On Intuition (1990-1999)

 “Every theoretical explanation is a reduction of intuition.” (Peter Høeg,  “Smilla's Sense of Snow”, 1992)

“Intuition is the art, peculiar to the human mind, of working out the correct answer from data that is, in itself, incomplete or even, perhaps, misleading.” (Isaac Asimov, “Forward the Foundation”, 1993)

“All this points to an appealing intuition: that a faculty for analogical reasoning is an innate part of human cognition.” (Dedre Gentner & Michael Jeziorski, “Western science”, 1993)

“People have amazing facilities for sensing something without knowing where it comes from (intuition); for sensing that some phenomenon or situation or object is like something else (association); and for building and testing connections and comparisons, holding two things in mind at the same time (metaphor). These facilities are quite important for mathematics. Personally, I put a lot of effort into ‘listening’ to my intuitions and associations, and building them into metaphors and connections. This involves a kind of simultaneous quieting and focusing of my mind. Words, logic, and detailed pictures rattling around can inhibit intuitions and associations.” (William P Thurston, “On proof and progress in mathematics”, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society Vol. 30 (2), 1994)

“The sequence for the understanding of mathematics may be: intuition, trial, error, speculation, conjecture, proof. The mixture and the sequence of these events differ widely in different domains, but there is general agreement that the end product is rigorous proof – which we know and can recognize, without the formal advice of the logicians. […] Intuition is glorious, but the heaven of mathematics requires much more. Physics has provided mathematics with many fine suggestions and new initiatives, but mathematics does not need to copy the style of experimental physics. Mathematics rests on proof - and proof is eternal.” (Saunders Mac Lan, “Reponses to …”,m Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society Vol. 30 (2), 1994)

“Many pages have been expended on polemics in favor of rigor over intuition, or of intuition over rigor. Both extremes miss the point: the power of mathematics lies precisely in the combination of intuition and rigor.” (Ian Stewart, “Concepts of Modern Mathematics”, 1995)

 “Physics is not difficult; it’s just weird. […] Physics is weird because intuition is false. To understand what an electron’s world is like, you’ve got to be an electron, or jolly nearly. Intuition is forged in the hellish fires of the everyday world, which makes it so eminently useful in our daily struggle for survival. For anything else, it is hopeless.” (Vincent Icke, “The Force of Symmetry”, 1995)

“The entrepreneur's instinct is to exploit the natural world. The engineer's instinct is to change it. The scientist's instinct is to try to understand it - to work out what's really going on. The mathematician's instinct is to structure that process of understanding by seeking generalities that cut across the obvious subdivisions.” (Ian Stewart, “Nature's Numbers”, 1995)

“Scientists reach their  conclusions  for the damnedest of reasons: intuition, guesses, redirections after wild-goose chases, all combing with a dollop of rigorous observation and logical  reasoning to be sure […] This  messy and personal side of science should not be  disparaged, or covered up, by  scientists for two  major reasons. First, scientists should proudly show this  human face to  display their kinship with all other  modes of creative human thought […] Second, while biases and references often impede understanding, these  mental idiosyncrasies  may  also serve as powerful, if  quirky and personal, guides to solutions.” (Stephen J Gould, “Dinosaur in a  Haystack: Reflections in natural  history”, 1995)

“What's so awful about using intuition or using inductive arguments? […] without them we would have virtually no mathematics at all; for, until the last few centuries, mathematics was advanced almost solely by intuition, inductive observation, and arguments designed to compel belief, not by laboured proofs, and certainly not through proofs of the ghastliness required by today's academic journals” (Jon MacKeman, “What's the point of proof?”, Mathematics Teaching 155, 1996)

“Intuition isn't direct perception of something external. It's the effect in the mind/brain of manipulating concrete objects - at a later stage, of making marks on paper, and still later, manipulating mental images. This experience leaves a trace, an effect, in your mind/brain.” (Reuben Hersh, “What Is Mathematics, Really?”, 1998)