On Proofs (1970-1979)

"A diagram is worth a thousand proofs."  (Carl E Linderholm, “Mathematics Made Difficult”, 1971)

"Any mathematician endowed with a modicum of intellectual honesty will recognise then that in each of his proofs he is capable of giving a meaning to the symbols he uses." (René F Thom, "Modern mathematics, does it exist?", 1972)

"Historically, hyperbolic geometry was first developed on an axiomatic basis. It arose as a result of efforts to prove the axiom of parallels from the other axioms. Doubt persisted for a long time as to whether this axiom could be deduced from the remaining axioms of Euclidean geometry. In their attempts to prove this axiom, mathematicians used the method of 'proof by contradiction' i.e., they assumed that the axiom of parallels was false and tried, on the basis of this assumption, to obtain a contradiction. All of these attempts were fruitless. True, the theorems obtained by negating the axiom of parallels appeared strange, but they did not contradict one another. The issue was resolved when C. F. Gauss, N. I. Lobachevski and J. Bolyai first stated explicitly that by negating the axiom of parallels one arrives at a new geometry, just as consistent as the usual (Euclidean) geometry." (Isaak Yaglom, "Geometric Transformations", 1973)

"In many cases a dull proof can be supplemented by a geometric analogue so simple and beautiful that the truth of a theorem is almost seen at a glance." (Martin Gardner, "Mathematical Games", Scientific American, 1973)

"Induction is the process of eliciting general laws via observation and the correlation of particular instances. All sciences, including mathematics, make use of the induction method. Now, mathematical induction is applied only by mathematicians in the proof of theorems of a particular kind." (Yakov Khurgin, "Did You Say Mathematics?", 1974)

"Non-standard analysis frequently simplifies substantially the proofs, not only of elementary theorems, but also of deep results. This is true, e.g., also for the proof of the existence of invariant subspaces for compact operators, disregarding the improvement of the result; and it is true in an even higher degree in other cases. This state of affairs should prevent a rather common misinterpretation of non-standard analysis, namely the idea that it is some kind of extravagance or fad of mathematical logicians. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Rather, there are good reasons to believe that non-standard analysis, in some version or other, will be the analysis of the future." (Kurt Gödel, "Remark on Non-standard Analysis", 1974)

"No theory ever agrees with all the facts in its domain, yet it is not always the theory that is to blame. Facts are constituted by older ideologies, and a clash between facts and theories may be proof of progress. It is also a first step in our attempt to find the principles implicit in familiar observational notions." (Paul K Feyerabend, "Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge", 1975)

"Taking experimental results and observations for granted and putting the burden of proof on the theory means taking the observational ideology for granted without having ever examined it." (Paul K Feyerabend, "Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge", 1975)

"The conception of the mental construction which is the fully analysed proof as being an infinite structure must, of course, be interpreted in the light of the intuitionist view that all infinity is potential infinity: the mental construction consists of a grasp of general principles according to which any finite segment of the proof could be explicitly constructed." (Michael Dummett, "The philosophical basis of intuitionistic logic", 1975)

"The following four propositions, which appear to the author to be incapable of formal proof, are presented as Fundamental Postulates upon which the entire superstructure of General Systemantics [...] is based [...] (1) Everything is a system. (2) Everything is part of a larger system. (3) The universe is infinitely systematizable, both upward (larger systems) and downward (smaller systems) (4) All systems are infinitely complex. (The illusion of simplicity comes from focusing attention on one or a few variables.)" (John Gall, "General Systemantics: How systems work, and especially how they fail", 1975)

"There is an infinite regress in proofs; therefore proofs do not prove. You should realize that proving is a game, to be played while you enjoy it and stopped when you get tired of it." (Imre Lakatos, "Proofs and Refutations", 1976)

"A proof only becomes a proof after the social act of ‘accepting it as a proof’." (Yuri I Manin, "A Course in Mathematical Logic", 1977)

"Mathematical induction […] is an entirely different procedure. Although it, too, leaps from the knowledge of particular cases to knowledge about an infinite sequence of cases, the leap is purely deductive. It is as certain as any proof in mathematics, and an indispensable tool in almost every branch of mathematics." (Martin Gardner, "Aha! Insight", 1978)

"On the face of it there should be no disagreement about mathematical proof. Everybody looks enviously at the alleged unanimity of mathematicians; but in fact there is a considerable amount of controversy in mathematics. Pure mathematicians disown the proofs of applied mathematicians, while logicians in turn disavow those of pure mathematicians. Logicists disdain the proofs of formalists and some intuitionists dismiss with contempt the proofs of logicists and formalists." (Imre Lakatos, "Mathematics, Science and Epistemology" Vol. 2, 1978)

"A proof is a construction that can be looked over, reviewed, verified by a rational agent. We often say that a proof must be perspicuous or capable of being checked by hand. It is an exhibition, a derivation of the conclusion, and it needs nothing outside itself to be convincing. The mathematician surveys the proof in its entirety and thereby comes to know the conclusion." (Thomas Tymoczko, "The Four Color Problems", Journal of Philosophy , Vol. 76, 1979)

"Science sometimes improves hypothesis and sometimes disproves them. But proof would be another matter and perhaps never occurs except in the realms of totally abstract tautology. We can sometimes say that if such and such abstract suppositions or postulates are given, then such and such abstract suppositions or postulates are given, then such and such must follow absolutely. But the truth about what can be perceived or arrived at by induction from perception is something else again." (Gregory Bateson, "Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity", 1979)

On Problem Solving: On Simplicity

"The difficult problems in life always start off being simple. Great affairs always start off being small." (Lao Tzu, cca 400 BC)

"There is the very real danger that a number of problems which could profitably be subjected to analysis, and so treated by simpler and more revealing techniques. will instead be routinely shunted to the computing machines [...] The role of computing machines as a mathematical tool is not that of a panacea for all computational ills." (Richard E Bellman & Paul Brock, "On the Concepts of a Problem and Problem-Solving", American Mathematical Monthly 67, 1960)

"The basic idea behind all of these techniques is to simplify problem solving by concentrating on its essentials. Consolidate and simplify the objectives. Focus on the things with the highest impact, things that determine other things. Put to one side minor issues likely to be resolved by the resolution of major ones. Discard the nonessentials. Model (abstract) the system at as high a level as possible, then progressively reduce the level of abstraction. In short: Simplify!" (Mark W Maier, "The Art Systems of Architecting" 3rd Ed., 2009)

"What makes a great mathematical problem great? Intellectual depth, combined with simplicity and elegance. Plus: it has to be hard. Anyone can climb a hillock; Everest is another matter entirely. A great problem is usually simple to state, although the terms required may be elementary or highly technical." (Ian Stewart, "Symmetry: A Very Short Introduction", 2013)

"Calculus succeeds by breaking complicated problems down into simpler parts. That strategy, of course, is not unique to calculus. All good problem-solvers know that hard problems become easier when they’re split into chunks. The truly radical and distinctive move of calculus is that it takes this divide-and-conquer strategy to its utmost extreme - all the way out to infinity." (Steven H Strogatz, "Infinite Powers: The Story of Calculus - The Most Important Discovery in Mathematics", 2019)

"A problem thoroughly understood is always fairly simple." (Charles Kettering)

"A problem thoroughly understood is always fairly simple. Found your opinions on facts, not prejudices. We know too many things that are not true." (Charles F Kettering)

"I do believe in simplicity. It is astonishing as well as sad, how many trivial affairs even the wisest thinks he must attend to in a day; how singular an affair he thinks he must omit. When the mathematician would solve a difficult problem, he first frees the equation of all encumbrances, and reduces it to its simplest terms. So simplify the problem of life, distinguish the necessary and the real. Probe the earth to see where your main roots run." (Henry D Thoreau)

On Problem Solving 21: On Statistics

"Difficulties in identifying problems have delayed statistics far more than difficulties in solving problems." (John W Tukey, Unsolved Problems of Experimental Statistics, 1954)

"Stepwise regression is probably the most abused computerized statistical technique ever devised. If you think you need stepwise regression to solve a particular problem you have, it is almost certain that you do not. Professional statisticians rarely use automated stepwise regression." (Leland Wilkinson, "SYSTAT", 1984)

"We have to teach non-statisticians to recognize where statistical expertise is required. No one else will. We teach students how to solve simple statistical problems, but how often do we make any serious effort to teach them to recognize situations that call for statistical expertise that is beyond the technical content of the course." (Christopher J Wild, "Embracing the ‘Wider view’ of Statistics", The American Statistician 48, 1994)

"The goals in statistics are to use data to predict and to get information about the underlying data mechanism. Nowhere is it written on a stone tablet what kind of model should be used to solve problems involving data. To make my position clear, I am not against models per se. In some situations they are the most appropriate way to solve the problem. But the emphasis needs to be on the problem and on the data. Unfortunately, our field has a vested interest in models, come hell or high water." (Leo Breiman, "Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures, Statistical Science" Vol. 16(3), 2001)

"Teaching statistical thinking means giving people tools for problem solving in the real world. It should not be taught as pure mathematics. Instead of mechanically solving a dozen problems with the help of a particular formula, children and adolescents should be asked to find solutions to real-life problems. That’s what teaches them how to solve problems, and also shows that there may be more than one good answer in the first place. Equally important is encouraging curiosity, such as asking for answers to questions by doing experiments." (Gerd Gigerenzer, "Risk Savvy: How to make good decisions", 2014)

On Problem Solving 31: On Challenges

"A great discovery solves a great problem but there is a grain of discovery in the solution of any problem. Your problem may be modest; but if it challenges your curiosity and brings into play your inventive faculties, and if you solve it by your own means, you may experience the tension and enjoy the triumph of discovery." (George Polya, "How to solve it", 1944)

"Throughout the evolution of mathematics, problems have acted as catalysts in the discovery and development of mathematical ideas. In fact, the history of mathematics can probably be traced by studying the problems that mathematicians have tried to solve over the centuries. It is almost disheartening when an old problem is finally solved, for it will no longer be around to challenge and stimulate mathematical thought." (Theoni Pappas, "More Joy of Mathematics: Exploring mathematical insights & concepts", 1991)

"[...] all problems can be reperceived as challenges, or 'opportunities' to change, grow or learn." (Robert B Dilts, "Sleight of Mouth: The Magic of Conversational Belief Change", 1999

"The real raison d'etre for the mathematician's existence is simply to solve problems. So what mathematics really consists of is problems and solutions. And it is the 'good' problems, the ones that challenge the greatest minds for decades, if not centuries, that eventually become enshrined as mathematical mountaintops." (John L Casti, "Mathematical Mountaintops: The Five Most Famous Problems of All Time", 2001) 

"Many of the great mathematical problems stem from deep and difficult questions in well-established areas of the subject. They are the big challenges that emerge when a major area has been thoroughly explored. They tend to be quite technical, and everyone in the area knows they’re hard to answer, because many experts have tried and failed. The area concerned will already possess many powerful techniques, massive mathematical machines whose handles can be cranked if you’ve done your homework - but if the problem is still open, then all of the plausible ways to use those techniques have already been tried, and they didn’t work. So either there is a less plausible way to use the tried-and-tested techniques of the area, or you need new techniques." (Ian Stewart, "Symmetry: A Very Short Introduction", 2013)

"A great discovery solves a great problem but there is a grain of discovery in the solution of any problem. Your problem may be modest; but if it challenges your curiosity and brings into play your inventive faculties, and if you solve it by your own means, you may experience the tension and enjoy the triumph of discovery." (George Polya)

"I hope that seeing the excitement of solving this problem will make young mathematicians realize that there are lots and lots of other problems in mathematics which are going to be just as challenging in the future." (Andrew Wiles)

"The greatest challenge to any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution." (Bertrand Russell)

On Physics: On Electromagnetism (2010-)

"First, without a physical interpretation, a purely mathematical structure, here a Lie algebra, would have no empirical content. Second, if we interpret the Lie algebra in terms of physical structures, taking electromagnetic and weak currents as its representations, then we have physical content, but only at the phenomenological level. In order to understand the physical structures (the currents) properly, we have to move deeper onto the level of their constituents (hadrons or quarks) and their dynamics so that we can have a dynamic understanding of the behavior of the currents, and thus of many features of current algebra and of reasons why current algebra is so successful." (Tian Yu Cao,"From Current Algebra to Quantum Chromodynamics: A Case for Structural Realism", 2010)

"The underlying idea of current algebra, light-cone current algebra included, was to exploit the broken symmetry of strong interactions. The idea was pursued through abstracting physical predictions, as the consequences of the symmetry and in the form of certain algebraic relations obeyed by weak and electromagnetic currents of hadrons to all orders in strong interactions, from some underlying mathematical field theoretical models of hadrons and their interactions, more specifically from models of quark fields universally coupled to a neutral gluon field." (Tian Yu Cao,"From Current Algebra to Quantum Chromodynamics: A Case for Structural Realism", 2010)

"Rotations and translations are global symmetries: they apply uniformly across the whole of space and time. A rotation about some axis rotates every point in space through the same angle. Gauge symmetries are different: they are local symmetries, which can vary from point to point in space. In the case of electromagnetism, these local symmetries are changes of phase. A local oscillation of the electromagnetic field has both an amplitude (how big it is) and a phase (the time at which it reaches its peak)." (Ian Stewart, "Symmetry: A Very Short Introduction", 2013)

"The classical theories of space, time, and matter were brought to their peak in James Clerk Maxwell’s equations for electromagnetism. This elegant system of equations unified two of nature’s forces, previously thought to be distinct. In place of electricity and magnetism, there was a single electromagnetic field. A field pervades the whole of space, as if the universe were filled with some kind of invisible fluid. At each point of space we can measure the strength and direction of the field, as if that fluid were flowing in mathematical patterns. For some purposes the electromagnetic field can be split into two components, the electric field and the magnetic field. But a moving magnetic field creates an electric one, and conversely, so when it comes to dynamics, both fields must be combined into a single more complex one." (Ian Stewart, "Visions of Infinity", 2013)

"The invariance of physical laws with respect to position or orientation (i.e., the symmetry of space) gives rise to conservation laws for linear and angular momentum. Sometimes the implications of symmetry invariance are far more complicated or sophisticated than might at first be supposed; the invariance of the forces predicted by electromagnetic theory when measurements are made in observation frames moving uniformly at different speeds (inertial frames) was an important clue leading Einstein to the discovery of special relativity. With the advent of quantum mechanics, considerations of angular momentum and spin introduced new symmetry concepts into physics. These ideas have since catalyzed the modern development of particle theory." (George B Arfken et al, "Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A comprehensive guide", 2013)

"Symmetry is not enough by itself. In electromagnetism, for example, if you write down all the symmetries we know, such as Lorentz invariance and gauge invariance, you don’t get a unique theory that predicts the magnetic moment of the electron. The only way to do that is to add the principle of renormalisability - which dictates a high degree of simplicity in the theory and excludes these additional terms that would have changed the magnetic moment of the electron from the value Schwinger calculated in 1948." (Steven Weinberg, CERN Courier, [interview with Matthew Chalmers] 2017)

"Electromagnetism is the theory describing the interactions of electric and magnetic fields with matter based upon charges and currents. [...] Once delving a bit deeper into the theory of electromagnetism, it will become apparent that the use of tensors will help us significantly. In particular, when formulating Maxwell’s equations in the framework of special relativity, it will become clear that the electric and magnetic fields are different components of a rank two anti-symmetric tensor in four-dimensional space-time rather than vector fields in space that depend on time." (Mattias Blennow, "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering", 2018)

"Euler’s formula - although deceptively simple - is actually staggeringly conceptually difficult to apprehend in its full glory, which is why so many mathematicians and scientists have failed to see its extraordinary scope, range, and ontology, so powerful and extensive as to render it the master equation of existence, from which the whole of mathematics and science can be derived, including general relativity, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces! It’s not called the God Equation for nothing. It is much more mysterious than any theistic God ever proposed." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)

On Physics: On Electromagnetism (2000-2009)

"For [...] small things, there must be something else. There is. We call it the electric interaction (more generally, the electromagnetic interaction), and it arises from an endowment of matter known as the electric charge. Standing still, an electrically charged particle throws up an electric potential to which other charged particles can respond.Electric or magnetic, charge gives rise to both. Whether we say 'electric potential' (because we perceive a charge to be at rest) or "magnetic potential" (because we perceive a charge to be in motion), the difference lies solely in our point of view. The source is one. From the world of mass we descend [...] into the world of charge, ready to see our most familiar surroundings in a new light. Let there be electric charge." (Michael Munowitz, "Knowing: The Nature of Physical Law", 2005)

"We divide math up into separate areas (analysis, mechanics, algebra, geometry, electromagnetism, number theory, quantum mechanics, etc.) to clarify the study of each part; but the equally valuable activity of integrating the components into a working whole is all too often neglected. Without it, the stated aim of ‘taking something apart to see how it ticks’ degenerates imperceptibly into ‘taking it apart to ensure it never ticks again’." (Miles Reid & Balazs Szendröi, "Geometry and Topology", 2005)

"In formal terms, the ground state energy (vacuum energy) of the electromagnetic quantum field is infinite. This causes mathematical trouble in quantum electrodynamics." Eberhard Zeidler, "Quantum Field Theory II: Quantum Electrodynamics", 2006)

"Topology is rooted in Maxwell’s theory on the electromagnetic field." (Eberhard Zeidler, "Quantum Field Theory I: Basics in Mathematics and Physics", 2006)

"In a Newtonian view, space and time are separate and different. Symmetries of the laws of physics are combinations of rigid motions of space and an independent shift in time. But... these transformations do not leave Maxwell's equations invariant. Pondering this, the mathematicians Henri Poincaré and Hermann Minkowski were led to a new view of the symmetries of space and time, on a purely mathematical level. If they had described these symmetries in physical terms, they would have beaten Einstein to relativity, but they avoided physical speculations. They did understand that symmetries in the laws of electromagnetism do not affect space and time independently but mix them up. The mathematical scheme describing these intertwined changes is known as the Lorentz group, after the physicist, Hendrik Lorentz." (Ian Stewart, "Why Beauty Is Truth: The History of Symmetry", 2008)

"The abstractions of Einstein's curved space and time gave rise to analogies and pictures that played a new explanatory role. Space and time gave way to space-time, visible light was augmented by images across the rest of the electromagnetic spectrum, and we realise d that we could see back towards the apparent beginnings of time." (John D Barrow,"Cosmic Imagery: Key Images in the History of Science", 2008)

"There’s matter, like the electron; antimatter, like the positron; and then there are things that are neither matter nor antimatter. The most familiar example of something that is beyond substance is electromagnetic radiation. All electromagnetic radiation, from gamma rays through X-rays and ultra-violet to visible light, infra red, and radio waves, consists of photons of different energies. Matter and antimatter can cancel one another out, their annihilation leaving non-substance in the form of photons; if the conditions are right this sequence can happen in reverse where photons turn into pieces of matter and antimatter." (Frank Close, "Antimatter", 2009)

On Physics: On Electromagnetism (1975-1999)

"Electromagnetic fields [...] are neither charged nor magnetized and thus cannot contribute to their own source. The general theory does reveal a new feature of electromagnetic fields... Since they have energy, they produce gravitational effects and thus affect the structure of space-time, which, in turn, means that an electromagnetic field can affect the motion of non-charged matter." (Nancy Nersessian, "Faraday to Einstein: Constructing Meaning in Scientific Theories", 1984)

"The [...] weak force [...] couples to both quarks and leptons, and is very short-ranged due to the large rest mass of the messenger quanta involved. Its effective strength is usually many orders of magnitude weaker than electromagnetism, and its action can cause particles to change identity, as when a neutron decays. Unlike the electromagnetic and strong forces, the weak force violates parity conservation." (Paul Davies, "Forces of Nature", 1986)

"If grand unified theories are correct, we ought to be able to derive the relative power of the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions at accessible energies from their presumed equality at much higher energies. When this is attempted, a wonderful result emerges. …in the form first calculated by Howard Georgi, Helen Quinn, and Steven Weinberg […] The couplings of strong-interaction gluons decrease, those of the [weak interaction] W bosons stay roughly constant, and those of the [electromagnetic interaction] photons increase at short distances [or high energies] - so they all tend to converge, as desired." (Frank Wilczek, "Longing for the Harmonies: Themes and Variations from Modern Physics", 1987)

"Strong, weak and electromagnetic interaction are evidently part of a grand unified theory. These temperatures are today quite inaccessible. They were achieved only in the earliest moments of the Big Bang. Since then, the universe has congealed, losing its symmetry." (Sheldon L Glashow, "The Charm of Physics", 1991)

"Einstein was thus faced with the following apparent problem. Either give up the principle of relativity, which appears to make physics possible by saying that the laws of physics are independent of where you measure them, as long as you are in a state of uniform motion; or give up Maxwell’s beautiful theory of electromagnetism and electromagnetic waves. In a truly revolutionary move, he chose to give up neither. [...] It is a testimony to his boldness and creativity not that he chose to throw out existing laws that clearly worked, but rather that he found a creative way to live within their framework. So creative, in fact, that it sounds nuts." (Lawrence M Krauss, "Fear of Physics: A Guide for the Perplexed", 1993)

"The problems associated with the initial singularity of the universe bring us to what is called the theory of everything. It is an all-encompassing theory that would completely explain me origin of the universe and everything in it. It would bring together general relativity and quantum mechanics, and explain everything there is to know about the elementary particles of the universe, and the four basic forces of nature (gravitational, electromagnetic, weak, and strong nuclear forces). Furthermore, it would explain the basic laws of nature and the fundamental constants of nature such as the speed of light and Planck's constant." (Barry R Parker, "Chaos in the Cosmos: The stunning complexity of the universe", 1996)

"The reason general relativity cannot be unified with electromagnetic theory seems to be related to its nonlinearity. To unify the two fields properly we have to construct a "quantized" version of relativity; in other words, we have to quantize it, and so far no one has." (Barry R Parker, "Chaos in the Cosmos: The stunning complexity of the universe", 1996)

On Physics: On Electromagnetism (1925-1949)

"The velocity of light is one of the most important of the fundamental constants of Nature. Its measurement by Foucault and Fizeau gave as the result a speed greater in air than in water, thus deciding in favor of the undulatory and against the corpuscular theory. Again, the comparison of the electrostatic and the electromagnetic units gives as an experimental result a value remarkably close to the velocity of light – a result which justified Maxwell in concluding that light is the propagation of an electromagnetic disturbance. Finally, the principle of relativity gives the velocity of light a still greater importance, since one of its fundamental postulates is the constancy of this velocity under all possible conditions." (A.A. Michelson, "Studies in Optics", 1927)

"The spirit of seeking which animates us refuses to regard any kind of creed as its goal. It would be a shock to come across a university where it was the practice of the students to recite adherence to Newton's laws of motion, to Maxwell's equations and to the electromagnetic theory of light. We should not deplore it the less if our own pet theory happened to be included, or if the list were brought up to date every few years. We should say that the students cannot possibly realise the intention of scientific training if they are taught to look on these results as things to be recited and subscribed to. Science may fall short of its ideal, and although the peril scarcely takes this extreme form, it is not always easy, particularly in popular science, to maintain our stand against creed and dogma." (Arthur S Eddington, "Science and the Unseen World", 1929)

"Classical mechanics has been developed continuously from the time of Newton and applied to an ever-widening range of dynamical systems, including the electromagnetic field in interaction with matter. The underlying ideas and the laws governing their application form a simple and elegant scheme, which one would be inclined to think could not be seriously modified without having all its attractive features spout. Nevertheless it has been found possible to set up a new scheme, called quantum mechanics, which is more suitable for the description of phenomena on the atomic scale and which is in some respects more elegant and satisfying than the classical scheme. This possibility is due to the changes which the new scheme involves being of a very profound character and not clashing with the features of the classical theory that make it so attractive, as a result of which all these features can be incorporated in the new scheme." (Paul Dirac, "The Principles of Quantum Mechanics", 1930)

"In electromagnetism [...] the law of the inverse square had been supreme, but, as a consequence of the work of Faraday and Maxwell, it was superseded by the field. And the same change took place in the theory of gravitation. By and by the material particles, electrically charged bodies, and magnets which are the things that we actually observe come to be looked upon only as 'singularities' in the field. So far this transformation from the force to the potential, from the action at a distance to the field, is only a purely mathematical operation." (Willem de Sitter,"Kosmos", 1932)

"Two points should be specially emphasized in connection with the general theory of relativity. First, it is a purely physical theory, invented to explain empirical physical facts, especially the identity of gravitational and inertial mass, and to coordinate and harmonize different chapters of physical theory, especially mechanics and electromagnetic theory. It has nothing metaphysical about it. Its importance from a metaphysical or philosophical point of view is that it aids us to distinguish in the observed phenomena what is absolute, or due to the reality behind the phenomena, from what is relative, i.e. due to the observer.S econd, it is a pure generalization, or abstraction, like Newton's system of mechanics and law of gravitation. It contains no hypothesis, as contrasted with the atomic theory or the theory of quanta, which are based on hypothesis. It may be considered as the logical sequence and completion of Newton's Principia. The science of mechanics was founded by Archimedes, who had a clear conception of the relativity of motion, and may be called the first relativist. Galileo, who was inspired by the reading of the works of Archimedes, took the subject up where his great predecessor had left it. His fundamental discovery is the law of inertia, which is the backbone of Newton's classical system of mechanics, and retains the same central position in Einstein's relativistic system. Thus one continuous line of thought can be traced through the development of our insight into the mechanical processes of nature... characterized by the sequence [...] Archimedes, Galileo, Newton, Einstein." (Willem de Sitter, "The Astronomical Aspect of the Theory of Relativity", 1933)

"The electromagnetic field theory is, for the modern physicist, as real as the chair on which he sits." (Leopold Infeld, "The Evolution of Physics, Field and Ether", 1938)

"Faraday, Maxwell, Larmor and a great number of others tried to explain electromagnetic action on these lines, but all attempts failed, and it began to seem impossible that any properties of ether could explain the observed pattern of events." (James Jeans, "Physics and Philosophy", 1942)

"Then the theory of relativity came and explained the cause of the failure. Electric action requires time to travel from one point of space to another, the simplest instance of this being the finite speed of travel of light […] Thus electromagnetic action may be said to travel through space and time jointly. But by filling space and space alone [excluding time] with an ether, the pictorial representations had all supposed a clear-cut distinction between space and time." (James H Jeans, "Physics and Philosophy", 1942)

"It is as dangerous for people unaccustomed to handling words and unacquainted with their technique to tinker about with these heavily-charged nuclei of emotional power as it would be for me to burst into a laboratory and play about with a powerful electromagnet or other machine highly charged with electrical force." (Dorothy L Sayers, "Unpopular Opinions", 1946)

"In the development of electromagnetic theory, there has been a continual and significant trend, which in a way has set the pattern for the development of all of theoretical physics. This has been the trend away from the concept known as "action at a distance" toward the concept of field theory." (John C Slater & Nathaniel H Frank, "Electromagnetism", 1947)

"The first forces brought into mathematical formulation were gravitational forces, as seen in planetary motion. Next were elastic forces. Then followed electric and magnetic forces... Their [electric and magnetic forces] study was mostly a product of the nineteenth century. [...] electromagnetic forces are of a far wider application than was first supposed. It has become evident that, instead of being active only in electrostatic and electromagnetic applications such as the telegraph, dynamo, and radio, the forces between the nuclei and electrons of single atoms, the chemical forces between atoms and molecules, the forces of cohesion and elasticity holding solids together, are all of an electric nature. [...] electromagnetic theory [...] carries us rather far into the structure of matter [...] The equations underlying the theory, Maxwell's equations, are relatively simple, but not nearly so simple as Newton's Newton's laws of motion." (John C Slater & Nathaniel H Frank, "Electromagnetism", 1947)

"This fact, that all charges are integral multiples of a fundamental unit, is still one of the unexplained puzzles of fundamental physics. It does not in any way contradict electromagnetic theory, but it is not predicted by it, and until we have a more fundamental theory that explains it, we shall not feel that we really understand electromagnetic phenomena thoroughly. Presumably its explanation will not come until we understand quantum theory more thoroughly than we do at present." (John C Slater & Nathaniel H Frank, "Electromagnetism", 1947)

"Although the Special Theory of Relativity does not account for electromagnetic phenomena, it explains many of their properties. General Relativity, however, tells us nothing about electromagnetism. In Einstein's space-time continuum gravitational forces are absorbed in the geometry, but the electromagnetic forces are quite unaffected. Various attempts have been made to generate the geometry of space-time so as to produce a unified field theory incorporating both gravitational and electromagnetic forces." (Gerald J Whitrow, "The Structure of the Universe: An Introduction to Cosmology", 1949)

On Physics: On Electromagnetism (1950-1974)

"[...] even in a temporal description of nature given by a relational theory of time. However, a theory, like the special theory of relativity, that denies the existence of an infinitely fast causal chain, deprives the concept of absolute simultaneity of its physical meaning even within a single inertial system. [...]  But since the metrical concept of velocity presupposes that we know the meaning of a transit time and since such a time, in turn, depends on a prior criterion of clock synchronization or simultaneity, we must first formulate the limiting property of electromagnetic chains [the fastest causal chain] without using the concept of simultaneity of noncoincident events." (Adolf Grünbaum, "Logical and philosophical foundations of the special theory of relativity", American Journal of Physics 23, 1955)

"There is nothing in the world except empty curved space. Matter, charge, electromagnetism, and other fields are only manifestations of the curvature of space." (John A Wheeler, 1957)

"In essence, the curvature in space created by the electromagnetic field is the electromagnetic field; and this curvature can in principle be detected by purely geometric measurements." (Kip Thorne, "The Dynamics of Space-Time", 1963) 

"It requires a much higher degree of imagination to understand the electromagnetic field than to understand invisible angels. […] I speak of the E and B fields and wave my arms and you may imagine that I can see them […] [but] I cannot really make a picture that is even nearly like the true waves." (Richard Feynman, "The Feynman Lectures on Physics", 1964)

"Thermostatics, which even now is usually called thermodynamics, has an unfortunate history and a cancerous tradition. It arose in a chaos of metaphysical and indeed irrational controversy, the traces of which drip their poison even today. As compared with the older science of mechanics and the younger science of electromagnetism, its mathematical structure is meager. Though claims for its breadth of application are often extravagant, the examples from which its principles usually are inferred are most special, and extensive mathematical developments based on fundamental equations, such as typify mechanics and electromagnetism, are wanting. The logical standards acceptable in thermostatics fail to meet the criteria of other exact sciences [...]." (Clifford Truesdell, "Six Lectures on Modern Natural Philosophy", 1966)

"Let us consider, for a moment, the world as described by the physicist. It consists of a number of fundamental particles which, if shot through their own space, appear as waves, and are thus [...] of the same laminated structure as pearls or onions, and other wave forms called electromagnetic which it is convenient, by Occam’s razor, to consider as travelling through space with a standard velocity. All these appear bound by certain natural laws which indicate the form of their relationship." (G Spencer-Brown, "Laws of Form", 1969)

On Physics: On Electromagnetism (1900-1924)

"By laying down the relativity postulate from the outset, sufficient means have been created for deducing henceforth the complete series of Laws of Mechanics from the principle of conservation of energy (and statements concerning the form of the energy) alone." (Hermann Minkowski, "The Fundamental Equations for Electromagnetic Processes in Moving Bodies", 1907)

"It would be very unsatisfactory if the new way of looking at the time-concept, which permits a Lorentz transformation, were to be confined to a single part of Physics." (Hermann Minkowski, "The Fundamental Equations for Electromagnetic Processes in Moving Bodies", 1907)

"Electric and magnetic forces. May they live for ever, and never be forgot, if only to remind us that the science of electromagnetics, in spite of the abstract nature of its theory, involving quantities whose nature is entirely unknown at the present, is really and truly founded on the observations of real Newtonian forces, electric and magnetic respectively." (Oliver Heaviside, "Electromagnetic Theory", 1912)

"I cannot but regard the ether, which can be the seat of an electromagnetic field with its energy and its vibrations, as endowed with a certain degree of substantiality, however different it may be from all ordinary matter." (Hendrik Lorentz, "The Theory of Electrons and Its Applications to the Phenomena of Light and Radiant Heat", 1916)

"A new theory by the author has been added, which draws the physical inferences consequent on the extension of the foundations of geometry beyond Reimann... and represents an attempt to derive from world-geometry not only gravitational but also electromagnetic phenomena. Even if this theory is still only in its infant stage, I feel convinced that it contains no less truth than Einstein's Theory of Gravitation—whether this amount of truth is unlimited or, what is more probable, is bounded by the Quantum Theory." (Albert Einstein, "The Meaning of Relativity", 1922)

"Before the development of the theory of relativity it was known the principle of energy and momentum could be expressed in a differential form for the electromagnetic field. The four-dimensional formulation of these principles leads to an important conception, that of the energy tensor, which is important of the further development of the theory of relativity." (Albert Einstein, "The Meaning of Relativity", 1922)

"First, the physicists in the persons of Faraday and Maxwell, proposed the 'electromagnetic field' in contradistinction to matter, as a reality of a different category. Then, during the last century, the mathematicians, […] secretly undermined belief in the evidence of Euclidean Geometry. And now, in our time, there has been unloosed a cataclysm which has swept away space, time, and matter hitherto regarded as the firmest pillars of natural science, but only to make place for a view of things of wider scope and entailing a deeper vision. This revolution was promoted essentially by the thought of one man, Albert Einstein." (Hermann Weyl," Space, Time, Matter", 1922)

"When Faraday filled space with quivering lines of force, he was bringing mathematics into electricity. When Maxwell stated his famous laws about the electromagnetic field it was mathematics. The relativity theory of Einstein which makes gravity a fiction, and reduces the mechanics of the universe to geometry, is mathematical research." (James B Shaw, "The Spirit of Research", The Monist No. 4, 1922)

On Physics: On Electromagnetism (-1899)

"My theory of electrical forces is that they are called into play in insulating media by slight electric displacements, which put certain small portions of the medium into a state of distortion which, being resisted by the elasticity of the medium, produces an electromotive force [...] I suppose the elasticity of the sphere to react on the electrical matter surrounding it, and press it downwards. From the determination by Kohlrausch and Weber of the numerical relation between the statical and magnetic effects of electricity, I have determined the elasticity of the medium in air, and assuming that it is the same with the luminiferous ether I have determined the velocity of propagation of transverse vibrations." (James C Maxwell, [Letter to Michael Faraday] 1861) 

"The general equations are next applied to the case of a magnetic disturbance propagated through a non-conductive field, and it is shown that the only disturbances which can be so propagated are those which are transverse to the direction of propagation, and that the velocity of propagation is the velocity v, found from experiments such as those of Weber, which expresses the number of electrostatic units of electricity which are contained in one electromagnetic unit. This velocity is so nearly that of light, that it seems we have strong reason to conclude that light itself (including radiant heat, and other radiations if any) is an electromagnetic disturbance in the form of waves propagated through the electromagnetic field according to electromagnetic laws." (James C Maxwell, "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field", 1865)

"The theory I propose may therefore be called a theory of the Electromagnetic Field because it has to do with the space in the neighbourhood of the electric or magnetic bodies, and it may be called a Dynamical Theory, because it assumes that in the space there is matter in motion, by which the observed electromagnetic phenomena are produced." (James Clerk Maxwell, "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field", 1865)

"What, then, is light according to the electromagnetic theory? It consists of alternate and opposite rapidly recurring transverse magnetic disturbances, accompanied with electric displacements, the direction of the electric displacement being at the right angles to the magnetic disturbance, and both at right angles to the direction of the ray." (James Clerk Maxwell, "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field", 1865)

"Faraday is, and must always remain, the father of that enlarged science of electromagnetism." (James C Maxwell, "Faraday", Nature, 1873)

"The experimental investigation by which Ampere established the law of the mechanical action between electric currents is one of the most brilliant achievements in science. The whole theory and experiment, seems as if it had leaped, full grown and full armed, from the brain of the 'Newton of Electricity'. It is perfect in form, and unassailable in accuracy, and it is summed up in a formula from which all the phenomena may be deduced, and which must always remain the cardinal formula of electro-dynamics." (James C Maxwell, "A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism", 1873)

"One of the chief peculiarities of this treatise is the doctrine that the true electric current, on which the electromagnetic phenomena depend, is not the same thing as the current of conduction, but that the time-variation of the electric displacement must [also] be taken into account [...]" (James C Maxwell, "A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism" 1881)

"This maze of symbols, electric and magnetic potential, vector potential, electric force, current, displacement, magnetic force, and induction, have been practically reduced to two, electric and magnetic force." (George F Fitzgerald, The Electrician, [bookmreview] 1893) 

On Systems: On Equilibrium (From Fiction to Science-Fiction)

"From a caprice of nature, not from the ignorance of man. Not a mistake has been made in the working. But we cannot prevent equilibrium from producing its effects. We may brave human laws, but we cannot resist natural ones." (Jules Verne, "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea", 1870)

"Throughout recorded time, and probably since the end of the Neolithic Age, there have been three kinds of people in the world, the High, the Middle, and the Low. They have been subdivided in many ways, they have borne countless different names, and their relative numbers, as well as their attitude toward one another, have varied from age to age; but the essential structure of society has never altered. Even after enormous upheavals and seemingly irrevocable changes, the same pattern has always reasserted itself, just as a gyroscope will always return to equilibrium, however far it is pushed one way or the other." (George Orwell, "1984", 1949)

"But you must not change one thing, one pebble, one grain of sand, until you know what good and evil will follow on that act. The world is in balance, in Equilibrium. […] It is dangerous, that power. [...] It must follow knowledge, and serve need." (Ursula K Le Guin, "A Wizard of Earthsea", 1968)

"Living systems are never in equilibrium. They are inherently unstable. They may seem stable, but they’re not. Everything is moving and changing. In a sense, everything is on the edge of collapse. (Michael Crichton, "Jurassic Park", 1990)

"Maybe those nihilist philosophers are right; maybe this is all we can expect of the universe, a relentless crushing of life and spirit, because the equilibrium state of the cosmos is death..." (Arthur C Clarke, "The Light of Other Days", 2000)

"The universe is full of energy, but much of it is at equilibrium. At equilibrium no energy can flow, and therefore it cannot be used for work, any more than the level waters of a pond can be used to drive a water-wheel. It is on the flow of energy out of equilibrium - the small fraction of 'useful' energy, 'exergy' - that life depends." (Arthur C Clarke, "Firstborn", 2007)

On Physics: On Gravity (1850-1899)

"It is no valid objection that science as yet throws no light on the far higher problem of the essence or origin of life. Who can explain gravity? No one now objects to following out the results consequent on this unknown element of attraction" (Charles Darwin, "The Origin of Species", 1859)

"Newton's law is nothing but the statistics of gravitation, it has no power whatever. Let us get rid of the idea of power from law altogether. Call law tabulation of facts, expression of facts, or what you will; anything rather than suppose that it either explains or compels."(Florence Nightingale, "Suggestions for Thought", 1860)

"Any opinion as to the form in which the energy of gravitation exists in space is of great importance, and whoever can make his opinion probable will have, made an enormous stride in physical speculation. The apparent universality of gravitation, and the equality of its effects on matter of all kinds are most remarkable facts, hitherto without exception; but they are purely experimental facts, liable to be corrected by a single observed exception. We cannot conceive of matter with negative inertia or mass; but we see no way of accounting for the proportionality of gravitation to mass by any legitimate method of demonstration. If we can see the tails of comets fly off in the direction opposed to the sun with an accelerated velocity, and if we believe these tails to be matter and not optical illusions or mere tracks of vibrating disturbance, then we must admit a force in that direction, and we may establish that it is caused by the sun if it always depends upon his position and distance." (James C Maxwell, [Letter to William Huggins] 1868)

"Economic laws are statements with regard to the tendencies of man's action under certain conditions. They are hypothetical only in the same sense as are the laws of the physical sciences: for those laws also contain or imply conditions. But there is more difficulty in making the conditions clear, and more danger in any failure to do so, in economics than in physics. The laws of human action are not indeed as simple, as definite or as clearly ascertainable as the law of gravitation; but many of them may rank with the laws of those natural sciences which deal with complex subject-matter." (Alfred Marshall, "Principles of Economics", 1890)

"Everything in physical science, from the law of gravitation to the building of bridges, from the spectroscope to the art of navigation, would be profoundly modified by any considerable inaccuracy in the hypothesis that our actual space is Euclidean. The observed truth of physical science, therefore, constitutes overwhelming empirical evidence that this hypothesis is very approximately correct, even if not rigidly true." (Bertrand Russell, "Foundations of Geometry", 1897)

On Physics: On Gravity (1925-1949)

"The essence of Riemann's discoveries consists in having shown that there exist a vast number of possible types of spaces, all of them perfectly self-consistent. When, therefore, it comes to deciding which one of these possible spaces real space will turn out to be, we cannot prejudge [...] Experiment and observation alone can yield us a clue. To a first approximation, experiment and observation prove space to be Euclidean, and this accounts for our natural belief [...] merely by force of habit. But experiment is necessarily innacurate, and we cannot foretell whether our opinions will not have to be modified when our experiments are conducted with greater accuracy. Riemann's views thus place the problem of space on an empirical basis excluding all a priori assertions on the subject [...] the relativity theory is very intimately connected with this empirical philosophy; for. [...] Einstein is compelled to appeal to a varying non-Euclideanism of four-dimensional space-time in order to account with extreme simplicity for gravitation. [...] had the extension of the universe been restricted on a priori grounds [...] to three dimensional Euclidean space, Einstein's theory would have been rejected on first principles. [...] as soon as we recognise that the fundamental continuum of the universe and its geometry cannot be posited a priori [...] a vast number of possibilities are thrown open. Among these the four-dimensional space-time of relativity, with its varying degrees of non-Euclideanism, finds a ready place." (Aram D'Abro,  "The Evolution of Scientific Thought from Newton to Einstein", [Forward] 1927)

"Light-waves in passing a massive body such as the sun are deflected through a small angle. This is additional evidence that the Newtonian picture of gravitation as a tug is inadequate. You cannot deflect waves by tugging at them, and clearly another representation of the agency which deflects them must be found." (Arthur Eddington, "The Nature of the Physical World", 1928)

"The force acting on the pendulum is proportional to its active mass, its inertia is proportional to its passive mass, so that the period will depend on the ratio of the passive and the active mass. Consequently the fact that the period of all these different pendulums was the same, proves that this ratio is a constant, and can be made equal to unity by a suitable choice of units, i. e., the inertial and the gravitational mass are the same." (Willem de Sitter, "The Astronomical Aspect of the Theory of Relativity", 1933)

"In electromagnetism [...] the law of the inverse square had been supreme, but, as a consequence of the work of Faraday and Maxwell, it was superseded by the field. And the same change took place in the theory of gravitation. By and by the material particles, electrically charged bodies, and magnets which are the things that we actually observe come to be looked upon only as 'singularities' in the field. So far this transformation from the force to the potential, from the action at a distance to the field, is only a purely mathematical operation." (Willem de Sitter,"Kosmos", 1932)

"Two points should be specially emphasized in connection with the general theory of relativity. First, it is a purely physical theory, invented to explain empirical physical facts, especially the identity of gravitational and inertial mass, and to coordinate and harmonize different chapters of physical theory, especially mechanics and electromagnetic theory. It has nothing metaphysical about it. Its importance from a metaphysical or philosophical point of view is that it aids us to distinguish in the observed phenomena what is absolute, or due to the reality behind the phenomena, from what is relative, i.e. due to the observer.S econd, it is a pure generalization, or abstraction, like Newton's system of mechanics and law of gravitation. It contains no hypothesis, as contrasted with the atomic theory or the theory of quanta, which are based on hypothesis. It may be considered as the logical sequence and completion of Newton's Principia. The science of mechanics was founded by Archimedes, who had a clear conception of the relativity of motion, and may be called the first relativist. Galileo, who was inspired by the reading of the works of Archimedes, took the subject up where his great predecessor had left it. His fundamental discovery is the law of inertia, which is the backbone of Newton's classical system of mechanics, and retains the same central position in Einstein's relativistic system. Thus one continuous line of thought can be traced through the development of our insight into the mechanical processes of nature... characterized by the sequence [...] Archimedes, Galileo, Newton, Einstein." (Willem de Sitter, "The Astronomical Aspect of the Theory of Relativity", 1933)

"There are necessities and impossibilities in reality which do not obtain in fiction, any more than the law of gravity to which we are subject controls what is represented in a picture. [...] It is the same with pure good; for a necessity as strong as gravity condemns man to evil and forbids him any good, or only within the narrowest limits and laboriously obtained and soiled and adulterated with evil. [...] The simplicity which makes the fictional good something insipid and unable to hold the attention becomes, in the real good, an unfathomable marvel." (Simone Weil, "Morality and Literature", cca. 1941)

"Any region of space-time that has no gravitating mass in its vicinity is uncurved, so that the geodesics here are straight lines, which means that particles move in straight courses at uniform speeds (Newton's first law). But the world-lines of planets, comets and terrestrial projectiles are geodesics in a region of space-time which is curved by the proximity of the sun or earth. […] No force of gravitation is […] needed to impress curvature on world-lines; the curvature is inherent in the space […]" (James H Jeans," The Growth of Physical Science", 1947)

"The first forces brought into mathematical formulation were gravitational forces, as seen in planetary motion. Next were elastic forces. Then followed electric and magnetic forces... Their [electric and magnetic forces] study was mostly a product of the nineteenth century. [...] electromagnetic forces are of a far wider application than was first supposed. It has become evident that, instead of being active only in electrostatic and electromagnetic applications such as the telegraph, dynamo, and radio, the forces between the nuclei and electrons of single atoms, the chemical forces between atoms and molecules, the forces of cohesion and elasticity holding solids together, are all of an electric nature. [...] electromagnetic theory [...] carries us rather far into the structure of matter [...] The equations underlying the theory, Maxwell's equations, are relatively simple, but not nearly so simple as Newton's Newton's laws of motion." (John C Slater & Nathaniel H Frank, "Electromagnetism", 1947)

"Although the Special Theory of Relativity does not account for electromagnetic phenomena, it explains many of their properties. General Relativity, however, tells us nothing about electromagnetism. In Einstein's space-time continuum gravitational forces are absorbed in the geometry, but the electromagnetic forces are quite unaffected. Various attempts have been made to generate the geometry of space-time so as to produce a unified field theory incorporating both gravitational and electromagnetic forces." (Gerald J Whitrow, "The Structure of the Universe: An Introduction to Cosmology", 1949)

On Physics: On Gravity (2010-)

"Starting with Einstein’s general relativity, differential geometry has started playing a major role in physics. General relativity describes the gravitational fields as a metric property of the spacetime manifold. More precisely, spacetime (i.e., the manifold the points of which are events; we may intuitively say that an event is ‘something that happens in a given point in space at a certain time’) is supposed to be endowed with a Lorentzian metric. This means that spacetime has pointwise the same structure as the Minkowski space of special relativity but in general is not flat, as on the contrary Minkowski space is. Indeed, out of the metric tensor one can construct another tensor field, the curvature field, which measures how far the geometry of spacetime is from that of a flat space. The celebrated Einstein equations prescribe how the matter in our universe determines the curvature of spacetime, and in turn the curvature determines how matter (particles, light rays, extended bodies…) moves." (Claudio Bartocci & Ugo Bruzzo, [Claudio Bartocci et al (Eds), "New Trends in Geometry: Their tole in the natural and social sciences"], 2011)

"The Newtonian universe is material in the sense that the world was viewed as being made up of stuff - tangible, real objects. It was argued that even forces like gravity that appear to act across empty stretches of space are conveyed by tiny particles, or corpuscles. Moreover, since the universe is material, its behavior can be predicted or understood. Things are they way they are for a reason or a cause. The Newtonian world is mathematical, in that it was viewed that the regularities or laws that describe or govern the world are mathematical in nature." (David P Feldman,"Chaos and Fractals: An Elementary Introduction", 2012)

"[…] there’s atomic physics - electrons and protons and neutrons, all the stuff of which atoms are made. At these very, very, very small scales, the laws of physics are much the same, but there is also a force you ignore, which is the gravitational force. Gravity is present everywhere because it comes from the entire mass of the universe. It doesn’t cancel itself out, it doesn’t have positive or negative value, it all adds up." (Michael F Atiyah, [interview] 2013)

"The most familiar manifold, however, is the space-time manifold, which has 4 dimensions. It is described by a time coordinate and three spatial coordinates. In addition to being a differentiable manifold, space-time has much more additional structure. It is at the level of this additional structure, which will be the subject of later chapters, that the space-time of Newtonian physics differs from the space-time of special relativity and from the space-times of Einstein’s theory of gravity (also called general relativity)." (José G Vargas, "Differential Geometry for Physicists and Mathematicians: Moving frames and differential forms from Euclid past Riemann", 2014)

"String theory today looks almost fractal. The more closely people explore any one corner, the more structure they find. Some dig deep into particular crevices; others zoom out to try to make sense of grander patterns. The upshot is that string theory today includes much that no longer seems stringy. Those tiny loops of string whose harmonics were thought to breathe form into every particle and force known to nature (including elusive gravity) hardly even appear anymore on chalkboards at conferences." (K C Cole, "The Strange Second Life of String Theory", Quanta Magazine", 2016) [source]

"Granularity is ubiquitous in nature: light is made of photons, the particles of light. The energy of electrons in atoms can acquire only certain values and not others. The purest air is granular, and so, too, is the densest matter. Once it is understood that Newton’s space and time are physical entities like all others, it is natural to suppose that they are also granular. Theory confirms this idea: loop quantum gravity predicts that elementary temporal leaps are small, but finite." (Carlo Rovelli, "The Order of Time", 2018)

"[...] one thing that's worth mentioning, though, it that apart from the dream of understanding physics at a deeper level involving gravity, work in string theory has been useful in shedding lights on more conventional problems in quantum field theory and even in condensed matter physics and as well with applications to mathematics. Apart from its intrinsic interest, those successes are one of the things that tend to give us confidence that we're on the right track. Because, speaking personally, I find it implausible that a completely wrong new physics theory would give rise to useful insights about so many different areas." (Edward Witten, [in "Dirac Conversation: Edward Witten". Interview at Int'l Center for Theoretical Physics], 2024) [source] 

On Physics: On Gravity (1950-1999)

"As soon as matter took over, the force of Newtonian gravity, which represents one of the most important characteristics of 'ponderable' matter, came into play." (George Gamow, "Conclusion of The Creation of the Universe", 1952)

"The second law of thermodynamics is, without a doubt, one of the most perfect laws in physics. Any reproducible violation of it, however small, would bring the discoverer great riches as well as a trip to Stockholm. The world’s energy problems would be solved at one stroke. […] Not even Maxwell’s laws of electricity or Newton’s law of gravitation are so sacrosanct, for each has measurable corrections coming from quantum effects or general relativity. The law has caught the attention of poets and philosophers and has been called the greatest scientific achievement of the nineteenth century." (Ivan P. Bazarov, "Thermodynamics", 1964)

"The force of gravity - though it is the first force with which we are acquainted, and though it is always with us, and though it is the one with a strength we most thoroughly appreciate - is by far the weakest known force in nature. It is first and rearmost." (Isaac Asimov, "Asimov On Physics", 1976)

"So much of science consists of things we can never see: light ‘waves’ and charged ‘particles’; magnetic ‘fields’ and gravitational ‘forces’; quantum ‘jumps’ and electron ‘orbits’. In fact, none of these phenomena is literally what we say it is. Light waves do not undulate through empty space in the same way that water waves ripple over a still pond; a field is only a mathematical description of the strength and direction of a force; an atom does not literally jump from one quantum state to another, and electrons do not really travel around the atomic nucleus in orbits. The words we use are merely metaphors." (K C Cole, "On Imagining the Unseeable", Discover Magazine, 1982)

"Electromagnetic fields [...] are neither charged nor magnetized and thus cannot contribute to their own source. The general theory does reveal a new feature of electromagnetic fields... Since they have energy, they produce gravitational effects and thus affect the structure of space-time, which, in turn, means that an electromagnetic field can affect the motion of non-charged matter." (Nancy Nersessian, "Faraday to Einstein: Constructing Meaning in Scientific Theories", 1984)

"Until now, physical theories have been regarded as merely models with approximately describe the reality of nature. As the models improve, so the fit between theory and reality gets closer. Some physicists are now claiming that supergravity is the reality, that the model and the real world are in mathematically perfect accord." (Paul C W Davies, "Superforce", 1984)

"For the advancing army of physics, battling for many a decade with heat and sound, fields and particles, gravitation and spacetime geometry, the cavalry of mathematics, galloping out ahead, provided what it thought to be the rationale for the natural number system. Encounter with the quantum has taught us, however, that we acquire our knowledge in bits; that the continuum is forever beyond our reach. Yet for daily work the concept of the continuum has been and will continue to be as indispensable for physics as it is for mathematics." (John A Wheeler, "Hermann Weyl and the Unity of Knowledge", American Scientist Vol. 74, 1986)

"In deterministic geometry, structures are defined, communicated, and analysed, with the aid of elementary transformations such as affine transfor- transformations, scalings, rotations, and congruences. A fractal set generally contains infinitely many points whose organization is so complicated that it is not possible to describe the set by specifying directly where each point in it lies. Instead, the set may be defined by "the relations between the pieces." It is rather like describing the solar system by quoting the law of gravitation and stating the initial conditions. Everything follows from that. It appears always to be better to describe in terms of relationships." (Michael Barnsley, "Fractals Everwhere", 1988)

"To build matter itself from geometry - that in a sense is what string theory does. It can be thought of that way, especially in a theory like the heterotic string which is inherently a theory of gravity in which the particles of matter as well as the other forces of nature emerge in the same way that gravity emerges from geometry. Einstein would have been pleased with this, at least with the goal, if not the realization. [...] He would have liked the fact that there is an underlying geometrical principle - which, unfortunately, we don’t really yet understand." (David Gross, [interview] 1988)

"In contrast to gravitation, interatomic forces are typically modeled as inhomogeneous power laws with at least two different exponents. Such laws (and exponential laws, too) are not scale-free; they necessarily introduce a characteristic length, related to the size of the atoms. Power laws also govern the power spectra of all kinds of noises, most intriguing among them the ubiquitous (but sometimes difficult to explain)." (Manfred Schroeder, "Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws Minutes from an Infinite Paradise", 1990)

"Scaling invariance results from the fact that homogeneous power laws lack natural scales; they do not harbor a characteristic unit (such as a unit length, a unit time, or a unit mass). Such laws are therefore also said to be scale-free or, somewhat paradoxically, 'true on all scales'. Of course, this is strictly true only for our mathematical models. A real spring will not expand linearly on all scales; it will eventually break, at some characteristic dilation length. And even Newton's law of gravitation, once properly quantized, will no doubt sprout a characteristic length." (Manfred Schroeder, "Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws Minutes from an Infinite Paradise", 1990)

"In practice, the intelligibility of the world amounts to the fact that we find it to be algorithmically compressible. We can replace sequences of facts and observational data by abbreviated statements which contain the same information content. These abbreviations we often call 'laws of Nature.' If the world were not algorithmically compressible, then there would exist no simple laws of nature. Instead of using the law of gravitation to compute the orbits of the planets at whatever time in history we want to know them, we would have to keep precise records of the positions of the planets at all past times; yet this would still not help us one iota in predicting where they would be at any time in the future. This world is potentially and actually intelligible because at some level it is extensively algorithmically compressible. At root, this is why mathematics can work as a description of the physical world. It is the most expedient language that we have found in which to express those algorithmic compressions." (John D Barrow, "New Theories of Everything", 1991)

"Three laws governing black hole changes were thus found, but it was soon noticed that something unusual was going on. If one merely replaced the words 'surface area' by 'entropy' and 'gravitational field' by 'temperature', then the laws of black hole changes became merely statements of the laws of thermodynamics. The rule that the horizon surface areas can never decrease in physical processes becomes the second law of thermodynamics that the entropy can never decrease; the constancy of the gravitational field around the horizon is the so-called zeroth law of thermodynamics that the temperature must be the same everywhere in a state of thermal equilibrium. The rule linking allowed changes in the defining quantities of the black hole just becomes the first law of thermodynamics, which is more commonly known as the conservation of energy." (John D Barrow, "Theories of Everything: The Quest for Ultimate Explanation", 1991)

"The Feynman method has the virtue that it provides us with a vivid picture of nature’s quantum trickery at work. The idea is that the path of a particle through space is not generally well defined in quantum mechanics. […] So when an electron arrives at a point in space - say a target screen - many different histories must be integrated together to create this one event. Feynman’s so-called path-integral, or sum-over-histories approach to quantum mechanics, set this remarkable concept out as a mathematical procedure. It remained more or less a curiosity for many years, but as physicists pushed quantum mechanics to its limits - applying it to gravitation and even cosmology - so the Feynman approach turned out to offer the best calculational tool for describing a quantum universe. History may well judge that, among his many outstanding contributions to physics, the path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics is the most significant." (Paul Davies , [Introduction to Richard P Feynman's"Six Easy Pieces"] 1994)

"No other theory known to science [other than superstring theory] uses such powerful mathematics at such a fundamental level. […] because any unified field theory first must absorb the Riemannian geometry of Einstein’s theory and the Lie groups coming from quantum field theory. […] The new mathematics, which is responsible for the merger of these two theories, is topology, and it is responsible for accomplishing the seemingly impossible task of abolishing the infinities of a quantum theory of gravity." (Michio Kaku, "Hyperspace", 1995)

"Riemann concluded that electricity, magnetism, and gravity are caused by the crumpling of our three-dimensional universe in the unseen fourth dimension. Thus a 'force' has no independent life of its own; it is only the apparent effect caused by the distortion of geometry. By introducing the fourth spatial dimension, Riemann accidentally stumbled on what would become one of the dominant themes in modern theoretical physics, that the laws of nature appear simple when expressed in higher-dimensional space. He then set about developing a mathematical language in which this idea could be expressed." (Michio Kaku, "Hyperspace", 1995)

"Much of what the universe had been, was, and would be, Newton had disclosed, was the outcome of an infinity of material particles all pulling on one another simultaneously. If the result of all that gravitational tussling had appeared to the Greeks to be a cosmos, it was simply because the underlying equation describing their behavior had itself turned out to be every bit a cosmos-orderly, beautiful, and decent." (Michael Guillen," Five Equations That Changed the World", 1995)

"The laws of Nature are based upon the existence of a pattern, linking one state of affairs to another; and where there is pattern, there is symmetry. Yet. [...] the symmetries that the laws enshrine are broken in [...] outcomes. Suppose that we balance a needle on its point and then release it. The law of gravity, which governs its subsequent motion, is perfectly democratic. It has no preference for any particular direction in the Universe: it is symmetrical in this respect. Yet, when the needle falls, it must fall in a particular direction. The directional symmetry of the underlying law is broken, therefore [...] By the same token, the fallen needle hides the symmetry of the law. [...] Such 'symmetry-breaking' governs much of what we see in the Universe... It allows a Universe governed by a small number of symmetrical laws to manifest an infinite diversity of complex, asymmetrical states. This is how the Universe can be at once, simple and complicated." (John D Barrow, "The Artful Universe", 1995)

"The problems associated with the initial singularity of the universe bring us to what is called the theory of everything. It is an all-encompassing theory that would completely explain me origin of the universe and everything in it. It would bring together general relativity and quantum mechanics, and explain everything there is to know about the elementary particles of the universe, and the four basic forces of nature (gravitational, electromagnetic, weak, and strong nuclear forces). Furthermore, it would explain the basic laws of nature and the fundamental constants of nature such as the speed of light and Planck's constant." (Barry R Parker, "Chaos in the Cosmos: The stunning complexity of the universe", 1996)

"The universe would have expanded in a smooth way from a single point. As it expanded, it would have borrowed energy from the gravitational field, to create matter. As any economist could have predicted, the result of all that borrowing, was inflation. The universe expanded and borrowed at an ever-increasing rate. Fortunately, the debt of gravitational energy will not have to be repaid until the end of the universe." (Stephen Hawking," The Beginning of Time", 1996)

"Discovery of supersymmetry would be one of the real milestones in physics, made even more exciting by its close links to still more ambitious theoretical ideas. Indeed, supersymmetry is one of the basic requirements of 'string theory', which is the framework in which theoretical physicists have had some success in unifying gravity with the rest of the elementary particle forces. Discovery of supersymmetry would would certainly give string theory an enormous boost." (Edward Witten, [preface to (Gordon Kane, "Supersymmetry: Unveiling the Ultimate Laws of Nature", 2000)] 1999)

On Physics: On Gravity (1800-1849)

"The law of gravitation extends universally over all matter. The fixed stars obeying central forces move in orbits. The milky way comprehends several systems of fixed stars; those that appear out of the tract of the milky way form but one system which is our own. The sun being of the number of fixed stars, revolves round a centre like the rest. Each system has its centre, and several systems taken together have a common centre, Assemblages of their assemblages have likewise theirs. In fine, there is à universal centre for the whole world round which all things revolve." (Johann H Lambert, "The System of the World", 1800)

"Given for one instant an intelligence which could comprehend all the forces by which nature is animated and the respective positions of the beings which compose it, if moreover this intelligence were vast enough to submit these data to analysis, it would embrace in the same formula both the movements of the largest bodies in the universe and those of the lightest atom: to it nothing would be uncertain, and the future as the past would be present to its eyes. The human mind offers a feeble outline of that intelligence, in the perfection which it has given to astronomy. Its discoveries in mechanics and in geometry, joined to that of universal gravity, have enabled it to comprehend in the same analytical expressions the past and future states of the world system." (Pierre-Simon Laplace, "Analytical Theory of Probability", 1812)

"Analysis and natural philosophy owe their most important discoveries to this fruitful means, which is called induction. Newton was indebted to it for his theorem of the binomial and the principle of universal gravity." (Pierre-Simon Laplace, "Philosophical Essay on Probabilities”, 1814)

"Primary causes are unknown to us; but are subject to simple and constant laws, which may be discovered by observation, the study of them being the object of natural philosophy. Heat, like gravity, penetrates every substance of the universe, its rays occupy all parts of space. The object of our work is to set forth the mathematical laws which this element obeys. The theory of heat will hereafter form one of the most important branches of general physics." (Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Fourier, "The Analytical Theory of Heat", 1822)

"In order that a pendulum may continue to make the same number of oscillations in a given time, it must be shortened as it is carried towards the equator; and the variation of its length in different latitudes affords an accurate measurement of the force of gravity. But the force of gravity has known relation to the figure of the earth, which, therefore, may be determined, by observing the length of the seconds pendulum at different points on its surface." (David Brewster, [in "The Edinburgh Encyclopaedia"] 1830) 

"Science and knowledge are subject, in their extension and increase, to laws quite opposite to those which regulate the material world. Unlike the forces of molecular attraction, which cease at sensible distances; or that of gravity, which decreases rapidly with the increasing distance from the point of its origin; the farther we advance from the origin of our knowledge, the larger it becomes, and the greater power it bestows upon its cultivators, to add new fields to its dominions." (Charles Babbage, "On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures", 1832)

"It is a mathematical fact that the casting of this pebble from my hand alters the centre of gravity of the universe." (Thomas Carlyle, "Sartor Resartus", 1836)

"Gravity. Surely this force must be capable of an experimental relation to electricity, magnetism, and the other forces, so as to bind it up with them in reciprocal action and equivalent effect." (Michael Faraday, [Notebook entry] 1849) 

On Physics: On Gravity (2000-2009)

"In the language of mental models, such past experience provided the default assumptions necessary to fill the gaps in the emerging and necessarily incomplete framework of a relativistic theory of gravitation. It was precisely the nature of these default assumptions that allowed them to be discarded again in the light of novel information - provided, for instance, by the further elaboration of the mathematical formalism - without, however, having to abandon the underlying mental models which could thus continue to function as heuristic orientations." (Jürgen Renn, "Before the Riemann Tensor: The Emergence of Einstein’s Double Strategy", [in "The Universe of General Relativity"] 2000)

"In string theory one studies strings moving in a fixed classical spacetime. […] what we call a background-dependent approach. […] One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that there is no fixed background. The very geometry of space and time is a dynamical system that evolves in time. The experimental observations that energy leaks from binary pulsars in the form of gravitational waves - at the rate predicted by general relativity to the […] accuracy of eleven decimal place - tell us that there is no more a fixed background of spacetime geometry than there are fixed crystal spheres holding the planets up." (Lee Smolin, "Loop Quantum Gravity", The New Humanists: Science at the Edge, 2003)

"It was found [in the 1970s], unexpectedly and without anyone really having a concept for it, that the rules of perturbation theory can be changed in a way that makes relativistic quantum gravity inevitable rather than impossible. The change is made by replacing point particles by strings. Then Feynman graphs are replaced by Riemann surfaces, which are smooth - unlike the graphs, which have singularities at interaction vertices. The Riemann surfaces can degenerate to graphs in many different ways. In field theory, the interactions occur at the vertices of a Feynman graph. By contrast, in string theory, the interaction is encoded globally, in the topology of a Riemann surface, any small piece of which is like any other. This is reminiscent of how non-linearities are encoded globally in twistor theory." (Edward Witten,"The Past and Future of String Theory", [in  W Gibbons et al, "The Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology: Celebrating Stephen Hawking's Contributions to Physics", 2003)

"General relativity explains gravitation as a curvature, or bending, or warping, of the geometry of space-time, produced by the presence of matter. Free fall in a space shuttle around Earth, where space is warped, produces weightlessness, and is equivalent from the observer's point of view to freely moving in empty space where there is no large massive body producing curvature. In free fall we move along a 'geodesic' in the curved space-time, which is essentially a straight-line motion over small distances. But it becomes a curved trajectory when viewed at large distances. This is what produces the closed elliptical orbits of planets, with tiny corrections that have been correctly predicted and measured. Planets in orbits are actually in free fall in a curved space-time!" (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"Combine general relativity and quantum theory into a single theory that can claim to be the complete theory of nature. This is called the problem of quantum gravity." (Lee Smolin, "The Trouble with Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science and What Comes Next", 2006)

"String theory was not invented to describe gravity; instead it originated in an attempt to describe the strong interactions, wherein mesons can be thought of as open strings with quarks at their ends. The fact that the theory automatically described closed strings as well, and that closed strings invariably produced gravitons and gravity, and that the resulting quantum theory of gravity was finite and consistent is one of the most appealing aspects of the theory." (David Gross, "Einstein and the Search for Unification", 2005)

"Mathematical theories have sometimes been used to predict phenomena that were not confirmed until years later. For example, Maxwell’s equations, named after physicist James Clerk Maxwell, predicted radio waves. Einstein’s field equations suggested that gravity would bend light and that the universe is expanding. Physicist Paul Dirac once noted that the abstract mathematics we study now gives us a glimpse of physics in the future. In fact, his equations predicted the existence of antimatter, which was subsequently discovered. Similarly, mathematician Nikolai Lobachevsky said that “there is no branch of mathematics, however abstract, which may not someday be applied to the phenomena of the real world." (Clifford A Pickover, "The Math Book: From Pythagoras to the 57th Dimension, 250 Milestones in the History of Mathematics", 2009)

"The concept of symmetry is used widely in physics. If the laws that determine relations between physical magnitudes and a change of these magnitudes in the course of time do not vary at the definite operations (transformations), they say, that these laws have symmetry (or they are invariant) with respect to the given transformations. For example, the law of gravitation is valid for any points of space, that is, this law is in variant with respect to the system of coordinates." (Alexey Stakhov et al, "The Mathematics of Harmony", 2009)

On Coordinates (2010-)

"One of the most important skills you will need to acquire in order to use manifold theory effectively is an ability to switch back and forth easily between invariant descriptions and their coordinate counterparts." (John M Lee, "Introduction to Smooth Manifolds" 2nd Ed., 2013)

"The fact that manifolds do not come with any predetermined choice of coordinates is both a blessing and a curse. The flexibility to choose coordinates more or less arbitrarily can be a big advantage in approaching problems in manifold theory, because the coordinates can often be chosen to simplify some aspect of the problem at hand. But we pay for this flexibility by being obliged to ensure that any objects we wish to define globally on a manifold are not dependent on a particular choice of coordinates. There are generally two ways of doing this: either by writing down a coordinate-dependent definition and then proving that the definition gives the same results in any coordinate chart, or by writing down a definition that is manifestly coordinate-independent (often called an invariant definition)." (John M Lee, "Introduction to Smooth Manifolds" 2nd Ed., 2013)

"A coordinate system then is a map from a region of the differentiable manifold to the set of n-tuples. If we choose a point, the map determines an n-tuple of coordinates of the point. Hence, we have the coordinate map and the coordinates as components, or values taken by the set of coordinate functions that constitute the map. When two coordinate systems overlap, it is required that the functions expressing the coordinate transformation are continuous and have continuous derivatives up to some order, appropriate to achieve some specific purpose." (José G Vargas, "Differential Geometry for Physicists and Mathematicians: Moving frames and differential forms from Euclid past Riemann", 2014)

"A pair of region and coordinate assignment is called a chart. The region. in the chart of Cartesian coordinates in the plane is the whole plane. And the region in the chart for the system of polar coordinates is the plane punctured at the chosen origin of the system." (José G Vargas, "Differential Geometry for Physicists and Mathematicians: Moving frames and differential forms from Euclid past Riemann", 2014)

"In Riemann’s and Cartan’s theories, a surface is a differentiable manifold of dimension two, meaning that we need two independent coordinates to label its points. But, as we shall see in an appendix, the theory of differentiable manifolds of dimension two and the theory of surfaces developed before Riemann do not coincide. Thus, whereas we may speak of the torsion of a differentiable 2-manifold, we may not speak of the torsion of a surface in the theory of curves and surfaces of that time." (José G Vargas, "Differential Geometry for Physicists and Mathematicians: Moving frames and differential forms from Euclid past Riemann", 2014)

"One sometimes finds in the literature the statement that a tensor transforms in such and such way under a coordinate transformation. Tensors do not transform. They are invariants. Their components do, under changes of section of the frame bundle." (José G Vargas, "Differential Geometry for Physicists and Mathematicians: Moving frames and differential forms from Euclid past Riemann", 2014)

"The most familiar manifold, however, is the space-time manifold, which has 4 dimensions. It is described by a time coordinate and three spatial coordinates. In addition to being a differentiable manifold, space-time has much more additional structure. It is at the level of this additional structure, which will be the subject of later chapters, that the space-time of Newtonian physics differs from the space-time of special relativity and from the space-times of Einstein’s theory of gravity (also called general relativity)." (José G Vargas, "Differential Geometry for Physicists and Mathematicians: Moving frames and differential forms from Euclid past Riemann", 2014)

"The primary aspects of the theory of complex manifolds are the geometric structure itself, its topological structure, coordinate systems, etc., and holomorphic functions and mappings and their properties. Algebraic geometry over the complex number field uses polynomial and rational functions of complex variables as the primary tools, but the underlying topological structures are similar to those that appear in complex manifold theory, and the nature of singularities in both the analytic and algebraic settings is also structurally very similar." (Raymond O Wells Jr, "Differential and Complex Geometry: Origins, Abstractions and Embeddings", 2017) 

On Coordinates (2000-2009)

"By definition, a Kähler manifold is one with a complex structure (this means in particular that the coordinates changes are holomorphic for the complex coordinates) together with a Riemannian metric which has with this complex structure the best possible link, namely that multiplication of tangent vectors by unit complex numbers preserves the metric, but moreover the complex structure is invariant under parallel transport. This is equivalent to the condition that the holonomy group be included in the unitary group, hence equivalent also to ask for the existence of a 2-form of maximal rank and of zero covariant derivative."(Marcel Berger, "A Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry", 2003)

"Descartes’ idea to use numbers to describe points in space involves the choice of a coordinate system or coordinate frame: an origin, together with axes and units of length along the axes. A recurring theme of all the different geometries [...] is the question of what a coordinate frame is, and what I can get out of it. While coordinates provide a convenient framework to discuss points, lines, and so on, it is a basic requirement that any meaningful statement in geometry is independent of the choice of coordinates. That is, coordinate frames are a humble technical aid in determining the truth, and are not allowed the dignity of having their own meaning." (Miles Reid & Balazs Szendröi, "Geometry and Topology", 2005)

"Descartes’ invention of coordinate geometry is another key ingredient in modern science. It is scarcely an accident that calculus was discovered by Leibnitz and Newton (independently, alphabetical order) in the fifty years following the dissemination of Descartes’ ideas. Interactions between the axiomatic and the coordinate-based points of view go in both ways: coordinate geometry gives models of axiomatic geometries, and conversely, axiomatic geometries allow the introduction of number systems and coordinates." (Miles Reid & Balazs Szendröi, "Geometry and Topology", 2005)

"Minkowski calls a spatial point existing at a temporal point a world point. These coordinates are now called 'space-time coordinates'. The collection of all imaginable value systems or the set of space-time coordinates Minkowski called the world. This is now called the manifold. The manifold is four-dimensional and each of its space-time points represents an event." (Friedel Weinert," The Scientist as Philosopher: Philosophical Consequences of Great Scientific Discoveries", 2005)

"Roughly speaking, a manifold is essentially a space that is locally similar to the Euclidean space. This resemblance permits differentiation to be defined. On a manifold, we do not distinguish between two different local coordinate systems. Thus, the concepts considered are just those independent of the coordinates chosen. This makes more sense if we consider the situation from the physics point of view. In this interpretation, the systems of coordinates are systems of reference." (Ovidiu Calin & Der-Chen Chang,  "Geometric Mechanics on Riemannian Manifolds : Applications to partial differential equations", 2005)

"When real numbers are used as coordinates, the number of coordinates is the dimension of the geometry. This is why we call the plane two-dimensional and space three-dimensional. However, one can also expect complex numbers to be useful, knowing their geometric properties […] What is remarkable is that complex numbers are if anything more appropriate for spherical and hyperbolic geometry than for Euclidean geometry. With hindsight, it is even possible to see hyperbolic geometry in properties of complex numbers that were studied as early as 1800, long before hyperbolic geometry was discussed by anyone." (John Stillwell, "Yearning for the Impossible: The Surprising Truths of Mathematics", 2006)

"Coordinates and vectors - in one form or another - are two of the most fundamental concepts in any discussion of mathematics as applied to physical problems. So, it is beneficial to start our study with these two concepts. Both vectors and coordinates have generalizations that cover a wide variety of physical situations including not only ordinary three-dimensional space with its ordinary vectors, but also the four-dimensional spacetime of relativity with its so-called four vectors, and even the infinite-dimensional spaces used in quantum physics with their vectors of infinite components." (Sadri Hassani, "Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields", 2009)

"Coordinates are 'functions' that specify points of a space. The smallest number of these functions necessary to specify a point is called the dimension of that space. For instance, a point of a plane is specified by two numbers, and as the point moves in the plane the two numbers change, i.e., the coordinates are functions of the position of the point." (Sadri Hassani, "Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields", 2009)

"One of the great advantages of vectors is their ability to express results independent of any specific coordinate systems. Physical laws are always coordinate-independent. For example, when we write F = ma both F and a could be expressed in terms of Cartesian, spherical, cylindrical, or any other convenient coordinate system. This independence allows us the freedom to choose the coordinate systems most convenient for the problem at hand. For example, it is extremely difficult to solve the planetary motions in Cartesian coordinates, while the use of spherical coordinates facilitates the solution of the problem tremendously." (Sadri Hassani, "Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields", 2009)

"One of the greatest achievements in the development of mathematics since Euclid was the introduction of coordinates. Two men take credit for this development: Fermat and Descartes. These two great French mathematicians were interested in the unification of geometry and algebra, which resulted in the creation of a most fruitful branch of mathematics now called analytic geometry. Fermat and Descartes who were heavily involved in physics, were keenly aware of both the need for quantitative methods and the capacity of algebra to deliver that method." (Sadri Hassani, "Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields", 2009)

"The concept of symmetry is used widely in physics. If the laws that determine relations between physical magnitudes and a change of these magnitudes in the course of time do not vary at the definite operations (transformations), they say, that these laws have symmetry (or they are invariant) with respect to the given transformations. For example, the law of gravitation is valid for any points of space, that is, this law is in variant with respect to the system of coordinates." (Alexey Stakhov et al, "The Mathematics of Harmony", 2009)

"Which one of the three systems of coordinates to use in a given physical problem is dictated mainly by the geometry of that problem. As a rule, spherical coordinates are best suited for spheres and spherically symmetric problems. Spherical symmetry describes situations in which quantities of interest are functions only of the distance from a fixed point and not on the orientation of that distance. Similarly, cylindrical coordinates ease calculations when cylinders or cylindrical symmetries are involved. Finally, Cartesian coordinates are used in rectangular geometries." (Sadri Hassani, "Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields", 2009)