Avinash K Dixit - Collected Quotes

"A game is a situation of strategic interdependence: the outcome of your choices (strategies) depends upon the choices of one or more other persons acting purposely. The decision makers involved in a game are called players, and their choices are called moves. The interests of the players in a game may be in strict conflict; one person’s gain is always another’s loss. Such games are called zero-sum. More typically, there are zones of commonality of interests as well as of conflict and so, there can be combinations of mutually gainful or mutually harmful strategies. Nevertheless, we usually refer to the other players in a game as one’s rivals." (Avinash K Dixit & Barry J Nalebuff, "The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life", 2008)

"Chess experts have been successful at characterizing optimal strategies near the end of the game. Once the chessboard has only a small number of pieces on it, experts are able to look ahead to the end of the game and determine by backward reasoning whether one side has a guaranteed win or whether the other side can obtain a draw. But the middle of the game, when several pieces remain on the board, is far harder. Looking ahead five pairs of moves, which is about as much as can be done by experts in a reasonable amount of time, is not going to simplify the situation to a point where the endgame can be solved completely from there on." (Avinash K Dixit & Barry J Nalebuff, "The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life", 2008)

"Chess strategy illustrates another important practical feature of looking forward and reasoning backward: you have to play the game from the perspective of both players. While it is hard to calculate your best move in a complicated tree, it is even harder to predict what the other side will do." (Avinash K Dixit & Barry J Nalebuff, "The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life", 2008)

"John Nash’s beautiful equilibrium was designed as a theoretical way to square just such circles of thinking about thinking about other people’s choices in games of strategy. The idea is to look for an outcome where each player in the game chooses the strategy that best serves his or her own interest, in response to the other’s strategy. If such a configuration of strategies arises, neither player has any reason to change his choice unilaterally. Therefore, this is a potentially stable outcome of a game where the players make individual and simultaneous choices of strategies." (Avinash K Dixit & Barry J Nalebuff, "The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life", 2008)

"Many mathematical game theorists dislike the dependence of an outcome on historical, cultural, or linguistic aspects of the game or on purely arbitrary devices like round numbers; they would prefer the solution be determined purely by the abstract mathematical facts about the game - the number of players, the strategies available to each, and the payoffs to each in relation to the strategy choices of all. We disagree. We think it entirely appropriate that the outcome of a game played by humans interacting in a society should depend on the social and psychological aspects of the game." (Avinash K Dixit & Barry J Nalebuff, "The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life", 2008)

"Science and art, by their very nature, differ in that science can be learned in a systematic and logical way, whereas expertise in art has to be acquired by example, experience, and practice." (Avinash K Dixit & Barry J Nalebuff, "The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life", 2008)

"Strategic thinking starts with your basic skills and considers how best to use them. Knowing the law, you must decide the strategy for defending your client. Knowing how well your football team can pass or run and how well the other team can defend against each choice, your decision as the coach is whether to pass or to run. Sometimes, as in the case of nuclear brinkmanship, strategic thinking also means knowing when not to play." (Avinash K Dixit & Barry J Nalebuff, "The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life", 2008)

"The essence of a game of strategy is the interdependence of the players’ decisions. These interactions arise in two ways. The first is sequential [...] The players make alternating moves. [...] The second kind of interaction is simultaneous, as in the prisoners’ dilemma [...] The players act at the same time, in ignorance of the others’ current actions. However, each must be aware that there are other active players, who in turn are similarly aware, and so on. Therefore each must figuratively put himself in the shoes of all and try to calculate the outcome. His own best action is an integral part of this overall calculation. When you find yourself playing a strategic game, you must determine whether the interaction is simultaneous or sequential." (Avinash K Dixit & Barry J Nalebuff, "The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life", 2008)

"When playing mixed or random strategies, you can’t fool the opposition every time. The best you can hope for is to keep them guessing and fool them some of the time. You can know the likelihood of your success but cannot say in advance whether you will succeed on any particular occasion. In this regard, when you know that you are talking to a person who wants to mislead you, it may be best to ignore any statements he makes rather than accept them at face value or to infer that exactly the opposite must be the truth." (Avinash K Dixit & Barry J Nalebuff, "The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life", 2008)

On Art IX: Metaphysics

"Metaphysics may be, after all, only the art of being sure of something that is not so and logic only the art of going wrong with confidence." (Joseph W Krutch, "The Modern Temper", 1929)

"As to the role of emotions in art and the subconscious mechanism that serves as the integrating factor both in artistic creation and in man's response to art, they involve a psychological phenomenon which we call a sense of life. A sense of life is a pre-conceptual equivalent of metaphysics, an emotional, subconsciously integrated appraisal of man and of existence." (Ayn Rand, "The Romantic Manifesto: A Philosophy of Literature", 1969)

"For some years now the activity of the artist in our society has been trending more toward the function of the ecologist: one who deals with environmental relationships. Ecology is defined as the totality or pattern of relations between organisms and their environment. Thus the act of creation for the new artist is not so much the invention of new objects as the revelation of previously unrecognized relation- ships between existing phenomena, both physical and metaphysical. So we find that ecology is art in the most fundamental and pragmatic sense, expanding our apprehension of reality." (Gene Youngblood, "Expanded Cinema", 1970)

"The mystery of sound is mysticism; the harmony of life is religion. The knowledge of vibrations is metaphysics, the analysis of atoms is science, and their harmonious grouping is art. The rhythm of form is poetry, and the rhythm of sound is music. This shows that music is the art of arts and the science of all sciences; and it contains the fountain of all knowledge within itself." (Inayat Khan, "The Mysticism of Sound and Music", 1996)

 "Science, as usually taught to liberal arts students, emphasizes results rather than method, and tries to teach technique rather than to give insight into and understanding of the scientific habit of thought. What is needed, however, is not a dose of metaphysics but a truly humanistic teaching of science." (Harry D Gideonse)

On Art VIII: Physics

"It is impossible to follow the march of one of the greatest theories of physics, to see it unroll majestically its regular deductions starting from initial hypotheses, to see its consequences represent a multitude of experimental laws down to the smallest detail, without being charmed by the beauty of such a construction, without feeling keenly that such a creation of the human mind is truly a work of art." (Pierre-Maurice-Marie DuhemDuhem, "The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory", 1908)

"What had already been done for music by the end of the eighteenth century has at last been begun for the pictorial arts. Mathematics and physics furnished the means in the form of rules to be followed and to be broken. In the beginning it is wholesome to be concerned with the functions and to disregard the finished form. Studies in algebra, in geometry, in mechanics characterize teaching directed towards the essential and the functional, in contrast to apparent. One learns to look behind the façade, to grasp the root of things. One learns to recognize the undercurrents, the antecedents of the visible. One learns to dig down, to uncover, to find the cause, to analyze." (Paul Klee, "Bauhaus prospectus", 1929)

"Mathematicians who build new spaces and physicists who find them in the universe can profit from the study of pictorial and architectural spaces conceived and built by men of art." (György Kepes, "The New Landscape In Art and Science", 1956)

"A more problematic example is the parallel between the increasingly abstract and insubstantial picture of the physical universe which modern physics has given us and the popularity of abstract and non-representational forms of art and poetry. In each case the representation of reality is increasingly removed from the picture which is immediately presented to us by our senses." (Harvey Brooks, "Scientific Concepts and Cultural Change", 1965)

"Part of the art and skill of the engineer and of the experimental physicist is to create conditions in which certain events are sure to occur." (Eugene P Wigner, "Symmetries and Reflections", 1979)

"There is nothing as dreamy and poetic, nothing as radical, subversive, and psychedelic, as mathematics. It is every bit as mind blowing as cosmology or physics (mathematicians conceived of black holes long before astronomers actually found any), and allows more freedom of expression than poetry, art, or music (which depends heavily on properties of the physical universe). Mathematics is the purest of the arts, as well as the most misunderstood." (Paul Lockhart, "A Mathematician's Lament", 2009)

Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar - Collected Quotes

"All of us are sensitive to nature's beauty. It is not unreasonable that some aspects of this beauty are shared by the natural sciences." (Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, "Beauty and the Quest for Beauty in Science", Physics Today Vol. 32 (7), [lecture] 1979)

"It is, indeed an incredible fact that what the human mind, at its deepest and most profound, perceives as beautiful finds its realization in external nature.[...] What is intelligible is also beautiful." (Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, "Beauty and the Quest for Beauty in Science", Physics Today Vol. 32 (7), [lecture] 1979)

"The black holes of nature are the most perfect macroscopic objects there are in the universe: the only elements in their construction are our concepts of space and time." (Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, "The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes", 1983)

"A black hole partitions the three-dimensional space into two regions: an inner region which is bounded by a smooth two-dimensional surface called the event horizon; and an outer region, external to the event horizon, which is asymptotically flat; and it is required (as a part of the definition) that no point in the inner region can communicate with any point of the outer region. This incommunicability is guaranteed by the impossibility of any light signal, originating in the inner region, crossing the event horizon. The requirement of asymptotic flatness of the outer region is equivalent to the requirement that the black hole is isolated in space and that far from the event horizon the space-time approaches the customary space-time of terrestrial physics." (Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, "On Stars, Their Evolution, and Their Stability",[Nobel lecture] 1983)

"The mathematical theory of black holes is a subject of immense complexity; but its study has convinced me of the basic truth of the ancient mottoes 'The simple is the seal of the true' and 'beauty is the splendor of truth.'" (Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, "On Stars, Their Evolution, and Their Stability",[Nobel lecture] 1983)

"Turning to the physical properties of the black holes, we can study them best by examining their reaction to external perturbations such as the incidence of waves of different sorts. Such studies reveal an analytic richness of the Kerr space-time which one could hardly have expected. This is not the occasion to elaborate on these technical matters. Let it suffice to say that contrary to every prior expectation, all the standard equations of mathematical physics can be solved exactly in the Kerr space-time. And the solutions predict a variety and range of physical phenomena which black holes must exhibit in their interaction with the world outside." (Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, "On Stars, Their Evolution, and Their Stability",[Nobel lecture] 1983)

"In some strange way, any new fact or insight that I may have found has not seemed to me as a 'discovery' of mine, but rather something that had always been there and that I had chanced to pick up." (Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, "Truth and Beauty: Aesthetics and Motivations in Science", 1987)

"The pursuit of science has often been compared to the scaling of mountains, high and not so high. But who amongst us can hope, even in imagination, to scale the Everest and reach its summit when the sky is blue and the air is still, and in the stillness of the air survey the entire Himalayan range in the dazzling white of the snow stretching to infinity? None of us can hope for a comparable vision of nature and of the universe around us. But there is nothing mean or lowly in standing in the valley below and awaiting the sun to rise over Kinchinjunga." (Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, "Truth and Beauty: Aesthetics and Motivations in Science, 1987)

"When a supremely great creative mind is kindled, it leaves a blazing trail that remains a beacon for centuries." (Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, "Newton and Michelangelo", Current Science Vol. 67 (7), 1994)

"This 'shuddering before the beautiful', this incredible fact that a discovery motivated by a search after the beautiful in mathematics should find its exact replica in Nature, persuades me to say that beauty is that to which the human mind responds at its deepest and most profound." (Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar)

Figurative Figures IV: On Circumference

"Nature is an infinite sphere of which the center is everywhere and the circumference nowhere." (Blaise Pascal, "Pensées", 1670)

"Many errors, of a truth, consist merely in the application of the wrong names of things. For if a man says that the lines which are drawn from the centre of the circle to the circumference are not equal, he understands by the circle, at all events for the time, something else than mathematicians understand by it." (Baruch Spinoza, "Ethics", Book I, 1677)

"A system of nature proceeding from subjects of the most simple organization to such as are more perfect, or from the circumference to the centre, is called a Mathematical System." (John Lindley, "Some Account of the Spherical and Numerical System of Nature o/M. Elias Fries", ‘Philosophical magazine: a journal of theoretical, experimental and applied physics’ Vol. 68, 1826)

"Philosophical systems do not depend upon individual productions which are subject to continual variation, but upon eternal and unchangeable ideas. These always proceed from the centre to the circumference, or from the most perfect productions to those of a lower order." (John Lindley, "Some Account of the Spherical and Numerical System of Nature o/M. Elias Fries", ‘Philosophical magazine: a journal of theoretical, experimental and applied physics’ Vol. 68, 1826)

"The world can no more have two summits than a circumference can have two centres." (Pierre T de Chardin, "The Divine Milieu", 1960)

"An observer of our biological sciences today sees dark figures moving over a bridge of glass. We are faced with an ever expanding universe of light and darkness. The greater the circle of understanding becomes, the greater is the circumference of surrounding ignorance." (Erwin Chargaff, "Essays on Nucleic Acids", 1963)

"The universe has no circumference, for if it had a center and a circumference there would be some and some thing beyond the world, suppositions which are wholly lacking in truth. Since, therefore, it is impossible that the universe should be enclosed within a corporeal center and corporeal boundary, it is not within our power to understand the universe, whose center and circumference are God. And though the universe." (Nicholas of Cusa[Nicolaus Cusanus])

Geometrical Figures XIX: On Circumference

"Now discourse is necessarily limited by its point of departure and its point of arrival, and since these are in mutual opposition we speak of contradiction. For the discursive reason these terms are opposed and distinct. In the realm of the reason, therefore, there is a necessary disjunction between extremes, as, for example, in the rational definition of the circle where the lines from the center to the circumference are equal and where the center cannot coincide with the circumference." (Nicholas of Cusa, "Apologia Doctae ignorantiae" ["The Defense of Learned Ignorance"], 1449)

"Many errors, of a truth, consist merely in the application of the wrong names of things. For if a man says that the lines which are drawn from the centre of the circle to the circumference are not equal, he understands by the circle, at all events for the time, something else than mathematicians understand by it." (Baruch Spinoza, "Ethics", Book I, 1677)

"The circumference of any circle being given, if that circumference be brought into the form of a square, the area of that square is equal to the area of another circle, the circumscribed square of which is equal to the area of the circle whose circumference is first given." (John A Parker, "The Quadrature of the Circle", 1874)

"Infinity is the land of mathematical hocus pocus. There Zero the magician is king. When Zero divides any number he changes it without regard to its magnitude into the infinitely small [great?], and inversely, when divided by any number he begets the infinitely great [small?]. In this domain the circumference of the circle becomes a straight line, and then the circle can be squared. Here all ranks are abolished, for Zero reduces everything to the same level one way or another. Happy is the kingdom where Zero rules!" (Paul Carus, "The Nature of Logical and Mathematical Thought"; Monist Vol 20, 1910)

"To square a circle means to find a square whose area is equal to the area of a given circle. In its first form this problem asked for a rectangle whose dimensions have the same ratio as that of the circumference of a circle to its radius. The proof of the impossibility of solving this by use of ruler and compasses alone followed immediately from the proof, in very recent times, that π cannot be the root of a polynomial equation with rational coefficients." (Mayme I Logsdon, "A Mathematician Explains", 1935)

"The digits of pi beyond the first few decimal places are of no practical or scientific value. Four decimal places are sufficient for the design of the finest engines; ten decimal places are sufficient to obtain the circumference of the earth within a fraction of an inch if the earth were a smooth sphere" (Petr Beckmann, "A History of Pi", 1976)

"There are a number of diagrams in the literature of Sacred Geometry all related to the single idea known as the 'Squaring of the Circle'. This is a practice which seeks, with only the usual compass and straight-edge, to construct a square which is virtually equal in perimeter to the circumference of a given circle, or which is virtually equal in area to the area of a given circle. Because the circle is an incommensurable figure based on π, it is impossible to draw a square more than approximately equal to it." (Robert Lawlor, "Sacred Geometry", 1982)

"The mathematician's circle, with its infinitely thin circumference and a radius that remains constant to infinitely many decimal places, cannot take physical form. If you draw it in sand, as Archimedes did, its boundary is too thick and its radius too variable." (Ian Stewart, "Letters to a Young Mathematician", 2006)

"In the case of circle squaring, since the problem requires pinpointing the ratio between a circle’s diameter and circumference, the irrational number the investigator bumps into is pi (π). Perhaps because of its extreme (in fact, total) difficulty - similar to the alchemist’s hope of turning lead into gold - circle squaring offered its pursuers the dream of international fame in the discovery of an unknown quantity seemingly woven into the fabric of the universe." (Daniel J Cohen, "Equations from God: Pure Mathematics and Victorian Faith", 2007)

"Is it possible to construct a square, using only a compass and a straightedge, that is exactly equal in area to the area of a given circle? If π could be expressed as a rational fraction or as the root of a first- or second-degree equation, then it would be possible, with compass and straightedge, to construct a straight line exactly equal to the circumference of a circle. The squaring of the circle would quickly follow. We have only to construct a rectangle with one side equal to the circle’s radius and the other equal to half the circumference. This rectangle has an area equal to that of the circle, and there are simple procedures for converting the rectangle to a square of the same area. Conversely, if the circle could be squared, a means would exist for constructing a line segment exactly equal to π. However, there are ironclad proofs that π is transcendental and that no straight line of transcendental length can be constructed with compass and straightedge. " (Martin Gartner, "Sphere Packing, Lewis Carroll, and Reversi", 2009)

"The engineer and the mathematician have a completely different understanding of the number pi. In the eyes of an engineer, pi is simply a value of measurement between three and four, albeit fiddlier than either of these whole numbers. [...] Mathematicians know the number pi differently, more intimately. What is pi to them? It is the length of a circle’s round line (its circumference) divided by the straight length (its diameter) that splits the circle into perfect halves. It is an essential response to the question, ‘What is a circle?’ But this response – when expressed in digits – is infinite: the number has no last digit, and therefore no last-but-one digit, no antepenultimate digit, no third-from-last digit, and so on." (Daniel Tammet, "Thinking in Numbers" , 2012)

"It just so happens that π can be characterised precisely without any reference to decimals, because it is simply the ratio of any circle’s circumference to its diameter. Likewise can be characterised as the positive number which squares to 2. However, most irrational numbers can’t be characterised in this way." (Eugenia Cheng, "Beyond Infinity: An Expedition to the Outer Limits of Mathematics", 2017)

"Mathematically, circles embody change without change. A point moving around the circumference of a circle changes direction without ever changing its distance from a center. It’s a minimal form of change, a way to change and curve in the slightest way possible. And, of course, circles are symmetrical. If you rotate a circle about its center, it looks unchanged. That rotational symmetry may be why circles are so ubiquitous. Whenever some aspect of nature doesn’t care about direction, circles are bound to appear. Consider what happens when a raindrop hits a puddle: tiny ripples expand outward from the point of impact. Because they spread equally fast in all directions and because they started at a single point, the ripples have to be circles. Symmetry demands it." (Steven H Strogatz, "Infinite Powers: The Story of Calculus - The Most Important Discovery in Mathematics", 2019)

"Pi is fundamentally a child of calculus. It is defined as the unattainable limit of a never-ending process. But unlike a sequence of polygons steadfastly approaching a circle or a hapless walker stepping halfway to a wall, there is no end in sight for pi, no limit we can ever know. And yet pi exists. There it is, defined so crisply as the ratio of two lengths we can see right before us, the circumference of a circle and its diameter. That ratio defines pi, pinpoints it as clearly as can be, and yet the number itself slips through our fingers." (Steven H Strogatz, "Infinite Powers: The Story of Calculus - The Most Important Discovery in Mathematics", 2019)

"The incommensurability of the diagonal of a square was initially a problem of measuring length but soon moved to the very theoretical level of introducing irrational numbers. Attempts to compute the length of the circumference of the circle led to the discovery of the mysterious number. Measuring the area enclosed between curves has, to a great extent, inspired the development of calculus." (Heinz-Otto Peitgen et al, "Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science" 2nd Ed., 2004)

"Imagine a person with a gift of ridicule [He might say] First that a negative quantity has no logarithm [ln(-1)]; secondly that a negative quantity has no square root [√-1]; thirdly that the first non-existent is to the second as the circumference of a circle is to the diameter [π]." (Augustus De Morgan) [attributed]

"Ten decimal places of pi are sufficient to give the circumference of the earth to a fraction of an inch, and thirty decimal places would give the circumference of the visible universe to a quantity imperceptible to the most powerful microscope." (Simon Newcomb)

"The attempt to apply rational arithmetic to a problem in geometry resulted in the first crisis in the history of mathematics. The two relatively simple problems - the determination of the diagonal of a square and that of the circumference of a circle - revealed the existence of new mathematical beings for which no place could be found within the rational domain." (Tobias Dantzig)

William Herschel - Collected Quotes

"We may strongly suspect that there is not, in strictness of speaking, one fixed star in the heavens, and reasons which I shall adduce will render this so obvious that there can hardly remain a doubt of the general motion of all the starry systems, and, consequently, of the solar one among the rest." (William Herschel, "On the Proper Motion of the Sun and Solar System", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Vol. 73, 1783)

"If we indulge a fanciful imagination and build worlds of our own, we must not wonder at our going wide from the path of truth and nature; but these will vanish like the Cartesian vortices, that soon gave way when better theories were offered." (William Herschel, "The Construction of the Heavens", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Vol. LXXV, 1785) 

"The subject of the Construction of the Heavens is of so extensive and important a nature, that we cannot exert too much attention in our endeavors to throw all possible light upon it." (William Herschel, "The Construction of the Heavens", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Vol. LXXV, 1785) 

"The phenomena of nature, especially those that fall under the inspection of the astronomer, are to be viewed, not only with the usual attention to facts as they occur, but with the eye of reason and experience." (William Herschel, "An Account of Three Volcanoes in the Moon", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Vol. 67, 1787)

"It is sometimes of great use in natural philosophy to doubt of things that are commonly taken for granted; especially as the means of resolving any doubt, when once it is entertained, are often within our reach." (William Herschel, "Investigation of the Powers the Prismatic Colours to Heat and Illuminate Objects", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Vol. 90, 1800)

"Familiar objects and events are far from presenting themselves to our senses in that aspect and with those connections under which science requires them to be viewed, and which constitute their rational explanation." (William Herschel, "Outlines of Astronomy", 1849)

"I have looked farther into space than ever human being did before me. I have observed stars of which the light, it can be proved, must take two millions of years to reach this earth!" (William Herschel)

"There are two kinds of happiness or contentment for which we mortals are adapted; the first we experience in thinking and the other in feeling. The first is the purest and most unmixed. Let a man once know what sort of a being he is; how great the being which brought him into existence, how utterly transitory is everything in the material world, and let him realize this without passion in a quiet philosophical temper, and I maintain that then he is happy; as happy indeed as it is possible for him to be." (William Herschel [letter to Jacob Herschel)

"When an object is once discovered by a superior power, an inferior one will suffice to see if afterwards." (William Herschel)

On Simplicity: Simple Rules

"Of course we have still to face the question why these analogies between different mechanisms - these similarities of relation-structure - should exist. To see common principles and simple rules running through such complexity is at first perplexing though intriguing. When, however, we find that the apparently complex objects around us are combinations of a few almost indestructible units, such as electrons, it becomes less perplexing." (Kenneth Craik, "The Nature of Explanation", 1943)

"Simple rules can have complex consequences. This simple rule has such a wealth of implications that it is worth examining in detail. It is the far from self-evident guiding principle of reductionism and of most modern investigations into cosmic complexity. Reductionism will not be truly successful until physicists and cosmologists demonstrate that the large-scale phenomena of the world arise from fundamental physics alone. This lofty goal is still out of reach. There is uncertainty not only in how physics generates the structures of our world but also in what the truly fundamental rules of physics are. (William Poundstone, "The Recursive Universe", 1985)

"As glimpsed by physicists, Nature's rules are simple, but also intricate: Different rules are subtly related to each other. The intricate relations between the rules produce interesting effects in many physical situations. [...] Nature's design is not only simple, but minimally so, in the sense that were the design any simpler, the universe would be a much duller place." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"All reality is a game. Physics at its most fundamental, the very fabric of our universe, results directly from the interaction of certain fairly simple rules, and chance; the same description may be applied to the best, most elegant and both intellectually and aesthetically satisfying games. By being unknowable, by resulting from events which, at the sub-atomic level, cannot be fully predicted, the future remains malleable, and retains the possibility of change, the hope of coming to prevail; victory, to use an unfashionable word. In this, the future is a game; time is one of its rules." (Iain Banks, "The Player of Games", 1988)

"One reason nature pleases us is its endless use of a few simple principles: the cube-square law; fractals; spirals; the way that waves, wheels, trig functions, and harmonic oscillators are alike; the importance of ratios between small primes; bilateral symmetry; Fibonacci series, golden sections, quantization, strange attractors, path-dependency, all the things that show up in places where you don’t expect them [...] these rules work with and against each other ceaselessly at all levels, so that out of their intrinsic simplicity comes the rich complexity of the world around us. That tension - between the simple rules that describe the world and the complex world we see - is itself both simple in execution and immensely complex in effect. Thus exactly the levels, mixtures, and relations of complexity that seem to be hardwired into the pleasure centers of the human brain - or are they, perhaps, intrinsic to intelligence and perception, pleasant to anything that can see, think, create? - are the ones found in the world around us." (John Barnes, "Mother of Storms", 1994)

"With the growing interest in complex adaptive systems, artificial life, swarms and simulated societies, the concept of 'collective intelligence' is coming more and more to the fore. The basic idea is that a group of individuals (e. g. people, insects, robots, or software agents) can be smart in a way that none of its members is. Complex, apparently intelligent behavior may emerge from the synergy created by simple interactions between individuals that follow simple rules." (Francis Heylighen, "Collective Intelligence and its Implementation on the Web", 1999)

"Through self-organization, the behavior of the group emerges from the collective interactions of all the individuals. In fact, a major recurring theme in swarm intelligence (and of complexity science in general) is that even if individuals follow simple rules, the resulting group behavior can be surprisingly complex - and remarkably effective. And, to a large extent, flexibility and robustness result from self-organization." (Eric Bonabeau & Christopher Meyer, "Swarm Intelligence: A Whole New Way to Think About Business", Harvard Business Review, 2001)

"Chaos theory revealed that simple nonlinear systems could behave in extremely complicated ways, and showed us how to understand them with pictures instead of equations. Complexity theory taught us that many simple units interacting according to simple rules could generate unexpected order. But where complexity theory has largely failed is in explaining where the order comes from, in a deep mathematical sense, and in tying the theory to real phenomena in a convincing way. For these reasons, it has had little impact on the thinking of most mathematicians and scientists." (Steven Strogatz, "Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order", 2003)

"[a complex system is] a system in which large networks of components with no central control and simple rules of operation give rise to complex collective behavior, sophisticated information processing, and adaptation via learning or evolution." (Melanie Mitchell, "Complexity: A Guided Tour", 2009)

"[...] the Game of Life, in which a few simple rules executed repeatedly can generate a surprising degree of complexity. Recall that the game treats squares, or pixels, as simply on or off (filled or blank) and the update rules are given in terms of the state of the nearest neighbours. The theory of networks is closely analogous. An electrical network, for example, consists of a collection of switches with wires connecting them. Switches can be on or off, and simple rules determine whether a given switch is flipped, according to the signals coming down the wires from the neighbouring switches. The whole network, which is easy to model on a computer, can be put in a specific starting state and then updated step by step, just like a cellular automaton. The ensuing patterns of activity depend both on the wiring diagram (the topology of the network) and the starting state. The theory of networks can be developed quite generally as a mathematical exercise: the switches are called ‘nodes’ and the wires are called ‘edges’. From very simple network rules, rich and complex activity can follow." (Paul Davies, "The Demon in the Machine: How Hidden Webs of Information Are Solving the Mystery of Life", 2019)

On Symmetry XII

"The beauty that Nature has revealed to physicists in Her laws is a beauty of design, a beauty that recalls, to some extent, the beauty of classical architecture, with its emphasis on geometry and symmetry. The system of aesthetics used by physicists in judging Nature also draws its inspiration from the austere finality of geometry." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"To detect a symmetry in the fundamental design, one would have to check the covariance of each of the many equations of motion in the differential formulation. With the action formulation, on the other hand, one has the considerably easier task of checking the invariance of the action." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The impossibility of defining absolute motion can be seen as the manifestation of a symmetry known as relativistic invariance. In the same way that parity invariance tells us that we cannot distinguish the mirror-image world from our world, relativistic invariance tells us that it is impossible to decide whether we are at rest or moving steadily." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The precise mathematical definition of symmetry involves the notion of invariance. A geometrical figure is said to be symmetric under certain operations if those operations leave it unchanged." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"Unlike an architect, Nature does not go around expounding on the wondrous symmetries of Her design. Instead, theoretical physicists must deduce them. Some symmetries, such as parity and rotational invariances, are intuitively obvious. We expect Nature to possess these symmetries, and we are shocked if She does not. Other symmetries, such as Lorentz invariance and general covariance, are more subtle and not grounded in our everyday perceptions. But, in any case, in order to find out if Nature employs a certain symmetry, we must compare the implications of the symmetry with observation." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"Symmetry is ubiquitous. Symmetry has myriad incarnations in the innumerable patterns designed by nature. It is a key element, often the central or defining theme, in art, music, dance, poetry, or architecture. Symmetry permeates all of science, occupying a prominent place in chemistry, biology, physiology, and astronomy. Symmetry pervades the inner world of the structure of matter, the outer world of the cosmos, and the abstract world of mathematics itself. The basic laws of physics, the most fundamental statements we can make about nature, are founded upon symmetry." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"The symmetries that we sense and observe in the world around us affirm the notion of the existence of a perfect order and harmony underlying everything in the universe. Through symmetry we sense an apparent logic at work in the universe, external to, yet resonant with, our own minds. [...] Symmetry gives wings to our creativity. It provides organizing principles for our artistic impulses and our thinking, and it is a source of hypotheses that we can make to understand the physical world." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"A symmetry is a function that preserves what we feel is important about an object." (Avner Ash & Robert Gross, "Fearless Symmetry: Exposing the hidden patterns of numbers", 2006)

"Lie groups turn up when we study a geometric object with a lot of symmetry, such as a sphere, a circle, or flat spacetime. Because there is so much symmetry, there are many functions from the object to itself that preserve the geometry, and these functions become the elements of the group." (Avner Ash & Robert Gross, "Fearless Symmetry: Exposing the hidden patterns of numbers", 2006)

"Mathematically, circles embody change without change. A point moving around the circumference of a circle changes direction without ever changing its distance from a center. It’s a minimal form of change, a way to change and curve in the slightest way possible. And, of course, circles are symmetrical. If you rotate a circle about its center, it looks unchanged. That rotational symmetry may be why circles are so ubiquitous. Whenever some aspect of nature doesn’t care about direction, circles are bound to appear. Consider what happens when a raindrop hits a puddle: tiny ripples expand outward from the point of impact. Because they spread equally fast in all directions and because they started at a single point, the ripples have to be circles. Symmetry demands it." (Steven H Strogatz, "Infinite Powers: The Story of Calculus - The Most Important Discovery in Mathematics", 2019)

Anthony Zee - Collected Quotes

"As glimpsed by physicists, Nature's rules are simple, but also intricate: Different rules are subtly related to each other. The intricate relations between the rules produce interesting effects in many physical situations. [...] Nature's design is not only simple, but minimally so, in the sense that were the design any simpler, the universe would be a much duller place." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"In science, one tries to say what no one else has ever said before. In poetry, one tries to say what everyone else has already said, but better. This explains, in essence, why good poetry is as rare as good science." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"In the path-integral formulation, the essence of quantum physics may be summarized with two fundamental rules: (1). The classical action determines the probability amplitude for a specific chain of events to occur, and (2) the probability that either one or the other chain of events occurs is determined by the probability amplitudes corresponding to the two chains of events. Finding these rules represents a stunning achievement by the founders of quantum physics." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"Physicists dream of a unified description of Nature. Symmetry, in its power to tie together apparently unrelated aspects of physics, is linked closely to the notion of unity." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"Physics is the most reductionistic of sciences. [...] Contemporary physics rests on the cornerstone of reductionism. As we delve deeper, Nature appears ever simpler. That this is so is, in fact, astonishing. We have no a priori reason to expect the universe, with its fantastic wealth of bewilderingly complex phenomena, to be governed ultimately by a few simple rules." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The beauty that Nature has revealed to physicists in Her laws is a beauty of design, a beauty that recalls, to some extent, the beauty of classical architecture, with its emphasis on geometry and symmetry. The system of aesthetics used by physicists in judging Nature also draws its inspiration from the austere finality of geometry." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The impossibility of defining absolute motion can be seen as the manifestation of a symmetry known as relativistic invariance. In the same way that parity invariance tells us that we cannot distinguish the mirror-image world from our world, relativistic invariance tells us that it is impossible to decide whether we are at rest or moving steadily." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The power and glory of symmetry allow us to bypass completely the construction of strong interaction theories of dubious utility. We are able to contain and isolate our ignorance. [...] Symmetry tells us that states in the same multiplet must have the same energy, but it cannot tell us what that energy is." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The precise mathematical definition of symmetry involves the notion of invariance. A geometrical figure is said to be symmetric under certain operations if those operations leave it unchanged." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The search for fundamental symmetries boils down to the study of transformations that do not change fundamental physical action - such transformations as reflection, rotation, the Lorentz transformation, and the like." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"To detect a symmetry in the fundamental design, one would have to check the covariance of each of the many equations of motion in the differential formulation. With the action formulation, on the other hand, one has the considerably easier task of checking the invariance of the action." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"Toward the end of the last century, many physicists felt that the mathematical description of physics was getting ever more complicated. Instead, the mathematics involved has become ever more abstract, rather than more complicated. The mind of God appears to be abstract but not complicated. He also appears to like group theory." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"Unlike an architect, Nature does not go around expounding on the wondrous symmetries of Her design. Instead, theoretical physicists must deduce them. Some symmetries, such as parity and rotational invariances, are intuitively obvious. We expect Nature to possess these symmetries, and we are shocked if She does not. Other symmetries, such as Lorentz invariance and general covariance, are more subtle and not grounded in our everyday perceptions. But, in any case, in order to find out if Nature employs a certain symmetry, we must compare the implications of the symmetry with observation." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"We intuitively know space to be a smooth continuum, an arena in which the fundamental particles move and interact. This assumption underpins our physical theories, and no experimental evidence has ever contradicted it. However, the possibility that space may not be smooth cannot be excluded." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"Welcome to the strange world of the quantum, where one cannot determine how a particle gets from here to there. Physicists are reduced to bookies, posting odds on the various possibilities." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

On Mind: The Mind of God

"[…] what is physical is subject to the laws of mathematics, and what is spiritual to the laws of God, and the laws of mathematics are but the expression of the thoughts of God." (Thomas Hill, "Uses of Mathesis", Bibliotheca Sacra Vol. 32, 1875)

"It is true that impatience, the mother of stupidity, praises brevity, as if such persons had not life long enough to serve them to acquire a complete knowledge of one single subject, such as the human body; and then they want to comprehend the mind of God in which the universe is included, weighing it minutely and mincing it into infinite parts, as if they had to dissect it!" (Leonardo da Vinci, "The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci", 1888) 

"Toward the end of the last century, many physicists felt that the mathematical description of physics was getting ever more complicated. Instead, the mathematics involved has become ever more abstract, rather than more complicated. The mind of God appears to be abstract but not complicated. He also appears to like group theory." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"[…] the search for a Theory of Everything also raises interesting philosophical questions. Some physicists, [Stephen] Hawking among them, would regard the construction of a Theory of Everything as being, in some sense, reading the mind of God. Or at least unravelling the inner secrets of physical reality. Others simply argue that a physical theory is just a description of reality, rather like a map." (Peter Coles, "Hawking and the Mind of God", 2000)

"To look at the development of physics since Newton is to observe a struggle to define the limits of science. Part of this process has been the intrusion of scientific methods and ideas into domains that have traditionally been the province of metaphysics or religion. In this conflict, Hawking’s phrase ‘to know the Mind of God’ is just one example of a border infringement. But by playing the God card, Hawking has cleverly fanned the flames of his own publicity, appealing directly to the popular allure of the scientist-as-priest." (Peter Coles, "Hawking and the Mind of God", 2000)

"The universe is a symphony of strings, and the mind of God that Einstein eloquently wrote about for thirty years would be cosmic music resonating through eleven-dimensional hyper space." (Michio Kaku, "Parallel Worlds: A journey through creation, higher dimensions, and the future of the cosmos", 2004)

"I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." (Albert Einstein)

"The laws of nature are but the mathematical thoughts of God." (Euclid)

"Time and the heavens came into being at the same instant, in order that, if they were ever to dissolve, they might be dissolved together. Such was the mind and thought of God in the creation of time." (Plato)

"Why waste words? Geometry existed before the Creation, is co-eternal with the mind of God, is God himself (what exists in God that is not God himself?): geometry provided God with a model for the Creation and was implanted into man, together with God's own likeness - and not merely conveyed to his mind through the eyes." (Johannes Kepler)

Frank L Wright - Collected Quotes

"Take nothing for granted as beautiful or ugly, but take every building to pieces, and challenge every feature. Learn to distinguish the curious from the beautiful. Get the habit of analysis - analysis will in time enable synthesis to become your habit of mind. 'Think simples' as my old master used to say - meaning to reduce the whole of its parts into the simplest terms, getting back to first principles." (Frank L Wright, "Two Lectures on Architecture", 1931)

"Science can give us only the tools in the box, these mechanical miracles that it has already given us. But of what use to us are miraculous tools until we have mastered the humane, cultural use of them? We do not want to live in a world where the machine has mastered the man; we want to live in a world where man has mastered the machine." (Frank L Wright, "Frank Lloyd Wright on Architecture: Selected Writings 1894-1940", 1941)

"Any good architect is by nature a physicist as a matter of fact, but as a matter of reality, as things are, he must be a philosopher and a physician." (Frank L Wright, "Frank Lloyd Wright: An Autobiography", 1943)

"A building should appear to grow easily from its site and be shaped to harmonize with its surroundings if Nature is manifest there." (Frank L Wright)

"Along the wayside some blossom, with unusually glowing color or prettiness of form attracts us; we accept gratefully its perfect loveliness; but, seeking to discover the secret of its charm, we find the blossom, whose more obvious claim first arrests our attention, intimately related to the texture and shape of its foliage; we discover a strange sympathy between the form of the flower and the sys- tern upon which the leaves are arranged about the stalk. From this we are led to observe a characteristic habit of growth, and resultant nature of structure." (Frank L Wright)

"Architecture is the triumph of human imagination over materials, methods, and men, to put man into possession of his own Earth. It is at least the geometric pattern of things, of life, of the human and social world. It is at best that magic framework of reality that we sometimes touch upon when we use the word order." (Frank L Wright)

"Beautiful buildings are more than scientific. They are true organisms, spiritually conceived; works of art, using the best technology by inspiration rather than the idiosyncrasies of mere taste or any averaging by the committee mind." (Frank L Wright)

"Building becomes architecture only when the mind of man consciously takes it and tries with all his resources to make it beautiful, to put concordance, sympathy with nature, and all that into it. Then you have architecture." (Frank L Wright)

"God is the great mysterious motivator of what we call nature and it has been said often by philosophers, that nature is the will of God. And, I prefer to say that nature is the only body of God that we shall ever see. If we wish to know the truth concerning anything, we'll find it in the nature of that thing." (Frank L Wright)

"How many understand that Nature is the essential character of whatever is. It's something you'll find by looking not at, but in, always in. It's always inside the thing, and it makes the outside. And some day, when you get sufficiently proficient in understanding the use of the term, you can tell by the outside pretty much from what's inside." (Frank L Wright)

"Space. The continual becoming: invisible fountain from which all rhythms flow and to which they must pass. Beyond time or infinity." (Frank L Wright)

"The architect should strive continually to simplify; the ensemble of the rooms should then be carefully considered that comfort and utility may go hand in hand with beauty." (Frank L Wright)

"The scientist has marched in and taken the place of the poet. But one day somebody will find the solution to the problems of the world and remember, it will be a poet, not a scientist." (Frank L Wright)

"We've been fighting from the beginning for organic architecture. That is, architecture where the whole is to the part as the part is to the whole, and where the nature of materials, the nature of the purpose, the nature of the entire performance becomes a necessity - architecture of democracy." (Frank L Wright)

"You can study mathematics all your life and never do a bit of thinking." (Frank L Wright)

Peter B Stevens - Collected Quotes

"All patterns, whether drawn by artists, calculated by mathematicians, or produced by natural forces are shaped by the same spatial environment. All are subject to the tyranny of space. Synthetic patterns of lines and dots are engaging in their own right but, more importantly, they speak eloquently of the order that all things inevitably share." (Peter B Stevens, "Patterns in Nature", 1974)

"Although we expect to find eddies in turbulent flow, we do not know when any specific eddy will come into being or die away . We cannot yet predict how eddies interact. Similarly, we know as a general rule that any particle within a turbulent flow gets knocked about in an aimless fashion by the swirls, so that it describes an erratic meandering path, but at any given moment we cannot predict the precise location or velocity of the particle." (Peter B Stevens, "Patterns in Nature", 1974)

"But even if we cannot predict all the details, we can predict something about the average case. We can consider the unpredictable local velocities and pressures as chance or random occurrences and then, with the aid of probability theory, take the mean of those occurrences and obtain mathematical descriptions of average motions in average flows." (Peter B Stevens, "Patterns in Nature", 1974)

"In order to describe meanders, then, we can invoke a model involving scour and centrifugal force, a model that describes the uniform expenditure of energy, or a model based on probability theory. All three models describe the same phenomenon. As far as meanders are concerned, all three models happen to be interrelated - but not out of any fundamental necessity. That is to say, the cross circulation induced by centrifugal force need not necessarily result in a uniform distribution of effort or produce a path that is especially probable. In a world of limited patterns, however, the meander answers several entirely different sets of specifications, so that scour, uniform effort, and probability produce the same design." (Peter B Stevens, "Patterns in Nature", 1974)

"The analysis of turbulence in terms of probability reveals several interesting things about eddies. For instance, the average eddy moves a distance about equal to its own diameter before it generates small eddies that move, more often than not, in the opposite direction. Those smaller eddies generate still smaller eddies and the process continues until all the energy dissipates as heat through molecular motion." (Peter B Stevens, "Patterns in Nature", 1974)

"Of all constraints of nature, the most far-reaching are imposed by space. For space itself has a structure that influences the shape of every existing thing." (Peter B Stevens, "Patterns in Nature", 1974)

"The effect of magnitude or absolute size as a determinant of form shows again how space shapes the things around us. In studying polyhedrons we are unconcerned with magnitude. We assume that a cube is a cube no matter what its size. We find, however, that the geometric relations that arise from a difference in size affect structural behavior, and that a large cube is relatively weaker than a small cube. We also find, as a corollary, that in order to maintain the same structural characteristics a difference in size must be accompanied by a difference in shape." (Peter B Stevens, "Patterns in Nature", 1974)

"The spiral is beautifully uniform; it curves around on itself in a perfectly regular manner. It can fill all of two-dimensional space, being capable of infinite expansion, and it is also quite short. But [...], as measured by the mean of distances to its center, the spiral is extremely indirect." (Peter B Stevens, "Patterns in Nature", 1974)

"Turbulence forms the primordial pattern, the chaos that was 'in the beginning'." (Peter B Stevens, "Patterns in Nature", 1974)

"We might note in passing that the lines and circles adopted by natural forms are never perfect. Neither the stream nor the meteor runs perfectly straight, nor is the pond or orbital trajectory a perfect circle. Straight lines and circles are only the pure forms. They occur under only the simplest conditions. In nature, however, conditions are never entirely simple, and any 'elementary' or 'isolated' part is embedded in a larger system that operates in turn within other still larger systems. To some extent, then, the part is acted upon by the whole - by the totality of all the systems - and it never exactly fits an easily definable pattern. The warning is clear: nature never conforms precisely to our simple models; she introduces modifications as dictated by her lawful response to a multiplicity of demands." (Peter B Stevens, "Patterns in Nature", 1974)

Joseph O’Connor - Collected Quotes

"A model is an edited, distorted and generalised copy of the original and therefore there can never be complete. A model is not in any sense ‘true’: it can be judged only by whether it works or doesn’t work. If it works, it allows another person to get the same class of results as the original person from whom the model was taken." (Joseph O’Connor, "Leading With NLP: Essential Leadership Skills for Influencing and Managing People", 1998)

"All actions have a purpose. Our actions are not random; we are always trying to achieve something, although we may not be aware of what that is." (Joseph O’Connor, "Leading With NLP: Essential Leadership Skills for Influencing and Managing People", 1998)

"Beliefs are those ideas we take as true and use to guide our actions. We all have beliefs about what sort of people we are and what we are capable of. These beliefs act as permissions for or limitations on what we do. When we believe something is possible, we will try it; if we believe it impossible, we will not." (Joseph O’Connor, "Leading With NLP: Essential Leadership Skills for Influencing and Managing People", 1998)

"Every time we push the boundary on the outside world we also push the boundary on our inner world. We open a larger ‘idea space’. Every advance in science, art and technology means we have gone beyond the limiting ideas that have stopped us advancing in the past." (Joseph O’Connor, "Leading With NLP: Essential Leadership Skills for Influencing and Managing People", 1998)

"Having a choice is better than not having a choice. Always try to have a map for yourself that gives you the widest and richest number of choices. Act always to increase choice. The more choices you have, the freer you are and the more influence you have." (Joseph O’Connor, "Leading With NLP: Essential Leadership Skills for Influencing and Managing People", 1998)

"Neuro-Linguistic programming is the study of our subjective experience; how we create what passes for reality in our minds. [...] NLP also studies brilliance and quality - how outstanding individuals and organisations get their outstanding results." (Joseph O’Connor, "Leading With NLP: Essential Leadership Skills for Influencing and Managing People", 1998)

"People respond to their experience, not to reality itself. We do not know what reality is. Our senses, beliefs, and past experience give us a map of the world from which to operate." (Joseph O’Connor, "Leading With NLP: Essential Leadership Skills for Influencing and Managing People", 1998)

"The meaning of the communication is not simply what you intend, but also the response you get." (Joseph O’Connor, "Leading With NLP: Essential Leadership Skills for Influencing and Managing People", 1998)

Hans Vaihinger - Collected Quotes

"It must be remembered that the object of the world of ideas as a whole [the map or model] is not the portrayal of reality - this would be an utterly impossible task - but rather to provide us with an instrument for finding our way about more easily in the world." (Hans Vaihinger, "The Philosophy of 'As if': A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind", 1911)

"[...] operations of an almost mysterious character, which run counter to ordinary procedure in a more or less paradoxical way. They are methods which give an onlooker the impression of magic if he be not himself initiated or equally skilled in the mechanism.  (Hans Vaihinger, "The Philosophy of 'As if': A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind", 1911)

"Scientific thought is a function of the psyche [...]. Psychical actions and reactions are, like every event known to us, necessary occurrences; that is to say, they result with compulsory regularity from their conditions and causes." (Hans Vaihinger, "The Philosophy of 'As if': A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind", 1911)

"The opponents of the atom are generally content to point to its contradictions and reject it as unfruitful for science. A rash form of caution, for without the atom science falls." (Hans Vaihinger, "The Philosophy of 'As if': A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind", 1911)

"[...] the organic function of thought is carried on for the most part unconsciously. Should the product finally enter consciousness also, or should consciousness momentarily accompany the processes of logical thought, this light only penetrates to the shallows, an the actual fundamental processes are carried on in the darkness of the unconscious. The specifically purposeful operations are chiefly, and in any case at the beginning, wholly instinctive and unconscious, even if they later press forward into the luminous circle of consciousness [...]" (Hans Vaihinger, "The Philosophy of 'As if': A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind", 1911)

"The organized activity of the logical function draws into itself all the sensations and constructs an inner world of its own, which progressively departs from reality but yet at certain points still retains so intimate a connection with it that transitions from one to the other continually take place and we hardly notice that we are acting on a double stage - our own inner world (which, of course, we objectify as the world of sense-perception) and also an entirely different and external world." (Hans Vaihinger, "The Philosophy of 'As if': A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind", 1911)

"The psyche works over the material presented to it by the sensations, i.e. elaborates the only available foundation with the help of the logical forms; it sifts the sensations, on the one hand cutting away definite portions of the given sensory material, in conformity with the logical functions, and on the other making subjective additions to what is immediately give. And it is in these very operations that the process of acquiring knowledge consists, and it is all the while departing from reality as given to it." (Hans Vaihinger, "The Philosophy of 'As if': A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind", 1911)

"We have repeatedly insisted [...] that the boundary between truth and error is not a rigid one, and we were able ultimately to demonstrate that what we generally call truth, namely a conceptual world coinciding with the external world, is merely the most expedient error." (Hans Vaihinger, "The Philosophy of 'As if': A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind", 1911)

"Where the logical function actively intervenes, it alters what is given and causes it to depart from reality. We cannot even describe the elementary processes of the psyche without at every step meeting this disturbing -or shall we say helpful? - factor. As soon as sensation has entered the sphere of the psyche, it is drawn into the whirlpool of the logical processes. The psyche quite of i t s own accord alters both what is given and presented. Two things are to be distinguished in this process: First, the actual forms in which this change takes place; and secondly, the products obtained from the original material by this change. " (Hans Vaihinger, "The Philosophy of 'As if': A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind", 1911)

On Transformations ( - 1899)

"Given that annihilation of nature in its entirety is impossible, and that death and dissolution are not appropriate to the whole mass of this entire globe or star, from time to time, according to an established order, it is renewed, altered, changed, and transformed in all its parts." (Giordano Bruno, "The Ash Wednesday Supper", 1584)

"Concerning the theory of equations, I have tried to find out under what circumstances equations are solvable by radicals, which gave me the opportunity of investigating thoroughly, and describing, all transformations possible on an equation, even if it is the case that it is not solvable by radicals." (Évariste Galois, [letter to Auguste Chevalier] 1832)

"[Algebra] has for its object the resolution of equations; taking this expression in its full logical meaning, which signifies the transformation of implicit functions into equivalent explicit ones. In the same way arithmetic may be defined as destined to the determination of the values of functions. […] We will briefly say that Algebra is the Calculus of functions, and Arithmetic is the Calculus of Values." (Auguste Comte, "Philosophy of Mathematics", 1851)

"[…] the quantities of heat which must be imparted to, or withdrawn from a changeable body are not the same, when these changes occur in a non-reversible manner, as they are when the same changes occur reversibly. In the second place, with each non-reversible change is associated an uncompensated transformation […] I propose to call the magnitude S the entropy of the body […] I have intentionally formed the word entropy so as to be as similar as possible to the word energy […]" (Rudolf Clausius, "The Mechanical Theory of Heat", 1867)

"The second fundamental theorem [the second law of thermodynamics], in the form which I have given to it, asserts that all transformations occurring in nature may take place in a certain direction, which I have assumed as positive, by themselves, that is, without compensation […] the entire condition of the universe must always continue to change in that first direction, and the universe must consequently approach incessantly a limiting condition. […] For every body two magnitudes have thereby presented themselves - the transformation value of its thermal content [the amount of inputted energy that is converted to 'work'], and its disgregation [separation or disintegration]; the sum of which constitutes its entropy." (Rudolf Clausius, "The Mechanical Theory of Heat", 1867)

"Mathematics is the science of the functional laws and transformations which enable us to convert figured extension and rated motion into number." (George H Howison, "The Departments of Mathematics, and their Mutual Relations", Journal of Speculative Philosophy Vol. 5, No. 2, 1871)

"Instead of the points of a line, plane, space, or any manifold under investigation, we may use instead any figure contained within the manifold: a group of points, curve, surface, etc. As there is nothing at all determined at the outset about the number of arbitrary parameters upon which these figures should depend, the number of dimensions of the line, plane, space, etc. is likewise arbitrary and depends only on the choice of space element. But so long as we base our geometrical investigation on the same group of transformations, the geometrical content remains unchanged. That is, every theorem resulting from one choice of space element will also be a theorem under any other choice; only the arrangement and correlation of the theorems will be changed. The essential thing is thus the group of transformations; the number of dimensions to be assigned to a manifold is only of secondary importance." (Felix Klein, "A comparative review of recent researches in geometry", Bulletin of the American Mathematoical Society 2(10), 1893)

"In our century the conceptions substitution and substitution group, transformation and transformation group, operation and operation group, invariant, differential invariant and differential parameter, appear more and more clearly as the most important conceptions of mathematics." (Sophus Lie, Leipziger Berichte No. 47, 1896)

On Quaternions (1875-1899)

"Quantity is that which is operated with according to fixed mutually consistent laws. Both operator and operand must derive their meaning from the laws of operation. In the case of ordinary algebra these are the three laws already indicated [the commutative, associative, and distributive laws], in the algebra of quaternions the same save the law of commutation for multiplication and division, and so on. It may be questioned whether this definition is sufficient, and it may be objected that it is vague; but the reader will do well to reflect that any definition must include the linear algebras of Peirce, the algebra of logic, and others that may be easily imagined, although they have not yet been developed. This general definition of quantity enables us to see how operators may be treated as quantities, and thus to understand the rationale of the so called symbolical methods." (George Chrystal, "Mathematics", Encyclopedia Britannica, 1875)

"When the formulas admit of intelligible interpretation, they are accessions to knowledge; but independently of their interpretation they are invaluable as symbolical expressions of thought. But the most noted instance is the symbol called the impossible or imaginary, known also as the square root of minus one, and which, from a shadow of meaning attached to it, may be more definitely distinguished as the symbol of semi-inversion. This symbol is restricted to a precise signification as the representative of perpendicularity in quaternions, and this wonderful algebra of space is intimately dependent upon the special use of the symbol for its symmetry, elegance, and power."  (Benjamin Peirce, "On the Uses and Transformations of Linear Algebra", 1875)

"Closely akin to his third and fourth propositions is Riemann's fifth proposition, that continuous quantities are coördinate with discrete quantities, both being in their nature multiples or aggregates, and therefore species of the same genus. This pernicious fallacy is one of the traditional errors current among mathematicians, and has been prolific of innumerable delusions. It is this error which has stood in the way of the formation of a rational, intelligible, and consistent theory of irrational and imaginary quantities, so called, and has shrouded the true principles of the doctrine of "complex numbers" and of the calculus of quaternions in an impenetrable haze." (John Stallo, "The Concepts and Theories of Modern Physics", 1881)

"[....] this definition of mathematics is wider than that which is ordinarily given, and by which its range is limited to quantitative research. The ordinary definition, like those of other sciences, is objective; whereas this is subjective. Recent investigations, of which quaternions is the most noteworthy instance, make it manifest that the old definition is too restricted. The sphere of mathematics is here extended, in accordance with all the derivation of its name, to all demonstrative research, so as to include all knowledge capable of dogmatic teaching." (Benjamin Peirce, 1881)

"This symbol [v-1] is restricted to a precise signification as the representative of perpendicularity in quaternions, and this wonderful algebra of space is intimately dependent upon the special use of the symbol for its symmetry, elegance, and power. The immortal author of quaternions has shown that there are other significations which may attach to the symbol in other cases. But the strongest use of the symbol is to be found in its magical power of doubling the actual universe, and placing by its side an ideal universe, its exact counterpart, with which it can be compared and contrasted, and, by means of curiously connecting fibres, form with it an organic whole, from which modern analysis has developed her surpassing geometry." (Benjamin Peirce, "On the Uses and Transformations of Linear Algebras", American Journal of Mathematics Vol. 4, 1881)

"I think the time may come when double algebra will be the beginner’s tool; and quaternions will be where double algebra is now. The Lord only knows what will come above the quaternions." (Augustus De Morgan, "A. Graves’ Life of Hamilton" Vol. 3, 1882-1889)

"The merits or demerits of a pamphlet printed for private distribution a good many years ago do not constitute a subject of any great importance, but the assumptions implied in the sentence quoted are suggestive of certain reflections and inquiries which are of broader interest, and seem not untimely at a period when the methods and results of the various forms of multiple algebra are attracting so much attention. It seems to be assumed that a departure from quaternionic usage in the treatment of vectors is an enormity. If this assumption is true, it is an important truth; if not, it would be unfortunate if it should remain unchallenged, especially when supported by so high an authority. The criticism relates particularly to the notations, but I believe that there is a deeper question of notions underlying that of notations. Indeed, if my offence had been solely in the matter of notations, it would have been less accurate to describe my productions as a monstrosity, than to characterize its dress as uncouth." (Josiah W Gibbs, "The Rôle of Quaternions in the Algebra of Vectors, Nature vol. xliii, 1891)

"I do think [...] that you would find it would lose nothing by omitting the word 'vector' throughout. It adds nothing to the clearness or simplicity of the geometry, whether of two dimensions or three dimensions. Quaternions came from Hamilton after his really good work had been done; and, though beautifully ingenious, have been an unmixed evil to those who have touched them in any way, including Clerk Maxwell." (William T Kelvin, [Letter to Robert B Hayward] 1892) 

"[...] it is as unfair to call a vector a quaternion  as to call a man a quadruped." (Oliver Heaviside, 1892)

"The invention of quaternions must be regarded as a most remarkable feat of human ingenuity. Vector analysis, without quaternions, could have been found by any mathematician [...] but to find out quaternions required genius." (Oliver Heaviside, 1892)

"Symmetrical equations are good in their place, but "vector" is a useless survival, or offshoot, from quaternions, and has never been of the slightest use to any creature. Hertz wisely shunted it, but unwisely he adopted temporarily Heaviside’s nihilism. He even tended to nihilism in dynamics, as I warned you soon after his death. He would have grown out of all this, I believe, if he had lived. He certainly was the opposite pole of nature to a nihilist in his experimental work, and in his Doctorate Thesis on the impact of elastic bodies." (William T Kelvin, [footnote in Letter to George F FitzGerald] 1896)

"A much more natural and adequate comparison would, it seems to me, liken Coordinate Geometry to a steam-hammer, which an expert may employ on any destructive or constructive work of one general kind, say the cracking of an eggshell, or the welding of an anchor. But you must have your expert to manage it, for without him it is useless. He has to toil amid the heat, smoke, grime, grease, and perpetual din of the suffocating engine-room. The work has to be brought to the hammer, for it cannot usually be taken to its work. And it is not in general, transferable; for each expert, as a rule, knows, fully and confidently, the working details of his own weapon only. Quaternions, on the other hand, are like the elephant’s trunk, ready at any moment for anything, be it to pick up a crumb or a field-gun, to strangle a tiger, or uproot a tree; portable in the extreme, applicable anywhere - alike in the trackless jungle and in the barrack square - directed by a little native who requires no special skill or training, and who can be transferred from one elephant to another without much hesitation. Surely this, which adapts itself to its work, is the grander instrument. But then, it is the natural, the other, the artificial one." (Peter G Tait [in Alexander MacFarlane's "Lectures on Ten British Mathematicians", 1916])

"[...] of possible quadruple algebras the one [...] by far the most beautiful and remarkable was practically identical with quaternions, and [...] it [is] most interesting that a calculus which so strongly appealed to the human mind by its intrinsic beauty and symmetry should prove to be especially adapted to the study of natural phenomena. The mind of man and that of Nature’s God must work in the same channels." (Benjamin Peirce) [atributed by William E Byerly, former student of Peirce)

"Quaternions came from Hamilton [...] and have been an unmixed evil to those who have touched them in any way. Vector is a useless survival [...] and has never been of the slightest use to any creature."  (William T Kelvin)

"There is still something in the system [of quaternions] which gravels me. I have not yet any clear views as to the extent to which we are at liberty arbitrarily to create imaginaries, and to endow them with supernatural properties. [...] If with your alchemy you can make three pounds of gold, why should you stop there?" (John T Graves)

"Time is said to have only one dimension, and space to have three dimensions [...] The mathematical quaternion partakes of both these elements; in technical language it may be said to be 'time plus space', or 'space plus time': and in this sense it has, or at least involves a reference to, four dimensions. And how the One of Time, of Space the Three, Might in the Chain of Symbols girdled be." (William R Hamilton [in Robert P Graves's "Life of Sir William Rowan Hamilton", 1882-1889])

On Quaternions (1900 - )

"It is a curious fact in the history of mathematics that discoveries of the greatest importance were made simultaneously by different men of genius. The classical example is the […] development of the infinitesimal calculus by Newton and Leibniz. Another case is the development of vector calculus in Grassmann's Ausdehnungslehre and Hamilton's Calculus of Quaternions. In the same way we find analytic geometry simultaneously developed by Fermat and Descartes." (Julian L Coolidge, "A History of Geometrical Methods", 1940)

"His optical and dynamical investigations were prophetic and foreshadowed the quantum theory of our days. His quaternions foreshadowed the space-time world of relativity. The quaternion algebra was the first example of a noncommutative algebra, which released an avalanche of literature in all parts of the world. Indeed, his professional life was fruitful beyond measure." (Cornelius Lanczos, "William Rowan Hamilton - an appreciation", American Scientist 2, 1967)

"While translations are well animated by using vectors, rotation animation can be improved by using the progenitor of vectors, quaternions. [...] By an odd quirk of mathematics, only systems of two, four, or eight components will multiply as Hamilton desired; triples had been his stumbling block." (Ken Shoemake, "Animating Rotation with Quaternion Curves", ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics Vol. 19 (3), 1985)

"Any system with this mix of properties, commutative or not, is called a division algebra. The real numbers and the complex numbers are division algebras, be- cause we don't rule out commutativity of multiplication, we just don't demand it. Every field is a division algebra. But some division algebras are not fields, and the first to be discovered was the quaternions. In 1898, Adolf Hurwitz proved that the system of quaternions is also unique. The quaternions are the only finite-dimensional division algebra that contains the real numbers and is not equal either to the real numbers or the complex numbers." (Ian Stewart, "Why Beauty Is Truth", 2007)

"Quaternions have developed a strange habit of turning up in the most unlikely places. One reason is that they are unique. They can be characterized by a few reasonable, relatively simple properties-a selection of the 'laws of arithmetic', omitting only one important law-and they constitute the only mathematical system with that list of properties." (Ian Stewart, "Why Beauty Is Truth", 2007)

"The quaternions arise when we try to extend the complex numbers, increasing the dimension (while keeping it finite) and retaining as many of the laws of algebra as possible. The laws we want to keep are all the usual properties of addition and subtraction, most of the properties of multiplication, and the possibility of dividing by anything other than zero. The sacrifice this time is more serious; it is what caused Hamilton so much heartache. You have to abandon the commutative law of multiplication. You just have to accept that as a brutal fact, and move on. When you get used to it, you wonder why you ever expected the commutative law to hold in any case, and start to think it a minor miracle that it holds for the complex numbers." (Ian Stewart, "Why Beauty Is Truth", 2007)

"The system of quaternions contains a copy of the complex numbers, the quaternions of the form x + iy. Hamilton's formulas show that -1 does not have just two square roots, i and -i. It also has j, -j, k, and -k. In fact there are infinitely many different square roots of minus one in the quaternion system." (Ian Stewart, "Why Beauty Is Truth", 2007)

"However the nature of mathematics itself has led us, at first reluctantly, to go beyond real numbers to the realm of the so-called imaginary and complex numbers. Moreover modern mathematicians also deal in infinite numbers of more than one kind, and also quaternions, octonians, and matrices, which can be regarded as another generalization of number." (Peter M Higgins, "Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography", 2008)

"Quantum theory may be formulated using Hilbert spaces over any of the three associative normed division algebras: the real numbers, the complex numbers and the quaternions. Indeed, these three choices appear naturally in a number of axiomatic approaches. However, there are internal problems with real or quaternionic quantum theory. Here we argue that these problems can be resolved if we treat real, complex and quaternionic quantum theory as part of a unified structure. Dyson called this structure the ‘three-fold way’ […] This three-fold classification sheds light on the physics of time reversal symmetry, and it already plays an important role in particle physics." (John C Baez, "Division Algebras and Quantum Theory", 2011)

"Quaternions are not actual extensions of imaginary numbers, and they are not taking complex numbers into a multi-dimensional space on their own. Quaternion units are instances of some number-like object type, identified collectively, but they are not numbers (be it real or imaginary). In other words, they form a closed, internally consistent set of object instances; they can of course be plotted visually on a multi-dimensional space but this only is a visualization within their own definition." (Huseyin Ozel, "Redefining Imaginary and Complex Numbers, Defining Imaginary and Complex Objects", 2018)

On Quaternions ( - 1874)

"There is still something in the system [of quaternions] which gravels me. I have not yet any clear views as to the extent to which we are at liberty arbitrarily to create imaginaries, and to endow them with supernatural properties. [...] If with your alchemy you can make three pounds of gold, why should you stop there?" (John T Graves, [letter to William R Hamilton] 1843)

"There seems to me to be something analogous to polarized intensity in the pure imaginary part; and to unpolarized energy (indifferent to direction) in the real part of a quaternion: and thus we have some slight glimpse of a future Calculus of Polarities. This is certainly very vague […]" (Sir William R Hamilton, "On Quaternions; or on a new System of Imaginaries in Algebra", 1844)

"The algebraically real part may receive [...] all values contained on the one scale of progression of number from negative to positive infinity; we shall call it therefore the scalar part, or simply the scalar of the quaternion, and shall form its symbol by prefixing, to the symbol of the quaternion, the characteristic Scal., or simply S., where no confusion seems likely to arise from using this last abbreviation. On the other hand, the algebraically imaginary part, being geometrically constructed by a straight line, or radius vector, which has, in general, for each determined quaternion, a determined length and determined direction in space, may be called the vector part, or simply the vector of the quaternion; andmay be denoted by prefixing the characteristic Vect., or V." (William R Hamilton, 1846)

"The quaternion [was] born, as a curious offspring of a quaternion of parents, say of geometry, algebra, metaphysics, and poetry. [...] I have never been able to give a clearer statement of their nature and their aim than I have done in two lines of a sonnet addressed to Sir John Herschel: 'And how the one of Time, of Space the Three,/Might in the Chain of Symbols girdled be'" (William R Hamilton, [letter to  Rev. Townsend] 1855)

"Every man is ready to join in the approval or condemnation of a philosopher or a statesman, a poet or an orator, an artist or an architect. But who can judge of a mathematician? Who will write a review of Hamilton’s Quaternions, and show us wherein it is superior to Newton’s Fluxions?" (Thomas Hill, 'Imagination in Mathematics', North American Review 85, 1857)

"The prominent reason why a mathematician can be judged by none but mathematicians, is that he uses a peculiar language. The language of mathesis is special and untranslatable. In its simplest forms it can be translated, as, for instance, we say a right angle to mean a square corner. But you go a little higher in the science of mathematics, and it is impossible to dispense with a peculiar language. It would defy all the power of Mercury himself to explain to a person ignorant of the science what is meant by the single phrase “functional exponent.” How much more impossible, if we may say so, would it be to explain a whole treatise like Hamilton’s Quaternions, in such a wise as to make it possible to judge of its value! But to one who has learned this language, it is the most precise and clear of all modes of expression. It discloses the thought exactly as conceived by the writer, with more or less beauty of form, but never with obscurity. It may be prolix, as it often is among French writers; may delight in mere verbal metamorphoses, as in the Cambridge University of England; or adopt the briefest and clearest forms, as under the pens of the geometers of our Cambridge; but it always reveals to us precisely the writer’s thought." (Thomas Hill, North American Review 85, 1857)

"The next grand extensions of mathematical physics will, in all likelihood, be furnished by quaternions." (Peter G Tait, "Note on a Quaternion Transformation", [communication read] 1863) 

"If nothing more could be said of Quaternions than that they enable us to exhibit in a singularly compact and elegant form, whose meaning is obvious at a glance on account of the utter inartificiality of the method, results which in the ordinary Cartesian co-ordinates are of the utmost complexity, a very powerful argument for their use would be furnished. But it would be unjust to Quaternions to be content with such a statement; for we are fully entitled to say that in all cases, even in those to which the Cartesian methods seem specially adapted, they give as simple an expression as any other method; while in the great majority of cases they give a vastly simpler one. In the common methods a judicious choice of co-ordinates is often of immense importance in simplifying an investigation; in Quaternions there is usually no choice, for (except when they degrade to mere scalars) they are in general utterly independent of any particular directions in space, and select of themselves the most natural reference lines for each particular problem." (Peter G Tait, Nature Vol. 4, [address] 1871)

On Transformations (1900-1949)

"The power of differential calculus is that it linearizes all problems by going back to the 'infinitesimally small', but this process can be used only on smooth manifolds. Thus our distinction between the two senses of rotation on a smooth manifold rests on the fact that a continuously differentiable coordinate transformation leaving the origin fixed can be approximated by a linear transformation at О and one separates the (nondegenerate) homogeneous linear transformations into positive and negative according to the sign of their determinants. Also the invariance of the dimension for a smooth manifold follows simply from the fact that a linear substitution which has an inverse preserves the number of variables." (Hermann Weyl, "The Concept of a Riemann Surface", 1913)

"It can, you see, be said, with the same approximation to truth, that the whole of science, including mathematics, consists in the study of transformations or in the study of relations." (Cassius J Keyser. "Mathematical Philosophy: A Study of Fate and Freedom", 1922)

"The conception of tensors is possible owing to the circumstance that the transition from one co-ordinate system to another expresses itself as a linear transformation in the differentials. One here uses the exceedingly fruitful mathematical device of making a problem "linear" by reverting to infinitely small quantities." (Hermann Weyl, "Space - Time - Matter", 1922)

"The sequence of different positions of the same particle at different times forms a one-dimensional continuum in the four-dimensional space-time, which is called the world-line of the particle. All that physical experiments or observations can teach us refers to intersections of world-lines of different material particles, light-pulsations, etc., and how the course of the world-line is between these points of intersection is entirely irrelevant and outside the domain of physics. The system of intersecting world-lines can thus be twisted about at will, so long as no points of intersection are destroyed or created, and their order is not changed. It follows that the equations expressing the physical laws must be invariant for arbitrary transformations." (Willem de Sitter, "Kosmos", 1932)

"A mathematician is not a man who can readily manipulate figures; often he cannot. He is not even a man who can readily perform the transformations of equations by the use of calculus. He is primarily an individual who is skilled in the use of symbolic logic on a high plane, and especially he is a man of intuitive judgment in the choice of the manipulative processes he employs." (Vannevar Bush, "As We May Think", 1945)

"It should be observed first that the whole concept of a category is essentially an auxiliary one; our basic concepts are essentially those of a functor and of a natural transformation […]. The idea of a category is required only by the precept that every function should have a definite class as domain and a definite class as range, for the categories are provided as the domains and ranges of functors. Thus one could drop the category concept altogether […]" (Samuel Eilenberg & Saunders Mac Lane, "A general theory of natural equivalences", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 58, 1945)

"We have assumed that the laws of nature must be capable of expression in a form which is invariant for all possible transformations of the space-time co-ordinates." (Gerald J Whitrow, "The Structure of the Universe: An Introduction to Cosmology", 1949)

On Transformations (2010 - )

"All forms of complex causation, and especially nonlinear transformations, admittedly stack the deck against prediction. Linear describes an outcome produced by one or more variables where the effect is additive. Any other interaction is nonlinear. This would include outcomes that involve step functions or phase transitions. The hard sciences routinely describe nonlinear phenomena. Making predictions about them becomes increasingly problematic when multiple variables are involved that have complex interactions. Some simple nonlinear systems can quickly become unpredictable when small variations in their inputs are introduced." (Richard N Lebow, "Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations", 2010)

"Strange attractors, unlike regular ones, are geometrically very complicated, as revealed by the evolution of a small phase-space volume. For instance, if the attractor is a limit cycle, a small two-dimensional volume does not change too much its shape: in a direction it maintains its size, while in the other it shrinks till becoming a 'very thin strand' with an almost constant length. In chaotic systems, instead, the dynamics continuously stretches and folds an initial small volume transforming it into a thinner and thinner 'ribbon' with an exponentially increasing length." (Massimo Cencini et al, "Chaos: From Simple Models to Complex Systems", 2010)

"Symmetry may have its appeal but it is inherently stale. Some kind of imbalance is behind every transformation." (Marcelo Gleiser, "A Tear at the Edge of Creation: A Radical New Vision for Life in an Imperfect Universe", 2010)

"[…] topology is the study of those properties of geometric objects which remain unchanged under bi-uniform and bi-continuous transformations. Such transformations can be thought of as bending, stretching, twisting or compressing or any combination of these." (Lokenath Debnath, "The Legacy of Leonhard Euler - A Tricentennial Tribute", 2010)

"A crucial difference between topology and geometry lies in the set of allowable transformations. In topology, the set of allowable transformations is much larger and conceptually much richer than is the set of Euclidean transformations. All Euclidean transformations are topological transformations, but most topological transformations are not Euclidean. Similarly, the sets of transformations that define other geometries are also topological transformations, but many topological transformations have no counterpart in these geometries. It is in this sense that topology is a generalization of geometry." (John Tabak, "Beyond Geometry: A new mathematics of space and form", 2011)

"What distinguishes topological transformations from geometric ones is that topological transformations are more 'primitive'. They retain only the most basic properties of the sets of points on which they act." (John Tabak, "Beyond Geometry: A new mathematics of space and form", 2011)

"The potential freedom in the choice of a particular mathematical representation of physical objects is loosely called symmetry. In mathematical terms, physical symmetries are intimately related to groups in the sense that symmetry transformations form a group." (Teiko Heinosaari & Mario Ziman, "The Mathematical Language of Quantum Theory: From Uncertainty to Entanglement", 2012)

"Mathematics does not merely describe the problem in an abstract way, it allows us to find a previously unknown 'solution' from the abstract description. It is surprising that the unknown can be transformed into the well known when we succeed in describing the problem mathematically." (Waro Iwane, "Mathematics in Our Company: What Does It Describe?", [in "What Mathematics Can Do for You"] 2013)

"[…] the symmetry group of the infinite logarithmic spiral is an infinite group, with one element for each real number . Two such transformations compose by adding the corresponding angles, so this group is isomorphic to the real numbers under addition." (Ian Stewart, "Symmetry: A Very Short Introduction", 2013)

"Intersections of lines, for example, remain intersections, and the hole in a torus (doughnut) cannot be transformed away. Thus a doughnut may be transformed topologically into a coffee cup (the hole turning into a handle) but never into a pancake. Topology, then, is really a mathematics of relationships, of unchangeable, or 'invariant', patterns." (Fritjof Capra, "The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision", 2014)

"It is evident that chaotic behavior, in the new scientific sense of the term, is very different from random, erratic motion. With the help of strange attractors a distinction can be made between mere randomness, or 'noise', and chaos. Chaotic behavior is deterministic and patterned, and strange attractors allow us to transform the seemingly random data into distinct visible shapes." (Fritjof Capra, "The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision", 2014)

"Topology is a geometry in which all lengths, angles, and areas can be distorted at will. Thus a triangle can be continuously transformed into a rectangle, the rectangle into a square, the square into a circle, and so on. Similarly, a cube can be transformed into a cylinder, the cylinder into a cone, the cone into a sphere. Because of these continuous transformations, topology is known popularly as 'rubber sheet geometry'. All figures that can be transformed into each other by continuous bending, stretching, and twisting are called 'topologically equivalent'." (Fritjof Capra, "The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision", 2014)

"[…] topology is concerned precisely with those properties of geometric figures that do not change when the figures are transformed. Intersections of lines, for example, remain intersections, and the hole in a torus (doughnut) cannot be transformed away. Thus a doughnut may be transformed topologically into a coffee cup (the hole turning into a handle) but never into a pancake. Topology, then, is really a mathematics of relationships, of unchangeable, or 'invariant', patterns." (Fritjof Capra, "The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision", 2014)

"[…] the role that symmetry plays is not confined to material objects. Symmetries can also refer to theories and, in particular, to quantum theory. For if the laws of physics are to be invariant under changes of reference frames, the set of all such transformations will form a group. Which transformations and which groups depends on the systems under consideration." (William H Klink & Sujeev Wickramasekara, "Relativity, Symmetry and the Structure of Quantum Theory I: Galilean quantum theory", 2015)

"Symmetries are transformations that keep certain parameters (properties, equations, and so on) invariant, that is, the parameters they refer to are conserved under these transformations. It is to be expected, therefore, that the identification of conserved quantities is inseparable from the identification of fundamental symmetries in the laws of nature. Symmetries single out 'privileged' operations, conservation laws single out 'privileged' quantities or properties that correspond to these operations. Yet the specific connections between a particular symmetry and the invariance it entails are far from obvious. For instance, the isotropy of space (the indistinguishability of its directions) is intuitive enough, but the conservation of angular momentum based on that symmetry, and indeed, the concept of angular momentum, are far less intuitive." (Yemima Ben-Menahem, "Causation in Science", 2018)