidden entities or properties, or past events or far distant events. These hidden events are described in theories, and theories can be inferred from observation, that is, the hidden explanatory mechanism of the world can be discovered from what is open to observation. Man as scientist is regarded as standing apart from the world and able to experiment and theorize about it objectively and dispassionately." (Mary B Hesse, "Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science", 1980

"An extremely odd demand is often set forth but never met, even by those who make it; i.e., that empirical data should be presented without any theoretical context, leaving the reader, the student, to his own devices in judging it. This demand seems odd because it is useless simply to look at something. Every act of looking turns into observation, every act of observation into reflection, every act of reflection into the making of associations; thus it is evident that we theorize every time we look carefully at the world." (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe)

"A basic purpose of theorizing is to organize information in a way that will develop its nonobvious implications." (David R Heise)

💠On Problem Solving 12: On Theories

"The insights gained and garnered by the mind in its wanderings among basic concepts are benefits that theory can provide. Theory cannot equip the mind with formulas for solving problems, nor can it mark the narrow path on which the sole solution is supposed to lie by planting a hedge of principles on either side. But it can give the mind insight into the great mass of phenomena and of their relationships, then leave it free to rise into the higher realms of action." (Carl von Clausewitz, "On War", 1832)

"No mathematical idea has ever been published in the way it was discovered. Techniques have been developed and are used, if a problem has been solved, to turn the solution procedure upside down, or if it is a larger complex of statements and theories, to turn definitions into propositions, and propositions into definitions, the hot invention into icy beauty. This then if it has affected teaching matter, is the didactical inversion, which as it happens may be anti-didactical." (Hans Freudenthal, "The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences", 1961)

"The final test of a theory is its capacity to solve the problems which originated it." (George Dantzig, "Linear Programming and Extensions", 1963)

"If we deal with our problem not knowing, or pretending not to know the general theory encompassing the concrete case before us, if we tackle the problem 'with bare hands', we have a better chance to understand the scientist's attitude in general, and especially the task of the applied mathematician." (George Pólya, "Mathematical Methods in Science", 1977)

"[...] two related deficiencies have prevented real progress in understanding insight and its role in problem solving. First, we do not yet have a system of classifying problems into those in which insight occurs versus those in which it does not. However, only if we can isolate problems in which insight occurs will we be able to set on a firm base our theories of the mechanisms underlying insight. Second, formulation of such a taxonomic system requires that we agree on a definition of insight." (Robert W Weisberg, "Prolegomena to theories of insight in problem solving: a taxonomy of problems", 1995)

"Mathematics is not a matter of 'anything goes', and every mathematician is guided by explicit or unspoken assumptions as to what counts as legitimate – whether we choose to view these assumptions as the product of birth, experience, indoctrination, tradition, or philosophy. At the same time, mathematicians are primarily problem solvers and theory builders, and answer first and foremost to the internal exigencies of their subject." (Jeremy Avigad, "Methodology and Metaphysics in the Development of Dedekind’s Theory of Ideals", 2006)

"Therefore, although the notion of insight as a distinct process has a long history in the psychological study of problem solving, it might be useful at this point to refrain from using analytic and insight as theoretical terms applied a priori to problems." (Jason M Chein et al, "Working memory and insight in the nine-dot problem", Memory & Cognition 38, 2010)

Previous <<||>> Next

🎲On Probability Theory (2000-2009)

"Arithmetic and number theory study patterns of number and counting. Geometry studies patterns of shape. Calculus allows us to handle patterns of motion. Logic studies patterns of reasoning. Probability theory deals with patterns of chance. Topology studies patterns of closeness and position." (Keith Devlin, "The Math Gene: How Mathematical Thinking Evolved And Why Numbers Are Like Gossip", 2000)

"The most important aspect of probability theory concerns the behavior of sequences of random variables." (Larry A Wasserman, "All of Statistics: A concise course in statistical inference", 2004)

"In the laws of probability theory, likelihood distributions are fixed properties of a hypothesis. In the art of rationality, to explain is to anticipate. To anticipate is to explain." (Eliezer S. Yudkowsky, "A Technical Explanation of Technical Explanation", 2005)

"Chance is just as real as causation; both are modes of becoming. The way to model a random process is to enrich the mathematical theory of probability with a model of a random mechanism. In the sciences, probabilities are never made up or 'elicited' by observing the choices people make, or the bets they are willing to place.  The reason is that, in science and technology, interpreted probability exactifies objective chance, not gut feeling or intuition. No randomness, no probability." (Mario Bunge, "Chasing Reality: Strife over Realism", 2006)

"[...] in probability theory we are faced with situations in which our intuition or some physical experiments we have carried out suggest certain results. Intuition and experience lead us to an assignment of probabilities to events. As far as the mathematics is concerned, any assignment of probabilities will do, subject to the rules of mathematical consistency." (Robert Ash,"Basic Probability Theory", 2008)

🎲On Probability Theory (1975-1999)

"The theory of probability is the only mathematical tool available to help map the unknown and the uncontrollable. It is fortunate that this tool, while tricky, is extraordinarily powerful and convenient." (Benoit Mandelbrot, "The Fractal Geometry of Nature", 1977)

"Every branch of mathematics has its combinatorial aspects […] There is combinatorial arithmetic, combinatorial topology, combinatorial logic, combinatorial set theory-even combinatorial linguistics, as we shall see in the section on word play. Combinatorics is particularly important in probability theory where it is essential to enumerate all possible combinations of things before a probability formula can be found." (Martin Gardner, "Aha! Insight", 1978)

"The ‘eyes of the mind’ must be able to see in the phase space of mechanics, in the space of elementary events of probability theory, in the curved four-dimensional space-time of general relativity, in the complex infinite dimensional projective space of quantum theory. To comprehend what is visible to the ‘actual eyes’, we must understand that it is only the projection of an infinite dimensional world on the retina." (Yuri I Manin, "Mathematics and Physics", 1981)

"Scientific theories must tell us both what is true in nature, and how we are to explain it. I shall argue that these are entirely different functions and should be kept distinct. […] Scientific theories are thought to explain by dint of the descriptions they give of reality. […] The covering-law model supposes that all we need to know are the laws of nature - and a little logic, perhaps a little probability theory - and then we know which factors can explain which others." (Nancy Cartwright, "How the Laws of Physics Lie", 1983)

"Increasingly [...] the application of mathematics to the real world involves discrete mathematics... the nature of the discrete is often most clearly revealed through the continuous models of both calculus and probability. Without continuous mathematics, the study of discrete mathematics soon becomes trivial and very limited. [...] The two topics, discrete and continuous mathematics, are both ill served by being rigidly separated." (Richard W Hamming, "Methods of Mathematics Applied to Calculus, Probability, and Statistics", 1985)

"Independence is the central concept of probability theory and few would believe today that understanding what it meant was ever a problem." (Mark Kac, "Enigmas Of Chance", 1985)

"Probability and statistics are now so obviously necessary tools for understanding many diverse things that we must not ignore them even for the average student." (Richard W Hamming, "Methods of Mathematics Applied to Calculus, Probability, and Statistics", 1985)

"Phenomena having uncertain individual outcomes but a regular pattern of outcomes in many repetitions are called random. 'Random' is not a synonym for 'haphazard' but a description of a kind of order different from the deterministic one that is popularly associated with science and mathematics. Probability is the branch of mathematics that describes randomness." (David S Moore, "Uncertainty", 1990)

"Every field of knowledge has its subject matter and its methods, along with a style for handling them. The field of Probability has a great deal of the Art component in it-not only is the subject matter rather different from that of other fields, but at present the techniques are not well organized into systematic methods. As a result each problem has to be "looked at in the right way" to make it easy to solve. Thus in probability theory there is a great deal of art in setting up the model, in solving the problem, and in applying the results back to the real world actions that will follow." (Richard W Hamming, "The Art of Probability for Scientists and Engineers", 1991)

"Probability is too important to be left to the experts. […] The experts, by their very expert training and practice, often miss the obvious and distort reality seriously. [...] The desire of the experts to publish and gain credit in the eyes of their peers has distorted the development of probability theory from the needs of the average user. The comparatively late rise of the theory of probability shows how hard it is to grasp, and the many paradoxes show clearly that we, as humans, lack a well-grounded intuition in the matter. Neither the intuition of the man in the street, nor the sophisticated results of the experts provides a safe basis for important actions in the world we live in." (Richard W Hamming, "The Art of Probability for Scientists and Engineers", 1991)

"Probability theory has a right and a left hand. On the right is the rigorous foundational work using the tools of measure theory. The left hand 'thinks probabilistically', reduces problems to gambling situations, coin-tossing, motions of a physical particle." (Leo Breiman, "Probability", 1992)

"Probability theory is an ideal tool for formalizing uncertainty in situations where class frequencies are known or where evidence is based on outcomes of a sufficiently long series of independent random experiments. Possibility theory, on the other hand, is ideal for formalizing incomplete information expressed in terms of fuzzy propositions." (George Klir, "Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic", 1995)

"Probability theory is a serious instrument for forecasting, but the devil, as they say, is in the details - in the quality of information that forms the basis of probability estimates." (Peter L Bernstein, "Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk", 1996)

"The theory of probability can define the probabilities at the gaming casino or in a lottery - there is no need to spin the roulette wheel or count the lottery tickets to estimate the nature of the outcome - but in real life relevant information is essential. And the bother is that we never have all the information we would like. Nature has established patterns, but only for the most part. Theory, which abstracts from nature, is kinder: we either have the information we need or else we have no need for information." (Peter L Bernstein, "Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk", 1996)

"The theory of probability combines commonsense reasoning with calculation. It domesticates luck, making it subservient to reason." (Ivars Peterson, "The Jungles of Randomness", 1997)

🎲On Probability Theory (1950-1974)

"Historically, the original purpose of the theory of probability was to describe the exceedingly narrow domain of experience connected with games of chance, and the main effort was directed to the calculation of certain probabilities." (William Feller, "An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications", 1950)

"Infinite product spaces are the natural habitat of probability theory." (William Feller, "An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications", 1950)

"Probability is a mathematical discipline with aims akin to those, for example, of geometry or analytical mechanics. In each field we must carefully distinguish three aspects of the theory: (a) the formal logical content, (b) the intuitive background, (c) the applications. The character, and the charm, of the whole structure cannot be appreciated without considering all three aspects in their proper relation." (William Feller, "An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications", 1950)

"Sampling is the science and art of controlling and measuring the reliability of useful statistical information through the theory of probability." (William E Deming, "Some Theory of Sampling", 1950)

"The classical theory of probability was devoted mainly to a study of the gamble's gain, which is again a random variable; in fact, every random variable can be interpreted as the gain of a real or imaginary gambler in a suitable game." (William Feller, "An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications", 1950)

"The painful experience of many gamblers has taught us the lesson that no system of betting is successful in improving the gambler's chances. If the theory of probability is true to life, this experience must correspond to a provable statement." (William Feller, "An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications", 1950)

"In a sense, of course, probability theory in the form of the simple laws of chance is the key to the analysis of warfare; […] My own experience of actual operational research work, has however, shown that its is generally possible to avoid using anything more sophisticated. […] In fact the wise operational research worker attempts to concentrate his efforts in finding results which are so obvious as not to need elaborate statistical methods to demonstrate their truth. In this sense advanced probability theory is something one has to know about in order to avoid having to use it." (Patrick M S Blackett, "Operations Research", Physics Today, 1951)

"The study of inductive inference belongs to the theory of probability, since observational facts can make a theory only probable but will never make it absolutely certain." (Hans Reichenbach, "The Rise of Scientific Philosophy", 1951)

"To say that observations of the past are certain, whereas predictions are merely probable, is not the ultimate answer to the question of induction; it is only a sort of intermediate answer, which is incomplete unless a theory of probability is developed that explains what we should mean by ‘probable’ and on what ground we can assert probabilities." (Hans Reichenbach, "The Rise of Scientific Philosophy", 1951)

"The epistemological value of probability theory is based on the fact that chance phenomena, considered collectively and on a grand scale, create non-random regularity." (Andrey N Kolmogorov, "Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Random Variables", 1954)

"On the other hand, the 'subjective' school of thought, regards probabilities as expressions of human ignorance; the probability of an event is merely a formal expression of our expectation that the event will or did occur, based on whatever information is available. To the subjectivist, the purpose of probability theory is to help us in forming plausible conclusions in cases where there is not enough information available to lead to certain conclusions; thus detailed verification is not expected. The test of a good subjective probability distribution is does it correctly represent our state of knowledge as to the value of x?" (Edwin T Jaynes, "Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics" I, 1956)

"Probability is a mathematical discipline with aims akin to those, for example, of geometry or analytical mechanics. In each field we must carefully distinguish three aspects of the theory: (a) the formal logical content, (b) the intuitive background, (c) the applications. The character, and the charm, of the whole structure cannot be appreciated without considering all three aspects in their proper relation." (William Feller, "An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications", 1957)

"The theory of probability can never lead to a definite statement concerning a single event." (Richard von Mises, "Probability, Statistics, and Truth" 2nd Ed., 1957)

"To the author the main charm of probability theory lies in the enormous variability of its applications. Few mathematical disciplines have contributed to as wide a spectrum of subjects, a spectrum ranging from number theory to physics, and even fewer have penetrated so decisively the whole of our scientific thinking." (Mark Kac, "Lectures in Applied Mathematics" Vol. 1, 1959)

"The mathematician, the statistician, and the philosopher do different things with a theory of probability. The mathematician develops its formal consequences, the statistician applies the work of the mathematician and the philosopher describes in general terms what this application consists in. The mathematician develops symbolic tools without worrying overmuch what the tools are for; the statistician uses them; the philosopher talks about them. Each does his job better if he knows something about the work of the other two." (Irvin J Good, "Kinds of Probability", Science Vol. 129, 1959)

"Incomplete knowledge must be considered as perfectly normal in probability theory; we might even say that, if we knew all the circumstances of a phenomenon, there would be no place for probability, and we would know the outcome with certainty." (Félix E Borel, Probability and Certainty", 1963)

"The probability concept used in probability theory has exactly the same structure as have the fundamental concepts in any field in which mathematical analysis is applied to describe and represent reality." (Richard von Mises, "Mathematical Theory of Probability and Statistics", 1964)

"After all, without the experiment - either a real one or a mathematical model - there would be no reason for a theory of probability." (Thornton C Fry, "Probability and Its Engineering Uses", 1965)

"This faulty intuition as well as many modern applications of probability theory are under the strong influence of traditional misconceptions concerning the meaning of the law of large numbers and of a popular mystique concerning a so-called law of averages." (William Feller, "An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications", 1968)

"[...] in probability theory we are faced with situations in which our intuition or some physical experiments we have carried out suggest certain results. Intuition and experience lead us to an assignment of probabilities to events. As far as the mathematics is concerned, any assignment of probabilities will do, subject to the rules of mathematical consistency." (Robert Ash, "Basic probability theory", 1970)

"One can never really use mathematics to prove a specific physical fact. For example, we cannot prove mathematically that there is a physical quantity called 'force'. What we can do is postulate a mathematical entity called 'force' that satisfies a certain differential equation. We can build up a collection of mathematical results that, when interpreted properly, provide a reasonable description of certain physical phenomena (reasonable until another mathematical theory is constructed that provides a better description). Similarly, in probability theory we are faced with situations in which our intuition or some physical experiments we have carried out suggest certain results. Intuition and experience lead us to an assignment of probabilities to events. As far as the mathematics is concerned, any assignment of probabilities will do , subject to the rules of mathen1atical consistency." (Robert B. Ash, "Basic Propability Theory I", 1970)

"This so-called 'classical definition' of probability, (the probability of an event is the number of outcomes favorable to the event, divided by the total number of outcomes, where all outcomes are equally likely) is first of all restrictive (it considers only experiments with a finite number of outcomes) and , more seriously, circular (no matter how you look at it, 'equally likely'  essentially means 'equally probable', and thus we are using the concept of probability to define probability itself). Thus we cannot use this idea as the basis of a mathematical theory of probability; however, the early probabilists were not prevented from deriving many valid and useful results." (Robert B Ash, "Basic Propability Theory I", 1970)

"Probability theory, for us, is not so much a part of mathematics as a part of logic, inductive logic, really. It provides a consistent framework for reasoning about statements whose correctness or incorrectness cannot be deduced from the hypothesis. The information available is sufficient only to make the inferences 'plausible' to a greater or lesser extent." (Ralph Baierlein, "Atoms and Information Theory: An Introduction to Statistical Mechanics", 1971)

"Management theory is obsessed with risks. Top executives bemoan the lack of risk-taking initiative among their young. Politicians and stockholders are advised (by directors) to make directors rich, so that they can afford to take risks. Theorists teach how to construct decision trees, heraldic devices of scientific management; and how to marry the trees with probability theory, so that the degree of risk along each branch (each branch and twig representing alternative results of alternative courses of action) can be metered. But the measuring is spurious, and, anyway, the best management doesn't take risks. It avoids them. It goes for the sure thing." (Robert Heller, "The Naked Manager: Games Executives Play", 1972)

"Since small differences in probability cannot be appreciated by the human mind, there seems little point in being excessively precise about uncertainty." (George E P Box & G C Tiao, "Bayesian inference in statistical analysis", 1973)

"The field of probability and statistics is then transformed into a Tower of Babel, in which only the most naive amateur claims to understand what he says and hears, and this because, in a language devoid of convention, the fundamental distinctions between what is certain and what is not, and between what is impossible and what is not, are abolished. Certainty and impossibility then become confused with high or low degrees of a subjective probability, which is itself denied precisely by this falsification of the language. On the contrary, the preservation of a clear, terse distinction between certainty and uncertainty, impossibility and possibility, is the unique and essential precondition for making meaningful statements (which could be either right or wrong), whereas the alternative transforms every sentence into a nonsense." (Bruno de Finetti, "Theory of Probability", 1974)

🎲On Probability Theory (1900-1949)

"The theory of chance consists in reducing all the events of the same kind to a certain number of cases equally possible, that is to say, to such as we may be equally undecided about in regard to their existence, and in determining the number of cases favorable to the event whose probability is sought." (Pierre-Simon de Laplace, "Philosophical Essay on Probabilities", 1902)

“Nature prefers the more probable states to the less probable because in nature processes take place in the direction of greater probability. Heat goes from a body at higher temperature to a body at lower temperature because the state of equal temperature distribution is more probable than a state of unequal temperature distribution.” (Max Planck, “The Atomic Theory of Matter”, 1909)

"A collective appropriate for the application of the theory of probability must fulfil two conditions. First, the relative frequencies of the attributes must possess limiting values. Second, these limiting values must remain the same in all partial sequences which may be selected from the original one in an arbitrary way. Of course, only such partial sequences can be taken into consideration as can be extended indefinitely, in the same way as the original sequence itself." (Richard von Mises, "Probability, Statistics and Truth", 1928)

"A great number of popular and more or less serious objections to the theory of probability disappear at once when we recognize that the exclusive purpose of this theory is to determine, from the given probabilities in a number of initial collectives, the probabilities in a new collective derived from the initial ones." (Richard von Mises, "Probability, Statistics and Truth", 1928)

"The rational concept of probability, which is the only basis of probability calculus, applies only to problems in which either the same event repeats itself again and again, or a great number of uniform elements are involved at the same time. Using the language of physics, we may say that in order to apply the theory of probability we must have a practically unlimited sequence of uniform observations." (Richard von Mises, "Probability, Statistics and Truth", 1928)

"The result of each calculation appertaining to the field of probability is always, as far as our theory goes, nothing else but a probability, or, using our general definition, the relative frequency of a certain event in a sufficiently long (theoretically, infinitely long) sequence of observations. The theory of probability can never lead to a definite statement concerning a single event. The only question that it can answer is: what is to be expected in the course of a very long sequence of observations? It is important to note that this statement remains valid also if the calculated probability has one of the two extreme values 1 or 0." (Richard von Mises, "Probability, Statistics and Truth", 1928)

"The theory of probability as a mathematical discipline can and should be developed from axioms in exactly the same way as geometry and algebra." (Andrey N Kolmogorov, "Foundations of the Theory of Probability", 1933)

"The most important application of the theory of probability is to what we may call 'chance-like' or 'random' events, or occurrences. These seem to be characterized by a peculiar kind of incalculability which makes one disposed to believe - after many unsuccessful attempts - that all known rational methods of prediction must fail in their case. We have, as it were, the feeling that not a scientist but only a prophet could predict them. And yet, it is just this incalculability that makes us conclude that the calculus of probability can be applied to these events." (Karl R Popper, "The Logic of Scientific Discovery", 1934)

"Statistics is a scientific discipline concerned with collection, analysis, and interpretation of data obtained from observation or experiment. The subject has a coherent structure based on the theory of Probability and includes many different procedures which contribute to research and development throughout the whole of Science and Technology." (Egon Pearson, 1936)

On Construction III: Theories

"Analysis is a method where one assumes that which is sought, and from this, through a series of implications, arrives at something which is agreed upon on the basis of synthesis; because in analysis, one assumes that which is sought to be known, proved, or constructed, and examines what this is a consequence of and from what this latter follows, so that by backtracking we end up with something that is already known or is part of the starting points of the theory; we call such a method analysis; it is, in a sense, a solution in reversed direction. In synthesis we work in the opposite direction: we assume the last result of the analysis to be true. Then we put the causes from analysis in their natural order, as consequences, and by putting these together we obtain the proof or the construction of that which is sought. We call this synthesis." (Pappus of Alexandria, cca. 4th century BC)

"[...] the task of the theory consists in constructing a picture of the external world that exists purely internally and must be our guiding star in all thought and experiment; that is in completing, as it were, the thinking process and carrying out globally what on a small scale occurs within us whenever we form an idea." (Ludwig E Boltzmann, "On the Significance of Theories", 1890)

"But surely it is self-evident that every theory is merely a framework or scheme of concepts together with their necessary relations to one another, and that the basic elements can be constructed as one pleases." (Gottlob Frege, "On the Foundations of Geometry and Formal Theories of Arithmetic" , cca. 1903-1909)

"We shall call this universal organizational science the 'Tektology'. The literal translation of this word from the Greek is 'the theory of construction'. 'Construction' is the most generaI and suitable synonym for the modern concept of 'organization'. [...] The aim of tektology is to systematize organizational experience; this science is clearly empirical and should draw its conclusions by way of induction." (Alexander Bogdanov, "Tektology: The Universal Organizational Science" Vol. I, 1913)

"[…] the process of scientific discovery may be regarded as a form of art. This is best seen in the theoretical aspects of Physical Science. The mathematical theorist builds up on certain assumptions and according to well understood logical rules, step by step, a stately edifice, while his imaginative power brings out clearly the hidden relations between its parts. A well-constructed theory is in some respects undoubtedly an artistic production." (Ernest Rutherford, 1932)

"A scientist, whether theorist or experimenter, puts forward statements, or systems of statements, and tests them step by step. In the field of the empirical sciences, more particularly, he constructs hypotheses, or systems of theories, and tests them against experience by observation and experiment." (Karl Popper, "The Logic of Scientific Discovery", 1934)

"A theoretical science unaware that those of its constructs considered relevant and momentous are destined eventually to be framed in concepts and words that have a grip on the educated community and become part and parcel of the general world picture - a theoretical science [...]" (Erwin Schrödinger, "Are There Quantum Jumps?", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Vol. 3, 1952)

"A second possible approach to general systems theory is through the arrangement of theoretical systems and constructs in a hierarchy of complexity, roughly corresponding to the complexity of the ‘individuals’ of the various empirical fields […] leading towards a ‘system of systems’." (Kenneth E Boulding, "General Systems Theory - The Skeleton of Science", 1956)

"General Systems Theory is a name which has come into use to describe a level of theoretical model-building which lies somewhere between the highly generalized constructions of pure mathematics and the specific theories of the specialized disciplines. Mathematics attempts to organize highly general relationships into a coherent system, a system however which does not have any necessary connections with the 'real' world around us. It studies all thinkable relationships abstracted from any concrete situation or body of empirical knowledge." (Kenneth E Boulding, "General Systems Theory - The Skeleton of Science", Management Science Vol. 2 (3), 1956)

"The usefulness of the models in constructing a testable theory of the process is severely limited by the quickly increasing number of parameters which must be estimated in order to compare the predictions of the models with empirical results" (Anatol Rapoport, "Prisoner's Dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation", 1965)

"Theories rarely arise as patient inferences forced by accumulated facts. Theories are mental constructs potentiated by complex external prods (including, in idealized cases, a commanding push from empirical reality)." (Stephen J Gould, "Leonardo's Mountain of Clams and the Diet of Worms", 1998)

Theory of Everything I

"Physicists dream of a unified description of Nature. Symmetry, in its power to tie together apparently unrelated aspects of physics, is linked closely to the notion of unity." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The theory of everything may come in its time, but not until we are certain that Nature has exhausted her bag of performable tricks." (Sheldon L Glashow, "Desperately Seeking Superstrings?", Physics Today, 1986)

"A more interesting problem is the extent to which the brain is qualitatively adapted to understand the Universe. Why should its categories of thought and understanding be able to cope with the scope and nature of the real world? Why should be Theory of Everything be written in a 'language' that our minds can decode? Why has the process of natural selection so over-endowed us with mental faculties that we can understand the whole fabric of the Universe far beyond anything required for our past and present survival?" (John D Barrow, "New Theories of Everything", 1991)

"On this view, we recognize science to be the search for algorithmic compressions. We list sequences of observed data. We try to formulate algorithms that compactly represent the information content of those sequences. Then we test the correctness of our hypothetical abbreviations by using them to predict the next terms in the string. These predictions can then be compared with the future direction of the data sequence. Without the development of algorithmic compressions of data all science would be replaced by mindless stamp collecting - the indiscriminate accumulation of every available fact. Science is predicated upon the belief that the Universe is algorithmically compressible and the modern search for a Theory of Everything is the ultimate expression of that belief, a belief that there is an abbreviated representation of the logic behind the Universe's properties that can be written down in finite form by human beings." (John D Barrow, New Theories of Everything", 1991)

"The inflationary period of expansion does not smooth out irregularity by entropy-producing processes like those explored by the cosmologies of the seventies. Rather it sweeps the irregularity out beyond the Horizon of our visible Universe, where we cannot see it. The entire universe of stars and galaxies on view to us. […] on this hypothesis, is but the reflection of a minute, perhaps infinitesimal, portion of the universe's initial conditions, whose ultimate extent and structure must remain forever unknowable to us. A theory of everything does not help here. The information contained in the observable part of the universe derives from the evolution of a tiny part of the initial conditions for the entire universe. The sum total of all the observations we could possibly make can only tell us about a minuscule portion of the whole." (John D Barrow, "Theories of Everything: The Quest for Ultimate Explanation", 1991)

"The scope of Theories of Everything is infinite but bounded; they are necessary parts of a full understanding of things but they are far from sufficient to reveal everything about a Universe like ours. In the pages of this book, we have seen something of what a Theory of Everything might hope to teach us about the unity of the Universe and the way in which it may contain elements that transcend our present compartmentalized view of Nature's ingredients. But we have also learnt that there is more to Everything than meets the eye. Unlike many others that we can imagine, our world contains prospective elements. Theories of Everything can make no impression upon predicting these prospective attributes of reality; yet, strangely, many of these qualities will themselves be employed in the human selection and approval of an aesthetically acceptable Theory of Everything. There is no formula that can deliver all truth, all harmony, all simplicity. No Theory of Everything can ever provide total insight. For, to see through everything, would leave us seeing nothing at all." (John D Barrow, "New Theories of Everything", 1991)

"The problems associated with the initial singularity of the universe bring us to what is called the theory of everything. It is an all-encompassing theory that would completely explain me origin of the universe and everything in it. It would bring together general relativity and quantum mechanics, and explain everything there is to know about the elementary particles of the universe, and the four basic forces of nature (gravitational, electromagnetic, weak, and strong nuclear forces). Furthermore, it would explain the basic laws of nature and the fundamental constants of nature such as the speed of light and Planck's constant." (Barry R Parker, "Chaos in the Cosmos: The stunning complexity of the universe", 1996)

"I don't have the hubris to imagine a theory of everything. I think that we scientists are seeking an understanding of the natural world. We come in various types - chemists and physicists and biologists and such - and we all have the same goal. We are making progress. The theories we have today of life and chemistry and physics are much better than they were ten years ago. And ten years from now they will be better still." (Sheldon Lee Glashow, [interview] 2003)