"But every continuum is actually existent. Therefore any of its parts is really existent in nature. But the parts of the continuum are infinite because there are not so many that there are not more, and therefore the infinite parts are actually existent." (William of Ockham, cca. 1320)
"Every measurable thing, except numbers, is imagined in the manner of continuous quantity. Therefore, for the mensuration of such a thing, it is necessary that points, lines and surfaces, or their properties be imagined. For in them, as the Philosopher has it, measure or ratio is initially found, while in other things it is recognized by similarity as they are being referred to by the intellect to the geometrical entities." (Nicole Oresme, "The Latitude of Forms", cca. 1348-1362)
"It is established that every continuum has further parts, and not so many parts finite in number that there are not further parts, and has all its parts actually and simultaneously, and therefore every continuum has simultaneously and actually infinitely many parts." (Gregory of Rimini [Gregorii Ariminensis], "Lectura super primum et secundum sententiarum", cca. 1350)
"Well, since paradoxes are at hand, let us see how it might be demonstrated that in a finite continuous extension it is not impossible for infinitely many voids to be found." (Galileo Galilei, "Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems", 1632)
"There is scarcely any one who states purely arithmetical questions, scarcely any who understands them. Is this not because arithmetic has been treated up to this time geometrically rather than arithmetically? This certainly is indicated by many works ancient and modern. Diophantus himself also indicates this. But he has freed himself from geometry a little more than others have, in that he limits his analysis to rational numbers only; nevertheless the Zetcica of Vieta, in which the methods of Diophantus are extended to continuous magnitude and therefore to geometry, witness the insufficient separation of arithmetic from geometry. Now arithmetic has a special domain of its own, the theory of numbers. This was touched upon but only to a slight degree by Euclid in his Elements, and by those who followed him it has not been sufficiently extended, unless perchance it lies hid in those books of Diophantus which the ravages of time have destroyed. Arithmeticians have now to develop or restore it. To these, that I may lead the way, I propose this theorem to be proved or problem to be solved. If they succeed in discovering the proof or solution, they will acknowledge that questions of this kind are not inferior to the more celebrated ones from geometry either for depth or difficulty or method of proof: Given any number which is not a square, there also exists an infinite number of squares such that when multiplied into the given number and unity is added to the product, the result is a square." (Pierre de Fermat, [Letter to Frénicle] 1657)
"Only geometry can hand us the thread [which will lead us through] the labyrinth of the continuum's composition, the maximum and the minimum, the infinitesimal and the infinite; and no one will arrive at a truly solid metaphysics except he who has passed through this [labyrinth]." (Gottfried W Leibniz, "Dissertatio Exoterica De Statu Praesenti et Incrementis Novissimis Deque Usu Geometriae", 1676)
"Since the nature of differentials […] consists in their being infinitely small and infinitely changeable up to zero, in being only quantitates evanescentes, evanescentia divisibilia, they will be always smaller than any given quantity whatsoever. In fact, some difference which one can assign between two magnitudes which only differ by a differential, the continuous and imperceptible variability of that infinitely small differential, even at the very point of becoming zero, always allows one to find a quantity less than the proposed difference." (Johann Bernoulli, cca. 1692–1702)
No comments:
Post a Comment