On Intuition (1960-1969)

"Intuition implies the act of grasping the meaning or significance or structure of a problem without explicit reliance on the analytical apparatus of one’s craft. It is the intuitive mode that yields hypotheses quickly, that produces interesting combinations of ideas before their worth is known. It precedes proof: indeed, it is what the techniques of analysis and proof are designed to test and check. It is founded on a kind of combinatorial playfulness that is only possible when the consequences of error are not overpowering or sinful." (Jerome S Bruner, "On Learning Mathematics", Mathematics Teacher Vol. 53, 1960)

"The first [principle], is that a mathematical theory can only he developed axiomatically in a fruitful way when the student has already acquired some familiarity with the corresponding material - a familiarity gained by working long enough with it on a kind of experimental, or semiexperimental basis, i.e. with constant appeal to intuition. The other principle [...]  is that when logical inference is introduced in some mathematical question, it should always he presented with absolute honesty - that is, without trying to hide gaps or flaws in the argument; any other way, in my opinion, is worse than giving no proof at all." (Jean Dieudonné, "Thinking in School Mathematics", 1961)

"The functional validity of a working hypothesis is not a priori certain, because often it is initially based on intuition. However, logical deductions from such a hypothesis provide expectations (so called prognoses) as to the circumstances under which certain phenomena will appear in nature. Such a postulate or working hypothesis can then be substantiated by additional observations or by experiments especially arranged to test details. The value of the hypothesis is strengthened if the observed facts fit the expectation within the limits of permissible error." (R Willem van Bemmelen, "The Scientific Character of Geology", The Journal of Geology Vol 69 (4), 1961)

"The object of mathematical rigor is to sanction and legitimize the conquests of intuition, and there never was any other object for it." (George Polya, "Mathematical Discovery", 1962)

"Intuition is the collection of odds and ends where we place all the intellectual mechanisms which we do not know how to analyze or even name with precision, or which we are not interested in analyzing or naming." (Mario Bunge, "Intuition and Science", 1962)

"Living mathematics rests on the fluctuation between the antithesis powers of intuition and logic, the individuality of 'grounded' problems and the generality of far-reaching abstractions. We ourselves must prevent the development being forced to only one pole of the life-giving antithesis." (Richard Courant, 1962)

"The moment of truth, the sudden emergence of new insight, is an act of intuition. Such intuitions give the appearance of miraculous flashes, or short circuits of reasoning. In fact they may be likened to an immersed chain, of which only the beginning and the end are visible above the surface of consciousness. The diver vanishes at one end of the chain and comes up at the other end, guided by invisible links." (Arthur Koestler, "The Act of Creation", 1964)

"Mathematicians create by acts of insight and intuition. Logic then sanctions the conquests of intuition. It is the hygiene that mathematics practices to keep its ideas healthy and strong. Moreover, the whole structure rests fundamentally on uncertain ground, the intuition of humans. Here and there an intuition is scooped out and replaced by a firmly built pillar of thought; however, this pillar is based on some deeper, perhaps less clearly defined, intuition. Though the process of replacing intuitions with precise thoughts does not change the nature of the ground on which mathematics ultimately rests, it does add strength and height to the structure." (Morris Kline, "Mathematics in Western Culture ", 1964)

"Mathematical intuition is more often conservative than revolutionary, more often hampering than liberating." (Freeman J Dyson, "Mathematics in the Physical Sciences", Scientific American Vol,. 211 (3), 1964)

 "People may come along and argue philosophically that they like one better than another; but we have learned from much experience that all philosophical intuitions about what nature is going to do fail." (Richard Feynman, "The Character of Physical Law", 1965)

"The most natural way to give an independence proof is to establish a model with the required properties. This is not the only way to proceed since one can attempt to deal directly and analyze the structure of proofs. However, such an approach to set theoretic questions is unnatural since all our intuition come from our belief in the natural, almost physical model of the mathematical universe." (Paul J Cohen, "Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis", 1966)

"Scientific research was much like prospecting: you went out and you hunted, armed with your maps and instruments, but in the end your preparations did not matter, or even your intuition. You needed your luck, and whatever benefits accrued to the diligent, through sheer, grinding hard work." (Michael Crichton, "The Andromeda Strain", 1969)