Mental Models XXXVIII

"[...] in ordering our thoughts and images, we must always attend to those things which arc good in each thing so that in this way we are always determined to acting from an affect of joy." (Baruch Spinoza, "Ethics", 1677)

"The idea of any mode in which the human body is affected by external bodies must involve the nature of the human body and at the same rime the nature of the external body." (Baruch Spinoza, "Ethics", 1677)

"The images of things are affections of the human body whose ideas represent external bodies as present to us. […] the affections of the human body whose ideas present external bodies as present to us, we shall call things, though they do not reproduce [external] figures of things. And when the mind regards bodies in this way, we shall say that it imagines." (Baruch Spinoza, "Ethics", 1677)

"It is a mistake to reduce mater to the perception which we have of it, a mistake also to make of it a thing able to produce in us perceptions, but in itself is of another nature than they. Matter, in our view, is an aggregate of ‘images’. And by ‘image‘ we mean a certain existence which is more than that which the idealist calls a representation, but less than that which the realist calls a thing - an existence placed halfway between the ‘thing‘ and the ‘representation’. This conception of matter is simply that of common sense. [...] For common sense, then, the object exists in itself, and, on the other hand, the object is, in itself, pictorial, as we perceive it image it is, but a self-existing image." (Henri Bergson,"Matter and Memory", 1896)

"My eyes are useless for they render back only the image of the known. My whole body must become a constant beam of light, moving with an ever greater rapidity, never arrested, never looking back, never dwindling." (Henry Miller, "Tropic of Capricorn", 1939)

"A thought that is born within thought, an act of thought engendered within its own genealogy, neither given through innateness, nor presupposed in reminiscence, is a thought without image." (Gilles Deleuze, "Difference and Repetition" , 1968)

"What is in the present is what the image ‘represents‘, but not the image itself which, in cinema as in painting, is never to be confused with what it represents. The image itself is the system of the relationships between its elements, that is, a set of relationships from which the variable present only flows. […] What is specific in the image, as soon as it is creative, is to make perceptible, to make visible, relationships of time which cannot be seen in the represented object and do not allow them - selves to be reduced to the present." (Gilles Deleuze, "Cinema 2: The Time-Image" , 1980)

"The thing and the perception of the thing are one amid the same thing, one and the same image, but related in one or other of two systems of reference. The thing is the image as it is in itself, as it is related to all the other images to whose action it completely submits and on which it reacts immediately. But the perception of the thing is the same image related to another special image which frames it, and which only retains a partial action from it, and only reacts to it mediately." (Gilles Deleuze, "Cinema 1: The Movement Image", 1983)

"Philosophy, art, and science are not the mental objects of an objectified brain but the three aspects under which the brain becomes subject." (Gilles Deleuze, What is Philosophy?", 1991)