5 Books 10 Quotes V: Randomness IV

Ivars Peterson, "The Jungles of Randomness: A Mathematical Safari", 1998
	"Often, we use the word random loosely to describe something that is disordered, irregular, patternless, or unpredictable. We link it with chance, probability, luck, and coincidence. However, when we examine what we mean by random in various contexts, ambiguities and uncertainties inevitably arise. Tackling the subtleties of randomness allows us to go to the root of what we can understand of the universe we inhabit and helps us to define the limits of what we can know with certainty."
"We use mathematics and statistics to describe the diverse realms of randomness. From these descriptions, we attempt to glean insights into the workings of chance and to search for hidden causes. With such tools in hand, we seek patterns and relationships and propose predictions that help us make sense of the world."
Leonard Mlodinow, "The Drunkard’s Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives", 2008
	"The theory of randomness is fundamentally a codification of common sense. But it is also a field of subtlety, a field in which great experts have been famously wrong and expert gamblers infamously correct. What it takes to understand randomness and overcome our misconceptions is both experience and a lot of careful thinking."
"Why is the human need to be in control relevant to a discussion of random patterns? Because if events are random, we are not in control, and if we are in control of events, they are not random. There is therefore a fundamental clash between our need to feel we are in control and our ability to recognize randomness. That clash is one of the principal reasons we misinterpret random events."
Deborah J Bennett, "Randomness", 1998
	"Is a random outcome completely determined, and random only by virtue of our ignorance of the most minute contributing factors? Or are the contributing factors unknowable, and therefore render as random an outcome that can never be determined? Are seemingly random events merely the result of fluctuations superimposed on a determinate system, masking its predictability, or is there some disorderliness built into the system itself?"
"Can randomness result from nonrandom situations? Is randomness merely the human inability to recognize a pattern that may in fact exist? Or is randomness a function of our inability, at any point, to predict the result?” (Deborah J. Bennett, "Randomness", 1998)
William Byers, "How Mathematicians Think", 2007
	"What is randomness? At the level of our everyday life experience we call it ‘chance’, something with which that we all feel familiar. It refers to something unexpected, something caused by luck or fortune, that is, without any apparent cause. Randomness is, in a sense, the opposite of determinism. It reflects the ordinary sense that some things are too complicated to admit of a simple explanation or even any explanation at all."
"[…] it would seem that randomness and order are both inevitable parts of any description of reality. When we try to understand some particular phenomenon we are, in effect, banishing disorder. Before a piece of mathematics is understood it stands as a random collection of data. After it is understood, it is ordered, manageable. […] Both properties - the randomness and the order - are present simultaneously. This is what should be called complexity. Complexity is ordered randomness."
Edward Beltrami, "Chaos and Order in Mathematics and Life", 1999
	"Randomness is the very stuff of life, looming large in our everyday experience. […] The fascination of randomness is that it is pervasive, providing the surprising coincidences, bizarre luck, and unexpected twists that color our perception of everyday events."
"The subject of probability begins by assuming that some mechanism of uncertainty is at work giving rise to what is called randomness, but it is not necessary to distinguish between chance that occurs because of some hidden order that may exist and chance that is the result of blind lawlessness. This mechanism, figuratively speaking, churns out a succession of events, each individually unpredictable, or it conspires to produce an unforeseeable outcome each time a large ensemble of possibilities is sampled." Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

5 Books 10 Quotes IV: On Complex Numbers IV

Ian Stewart, "Why Beauty Is Truth: The History of Symmetry", 2007
	“A complex number is just a pair of real numbers, manipulated according to a short list of simple rules. Since a pair of real numbers is surely just as ‘real’ as a single real number, real and complex numbers are equally closely related to reality, and ‘imaginary’ is misleading.”
“The complex numbers extend the real numbers by throwing in a new kind of number, the square root of minus one. But the price we pay for being able to take square roots of negative numbers is the loss of order. The complex numbers are a complete system but are spread out across a plane rather than aligned in a single orderly sequence.”
David Mumford, Caroline Series & David Wright, "Indra’s Pearls: The Vision of Felix Klein", 2002
	“Complex numbers are really not as complex as you might expect from their name, particularly if we think of them in terms of the underlying two dimensional geometry which they describe. Perhaps it would have been better to call them 'nature's numbers'. Behind complex numbers is a wonderful synthesis between two dimensional geometry and an elegant arithmetic in which every polynomial equation has a solution.”
“Ordinary numbers have immediate connection to the world around us; they are used to count and measure every sort of thing. Adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing all have simple interpretations in terms of the objects being counted and measured. When we pass to complex numbers, though, the arithmetic takes on a life of its own. Since -1 has no square root, we decided to create a new number game which supplies the missing piece. By adding in just this one new element √-1. we created a whole new world in which everything arithmetical, miraculously, works out just fine.”
Paul J Nahin, "An Imaginary Tale: The History of √-1", 1998
	“The discovery of complex numbers was the last in a sequence of discoveries that gradually filled in the set of all numbers, starting with the positive integers (finger counting) and then expanding to include the positive rationals and irrational reals, negatives, and then finally the complex.”
“When we try to take the square root of -1 (a real number), for example, we suddenly leave the real numbers, and so the reals are not complete with respect to the square root operation. We don’t have to be concerned that something like that will happen with the complex numbers, however, and we won’t have to invent even more exotic numbers (the ‘really complex’!) Complex numbers are everything there is in the two-dimensional plane.”
Jerry R Muir Jr., “Complex Analysis: A Modern First Course in Function Theory”, 2015
	“Complex analysis should never be underestimated as simply being calculus with complex numbers in place of real numbers and is distinguished from being so at every possible opportunity.”
“The upgrade from the real numbers to the complex numbers has both algebraic and analytic motivation. The real numbers are not algebraically complete, meaning there are polynomial equations such as x^2 = −1 with no solutions. The incorporation of  √-1 […] is a direct response to this.”
Tobias Dantzig, “Number: The Language of Science”, 1930
	“[…] extensions beyond the complex number domain are possible only at the expense of the principle of permanence. The complex number domain is the last frontier of this principle. Beyond this either the commutativity of the operations or the rôle which zero plays in arithmetic must be sacrificed.”
“And so it was that the complex number, which had its origin in a symbol for a fiction, ended by becoming an indispensable tool for the formulation of mathematical ideas, a powerful instrument for the solution of intricate problems, a means for tracing kinships between remote mathematical disciplines.” Previous Post <<||>> Next Post See also: More Quotes on Complex Numbers III More Quotes on Complex Numbers II More Quotes on Complex Numbers I Complex Numbers

5 Books 10 Quotes III: Beauty and Symmetry III

James R Newman, "The World of Mathematics Vol. I", 1956
	"In the everyday sense symmetry carries the meaning of balance, proportion, harmony, regularity of form. Beauty is sometimes linked with symmetry, but the relationship is not very illuminating since beauty is an even vaguer quality than symmetry."
"Symmetry, as wide or as narrow as you may define its meaning, is one idea by which man through the ages has tried to comprehend and create order, beauty, and perfection." (Herman Weyl, "Symmetry")
James R Newman, "The World of Mathematics Vol. II", 1956
	"Mathematicians study their problems on account of their intrinsic interest, and develop their theories on account of their beauty." (Karl Menger, "What Is Calculus of Variations and What Are Its Applications?")
"If we seek a cause wherever we perceive symmetry, it is not that we regard a symmetrical event as less possible than the others, but, since this event ought to be the effect of a regular cause or that of chance, the first of these suppositions is more probable than the second." (Pierre-Simon de Laplace, "Concerning Probability")
James R Newman, "The World of Mathematics Vol III", 1956
	"Geometry, whatever others may think, is the study of different shapes, many of them very beautiful, having harmony, grace and symmetry. […] Most of us, if we can play chess at all, are content to play it on a board with wooden chess pieces; but there are some who play the game blindfolded and without touching the board. It might be a fair analogy to say that abstract geometry is like blindfold chess – it is a game played without concrete objects." (Edward Kasner & James R Newman, "New Names for Old")
"The world of ideas which it discloses or illuminates, the contemplation of divine beauty and order which it induces, the harmonious connexion of its parts, the infinite hierarchy and absolute evidence of the truths with which it is concerned, these, and such like, are the surest grounds of the title of mathematics to human regard, and would remain unimpeached and unimpaired were the plan of the universe unrolled like a map at our feet, and the mind of man qualified to take in the whole scheme of creation at a glance." (James J Sylvester, "The Study That Knows Nothing of Observation")
James R Newman, "The World of Mathematics Vol IV", 1956
	"[...] what are the mathematic entities to which we attribute this character of beauty and elegance, and which are capable of developing in us a sort of esthetic emotion? They are those whose elements are harmoniously disposed so that the mind without effort can embrace their totality while realizing the details. This harmony 'is at once a satisfaction of our esthetic needs and an aid to the mind, sustaining and guiding." (Henri Poincare, "Mathematical Creation")
"When, for instance, I see a symmetrical object, I feel its pleasurable quality, but do not need to assert explicitly to myself, ‘How symmetrical!’. This characteristic feature may be explained as follows. In the course of individual experience it is found generally that symmetrical objects possess exceptional and desirable qualities. Thus our own bodies are not regarded as perfectly formed unless they are symmetrical. Furthermore, the visual and tactual technique by which we perceive the symmetry of various objects is uniform, highly developed, and almost instantaneously applied. It is this technique which forms the associative 'pointer.' In consequence of it, the perception of any symmetrical object is accompanied by an intuitive aesthetic feeling of positive tone." (George D Birkhoff, "Mathematics of Aesthetics")
K C Cole, "The Universe and the Teacup: The Mathematics of Truth and Beauty", 1997
	"Math has its own inherent logic, its own internal truth. Its beauty lies in its ability to distill the essence of truth without the messy interference of the real world. It’s clean, neat, above it all. It lives in an ideal universe built on the geometer’s perfect circles and polygons, the number theorist’s perfect sets. It matters not that these objects don’t exist in the real world. They are articles of faith."
"How deep truths can be defined as invariants – things that do not change no matter what; how invariants are defined by symmetries, which in turn define which properties of nature are conserved, no matter what. These are the selfsame symmetries that appeal to the senses in art and music and natural forms like snowflakes and galaxies. The fundamental truths are based on symmetry, and there’s a deep kind of beauty in that." Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

5 Books 10 Quotes II: Nature and the Quest for Models

Clifford A Pickover, "The Loom of God: Mathematical Tapestries at the Edge of Time", 1997
	"I do not know if God is a mathematician, but mathematics is the loom upon which God weaves the fabric of the universe. [...] The fact that reality can be described or approximated by simple mathematical expressions suggests to me that nature has mathematics at its core."
“In many ways, the mathematical quest to understand infinity parallels mystical attempts to understand God. Both religions and mathematics attempt to express the relationships between humans, the universe, and infinity. Both have arcane symbols and rituals, and impenetrable language. Both exercise the deep recesses of our mind and stimulate our imagination. Mathematicians, like priests, seek ‘ideal’, immutable, nonmaterial truths and then often try to apply theses truth in the real world.”
Fritjof Capra, "The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism", 1976
	“If physics leads us today to a world view which is essentially mystical, it returns, in a way, to its beginning, 2,500 years ago. […] Eastern thought and, more generally, mystical thought provide a consistent and relevant philosophical background to the theories of contemporary science; a conception of the world in which scientific discoveries can be in perfect harmony with spiritual aims and religious beliefs. The two basic themes of this conception are the unity and interrelation of all phenomena and the intrinsically dynamic nature of the universe. The further we penetrate into the submicroscopic world, the more we shall realize how the modern physicist, like the Eastern mystic, has come to see the world as a system of inseparable, interacting and ever-moving components with the observer being an integral part of this system.”
“Whenever the Eastern mystics express their knowledge in words - be it with the help of myths, symbols, poetic images or paradoxical statements-they are well aware of the limitations imposed by language and 'linear' thinking. Modern physics has come to take exactly the same attitude with regard to its verbal models and theories. They, too, are only approximate and necessarily inaccurate. They are the counterparts of the Eastern myths, symbols and poetic images, and it is at this level that I shall draw the parallels. The same idea about matter is conveyed, for example, to the Hindu by the cosmic dance of the god Shiva as to the physicist by certain aspects of quantum field theory. Both the dancing god and the physical theory are creations of the mind: models to describe their authors' intuition of reality.”
Mario Livio, "Is God a Mathematician?", 2011
	“The reality is that without mathematics, modern-day cosmologists could not have progressed even one step in attempting to understand the laws of nature. Mathematics provides the solid scaffolding that holds together any theory of the universe. […] Mathematics appears to be almost too effective in describing and explaining not only the cosmos at large, but even some of the most chaotic of human enterprises.”
“There are actually two sides to the success of mathematics in explaining the world around us (a success that Wigner dubbed ‘the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics’), one more astonishing than the other. First, there is an aspect one might call ‘active’. When physicists wander through nature’s labyrinth, they light their way by mathematics—the tools they use and develop, the models they construct, and the explanations they conjure are all mathematical in nature. This, on the face of it, is a miracle in itself. […] But there is also a ‘passive’ side to the mysterious effectiveness of mathematics, and it is so surprising that the “active” aspect pales by comparison. Concepts and relations explored by mathematicians only for pure reasons—with absolutely no application in mind—turn out decades (or sometimes centuries) later to be the unexpected solutions to problems grounded in physical reality!”
Ian Stewart & Martin Golubitsky, “Fearful Symmetry: Is God a Geometer?”, 1992
	“Scientists use mathematics to build mental universes. They write down mathematical descriptions - models - that capture essential fragments of how they think the world behaves. Then they analyse their consequences. This is called 'theory'. They test their theories against observations: this is called 'experiment'. Depending on the result, they may modify the mathematical model and repeat the cycle until theory and experiment agree. Not that it's really that simple; but that's the general gist of it, the essence of the scientific method.”
“Nature behaves in ways that look mathematical, but nature is not the same as mathematics. Every mathematical model makes simplifying assumptions; its conclusions are only as valid as those assumptions.”
Peter Coles, “Hawking and the Mind of God”, 2000
	“[…] the search for a Theory of Everything also raises interesting philosophical questions. Some physicists, [Stephen] Hawking among them, would regard the construction of a Theory of Everything as being, in some sense, reading the mind of God. Or at least unravelling the inner secrets of physical reality. Others simply argue that a physical theory is just a description of reality, rather like a map.”
“To look at the development of physics since Newton is to observe a struggle to define the limits of science. Part of this process has been the intrusion of scientific methods and ideas into domains that have traditionally been the province of metaphysics or religion. In this conflict, Hawking’s phrase ‘to know the Mind of God’ is just one example of a border infringement. But by playing the God card, Hawking has cleverly fanned the flames of his own publicity, appealing directly to the popular allure of the scientist-as-priest.” Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

5 Books 10 Quotes I: Mathematics in Its Creation

Walter W Sawyer, "What is Calculus About?”, 1961
	"In mathematics, a certain surprising thing happens again and again. Someone poses a simple question, a question so simple that it seems no useful result can come from answering it. And yet it turns out that  the answer opens the door to all kinds of interesting developments, and  gives great power to the person who understands it."
"Mathematics also is an exploration. As we push out further, we meet new and unexpected situations and we have to revise our ideas. Rules we have used, theorems we have proved turn out to have unforeseen weaknesses."
Ian Stewart, "In Pursuit of the Unknown", 2012
	“Equations have hidden powers. They reveal the innermost secrets of nature. […] The power of equations lies in the philosophically difficult correspondence between mathematics, a collective creation of human minds, and an external physical reality. Equations model deep patterns in the outside world. By learning to value equations, and to read the stories they tell, we can uncover vital features of the world around us.”
“There are two kinds of equations in mathematics, which on the surface look very similar. One kind presents relations between various mathematical quantities: the task is to prove the equation is true. The other kind provides information about an unknown quantity, and the mathematician’s task is to solve it - to make the unknown known.”
Philip J Davis et al, "The Mathematical Experience", 1995
	“Where is the place of mathematics? Where does it exist? On the printed page, of course, and prior to printing, on tablets or on papyri. Here is a mathematical book - take it in your hand; you have a palpable record of mathematics as an intellectual endeavor. But first it must exist in people's minds, for a shelf of books doesn't create mathematics.”
“The definition of mathematics changes. Each generation and each thoughtful mathematician within a generation formulates a definition according to his lights.”
David Ruelle, "Chance and Chaos", 1991
	"Because mathematical proofs are long, they are also difficult to invent. One has to construct, without making any mistakes, long chains of assertions, and see what one is doing, see where one is going. To see means to be able to guess what is true and what is false, what is useful and what is not. To see means to have a feeling for which definitions one should introduce, and what the key assertions are that will allow one to develop a theory in a natural manner."
"Mathematics has deep unity. More than a collection of separate theories such as set theory, topology, and algebra, each with its own basic assumptions, mathematics is a unified whole. Mathematics is a great  kingdom, and that kingdom belongs to those who see."
James R Brown,"Philosophy of Mathematics", 1999
	"Whatever the ins and outs of poetry, one thing is clear: the manner of expression - notation - is fundamental. It is the same with mathematics - not in the aesthetic sense that the beauty of mathematics is tied up with how it is expressed - but in the sense that mathematical truths are revealed, exploited and developed by various notational innovations."
“In sum, these are a few of the ingredients in the mathematical image: (1) Mathematical results are certain (2) Mathematics is objective (3) Proofs are essential (4) Diagrams are psychologically useful, but prove nothing (5) Diagrams can even be misleading (6) Mathematics is wedded to classical logic (7) Mathematics is independent of sense experience (8) The history of mathematics is cumulative (9) Computer proofs are merely long and complicated regular proofs (10) Some mathematical problems are unsolvable in principle” ||>> Next Post