George K Francis - Collected Quotes

"A hemispherical bowl has a single, circular edge. So does a disc. If you sew the disc to the hemisphere you obtain a closed, two-sided surface; it has an inside and an outside. Topologists still call this a sphere, and it could be inflated back to a geometrical sphere if you like. Now take a long, narrow strip of paper, give it a half twist and glue the ends together. The resulting surface is not only one sided, it has but a single, closed edge. What happens if this edge is sewn to the rim of a disc?" (George K Francis, "A Topological Picturebook", 1987)

"A surface which can be regarded as the set of successive position of a curve moving in space is said to be generated by the curve. The utility of this notion in constructing a surface geometrically, in a picture or as a model is increased as the complexity of the generator and its motion is decreased. When the generator is a straight line, it is called a ruled surface. Since you can exchange X and Y in the above analysis, the hyperbolic paraboloid is generated by a line in two ways. It is a doubly ruled surface." (George K Francis, "A Topological Picturebook", 1987)

"Good design of a topological picture involves imagmmg something in 3-space that embodies the mathematical idea to be illustrated. Then you must draw it in such a way that the viewer has no difficulty in recognizing the idea. The picture should cause him to imagine the same object without his having to consult a long verbal description." (George K Francis, "A Topological Picturebook", 1987)

"Since the days of Descartes, expressing geometrical information in that universal language of mathematics, algebra, has been immensely useful in the service of precision and economy of thought. Nevertheless, something is inevitably lost in this transcription. The task of descriptive topology is to unfold the visual secrets so often compressed into algebraic shorthand." (George K Francis, "A Topological Picturebook", 1987)

"For complicated objects it is often impossible to find a view which does not hide some important structure behind a surface sheet. One remedy is to remove a regular patch from the object, creating a transparent window through which this structure can be seen in the picture." (George K Francis, "A Topological Picturebook", 1987)

"Perspective is the simplest and most direct way of creating the illusion of depth in a picture of spatially extended objects. The more or less correctly placed vanishing points of parallel lines, the estimated regression of evenly spaced points on a line, the elliptically compressed circles: all these tricks of perspective do more than merely please the eye. They help the viewer guess correctly where the artist meant to place things relative to each other. For example, even a modest amount of perspective convergence prevents you from mistaking a three-dimensional picture for a two-dimensional diagram." (George K Francis, "A Topological Picturebook", 1987)

"[...] the image of a stable map of a surface into space looks like in the neighborhood of each point. If no neighborhood, no matter how small, of a given point looks like a mildly bent disc, then it is a singular point. A stable map can have three kinds of singular points. In a neighborhood of a double point a surface looks like two sheets of some fabric crossing along a so-called double curve. A neighborhood of a triple point looks like three surface sheets crossing transversely. Thus triple points are isolated. You can see why a quadruple point is unstable. A slight perturbation of one of the sheets would make four sheets cross each other so as to produce a little tetrahedral cell. Double curves are either closed, extend to infinity, terminate on the border or simply end at very special points, called pinch points." (George K Francis, "A Topological Picturebook", 1987)

"The mode in which analytical expressions and coordinate equations are formulated has considerable influence on the speed and precision with which the reader glimpses the same thing the writer means to describe. At times, efficiency requires a departure from customary style in analytical geometry. This is especially true for 3-dimensional objects and phenomena." (George K Francis, "A Topological Picturebook", 1987)

"There are two topological reasons for adopting normal surfaces as the basic forms for drawings. A sufficiently small distortion of a stable mapping of a surface can be returned to its original shape by an isotopy of the ambient space. In other words, there is a one parameter family of coordinate changes which removes the distortion. Moreover, arbitrarily near any smooth mapping there is a stable approximation to it. A practical way to check that a certain surface feature is unstable is to remove it from the surface by means of a small perturbartions of its parametrization." (George K Francis, "A Topological Picturebook", 1987)

"These then are the elements of descriptive topology: normal surfaces with their border curves and double curves, triple points and pinch points, and their pictures with cusps and contours." (George K Francis, "A Topological Picturebook", 1987)

On Topology: On Twisting

"In geometry, topology is the study of properties of shapes that are independent of size or shape and are not changed by stretching, bending, knotting, or twisting." (M C Escher, 1971)

"Intrinsic properties have to do with the object itself, in contrast to extrinsic properties which describe how the object is embedded in the surrounding space. The cylinder and the band with two twists are intrinsically the same:  There is a homeomorphism between them. The difference between them lies in how they sit in our 3-dimensional universe. Both are assembled from a rectangle by the same gluing instructions but one is given two twists before gluing." (L Christine Kinsey. "Topology of Surfaces", 1993)

"The Möbius band has the interesting property of having only one side, in contrast to the cylinder. It is easy to imagine a cylinder with the outside painted one color and the inside another. Try painting a Mobius strip. Another peculiarity of the Mobius band occurs when one cuts it along the dotted line (called the meridian), and then follows the gluing instructions of the edges [...]. The end result is a planar diagram for a cylinder. However, if one actually constructs a Möbius band of paper and cuts it as described above, one gets something that looks like a cylinder with two twists." (L Christine Kinsey. "Topology of Surfaces", 1993)

"[…] topology, the study of continuous shape, a kind of generalized geometry where rigidity is replaced by elasticity. It's as if everything is made of rubber. Shapes can be continuously deformed, bent, or twisted, but not cut - that's never allowed. A square is topologically equivalent to a circle, because you can round off the corners. On the other hand, a circle is different from a figure eight, because there's no way to get rid of the crossing point without resorting to scissors. In that sense, topology is ideal for sorting shapes into broad classes, based on their pure connectivity." (Steven Strogatz, "Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order", 2003)

"Topology is the mathematical study of properties of objects which are preserved through deformations, twistings, and stretchings but not through breaks or cuts." (David Robinson & David Goforth, "The Topology of the 2×2 Games: A New Periodic Table", 2005)

"Another feature of Bourbaki is that it rejects intuition of any kind. Bourbaki books tend not to contain explanations, examples, or heuristics. One of the main messages of the present book is that we record mathematics for posterity in a strictly rigorous, axiomatic fashion. This is the mathematician’s version of the reproducible experiment with control used by physicists and biologists and chemists. But we learn mathematics, we discover mathematics, we create mathematics using intuition and trial and error. We draw pictures. Certainly, we try things and twist things around and bend things to try to make them work. Unfortunately, Bourbaki does not teach any part of this latter process." (Steven G Krantz, "The Proof is in the Pudding", 2007)

"[…] topology is the study of those properties of geometric objects which remain unchanged under bi-uniform and bi-continuous transformations. Such transformations can be thought of as bending, stretching, twisting or compressing or any combination of these." (Lokenath Debnath, "The Legacy of Leonhard Euler - A Tricentennial Tribute", 2010)

"Topology is a geometry in which all lengths, angles, and areas can be distorted at will. Thus a triangle can be continuously transformed into a rectangle, the rectangle into a square, the square into a circle, and so on. Similarly, a cube can be transformed into a cylinder, the cylinder into a cone, the cone into a sphere. Because of these continuous transformations, topology is known popularly as 'rubber sheet geometry'. All figures that can be transformed into each other by continuous bending, stretching, and twisting are called 'topologically equivalent'." (Fritjof Capra, "The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision", 2014)

"In geometry, shapes like circles and polyhedra are rigid objects; the tools of the trade are lengths, angles and areas. But in topology, shapes are flexible things, as if made from rubber. A topologist is free to stretch and twist a shape. Even cutting and gluing are allowed, as long as the cut is precisely reglued. A sphere and a cube are distinct geometric objects, but to a topologist, they’re indistinguishable." (David E Richeson, "Topology 101: The Hole Truth", 2021)

On Topology: On Knotting

"In geometry, topology is the study of properties of shapes that are independent of size or shape and are not changed by stretching, bending, knotting, or twisting." (M C Escher, 1971) 

"Linking topology and dynamical systems is the possibility of using a shape to help visualize the whole range of behaviors of a system. For a simple system, the shape might be some kind of curved surface; for a complicated system, a manifold of many dimensions. A single point on such a surface represents the state of a system at an instant frozen in time. As a system progresses through time, the point moves, tracing an orbit across this surface. Bending the shape a little corresponds to changing the system's parameters, making a fluid more visous or driving a pendulum a little harder. Shapes that look roughly the same give roughly the same kinds of behavior. If you can visualize the shape, you can understand the system." (James Gleick, "Chaos: Making a New Science", 1987)

"Topology deals with those properties of curves, surfaces, and more general aggregates of points that are not changed by continuous stretching, squeezing, or bending. To a topologist, a circle and a square are the same, because either one can easily be bent into the shape of the other. In three dimensions, a circle and a closed curve with an overhand knot in it are topologically different, because no amount of bending, squeezing, or stretching will remove the knot." (Edward N Lorenz, "The Essence of Chaos", 1993)

"Quantum physics, in particular particle and string theory, has proven to be a remarkable fruitful source of inspiration for new topological invariants of knots and manifolds. With hindsight this should perhaps not come as a complete surprise. Roughly one can say that quantum theory takes a geometric object (a manifold, a knot, a map) and associates to it a (complex) number, that represents the probability amplitude for a certain physical process represented by the object." (Robbert Dijkgraaf, "Mathematical Structures", 2005)

"Like moonlight itself, Monstrous Moonshine is an indirect phenomenon. Just as in the theory of moonlight one must introduce the sun, so in the theory of Moonshine one must go well beyond the Monster. Much as a book discussing moonlight may include paragraphs on sunsets or comet tails, so do we discuss fusion rings, Galois actions and knot invariants." (Terry Gannon, "Moonshine Beyond the Monster: The Bridge Connecting Algebra, Modular Forms and Physics", 2006)

"Euler’s formula is an ideal tour guide because it has access to marvelous rooms that are rarely seen by other visitors. By following Euler’s formula we see some of the most intriguing areas of mathematics - geometry, combinatorics, graph theory, knot theory, differential geometry, dynamical systems, and topology. These are beautiful subjects that a typical student, even an undergraduate mathematics major, may never encounter." (David S Richeson, "Euler’s Gem: The Polyhedron Formula and the Birth of Topology", 2008)

"Topology is a child of twentieth century mathematical thinking. It allows us to consider the shape and structure of an object without being wedded to its size or to the distances between its component parts. Knot theory, homotopy theory, homology theory, and shape theory are all part of basic topology. It is often quipped that a topologist does not know the difference between his coffee cup and his donut - because each has the same abstract 'shape' without looking at all alike." (Steven G Krantz, "Essentials of Topology with Applications”, 2009)

"Knot theory for a long time was a little backwater of topology." (Joan Birman) 

On David Hilbert

"Hilbert’s mathematics may be a pretty game with formulas, more amusing even than chess; but what does it have to do with knowledge, since its formulas should admittedly have no contentual significance by virtue of which they would express intuitive truths?" (Hermann Weyl, "Philosophie der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften", 1927)

"The work of Galois and his successors showed that the nature, or explicit definition, of the roots of an algebraic equation is reflected in the structure of the group of the equation for the field of its coefficients. This group can be determined non-tentatively in a finite number of steps, although, as Galois himself emphasized, his theory is not intended to be a practical method for solving equations. But, as stated by Hilbert, the Galois theory and the theory of algebraic numbers have their common root in that of algebraic fields. The last was initiated by Galois, developed by Dedekind and Kronecker in the mid-nineteenth century, refined and extended in the late nineteenth century by Hilbert and others, and finally, in the twentieth century, given new direction by the work of Steinitz in 1910, and in that of E. Noether and her school since 1920." (Eric T Bell, "The Development of Mathematics", 1940)

"Historically speaking, topology has followed two principal lines of development. In homology theory, dimension theory, and the study of manifolds, the basic motivation appears to have come from geometry. In these fields, topological spaces are looked upon as generalized geometric configurations, and the emphasis is placed on the structure of the spaces themselves. In the other direction, the main stimulus has been analysis. Continuous functions are the chief objects of interest here, and topological spaces are regarded primarily as carriers of such functions and as domains over which they can be integrated. These ideas lead naturally into the theory of Banach and Hilbert spaces and Banach algebras, the modern theory of integration, and abstract harmonic analysis on locally compact groups." (George F Simmons, "Introduction to Topology and Modern Analysis", 1963)

"The theory of rings and ideals was put on a more systematic and axiomatic basis by Emmy Noether, one of the few great women mathematicians [...] Many results on rings and ideals were already known [...] but by properly formulating the abstract notions she was able to subsume these results under the abstract theory. Thus she reexpressed Hilbert's basic theorem [...] as follows: A ring of polynomials in any number of variables over a ring of coeffcients that has an identity element and a finite basis, itself has a finite basis. In this reforumulation she made the theory of invariants a part of abstract algebra." (Morris Kline, "Mathematical Thought From Ancient to Modern Times", 1972)

"The theory of the nature of mathematics is extremely reactionary. We do not subscribe to the fairly recent notion that mathematics is an abstract language based, say, on set theory. In many ways, it is unfortunate that philosophers and mathematicians like Russell and Hilbert were able to tell such a convincing story about the meaning-free formalism of mathematics. [...] Mathematics is a way of preparing for decisions through thinking. Sets and classes provide one way to subdivide a problem for decision preparation; a set derives its meaning from decision making, and not vice versa." (C West Churchman et al, "Thinking for Decisions Deduction Quantitative Methods", 1975)

"At the most elemental level, reality evanesces into something called Schröedinger's Wave Function: a mathematical abstraction which is best represented as a pattern in an infinite-dimensional space, Hilbert Space. Each point of the Hilbert Space represents a possible state of affairs. The wave function for some one physical or mental system takes the form of, let us say, a coloring in of Hilbert Space. The brightly colored parts represent likely states for the system, the dim parts represent less probable states of affairs." (Rudy Rucker, "The Sex Sphere", 1983) 

"There are at least three (overlapping) ways that mathematics may contribute to science. The first, and perhaps the most important, is this: Since the mathematical universe of the mathematician is much larger than that of the physicist, mathematicians are able to go beyond existing frameworks and see geometrical or analytic structures unavailable to tie physicist. Instead of using the particular equations used previously to describe reality, a mathematician has at his disposal an unused world of differential equations, to be studied with no a priori constraints. New scientific phenomena, new discoveries, may thus generated. Understanding of the present knowledge may be deepened via the corresponding deductions. [...] The second way [...] has to do with the consolidation of new physical ideas. One may express this as the proof of consistency of physical theories. [...] mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics with Hilbert space, its operator theory, and corresponding differential equations. [...] The third way [...] is by describing reality in mathematical terms, or by simply constructing a mathematical model." (Steven Smale, "What is chaos?", 1990)

"[...] all the laws of algebra correspond to projective coincidences, and von Staudt showed that all the required coincidences follow from the theorems of Pappus and Desargues. Then in 1899 David Hilbert showed that all laws of algebra except the commutative law for multiplication follow from the Desargues theorem. And in 1932 Ruth Moufang showed that all except the commutative and associative laws follow from the little Desargues theorem. Thus the Pappus, Desargues, and little Desargues theorems are mysteriously aligned with the laws of multiplication!" (John Stillwell, "The Four Pillars of Geometry", 2000)

On Quantum Mechanics (2010-)

"[...] according to the quantum theory, randomness is a basic trait of reality, whereas in classical physics it is a derivative property, though an equally objective one. Note, however, that this conclusion follows only under the realist interpretation of probability as the measure of possibility. If, by contrast, one adopts the subjectivist or Bayesian conception of probability as the measure of subjective uncertainty, then randomness is only in the eye of the beholder." (Mario Bunge, "Matter and Mind: A Philosophical Inquiry", 2010)

"The objectivist view is that probabilities are real aspects of the universe - propensities of objects to behave in certain ways - rather than being just descriptions of an observer’s degree of belief. For example, the fact that a fair coin comes up heads with probability 0.5 is a propensity of the coin itself. In this view, frequentist measurements are attempts to observe these propensities. Most physicists agree that quantum phenomena are objectively probabilistic, but uncertainty at the macroscopic scale - e.g., in coin tossing - usually arises from ignorance of initial conditions and does not seem consistent with the propensity view." (Stuart J Russell & Peter Norvig, "Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach", 2010)

"Quantum theory may be formulated using Hilbert spaces over any of the three associative normed division algebras: the real numbers, the complex numbers and the quaternions. Indeed, these three choices appear naturally in a number of axiomatic approaches. However, there are internal problems with real or quaternionic quantum theory. Here we argue that these problems can be resolved if we treat real, complex and quaternionic quantum theory as part of a unified structure. Dyson called this structure the ‘three-fold way’ […] This three-fold classification sheds light on the physics of time reversal symmetry, and it already plays an important role in particle physics." (John C Baez, "Division Algebras and Quantum Theory", 2011)

"The invariance of physical laws with respect to position or orientation (i.e., the symmetry of space) gives rise to conservation laws for linear and angular momentum. Sometimes the implications of symmetry invariance are far more complicated or sophisticated than might at first be supposed; the invariance of the forces predicted by electromagnetic theory when measurements are made in observation frames moving uniformly at different speeds (inertial frames) was an important clue leading Einstein to the discovery of special relativity. With the advent of quantum mechanics, considerations of angular momentum and spin introduced new symmetry concepts into physics. These ideas have since catalyzed the modern development of particle theory." (George B Arfken et al, "Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A comprehensive guide", 2013)

"Ironically, conventional quantum mechanics itself involves a vast expansion of physical reality, which may be enough to avoid Einstein Insanity. The equations of quantum dynamics allow physicists to predict the future values of the wave function, given its present value. According to the Schrödinger equation, the wave function evolves in a completely predictable way. But in practice we never have access to the full wave function, either at present or in the future, so this 'predictability' is unattainable. If the wave function provides the ultimate description of reality - a controversial issue!" (Frank Wilczek, "Einstein’s Parable of Quantum Insanity", 2015)

"[…] the role that symmetry plays is not confined to material objects. Symmetries can also refer to theories and, in particular, to quantum theory. For if the laws of physics are to be invariant under changes of reference frames, the set of all such transformations will form a group. Which transformations and which groups depends on the systems under consideration." (William H Klink & Sujeev Wickramasekara, "Relativity, Symmetry and the Structure of Quantum Theory I: Galilean quantum theory", 2015)

"Random means without reason - unpredictable - lawless. That little word random describes a key difference between ordinary classical mechanics and quantum mechanics. […] In classical physics only ignorance of the fine details or lack of control over them causes statistical randomness […] In principle, though not in practice, randomness is absent from classical physics." (Hans C von Baeyer, "QBism: The future of quantum physics", 2016)

"Euler’s formula - although deceptively simple - is actually staggeringly conceptually difficult to apprehend in its full glory, which is why so many mathematicians and scientists have failed to see its extraordinary scope, range, and ontology, so powerful and extensive as to render it the master equation of existence, from which the whole of mathematics and science can be derived, including general relativity, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces! It’s not called the God Equation for nothing. It is much more mysterious than any theistic God ever proposed." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)

"Complex numbers seem to be fundamental for the description of the world proposed by quantum mechanics. In principle, this can be a source of puzzlement: Why do we need such abstract entities to describe real things? One way to refute this bewilderment is to stress that what we can measure is essentially real, so complex numbers are not directly related to observable quantities. A more philosophical argument is to say that real numbers are no less abstract than complex ones, the actual question is why mathematics is so effective for the description of the physical world." (Ricardo Karam, "Why are complex numbers needed in quantum mechanics? Some answers for the introductory level", American Journal of Physics Vol. 88 (1), 2020)

"It is particularly helpful to use complex numbers to model periodic phenomena, especially to operate with phase differences. Mathematically, one can treat a physical quantity as being complex, but address physical meaning only to its real part. Another possibility is to treat the real and imaginary parts of a complex number as two related" (real) physical quantities. In both cases, the structure of complex numbers is useful to make calculations more easily, but no physical meaning is actually attached to complex variables." (Ricardo Karam, "Why are complex numbers needed in quantum mechanics? Some answers for the introductory level", American Journal of Physics Vol. 88" (1), 2020) 

"What is essentially different in quantum mechanics is that it deals with complex quantities" (e.g. wave functions and quantum state vectors) of a special kind, which cannot be split up into pure real and imaginary parts that can be treated independently. Furthermore, physical meaning is not attached directly to the complex quantities themselves, but to some other operation that produces real numbers" (e.g. the square modulus of the wave function or of the inner product between state vectors)." (Ricardo Karam, "Why are complex numbers needed in quantum mechanics? Some answers for the introductory level", American Journal of Physics Vol. 88 (1), 2020)

On Quantum Mechanics (1950-1974)

"Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects. From this point of view, the present universally used system of concepts in which particles and waves appear simultaneously, can be completely justified. The latest research on nuclei and elementary particles has led us, however, to limits beyond which this system of concepts itself does not appear to suffice. The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road." (Max Born, "The Statistical Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics", [Nobel lecture] 1954)

"[...] in quantum mechanics, we are not dealing with an arbitrary renunciation of a more detailed analysis of atomic phenomena, but with a recognition that such an analysis is to principle excluded." (Niels Bohr, "Atomic Theory and Human Knowledge", 1958)

"One might think one could measure a complex dynamical variable by measuring separately its real and pure imaginary parts. But this would involve two measurements or two observations, which would be alright in classical mechanics, but would not do in quantum mechanics, where two observations in general interfere with one another - it is not in general permissible to consider that two observations can be made exactly simultaneously, and if they are made in quick succession the first will usually disturb the state of the system and introduce an indeterminacy that will affect the second." (Ernst C K Stückelberg, "Quantum Theory in Real Hilbert Space", 1960) 

"[…] to the unpreoccupied mind, complex numbers are far from natural or simple and they cannot be suggested by physical observations. Furthermore, the use of complex numbers is in this case not a calculational trick of applied mathematics but comes close to being a necessity in the formulation of quantum mechanics." (Eugene Wigner, "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences", 1960) 

"It is widely believed that only those who can master the latest quantum mathematics can understand anything of what is happening. That is not so, provided one takes the long view, for no one can see far ahead. Against a historical background, the layman can understand what is involved, for example, in the fascinating challenge of continuity and discontinuity expressed in the antithesis of field and particle." (Lancelot L Whyte, "Essay on Atomism: From Democritus to 1960", 1961)

"It has been generally believed that only the complex numbers could legitimately be used as the ground field in discussing quantum-mechanical operators. Over the complex field, Frobenius' theorem is of course not valid; the only division algebra over the complex field is formed by the complex numbers themselves. However, Frobenius' theorem is relevant precisely because the appropriate ground field for much of quantum mechanics is real rather than complex." (Freeman Dyson, "The Threefold Way. Algebraic Structure of Symmetry Groups and Ensembles in Quantum Mechanics", Journal of Mathematical Physics Vol. 3, 1962)

"Theoretical physicists live in a classical world, looking out into a quantum-mechanical world. The latter we describe only subjectively, in terms of procedures and results in our classical domain." (John S Bell, "Introduction to the hidden-variable question", 1971)

D Chatterjee - Collected Quotes

"A main problem of topology is the classification of topological spaces: Given two spaces X and Y, are they homeomorphic? This is usually a very difficult question to answer without employing some fairly sophisticated machinery, and the idea of algebric topology is that in which one should transform such topological problems into algebraic problems in order to have a better chance of solution. It turns out, however, that the algebric techniques are usually not delicate enough to classify spaces up to homeomorphism. Hence we shall introduce the notion of homotopy, in order to achieve a somewhat coarser classification." (D Chatterjee, "Topology: General & Algebraic", 2003)

"One of the greatest successes of the combinatorial topology has been the extension of Homology Theory to general topological spaces. In what discussed above it is clear that Homology groups can be defined for a special kind of space, namely, compact polyhedron and the complexes obtained there were finite althrough. Singular Homology theory extends the notion of Homology groups for general topological spaces by associating with each space a chain complex. A continuous map induces homology homomorphisms in an obvious way and as a consequence it follows that homotopic maps induce the same homomorphisms. There is a natural homomorphism also from homology groups to singular homology groups. In the following lines we give a sketch of notions relevant in singular homology theory." (D Chatterjee, "Topology: General & Algebraic", 2003)

"Some areas of human knowledge ever since its origin had shaken our understanding of the universe from time to time. While this is more true about physics, it is true about mathematics as well. The birth of topology as analysis situs meaning rubbersheet geometry had a similar impact on our traditional knowledge of analysis. Indeed, topology had enough energy and vigour to give birth to a new culture of mathematical approach. Algebraic topology added a new dimension to that. Because quantum physicists and applied mathematicians had noted wonderful interpretations of many physical phenomena through algebraic topology, they took immense interest in the study of topology in the twentieth century." (D Chatterjee, "Topology: General & Algebraic", 2003)

"The concept of path-connectedness, in which it is required that it be possible to reach any point in the space from any other point along a continuous path is necessary for the notion of fundamental group. This approach is especially useful in studying connectivity properties from an algebraic point of view, e.g., via homotopy theory." (D Chatterjee, "Topology: General & Algebraic", 2003)

"The exquisite world of algebraic topology came into existence out of our attempts to solve topological problems by the use of algebraic tools and this revealed to us the nice interplay between algebra and topology which causes each to reinforce interpretations of the other there by breaking down the often artificial subdivision of mathematics into different branches and emphasizing the essential unity of all mathematics. The homology theory is the main branch of algebraic topology and plays the main role in the classification problems of topological spaces. There are various approaches to the study of this theory such as geometric approach, abstract approach and axiomatic approach. Since geometric approach appeals easily to our intuition, we shall start with geometric approach, the relevant development being called simplicial homology theory." (D Chatterjee, "Topology: General & Algebraic", 2003)

"The study of fibre bundles makes an important component of algebraic topology for many reasons. On one hand it helps classification of the topological spaces and on the other gives remarkable results in physics, differential geometry and many other areas so far as applications are concerned." (D Chatterjee, "Topology: General & Algebraic", 2003)

On Series VII: Numerical Series

"I regard the whole of arithmetic as a necessary, or at least natural, consequence of the simplest arithmetic act, that of counting, and counting itself as nothing else than the successive creation of the infinite series of positive integers in which each individual is defined by the one immediately preceding; the simplest act is the passing from an already-formed individual to the consecutive new one to be formed. The chain of these numbers forms in itself an exceedingly useful instrument for the human mind; it presents an inexhaustible wealth of remarkable laws obtained by the introduction of the four fundamental operations of arithmetic. Addition is the combination of any arbitrary repetitions of the above-mentioned simplest act into a single act; from it in a similar way arises multiplication. While the performance of these two operations is always possible, that of the inverse operations, subtraction and division, proves to be limited. Whatever the immediate occasion may have been, whatever comparisons or analogies with experience, or intuition, may have led thereto; it is certainly true that just this limitation in performing the indirect operations has in each case been the real motive for a new creative act; thus negative and fractional numbers have been created by the human mind; and in the system of all rational numbers there has been gained an instrument of infinitely greater perfection." (Richard Dedekind, "On Continuity and Irrational Numbers", 1872)

"The mystery that clings to numbers, the magic of numbers, may spring from this very fact, that the intellect, in the form of the number series, creates an infinite manifold of well distinguishable individuals. Even we enlightened scientists can still feel it e.g. in the impenetrable law of the distribution of prime numbers." (Hermann Weyl, "Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science", 1927)

"The series of integers is obviously an invention of the human mind, a self-created tool which simplifies the ordering of certain sensory experiences." (Albert Einstein, "Ideas and Opinions", 1954)

"One reason nature pleases us is its endless use of a few simple principles: the cube-square law; fractals; spirals; the way that waves, wheels, trig functions, and harmonic oscillators are alike; the importance of ratios between small primes; bilateral symmetry; Fibonacci series, golden sections, quantization, strange attractors, path-dependency, all the things that show up in places where you don’t expect them [...] these rules work with and against each other ceaselessly at all levels, so that out of their intrinsic simplicity comes the rich complexity of the world around us. That tension - between the simple rules that describe the world and the complex world we see - is itself both simple in execution and immensely complex in effect. Thus exactly the levels, mixtures, and relations of complexity that seem to be hardwired into the pleasure centers of the human brain - or are they, perhaps, intrinsic to intelligence and perception, pleasant to anything that can see, think, create? - are the ones found in the world around us." (John Barnes, "Mother of Storms", 1994)

On Neighborhoods (1875-1899)

"The separate atoms of a molecule are not connected all with all, or all with one, but, on the contrary, each one is connected only with one or with a few neighbouring atoms, just as in a chain link is connected with link." (Friedrich A Kekulé, "The Scientific Aims and Achievements of Chemistry", Nature 18, 1878)

"The best grouping, therefore, for the purposes of science is that which collects together all those facts and reasonings which are similar to one another in nature: so that the study of each may throw light on its neighbour. By working thus for a long time at one set of considerations, we get gradually nearer to those fundamental unities which are called nature's laws: we trace their action first singly, and then in combination; and thus make progress slowly but surely. The practical uses of economic studies should never be out of the mind of the economist, but his special business is to study and interpret facts and to find out what are the effects of different causes acting singly and in combination." (Alfred Marshall, "Principles of Economics", 1890)

"Analytic functions are those that can be represented by a power series, convergent within a certain region bounded by the so-called circle of convergence. Outside of this region the analytic function is not regarded as given a priori ; its continuation into wider regions remains a matter of special investigation and may give very different results, according to the particular case considered." (Felix Klein, "Sophus Lie", [lecture] 1893)

"If, in the very intense electric field in the neighbourhood of the cathode, the molecules of the gas are dissociated and are split up, not into the ordinary chemical atoms, but into these primordial atoms, which we shall for brevity call corpuscles; and if these corpuscles are charged with electricity and projected from the cathode by the electric field, they would behave exactly like the cathode rays." (Joseph J Thomson, "Cathode rays", Philosophical Magazine 44, 1897)

"The analogy between the results of the theory of algebraic functions of one variable and those of the theory of algebraic numbers suggested to me many years ago the idea of replacing the decomposition of algebraic numbers, with the help of ideal prime factors, by a more convenient procedure that fully corresponds to the expansion of an algebraic function in power series in the neighborhood of an arbitrary point." (Richard Dedekind, "New foundations of the theory of algebraic numbers", 1899)

On Group Theory (-1889)

"A set of symbols 1, α, β,..., all of them different, and such that the product of any two of them (no matter in what order), or the product of any one of them into itself, belongs to the set, is said to be a group. [...] These symbols are not in general convertible [commutative] but are associative [...] and it follows that if the entire group is multiplied by any one of the symbols, either as further or nearer factor [i.e., on the left or on the right], the effect is simply to reproduce the group." (Arthur Cayley, "On the theory of groups, as depending on the symbolic equation θ^n = 1.", 1854)

"This [...] does not in any wise show that the best or easiest mode of treating the general problem is thus to regard it as a problem of substitutions: and it seems clear that the better course is to consider the general problem in itself, and to deduce from it the theory of groups of substitutions." (Arthur Cayley, 1878)

"A group that is not irreducible [indecomposable] can be decomposed into purely irreducible factors. As a rule, such a decomposition can be accomplished in many ways. However, regardless of the way in which it is carried out, the number of irreducible factors is always the same and the factors in the two decompositions can be so paired off that the corresponding factors have the same order." (Georg Frobenius & Ludwig Stickelberger, "On groups of commuting elements", 1879)

"A system G of h arbitrary elements θ1, θ2,...,θh is called a group of degree h if it satisfies the following conditions: (I) By some rule which is designated as composition or multiplication, from any two elements of the same system one derives a new element of the samesystem. In symbols, θrθs = θt. (II) It is always true that (θrθs)θt = θr(θsθt) = θrθsθt. (III) From θθr = θθs or from θrθ = θsθ it follows that θr = θs." (Weber, 1882)

"The following investigations aim to continue the study of the properties of a group in its abstract formulation. In particular, this will pose the question of the extent to which these properties have an invariant character present in all the different realizations of the group, and the question of what leads to the exact determination of their essential group-theoretic content." (Walther von Dyck, "Group-theoretic studies", 1882)

"Now let there be given a sequence of transformations A, B, C,..., . If this sequence has the property that the composite of any two of its transformations yields a transformation that again belongs to the sequence, then the latter will be called a group of transformations." (Felix Klein, 1880s) 

"The special subject of group theory extends through all of modern mathematics. As an ordering and classifying principle, it intervenes in the most varied domains." (Felix Klein, 1880s)

"Instead of the points of a line, plane, space, or any manifold under investigation, we may use instead any figure contained within the manifold: a group of points, curve, surface, etc. As there is nothing at all determined at the outset about the number of arbitrary parameters upon which these figures should depend, the number of dimensions of the line, plane, space, etc. is likewise arbitrary and depends only on the choice of space element. But so long as we base our geometrical investigation on the same group of transformations, the geometrical content remains unchanged. That is, every theorem resulting from one choice of space element will also be a theorem under any other choice; only the arrangement and correlation of the theorems will be changed. The essential thing is thus the group of transformations; the number of dimensions to be assigned to a manifold is only of secondary importance." (Felix Klein, "A comparative review of recent researches in geometry", Bulletin of the American Mathematoical Society 2(10), 1893)