"To a given right line to apply a parallelogram equal to a given triangle in an angle which is equal to a given right lined angle. According to the Familiars of Eudemus, the inventions respecting the application, excess, and defect of spaces, is ancient and belongs to the Pythagoric muse. But junior mathematicians receiving names from these, transferred them to the lines which are called conic, because one of these they denominate a parabola, but the other an hyperbola, and the third an ellipsis; since, indeed these ancient and divine men, in the plane description of spaces on a terminated right line, regarded the things indicated by these appellations. For when a right line being proposed, you adapt a given space to the whole right line, then that space is said to be applied, but when you make the longitude of the space greater than that of the right line, then the space is said to exceed; but when less, so that some part of the right line is external to the described space, then the space is said to be deficient." (Proclus Lycaeus, cca 5th century)
"Whenever two unknown magnitudes appear in a final equation, we have a locus, the extremity of one of the unknown magnitudes describing a straight line or a curve. The straight line is simple and unique; the classes of curves are indefinitely many, - circle, parabola, hyperbola, ellipse, etc." (Pierre de Fermat, "Introduction aux Lieux Plans et Solides", 1679)
"The Ellipse is the most simple of the Conic Sections, most known, and nearest of Kin to a Circle, and easiest describ'd by the Hand in plano. Though many prefer the Parabola before it, for the Simplicity of the Æquation by which it is express'd. But by this Reason the Parabola ought to be preferr'd before the Circle it self, which it never is. Therefore the reasoning from the Simplicity of the Æquation will not hold. The modern Geometers are too fond of the Speculation of Æquations." (Isaac Newton, "Arithmetica Universalis", 1707)
"The perturbations which the motions of planets suffer from the influence other planets, are so small and so slow that they only become sensible after a long interval of time; within a shorter time, or even within one or several revolutions, according to circumstances, the motion would differ so little from motion exactly described, according to the laws of Kepler, in a perfect ellipse, that observations cannot show the difference. As long as this is true, it not be worth while to undertake prematurely the computation of the perturbations, but it will be sufficient to adapt to the observations what we may call an osculating conic section: but, afterwards, when the planet has been observed for a longer time, the effect of the perturbations will show itself in such a manner, that it will no longer be possible to satisfy exactly all the observations by a purely elliptic motion; then, accordingly, a complete and permanent agreement cannot be obtained, unless the perturbations are properly connected with the elliptic motion." (Carl F Gauss, "Theoria motus corporum coelestium in sectionibus conicis solem ambientium", 1809)
"Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas." (Carl von Clausewitz, "On War", 1832)
"But it is a third geometry from which quantity is completely excluded and which is purely qualitative; this is analysis situs. In this discipline, two figures are equivalent whenever one can pass from one to the other by a continuous deformation; whatever else the law of this deformation may be, it must be continuous. Thus, a circle is equivalent to an ellipse or even to an arbitrary closed curve, but it is not equivalent to a straight-line segment since this segment is not closed. A sphere is equivalent to any convex surface; it is not equivalent to a torus since there is a hole in a torus and in a sphere there is not. Imagine an arbitrary design and a copy of this same design executed by an unskilled draftsman; the properties are altered, the straight lines drawn by an inexperienced hand have suffered unfortunate deviations and contain awkward bends. From the point of view of metric geometry, and even of projective geometry, the two figures are not equivalent; on the contrary, from the point of view of analysis situs, they are.” (Henri Poincaré, “Dernières pensées”, 1913)
"A circle no doubt has a certain appealing simplicity at the first glance, but one look at a healthy ellipse should have convinced even the most mystical of astronomers that that the perfect simplicity of the circle is akin to the vacant smile of complete idiocy. Compared to what an ellipse can tell us, a circle has nothing to say." (Eric T Bell, "The Handmaiden of the Sciences", 1937)
"Since the ellipse is a closed curve it has a total length, λ say, and therefore f(l + λ) = f(l). The elliptic function f is periodic, with 'period' λ, just as the sine function is periodic with period 2π. However, as Gauss discovered in 1797, elliptic functions are even more interesting than this: they have a second, complex period. This discovery completely changed the face of calculus, by showing that some functions should be viewed as functions on the plane of complex numbers. And just as periodic functions on the line can be regarded as functions on a periodic line - that is, on the circle - elliptic functions can be regarded as functions on a doubly periodic plane - that is, on a 2-torus." (John Stillwell, "Yearning for the impossible: the surpnsing truths of mathematics", 2006)
No comments:
Post a Comment