From Facts to Theory

“[…] ideas may be both novel and important, and yet, if they are incorrect – if they lack the very essential support of incontrovertible fact, they are unworthy of credence. Without this, a theory may be both beautiful and grand, but must be as evanescent as it is beautiful, and as unsubstantial as it is grand.” (George Brewster, “A New Philosophy of Matter”, 1858)

“Perfect readiness to reject a theory inconsistent with fact is a primary requisite of the philosophic mind. But it, would be a mistake to suppose that this candour has anything akin to fickleness; on the contrary, readiness to reject a false theory may be combined with a peculiar pertinacity and courage in maintaining an hypothesis as long as its falsity is not actually apparent.” (William S Jevons, “The Principles of Science”, 1887)

”Scientific facts accumulate rapidly, and give rise to theories with almost equal rapidity. These theories are often wonderfully enticing, and one is apt to pass from one to another, from theory to theory, without taking care to establish each before passing on to the next, without assuring oneself that the foundation on which one is building is secure. Then comes the crash; the last theory
breaks down utterly, and on attempting to retrace our steps to firm ground and start anew, we may find too late that one of the cards, possibly at the very foundation of the pagoda, is either faultily placed or in itself defective, and that this blemish easily remedied if detected in time has, neglected, caused the collapse of the whole structure on whose erection so much skill and perseverance have been spent.” (Arthur M Marshall, 1894)

”Facts are carpet-tacks under the pneumatic tires of theory.” (Austin O’Malley, “Keystones of Thought”, 1918)

“Nothing is more interesting to the true theorist than a fact which directly contradicts a theory generally accepted up to that time, for this is his particular work.” (Max Planck, “A Survey of Physics”, 1925)

“[…] the mere collection of facts, without some basis of theory for guidance and elucidation, is foolish and profitless.” (Gamaliel Bradford, “Darwin”, 1926)

“[…] facts are too bulky to be lugged about conveniently except on the wheels of theory.” (Julian Huxley, “Essays of a Biologist”, 1929)

”[while] the traditional way is to regard the facts of science as something like the parts of a jig-saw puzzle, which can be fitted together in one and only one way, I regard them rather as the tiny pieces of a mosaic, which can be fitted together in many ways. A new theory in an old subject is, for me, a new mosaic pattern made with the pieces taken from an older pattern.” (William H George, “The Scientist in Action”, 1936)

”We can put it down as one of the principles learned from the history of science that a theory is only overthrown by a better theory, never merely by contradictory facts.” (James B Conant, “On Understanding Science”, 1947)

”Without facts we have no science. Facts are to the scientist what words are to the poet. The scientist has a love of facts, even isolated facts, similar to a poet’s love of words. But a collection of facts is not a science any more than a dictionary is poetry. Around his facts the scientist weaves a logical pattern or theory which gives the facts meaning, order and significance.” (Isidor Isaac Rabi, “Faith in Science”, Atlantic Monthly , Vol. 187, 1951)

“The true aim of science is to discover a simple theory which is necessary and sufficient to cover the facts, when they have been purified of traditional prejudices.” (Lancelot L Whyte, “Accent on Form”, 1954)

“Science does not begin with facts; one of its tasks is to uncover the facts by removing misconceptions.” (Lancelot L Whyte, “Accent on Form”, 1954) 

“When we meet a fact which contradicts a prevailing theory, we must accept the fact and abandon the theory, even when the theory is supported by great names and generally accepted.” (Claude Bernard, “An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine”, 1957)

”Facts do not ‘speak for themselves’; they are read in the light of theory. Creative thought, in science as much as in the arts, is the motor of changing opinion. Science is a quintessentially human activity, not a mechanized, robot-like accumulation of objective information, leading by laws of logic to inescapable interpretation.” (Stephen J Gould, “Ever Since Darwin”, 1977)

”No theory ever agrees with all the facts in its domain, yet it is not always the theory that is to blame. Facts are constituted by older ideologies, and a clash between facts and theories may be proof of progress.” (Paul K Feyerabend, “Against Method”, 1978)

[Maier’s Law:] ”If the facts do not conform to the theory, they must be disposed of.” (Norman R F Maier)

“First accumulate a mass of Facts: and then construct a Theory.” (Lewis Carroll)