On Geometry: On Fractals (-1989)

"Fractal geometry is not just a chapter of mathematics, but one that helps Everyman to see the same world differently." (Benoît Mandelbrot, "The Fractal Geometry of Nature", 1982)

"I coined fractal from the Latin adjective fractus. The corresponding Latin verb frangere means 'to break': to create irregular fragments [...] how appropriate for our needs!" (Benoît Mandelbrot, "The Fractal Geometry of Nature", 1982)

"A fractal is a mathematical set or concrete object that is irregular or fragmented at all scales [...]" (Benoît Mandelbrot, "The Fractal Geometry of Nature", 1982)

"A fractal is by definition a set for which the Hausdorff-Besicovitch dimension strictly exceeds the topological dimension." (Benoît Mandelbrot, "The Fractal Geometry of Nature", 1982)

"In the mind's eye, a fractal is a way of seeing infinity." (James Gleick, "Chaos: Making a New Science, A Geometry of Nature", 1987)

"Fractal geometry is concerned with the description, classification, analysis, and observation of subsets of metric spaces (X, d). The metric spaces are usually, but not always, of an inherently 'simple' geometrical character; the subsets are typically geometrically 'complicated'. There are a number of general properties of subsets of metric spaces, which occur over and over again, which are very basic, and which form part of the vocabulary for describing fractal sets and other subsets of metric spaces. Some of these properties, such as openness and closedness, which we are going to introduce, are of a topological character. That is to say, they are invariant under homeomorphism." (Michael Barnsley, "Fractals Everwhere", 1988)

"How big is a fractal? When are two fractals similar to one another in some sense? What experimental measurements might we make to tell if two different fractals may be metrically equivalent? [...] There are various numbers associated with fractals which can be used to compare them. They are generally referred to as fractal dimensions. They are attempts to quantify a subjective feeling which we have about how densely the fractal occupies the metric space in which it lies. Fractal dimensions provide an objective means for comparing fractals." (Michael Barnsley, "Fractals Everwhere", 1988)

"Fractals are geometric shapes that are equally complex in their details as in their overall form. That is, if a piece of a fractal is suitably magnified to become of the same size as the whole, it should look like the whole, either exactly, or perhaps after a slight limited deformation." (Benoît B Mandelbrot, "Fractals and an Art for the Sake of Science", 1989)

"Fractal geometry appears to have created a new category of art, next to art for art’s sake and art for the sake of commerce: art for the sake of science (and of mathematics). [...] The source of fractal art resides in the recognition that very simple mathematical formulas that seem completely barren may in fact be pregnant, so to speak, with an enormous amount of graphic structure. The artist’s taste can only affect the selection of formulas to be rendered, the cropping and the rendering. Thus, fractal art seems to fall outside the usual categories of ‘invention’, ‘discovery’ and ‘creativity’." (Benoît B Mandelbrot, "Fractals and an Art for the Sake of Science", 1989)

"What were the needs that led me to single out a few of these monsters, calling them fractals, to add some of their close or distant kin, and then to build a geometric language around them? The original need happens to have been purely utilitarian. That links exist between usefulness and beauty is, of course, well known. What we call the beauty of a flower attracts the insects that will gather and spread its pollen. Thus the beauty of a flower is useful - even indispensable - to the survival of its species. Similarly, it was the attractiveness of the fractal images that first brought them to the attention of many colleagues and then of a wide world." (Benoît B Mandelbrot, "Fractals and an Art for the Sake of Science", Leonardo [Supplemental Issue], 1989)