"Connectivity harbors other risks too. As we create more
links among the nodes of our technological and social networks, these networks
sometimes developed unexpected patterns of connections that make breakdown more
likely. They can, for instance, develop harmful feedback loops - what people
commonly call vicious circles - that reinforce instabilities and even lead to
collapse."
"In a random network the loss of a small number of nodes can cause the overall network to become incoherent - that is, to break into disconnected subnetworks. In a scale-free network, such an event usually won’t disrupt the overall network because most nodes don’t have many links. But there’s a big caveat to this general principle: if a scale-free network loses a hub, it can be disastrous, because many other nodes depend on that hub."
"In the case of a complex system, nonlinear behavior can happen as disturbances or changes in the system, each one relatively small by itself, accumulate. Outwardly, everything seems to be normal: the system doesn’t generate any surprises. At some point, though, the behavior of the whole system suddenly shifts to a radically new mode. This kind of behavior is often called a threshold effect, because the shift occurs when a critical threshold - usually unseen and often unexpected - is crossed." (Thomas Homer-Dixon, "The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization", 2006)
"People often use the words 'breakdown' and 'collapse' synonymously. But in my view, although both breakdown and collapse produce a radical simplification of a system, they differ in their long-term consequences. Breakdown may be serious, but it’s not catastrophic. Something can be salvaged after breakdown occurs and perhaps rebuilt better than before. Collapse, on the other hand, is far more harmful: the damage endures- it may even be permanent - and there’s far less knowledge, wealth, or information left behind to use in a process of renewal." (Thomas Homer-Dixon, "The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization", 2006)
"Scale-free networks are particularly vulnerable to intentional attack: if someone wants to wreck the whole network, he simply needs to identify and destroy some of its hubs. And here we see how our world’s increasing connectivity really matters. Scientists have found that as a scale-free network like the Internet or our food-distribution system grows- as it adds more nodes - the new nodes tend to hook up with already highly connected hubs." (Thomas Homer-Dixon, "The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization", 2006)
"So the first cost of greater connectivity is that damage or a shock in one part of the system […] can cascade farther and faster to other parts of the system. This is especially true when the nodes in the network, or the elements in the system, are packed so closely together that the links among them are very short - that is, when they’re tightly coupled." (Thomas Homer-Dixon, "The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization", 2006)
"Synergy happens when people, things, or events combine to produce a larger impact than they would if each acted separately." (Thomas Homer-Dixon, "The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization", 2006)
"The breakdown of a system […] simplifies its internal organization and reduces its range of potential behaviors."
"The intricate networks that tightly connect us together - and through which people, materials, information, money and energy move - amplify and transmit any shock." (Thomas Homer-Dixon, "The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization", 2006)
"When small things can make a big difference, and when it’s impossible to know which small things matter and which don’t, predicting the future becomes formidably difficult. This is especially true of human affairs." (Thomas Homer-Dixon, "The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization", 2006)
No comments:
Post a Comment