On Chaos IX

"Mathematicians are beginning to view order and chaos as two distinct manifestations of an underlying determinism. And neither state exists in isolation. The typical system can exist in a variety of states, some ordered, some chaotic. Instead of two opposed polarities, there is a continuous spectrum. As harmony and discord combine in musical beauty, so order and chaos combine in mathematical [and physical] beauty." (Ian Stewart, "Does God Play Dice: The New Mathematics of Chaos", 1989)

"Let us tum to the question, 'What is chaos?' Certainly the typical answer, 'sensitive dependence on initial conditions', is reasonable. But to be relevant to physics, more is required: the property should be robust or preserved under perturbations of the system. A response &lat involves a mechanism and meets the criteria is: 'Chaos is the presence of a (transversal) homoclinic point'." (Steven Smale, "What is chaos?", 1990)

"Summarizing, we have indicated why homoclinic points imply chaos. The converse is less formalizable, but I believe it is basically true. However,  there is a stronger notion of chaos, which we might call full chaos, where the set of initial conditions with sensitive dependence has positive or even full measure. In this case the corresponding homoclinic point could well be associated with a chaotic attractor, such as the Lorenz attractor. " (Steven Smale, "What is chaos?", 1990)

"Systems are thus seen by complexity as being ‘on the edge of chaos'. Order and chaos are in a kind of balance where the components are neither fully locked into place but yet do not fully dissolve into anarchy. chaos is not complete anarchic randomness but there is a kind of 'orderly disorder' present within all such dynamic systems." (John Urry, "Global Complexity", 2003)

"[...] imagine that at some point, this flickering chaos was suddenly influenced by a shift in the rules – perhaps the laws of physics as we know them didn't always apply. If these laws changed, they could have triggered a colossal release of energy, forcing spacetime to stabilize and expand – creating the Big Bang. In this view, the Big Bang wasn’t the true beginning but more like a dramatic phase transition, similar to water turning into steam when heated." (Lars Tvede et al, "Hyperintelligence How the Universe Engineers Its Own Mind", 2025)