On Laws (1990-1999)

"A law explains a set of observations; a theory explains a set of laws. […] a law applies to observed phenomena in one domain" (e.g., planetary bodies and their movements), while a theory is intended to unify phenomena in many domains. […] Unlike laws, theories often postulate unobservable objects as part of their explanatory mechanism." (John L Casti, "Searching for Certainty: How Scientists Predict the Future", 1990)

"The original purpose and immediate objective in introducing complex numbers into mathematics is to express laws of dependence between variables by simpler operations on the quantities involved. If one applies these laws of dependence in an extended context, by giving the variables to which they relate complex values, there emerges a regularity and harmony which would otherwise have remained concealed." (Heinz-Dieter Ebbinghaus et al,"Numbers", 1990)

"We live in an era when it seems legitimate to try everything conceivable within the known laws of physics, particularly in the absence of data." (Geoffrey Burbridge, "Focal Point", Sky and Telescope Vol. 78 (6), 1990)

"A purely psychological approach to science would miss the importance of the comprehensibility of mathematics, and of 'the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences'. In fact, some scientists in the 'soft' sciences seem to miss this as well. But mathematicians and physicists know that they deal with a reality that has laws of its own, a reality above our little psychological problems, a reality that is strange, fascinating, and in some sense beautiful." (David Ruelle, "Chance and Chaos", 1991)

"Everywhere […] in the Universe, we discern that closed physical systems evolve in the same sense from ordered states towards a state of complete disorder called thermal equilibrium. This cannot be a consequence of known laws of change, since […] these laws are time symmetric- they permit […] time-reverse. […] The initial conditions play a decisive role in endowing the world with its sense of temporal direction. […] some prescription for initial conditions is crucial if we are to understand […]" (John D Barrow, "Theories of Everything: The Quest for Ultimate Explanation", 1991)"

"In practice, the intelligibility of the world amounts to the fact that we find it to be algorithmically compressible. We can replace sequences of facts and observational data by abbreviated statements which contain the same information content. These abbreviations we often call 'laws of Nature.' If the world were not algorithmically compressible, then there would exist no simple laws of nature. Instead of using the law of gravitation to compute the orbits of the planets at whatever time in history we want to know them, we would have to keep precise records of the positions of the planets at all past times; yet this would still not help us one iota in predicting where they would be at any time in the future. This world is potentially and actually intelligible because at some level it is extensively algorithmically compressible. At root, this is why mathematics can work as a description of the physical world. It is the most expedient language that we have found in which to express those algorithmic compressions." (John D Barrow, "New Theories of Everything", 1991)

"Order wherever it reigns, brings beauty with it. Theory not only renders the group of physical laws it represents easier to handle, more convenient, and more useful, but also more beautiful." (Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem,"The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory", 1991)

"Somehow the breathless world that we witness seems far removed from the timeless laws of Nature which govern the elementary particles and forces of Nature. The reason is clear. We do not observe the laws of Nature: we observe their outcomes. Since these laws find their most efficient representation as mathematical equations, we might say that we see only the solutions of those equations not the equations themselves. This is the secret which reconciles the complexity observed in Nature with the advertised simplicity of her laws." (John D Barrow, "New Theories of Everything", 1991)

"The letter ‘i’ originally was meant to suggest the imaginary nature of this number, but with the greater abstraction of mathematics, it came to be realized that it was no more imaginary than many other mathematical constructs. True, it is not suitable for measuring quantities, but it obeys the same laws of arithmetic as do the real numbers, and, surprisingly enough, it makes the statement of various physical laws very natural." (John A Paulos,"Beyond Numeracy", 1991)

"Three laws governing black hole changes were thus found, but it was soon noticed that something unusual was going on. If one merely replaced the words 'surface area' by 'entropy' and 'gravitational field' by 'temperature', then the laws of black hole changes became merely statements of the laws of thermodynamics. The rule that the horizon surface areas can never decrease in physical processes becomes the second law of thermodynamics that the entropy can never decrease; the constancy of the gravitational field around the horizon is the so-called zeroth law of thermodynamics that the temperature must be the same everywhere in a state of thermal equilibrium. The rule linking allowed changes in the defining quantities of the black hole just becomes the first law of thermodynamics, which is more commonly known as the conservation of energy." (John D Barrow, "Theories of Everything: The Quest for Ultimate Explanation", 1991)

"What causes difficulties is the apparent contradiction between determinism and our free will, introspectively characterized by the fact that several possibilities are open, and we engage our responsibility by choosing one. Introducing chance into the laws of physics does not help us in any way to resolve this contradiction. […] what allows our free will to be a meaningful notion is the complexity of the universe or, more precisely, our own complexity." (David Ruelle, "Chance and Chaos", 1991)

"In everyday language, the words 'pattern' and 'symmetry' are used almost interchangeably, to indicate a property possessed by a regular arrangement of more-or-less identical units […]" (Ian Stewart & Martin Golubitsky,"Fearful Symmetry: Is God a Geometer?", 1992)

"Scientists have discovered many peculiar things, and many beautiful things. But perhaps the most beautiful and the most peculiar thing that they have discovered is the pattern of science itself. Our scientific discoveries are not independent isolated facts; one scientific generalization finds its explanation in another, which is itself explained by yet another. By tracing these arrows of explanation back toward their source we have discovered a striking convergent pattern - perhaps the deepest thing we have yet learned about the universe." (Steven Weinberg, "Dreams of a Final Theory: The Scientist’s Search for the Ultimate Laws of Nature", 1992)

"Symmetry is bound up in many of the deepest patterns of Nature, and nowadays it is fundamental to our scientific understanding of the universe. Conservation principles, such as those for energy or momentum, express a symmetry that" (we believe) is possessed by the entire space-time continuum: the laws of physics are the same everywhere." (Ian Stewart & Martin Golubitsky, "Fearful Symmetry: Is God a Geometer?", 1992)

"The laws of chess are as beautiful as those governing the universe - and as deadly." (Katherine NevilleA Calculated Risk, 1992)

"General evolution theory, based on the integration of the relevant tenets of general system theory, cybernetics, information and communication theory, chaos theory, dynamical systems theory, and nonequilibrium thermodynamics, can convey a sound understanding of the laws and dynamics that govern the evolution of complex systems in the various realms of investigation. […] The basic notions of this new discipline can be developed to give an adequate account of the dynamical evolution of human societies as well. Such an account could furnish the basis of a system of knowledge better able to orient human beings and societies in their rapidly changing milieu." (Ervin Laszlo et al.,"Evolution: The grand synthesis", 1993)

"A deterministic sequence is one in which only one thing can happen next; that is, its evolution is governed by precise laws. Randomness in the broader sense is therefore identical with the absence of determinism." (Edward N Lorenz, "The Essence of Chaos", 1993)

"General evolution theory, based on the integration of the relevant tenets of general system theory, cybernetics, information and communication theory, chaos theory, dynamical systems theory, and nonequilibrium thermodynamics, can convey a sound understanding of the laws and dynamics that govern the evolution of complex systems in the various realms of investigation [...]. The basic notions of this new discipline can be developed to give an adequate account of the dynamical evolution of human societies as well. Such an account could furnish the basis of a system of knowledge better able to orient human beings and societies in their rapidly changing milieu." (Ervin László et al, "The Evolution of Cognitive Maps: New Paradigms for the Twenty-first Century", 1993)

"[…] number theory […] is a field of almost pristine irrelevance to everything except the wondrous demonstration that pure numbers, no more substantial than Plato’s shadows, conceal magical laws and orders that the human mind can discover after all." (Sharon Begley, "New Answer for an Old Question", Newsweek, 5 July, 1993)

"How surprising it is that the laws of nature and the initial conditions of the universe should allow for the existence of beings who could observe it. Life as we know it would be impossible if any one of several physical quantities had slightly different values." (Steven Weinberg, Life in the Quantum Universe", Scientific American, 1995)"

"Arm chair reflections on the concept of causation [are] not going to yield new insights. The grandfather paradox is simply a way of pointing to the fact that if the usual laws of physics are supposed to hold true in a chronology violating spacetime, then consistency constraints emerge. [To understand these constraints] involves solving problems in physics, not armchair philosophical reflections." (John Earman,"Recent Work on Time Travel", 1995)

"How surprising it is that the laws of nature and the initial conditions of the universe should allow for the existence of beings who could observe it. Life as we know it would be impossible if any one of several physical quantities had slightly different values." (Steven Weinberg, "Life in the Quantum Universe", Scientific American, 1995)

"It suggests to me that consciousness and our ability to do mathematics are no mere accident, no trivial detail, no insignificant by-product of evolution that is piggy-backing on some other mundane property. It points to what I like to call the cosmic connection, the existence of a really deep relationship between minds that can do mathematics and the underlying laws of nature that produce them. We have a closed system of consistency here: the laws of physics produce complex systems, and these complex systems lead to consciousness, which then produces mathematics, which can encode [...] the very laws of physics that gave rise to it." (Paul Davies, "Are We Alone?: Philosophical Implications of the Discovery of Extraterrestrial Life", 1995)

"Riemann concluded that electricity, magnetism, and gravity are caused by the crumpling of our three-dimensional universe in the unseen fourth dimension. Thus a 'force' has no independent life of its own; it is only the apparent effect caused by the distortion of geometry. By introducing the fourth spatial dimension, Riemann accidentally stumbled on what would become one of the dominant themes in modern theoretical physics, that the laws of nature appear simple when expressed in higher-dimensional space. He then set about developing a mathematical language in which this idea could be expressed." (Michio Kaku, "Hyperspace", 1995)

"Underpinning everything [...] are the laws of physics. These remarkably ingenious laws are able to permit matter to self-organize to the point where consciousness emerges in the cosmos - mind from matter - and the most striking product of the human mind is mathematics. This is the baffling thing. Mathematics is [...] produced by the human mind. Yet if we ask where mathematics works best, it is in areas like particle physics and astrophysics, areas of fundamental science that are very, very far removed from everyday affairs. [...] at the opposite end of spectrum of complexity from the human brain. [...] a product of the most complex system we know in nature, the human brain, finds a consonance with the underlying, simplest and most fundamental level, the basic building blocks that make up the world." (Paul C W Davies, "Are We Alone?: Philosophical Implications of the Discovery of Extraterrestrial Life", 1995)

"So we pour in data from the past to fuel the decision-making mechanisms created by our models, be they linear or nonlinear. But therein lies the logician's trap: past data from real life constitute a sequence of events rather than a set of independent observations, which is what the laws of probability demand. [...] It is in those outliers and imperfections that the wildness lurks." (Peter L Bernstein, "Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk", 1996)

"The laws of biology are written in the language of diversity." (Edward O Wilson, "In Search of Nature", 1996)

"To be an engineer, and build a marvelous machine, and to see the beauty of its operation is as valid an experience of beauty as a mathematician's absorption in a wondrous theorem. One is not ‘more’ beautiful than the other. To see a space shuttle standing on the launch pad, the vented gases escaping, and witness the thunderous blast-off as it climbs heavenward on a pillar of flame - this is beauty. Yet it is a prime example of applied mathematics." (Calvin C Clawson,"Mathematical Mysteries", 1996)

"Mathematical beauty and mathematical truth share the fundamental property of objectivity, that of being inescapably context-dependent. Mathematical beauty and mathematical truth, like any other objective characteristics of mathematics, are subject to the laws of the real world, on a par with the laws of physics." (Gian-Carlo Rota,"The Phenomenology of Mathematical Beauty", 1997)

"Shearing away detail is the very essence of model building. Whatever else we require, a model must be simpler than the thing modeled. In certain kinds of fiction, a model that is identical with the thing modeled provides an interesting device, but it never happens in reality. Even with virtual reality, which may come close to this literary identity one day, the underlying model obeys laws which have a compact description in the computer - a description that generates the details of the artificial world." (John H Holland, "Emergence" , Philosophica 59, 1997)

"[…] all tangible phenomena, from the birth of stars to the workings of social institutions, are based on material processes that are ultimately reducible, however long and tortuous the sequences, to the laws of physics." (Edward O Wilson, "Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge", 1998)

"Good theories are the ones that get those predictions right; the best theories enable us to ‘get right’ the calculation of how the Universe came into being and then exploded into its present form. But that doesn’t mean that they convey ultimate truth, or that there ‘really are’ little hard particles rattling around against each other inside the atom. Such truth as there is in any of this work lies in the mathematics; the particle concept is simply a crutch ordinary mortals can use to help them towards an understanding of the mathematical laws." (John R Gribbin, "The Search of Superstrings, Symmetry, and the Theory of Everything", 1998)

"If life on earth is governed by the natural laws of living systems, then a successful participant should learn the concepts and principles." (Stephen G Haines, 1998)

"The beauty of this [systems thinking] mindset is that its mental models are based on natural laws, principles of interrelationship, and interdependence found in all living systems. They give us a new view of ourselves and our many systems, from the tiniest cell to the entire earth; and as our organizations are included in that great range, they help us define organizational problems as systems problems, so we can respond in more productive ways. The systems thinking mindset is a new orientation to life. In many ways it also operates as a worldview - an overall perspective on, and understanding of, the world." (Stephen G Haines, "The Managers Pocket Guide to Systems Thinking & Learning", 1998)

"Discovery of supersymmetry would be one of the real milestones in physics, made even more exciting by its close links to still more ambitious theoretical ideas. Indeed, supersymmetry is one of the basic requirements of 'string theory', which is the framework in which theoretical physicists have had some success in unifying gravity with the rest of the elementary particle forces. Discovery of supersymmetry would would certainly give string theory an enormous boost." (Edward Witten, [preface to" (Gordon Kane, "Supersymmetry: Unveiling the Ultimate Laws of Nature", 2000) 1999)

"If string theory is right, the microscopic fabric of our universe is a richly intertwined multidimensional labyrinth within which the strings of the universe endlessly twist and vibrate, rhythmically beating out the laws of the cosmos." (Brian Greene, "The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory", 1999)

"Knowledge is encoded in models. Models are synthetic sets of rules, pictures, and algorithms providing us with useful representations of the world of our perceptions and of their patterns. As argued by philosophers and shown by scientists, we do not have access to 'reality', only to some of its manifestations, whose regularities are used to determine rules, which when widely applicable become 'laws of nature'. These laws are constantly tested in the scientific march, and they evolve, develop and transmute as the frontier of knowledge recedes further away. " (Burton G Malkiel, "A Random Walk Down Wall Street", 1999)

"The laws of nature are rigged not only in favor of complexity, or just in favor of life, but also in favor of mind. To put it dramatically, it implies that mind is written into the laws of nature in a fundamental way." (Paul C W Davies, "The Fifth Miracle: The Search for the Origin and Meaning of Life", 1999)