16 September 2023

On Notation (2010-2019)

 "Notational complexity almost always results in informational inefficiency." (Joel Katz, "Designing Information: Human factors and common sense in information design", 2012) 

"In mathematics, the symbolic form of a rhetorical statement is more than just convenient shorthand. First, it is not specific to any particular language; almost all languages of the world use the same notation, though possibly in different scriptory forms. Second, and perhaps most importantly, it helps the mind to transcend the ambiguities and misinterpretations dragged along by written words in natural language. It permits the mind to lift particular statements to their general form." (Joseph Mazur, "Enlightening Symbols: A Short History of Mathematical Notation and Its Hidden Powers", 2014)

"What is good mathematical notation? As it is with most excellent questions, the answer is not so simple. Whatever a symbol is, it must function as a revealer of patterns, a pointer to generalizations. It must have an intelligence of its own, or at least it must support our own intelligence and help us think for ourselves. It must be an indicator of things to come, a signaler of fresh thoughts, a clarifier of puzzling concepts, a help to overcome the mental fatigues of confusion that would otherwise come from rhetoric or shorthand." (Joseph Mazur, "Enlightening Symbols: A Short History of Mathematical Notation and Its Hidden Powers", 2014)

"When we use algebraic notation in statistical models, the problem becomes more complicated because we cannot 'observe' a probability and know its exact number. We can only estimate probabilities on the basis of observations." (David S Salsburg, "Errors, Blunders, and Lies: How to Tell the Difference", 2017)

"Again, classical statistics only summarizes data, so it does not provide even a language for asking [a counterfactual] question. Causal inference provides a notation and, more importantly, offers a solution. As with predicting the effect of interventions [...], in many cases we can emulate human retrospective thinking with an algorithm that takes what we know about the observed world and produces an answer about the counterfactual world." (Judea Pearl & Dana Mackenzie, "The Book of Why: The new science of cause and effect", 2018)

"[...] the relations between the two [mathematics and music] disciplines were never truly symmetric. Yes, there are many similarities between the two. For example, mathematics and music both depend on an efficient system of notation - a set of written symbols that convey a precise, unambiguous meaning to its practitioners (although in music this is augmented by a large assortment of verbal terms to indicate the more emotional aspects of playing)." (Eli Maor, "Music by the Numbers: From Pythagoras to Schoenberg", 2018)

"Programming is the process of taking an algorithm and encoding it into a notation that the computer can execute." (Bradley N Miller et al, "Python Programming in Context", 2019)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

On Hypothesis Testing III

  "A little thought reveals a fact widely understood among statisticians: The null hypothesis, taken literally (and that’s the only way...