"Basis real and imaginary numbers have eternal and necessary reality. Complex numbers do not. They are temporal and contingent in the sense that for complex numbers to exist, we first have to carry out an operation: adding basis real and imaginary numbers together. Complex numbers therefore do not exist in their own right. They are constructed. They are derived. Symmetry breaking is exactly where constructed numbers come into existence. The very act of adding a sine wave to a cosine wave is the sufficient condition to create a broken symmetry: a complex number. The 'Big Bang', mathematically, is simply where a perfect array of basis sine and cosine waves start entering into linear combinations, creating a chain reaction, an 'explosion', of complex numbers - which corresponds to the “physical” universe." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)
"Euler’s formula - although deceptively simple - is actually staggeringly conceptually difficult to apprehend in its full glory, which is why so many mathematicians and scientists have failed to see its extraordinary scope, range, and ontology, so powerful and extensive as to render it the master equation of existence, from which the whole of mathematics and science can be derived, including general relativity, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces! It’s not called the God Equation for nothing. It is much more mysterious than any theistic God ever proposed." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)
"In any analysis of any part of the world, it is mandatory to institute a general reasoning in which the whole - the Absolute - is also included. This is what science scrupulously avoids. Science is all about the parts, and ignoring the whole. Science is non-holistic, which is why it cannot arrive at a grand unified, final theory of everything. From the whole you can get to every part, because the whole defines the parts. If you start with the parts, as science does, you can never get to the whole because the parts are necessarily defined piecemeal, heuristically and with no regard to the whole, since the whole is unknown. A bottom-up approach can never work. Only top-down approaches have any chance of working. Empiricists are always parts people and bottom-up people. Rationalists are holistic and top-down. These are opposite worldviews. The PSR is an explanatory, top-down principle. Randomness is a non-explanatory, bottom-up speculation." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)
"It is in fact mathematics itself that is simplest in hypothesis and also richest in phenomena (i.e. the simple source of all complexity). In ontological mathematics, all of existence comprises sinusoidal waves arranged into autonomous units called monads, and these are all that are required to explain everything." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)
"Mathematics is existence itself, existence in itself, existence for itself. […] Mathematics is the basis of everything. Mathematics is the true God, and it creates the universe from itself, using, naturally, mathematics." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)
"Ontological mathematics is operating in such a way as to organize itself into a zero-entropy structure – mathematical perfection. The 'Big Bang' is equivalent to the total scrambling of a cosmic Rubik’s Cube. The task of ontological mathematics is then to unscramble the Cube and return it to its original, pristine configuration. Emotionally, this amounts to returning to perfect Love and Bliss. Intellectually, it means reaching a state of perfect logic and reason [...] thinking perfectly." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)
"Reason is indeed all about identity, or, rather, tautology. Mathematics is the eternal, necessary system of rational, analytic tautology. Tautology is not 'empty', as it is so often characterized by philosophers. It is in fact the fullest thing there, the analytic ground of existence, and the basis of everything. Mathematical tautology has infinite masks to wear, hence delivers infinite variety. Mathematical tautology provides Leibniz’s world that is 'simplest in hypothesis and the richest in phenomena'. No hypothesis cold be simpler than the one revolving around tautologies concerning 'nothing'. There is something - existence - because nothing is tautologous, and 'something' is how that tautology is expressed. If we write x = 0, where x is any expression that has zero as its net result, then we have a world of infinite possibilities where something ('x') equals nothing (0)." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)
"The laws of the universe cannot be different from the universe. The laws of the universe must actually be the universe. Otherwise you create an impossible Cartesian dualism of laws and things operated on by laws. How can a law operate on a non-law? That’s a category error. The only way to make the laws and 'stuff' of the universe the same is via mathematics." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)
"The scientific method does not begin with the injunction to
use reason and logic, and to obey the principle of sufficient reason and
Occam’s razor. Instead, it begins with the word 'Observe'. In other words, if
reality in itself is unobservable - which is of course the case - then the
scientific method automatically fails to tell us a single thing about it."
"There are two things for which you would never use science if you wished to prove their existence. One is God and the other is mathematics. No one would ever turn to scientific arguments to establish the existence of God, and, equally, no one would ever appeal to science to explain the ontology of mathematics." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)
"There is no such thing as randomness. No one who could detect every force operating on a pair of dice would ever play dice games, because there would never be any doubt about the outcome. The randomness, such as it is, applies to our ignorance of the possible outcomes. It doesn’t apply to the outcomes themselves. They are 100% determined and are not random in the slightest. Scientists have become so confused by this that they now imagine that things really do happen randomly, i.e. for no reason at all." (Thomas Stark, "God Is Mathematics: The Proofs of the Eternal Existence of Mathematics", 2018)
"Zero is not a point of non-existence. Zero is always a balance point of existents. The human understanding of 'zero' must undergo the most radical of all transformations. Most people, especially scientists, associate it with absolute nothingness, with non-existence. This is absolutely untrue. Or, to put it another way, we can define it in two ways: 1) nothing as non-existence, in which case it has absolutely no consequences but leads to all manner of abstract paradoxes and contradictions, or 2) nothing as existence, in which case it is always a mathematical balance point for somethings. It is purely mathematical, not scientific, or religious, or spiritual, or emotional, or sensory, or mystical. It is analytic nothing and whenever you encounter it you have to establish the exact means by which it is maintaining its balance of zero."
No comments:
Post a Comment