"Mathematicians have sought knowledge in figures, Philosophers in systems, Logicians in subtleties, and Metaphysicians in sounds. It is not in any nor in all of these. He that studies only men, will get the body of knowledge without the soul, and he that studies only books, the soul without the body." (Charles C Colton, "Lacon: Many Things in Few Words", 1820)
"[...] we can not readily break up a complicated problem into successive steps which can be taken independently. We have, in fact, to solve the problem first, by determining what are the actual mutual relations of the classes involved, and then to draw the circles to represent this final result; we cannot work step-by-step towards the conclusion by aid of our figures." (John Venn, "On the Diagrammatic and Mechanical Representation of Propositions and Reasonings", 1880)
"Whereas in meaningful arithmetic equations and inequations are sentences expressing thoughts, in formal arithmetic they are comparable with the positions of chess pieces, transformed in accordance with certain rules without considerations for any sense. For if they were viewed as having sense, the rules could not be arbitrarily stipulated; they would have to be so chosen that from formulas expressing true propositions could be derived only formulas likewise expressing true propositions. Then the standpoint of formal arithmetic would have to be abandoned, which insists that the rules for the manipulation of signs are quite arbitrarily stipulated. Only subsequently may one ask whether the signs can be given a sense compatible with the rules previously laid down. Such matters, however, lie entirely outside formal arithmetic and only arise when applications are to be made. Then, however, they must be considered; for an arithmetic with no thought as its content will also be without possibility of application. Why can no application be made of a configuration of chess pieces? Obviously, because it expresses no thought. If it did so and every chess move conforming to the rules corresponded to a transition from one thought to another, applications of chess would also be conceivable. Why can arithmetical equations be applied? Only because they express thoughts. How could we possibly apply an equation which expressed nothing and was nothing more than a group of figures, to be transformed into another group of figures in accordance with certain rules? Now, it is applicability alone which elevates arithmetic from a game to the rank of a science. So applicability necessarily belongs to it. Is it good, then, to exclude from arithmetic what it needs in order to be a science?" (Gottlob Frege, "Grundgesetze der Arithmetik" ["Basic Laws of Arithmetic"], 1893)
"[…] theory of numbers lies remote from those who are indifferent; they show little interest in its development, indeed they positively avoid it. [..] the pure theory of numbers is an extremely abstract thing, and one does not often find the gift of ability to understand with pleasure anything so abstract. […] I believe that the theory of numbers would be made more accessible, and would awaken more general interest, if it mere presented in connection with graphical elements and appropriate figures.” (Felix Klein, “Elementary Mathematics from an Advanced Standpoint”, 1908)
"A mathematician is not a man who can readily manipulate figures; often he cannot. He is not even a man who can readily perform the transformations of equations by the use of calculus. He is primarily an individual who is skilled in the use of symbolic logic on a high plane, and especially he is a man of intuitive judgment in the choice of the manipulative processes he employs." (Vannevar Bush, "As We May Think", 1945)
"What in fact is the schema of the object? In one essential respect it is a schema belonging to intelligence. To have the concept of an object is to attribute the perceived figure to a substantial basis, so that the figure and the substance that it thus indicates continue to exist outside the perceptual field. The permanence of the object seen from this viewpoint is not only a product of intelligence, but constitutes the very first of those fundamental ideas of conservation which we shall see developing within the thought process." (Jean Piaget, "The Psychology of Intelligence", 1950)
"[Arithmetic] is another of the great master-keys of life. With it the astronomer opens the depths of the heavens; the engineer, the gates of the mountains; the navigator, the pathways of the deep. The skillful arrangement, the rapid handling of figures, is a perfect magician's wand." (Edward Everett)
No comments:
Post a Comment