On Manifolds (1925-1949)

"An 'empty world', i. e., a homogeneous manifold at all points at which equations (1) are satisfied, has, according to the theory, a constant Riemann curvature, and any deviation from this fundamental solution is to be directly attributed to the influence of matter or energy." (Howard P Robertson, "On Relativistic Cosmology", 1928)

"Euclidean geometry can be easily visualized; this is the argument adduced for the unique position of Euclidean geometry in mathematics. It has been argued that mathematics is not only a science of implications but that it has to establish preference for one particular axiomatic system. Whereas physics bases this choice on observation and experimentation, i. e., on applicability to reality, mathematics bases it on visualization, the analogue to perception in a theoretical science. Accordingly, mathematicians may work with the non-Euclidean geometries, but in contrast to Euclidean geometry, which is said to be "intuitively understood," these systems consist of nothing but 'logical relations' or 'artificial manifolds'. They belong to the field of analytic geometry, the study of manifolds and equations between variables, but not to geometry in the real sense which has a visual significance." (Hans Reichenbach, "The Philosophy of Space and Time", 1928)

"We must [...] maintain that mathematical geometry is not a science of space insofar as we understand by space a visual structure that can be filled with objects - it is a pure theory of manifolds." (Hans Reichenbach, "The Philosophy of Space and Time", 1928)

"Whereas the conception of space and time as a four-dimensional manifold has been very fruitful for mathematical physicists, its effect in the field of epistemology has been only to confuse the issue. Calling time the fourth dimension gives it an air of mystery. One might think that time can now be conceived as a kind of space and try in vain to add visually a fourth dimension to the three dimensions of space. It is essential to guard against such a misunderstanding of mathematical concepts. If we add time to space as a fourth dimension it does not lose any of its peculiar character as time. [...] Musical tones can be ordered according to volume and pitch and are thus brought into a two dimensional manifold. Similarly colors can be determined by the three basic colors red, green and blue… Such an ordering does not change either tones or colors; it is merely a mathematical expression of something that we have known and visualized for a long time. Our schematization of time as a fourth dimension therefore does not imply any changes in the conception of time. [...] the space of visualization is only one of many possible forms that add content to the conceptual frame. We would therefore not call the representation of the tone manifold by a plane the visual representation of the two dimensional tone manifold." (Hans Reichenbach, "The Philosophy of Space and Time", 1928)

"If a continuum, say, a two-dimensional closed manifold, a surface, is to be the subject of mathematícal investigation, t hen we must think of it as being subdivided into finitely many 'elementary pieces' whose topological nature is that of a circular disk. TP,ese pieces are further fragmented by repeated subdivision in accordance with a fixed scheme, and thus a particular spot in the continuum is ever more precisely intercepted by an infinite sequence 

of nested fragments that arise in t he course of successive subdivisions. In the onedimensional case, the repeated "normal subdivision" of an elementary segment is its bipartition. In the two-dirnensional case, each edge is first bipartitioned, then each piece of surface is divided into triangles by means of Unes in the surface that lead from a.n arbitrary center to the ( old and new) vertices." (Hermann Weyl, "Levels of Infinity", 1930)

"The sequence of numbers which grows beyond any stage already reached by passing to the next number is a manifold of possibilities open towards infinity, it remains forever in the status of creation, but is not a closed realm of things existing in themselves. That we blindly converted one into the other is the true source of our difficulties […]" (Hermann Weyl, "Mathematics and Logic", 1946)

"The first attempts to consider the behavior of so-called 'random neural nets' in a systematic way have led to a series of problems concerned with relations between the 'structure' and the 'function' of such nets. The 'structure' of a random net is not a clearly defined topological manifold such as could be used to describe a circuit with explicitly given connections. In a random neural net, one does not speak of 'this' neuron synapsing on 'that' one, but rather in terms of tendencies and probabilities associated with points or regions in the net." (Anatol Rapoport, "Cycle distributions in random nets", The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 10(3), 1948)