Anthony Zee - Collected Quotes

"As glimpsed by physicists, Nature's rules are simple, but also intricate: Different rules are subtly related to each other. The intricate relations between the rules produce interesting effects in many physical situations. [...] Nature's design is not only simple, but minimally so, in the sense that were the design any simpler, the universe would be a much duller place." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"In science, one tries to say what no one else has ever said before. In poetry, one tries to say what everyone else has already said, but better. This explains, in essence, why good poetry is as rare as good science." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"In the path-integral formulation, the essence of quantum physics may be summarized with two fundamental rules: (1). The classical action determines the probability amplitude for a specific chain of events to occur, and (2) the probability that either one or the other chain of events occurs is determined by the probability amplitudes corresponding to the two chains of events. Finding these rules represents a stunning achievement by the founders of quantum physics." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"Physicists dream of a unified description of Nature. Symmetry, in its power to tie together apparently unrelated aspects of physics, is linked closely to the notion of unity." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"Physics is the most reductionistic of sciences. [...] Contemporary physics rests on the cornerstone of reductionism. As we delve deeper, Nature appears ever simpler. That this is so is, in fact, astonishing. We have no a priori reason to expect the universe, with its fantastic wealth of bewilderingly complex phenomena, to be governed ultimately by a few simple rules." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The beauty that Nature has revealed to physicists in Her laws is a beauty of design, a beauty that recalls, to some extent, the beauty of classical architecture, with its emphasis on geometry and symmetry. The system of aesthetics used by physicists in judging Nature also draws its inspiration from the austere finality of geometry." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The impossibility of defining absolute motion can be seen as the manifestation of a symmetry known as relativistic invariance. In the same way that parity invariance tells us that we cannot distinguish the mirror-image world from our world, relativistic invariance tells us that it is impossible to decide whether we are at rest or moving steadily." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The power and glory of symmetry allow us to bypass completely the construction of strong interaction theories of dubious utility. We are able to contain and isolate our ignorance. [...] Symmetry tells us that states in the same multiplet must have the same energy, but it cannot tell us what that energy is." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The precise mathematical definition of symmetry involves the notion of invariance. A geometrical figure is said to be symmetric under certain operations if those operations leave it unchanged." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"The search for fundamental symmetries boils down to the study of transformations that do not change fundamental physical action - such transformations as reflection, rotation, the Lorentz transformation, and the like." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"To detect a symmetry in the fundamental design, one would have to check the covariance of each of the many equations of motion in the differential formulation. With the action formulation, on the other hand, one has the considerably easier task of checking the invariance of the action." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"Toward the end of the last century, many physicists felt that the mathematical description of physics was getting ever more complicated. Instead, the mathematics involved has become ever more abstract, rather than more complicated. The mind of God appears to be abstract but not complicated. He also appears to like group theory." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"Unlike an architect, Nature does not go around expounding on the wondrous symmetries of Her design. Instead, theoretical physicists must deduce them. Some symmetries, such as parity and rotational invariances, are intuitively obvious. We expect Nature to possess these symmetries, and we are shocked if She does not. Other symmetries, such as Lorentz invariance and general covariance, are more subtle and not grounded in our everyday perceptions. But, in any case, in order to find out if Nature employs a certain symmetry, we must compare the implications of the symmetry with observation." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"We intuitively know space to be a smooth continuum, an arena in which the fundamental particles move and interact. This assumption underpins our physical theories, and no experimental evidence has ever contradicted it. However, the possibility that space may not be smooth cannot be excluded." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

"Welcome to the strange world of the quantum, where one cannot determine how a particle gets from here to there. Physicists are reduced to bookies, posting odds on the various possibilities." (Anthony Zee, "Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics", 1986)

On Beauty: Nature

"Nature builds up by her refined and invisible architecture, with a delicacy eluding our conception, yet with a symmetry and beauty which we are never weary of admiring." (Sir John F W Herschel, "The Cabinet of Natural Philosophy", 1831)

"As long as men inquire, they will find opportunities to know more upon these topics than those who have gone before them, so inexhaustibly rich is nature in the innermost diversity of her treasures of beauty, order, and intelligence." (J Louis R Agassiz, "Essay on Classification", 1859)

"In order to depict nature in its exalted sublimity, we must not dwell exclusively on its external manifestations, but we must trace its image, reflected in the mind of man, at one time filling the dreamy land of physical myths with forms of grace and beauty, and at another developing the noble germ of artistic creations." (Alexander von Humboldt, "Cosmos: A Sketch of a Physical Description of the Universe" Vol. 2, 1869)

"The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful. If nature were not beautiful, it would not be worth knowing, and if nature were not worth knowing, life would not be worth living. Of course I do not here speak of that beauty that strikes the senses, the beauty of qualities and appearances; not that I undervalue such beauty, far from it, but it has nothing to do with science; I mean that profounder beauty which comes from the harmonious order of the parts, and which a pure intelligence can grasp." (Henri Poincaré, "The Value of Science", 1905)

"In the grandeur of its sweep in space and time, and the beauty and simplicity of the relations which it discloses between the greatest and the smallest things of which we know, it reveals as perhaps nothing else does, the majesty of the order about us which we call nature, and, as I believe, of that Power behind the order, of which it is but a passing shadow." (Henry N Russell, "Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution", 1923)

"It seems to be one of the fundamental features of nature that fundamental physical laws are described in terms of a mathematical theory of great beauty and power, needing quite a high standard of mathematics for one to understand it. You may wonder: Why is nature constructed along these lines? One can only answer that our present knowledge seems to show that nature is so constructed. We simply have to accept it. One could perhaps describe the situation by saying that God is a mathematician of a very high order, and He used very advanced mathematics in constructing the universe. Our feeble attempts at mathematics enable us to understand a bit of the universe, and as we proceed to develop higher and higher mathematics we can hope to understand the universe better." (Paul Dirac, "The Evolution of the Physicist's Picture of Nature", 1963)

"The study of symmetry was born out of art and mathematics; art as the comprehension of the beauty of nature and mathematics as the comprehension of the world's harmony. " (N F Ovchinnikov, "Principles of Preservation", 1966)

"To those who do not know mathematics it is difficult to get across a real feeling as to the beauty, the deepest beauty, of nature. […] If you want to learn about nature, to appreciate nature, it is necessary to understand the language that she speaks in." (Richard P Feynman, "The Character of Physical Law", 1967)

"Beauty is our weapon against nature; by it we make objects, giving them limit, symmetry, proportion. Beauty halts and freezes the melting flux of nature." (Camille Paglia, "Sexual Personae", 1990)

"The immediate evidence from the natural world may seem to be chaotic and without any inner regularity, but mathematics reveals that under the surface the world of nature has an unexpected simplicity - an extraordinary beauty and order." (William Byers, "How Mathematicians Think", 2007)

"The beauty of nature insists on taking its time. Everything is prepared. Nothing is rushed. The rhythm of emergence is a gradual, slow beat; always inching its way forward, change remains faithful to itself until the new unfolds in the full confidence of true arrival. Because nothing is abrupt, the beginning of spring nearly always catches us unawares. It is there before we see it; and then we can look nowhere without seeing it. (John O'Donohue, "To Bless the Space Between Us: A Book of Blessings", 2008)

"If nature leads to mathematical forms of great simplicity and beauty - to forms that no one has previously encountered - we cannot help thinking that they are true and that they revealed genuine features of Nature." (Werner K Heisenberg)

"Nature builds up her refined and invisible architecture, with a delicacy eluding our conception, yet with a symmetry and beauty which we are never weary of admiring." (John Herschel)

"Whence is it that nature does nothing in vain; and whence arises all that order and beauty which we see in the world?" (Sir Isaac Newton)

On Beauty: Science

"In science, reason is the guide; in poetry, taste. The object of the one is truth, which is uniform and indivisible; the object of the other is beauty, which is multiform and varied." (Charles C Colton, "Lacon", 1820)

"Science is a match that man has just got alight. He thought he was in a room - in moments of devotion, a temple - and that his light would be reflected from and display walls inscribed with wonderful secrets and pillars carved with philosophical systems wrought into harmony. It is a curious sensation, now that the preliminary splutter is over and the flame burns up clear, to see his hands and just a glimpse of himself and the patch he stands on visible, and around him, in place of all that human comfort and beauty he anticipated - darkness still." (Herbert G Wells, "The Rediscovery of the Unique", The Fortnightly Review, 1891)

"The scientific value of truth is not, however, ultimate or absolute. It rests partly on practical, partly on aesthetic interests. As our ideas are gradually brought into conformity with the facts by the painful process of selection, - for intuition runs equally into truth and into error, and can settle nothing if not controlled by experience, - we gain vastly in our command over our environment. This is the fundamental value of natural science" (George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty: Being the Outlines of Aesthetic Theory", 1896)

"It is indeed wrong to think that the poetry of Nature’s moods in all their infinite variety is lost on one who observes them scientifically, for the habit of observation refines our sense of beauty and adds a brighter hue to the richly coloured background against which each separate fact is outlined. The connection between events, the relation of cause and effect in different parts of a landscape, unite harmoniously what would otherwise be merely a series of detached sciences." (Marcel Minnaert, "The Nature of Light and Colour in the Open Air", 1954)

"If some great mathematicians have known how to give lyrical expression to their enthusiasm for the beauty of their science, nobody has suggested examining it as if it were the object of an art - mathematical art -  and consequently the subject of a theory of aesthetics, the aesthetics of mathematics." (François Le Lionnais, "Great Currents of Mathematical Thought", 1971)

"The mathematical theory of black holes is a subject of immense complexity; but its study has convinced me of the basic truth of the ancient mottoes 'The simple is the seal of the true' and 'Beauty is the splendor of truth.'" (Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, [Nobel lecture] 1983)

"To a considerable degree science consists in originating the maximum amount of information with the minimum expenditure of energy. Beauty is the cleanness of line in such formulations along with symmetry, surprise, and congruence with other prevailing beliefs." (Edward O Wilson, "Biophilia", 1984)

"Even distinguished philosophers of science [...] recognize the failure of philosophy to help understand the nature of science. They have not discovered a scientific method that provides a formula or prescriptions for how to make discoveries. But many famous scientists have given advice: try many things; do what makes your heart leap; think big; dare to explore where there is no light; challenge expectation; cherchez le paradox; be sloppy so that something unexpected happens, but not so sloppy that you can’t tell what happened; turn it on its head; never try to solve a problem until you can guess the answer; precision encourages the imagination; seek simplicity; seek beauty. [...] One could do no better than to try them all." (Lewis Wolpert, "The Unnatural Nature of Science", 1992)

"[…] the pursuit of science is more than the pursuit of understanding. It is driven by the creative urge, the urge to construct a vision, a map, a picture of the world that gives the world a little more beauty and coherence than it had before." (John A Wheeler, "Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam: A Life in Physics", 1998)

"The passion and beauty and joy of science is that we humans have invented a process to understand the universe in a way that is true for everyone. We are finding universal truths." (Bill Nye, 2000)

"In mathematics, beauty is a very important ingredient. Beauty exists in mathematics as in architecture and other things. It is a difficult thing to define but it is something you recognise when you see it. It certainly has to have elegance, simplicity, structure and form. All sorts of things make up real beauty. There are many different kinds of beauty and the same is true of mathematical theorems. Beauty is an important criterion in mathematics because basically there is a lot of choice in what you can do in mathematics and science. It determines what you regard as important and what is not." (Michael Atiyah, 2009)

"What is the basis of this interest in beauty? Is it the same in both mathematics and science? Is it rational, in either case, to expect or demand that the products of the discipline satisfy such a criterion? Is there an underlying assumption that the proper business of mathematics and science is to discover what can be discovered about reality and that truth - mathematical and physical - when seen as clearly as possible, must be beautiful? If the demand for beauty stems from some such assumption, is the assumption itself an article of blind faith? If such an assumption is not its basis, what is?" (Raymond S Nickerson, "Mathematical Reasoning:  Patterns, Problems, Conjectures, and Proofs", 2010)

On Beauty: Physics

"A physical law must possess mathematical beauty." (Paul A M Dirac, 1956)

"It seems to be one of the fundamental features of nature that fundamental physical laws are described in terms of a mathematical theory of great beauty and power, needing quite a high standard of mathematics for one to understand it. You may wonder: Why is nature constructed along these lines? One can only answer that our present knowledge seems to show that nature is so constructed. We simply have to accept it. One could perhaps describe the situation by saying that God is a mathematician of a very high order, and He used very advanced mathematics in constructing the universe. Our feeble attempts at mathematics enable us to understand a bit of the universe, and as we proceed to develop higher and higher mathematics we can hope to understand the universe better." (Paul Dirac, "The Evolution of the Physicist's Picture of Nature", 1963)

"Most of us who become experimental physicists do so for two reasons; we love the tools of physics because to us they have intrinsic beauty, and we dream of finding new secrets of nature as important and as exciting as those uncovered by our scientific heroes." (Luis W Alvarez, "Recent Developments in Particle Physics", [Nobel] 1968)

"Mathematics is much more than a language for dealing with the physical world. It is a source of models and abstractions which will enable us to obtain amazing new insights into the way in which nature operates. Indeed, the beauty and elegance of the physical laws themselves are only apparent when expressed in the appropriate mathematical framework." (Melvin Schwartz, "Principles of Electrodynamics", 1972)

"The beauty of physics lies in the extent which seemingly complex and unrelated phenomena can be explained and correlated through a high level of abstraction by a set of laws which are amazing in their simplicity." (Melvin Schwartz, "In Principles of Electrodynamics", 1972)

"The equations of physics have in them incredible simplicity, elegance and beauty. That in itself is sufficient to prove to me that there must be a God who is responsible for these laws and responsible for the universe" (Paul C W Davies, 1984)

"In lieu of the traditional confrontation between theory and experiment, superstring theorists pursue an inner harmony where elegance, uniqueness and beauty define truth. The theory depends for its existence upon magical coincidences, miraculous cancellations and relations among seemingly unrelated (and possibly undiscovered) fields of mathematics." (Sheldon L Glashow, "Desperately Seeking Superstrings?", Physics Today, 1986)

"Order wherever it reigns, brings beauty with it. Theory not only renders the group of physical laws it represents easier to handle, more convenient, and more useful, but also more beautiful." (Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem, "The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory", 1991)

"A physicist who says that a theory is beautiful does not mean quite the same thing that would be meant in saying that a particular painting or a piece of music or poetry is beautiful. It is not merely a personal expression of aesthetic pleasure; it is much closer to what a horse-trainer means when he looks at a racehorse and says that it is a beautiful horse. The horse-trainer is of course expressing a personal opinion, but it is an opinion about an objective fact: that, on the basis of judgements that the trainer could not easily put into words, this is the kind of horse that wins races [...] The physicist’s sense of beauty is also supposed to serve a purpose –it is supposed to help the physicist select ideas that help us to explain nature." (Steven Weinberg, "Dreams of a Final Theory", 1992)

"Mathematical beauty and mathematical truth share the fundamental property of objectivity, that of being inescapably context-dependent. Mathematical beauty and mathematical truth, like any other objective characteristics of mathematics, are subject to the laws of the real world, on a par with the laws of physics." (Gian-Carlo Rota, "The Phenomenology of Mathematical Beauty", Synthese, 111(2), 1997)

"Where we find certainty and truth in mathematics we also find beauty. Great mathematics is characterized by its aesthetics. Mathematicians delight in the elegance, economy of means, and logical inevitability of proof. It is as if the great mathematical truths can be no other way. This light of logic is also reflected back to us in the underlying structures of the physical world through the mathematics of theoretical physics." (F David Peat, "From Certainty to Uncertainty", 2002)

"Pure mathematics was characterized by an obsession with proof, rigor, beauty, and elegance, and sought its foundations in the disembodied worlds of logic or intuition. Far from being coextensive with physics, pure mathematics could be ‘applied’ only after it had been made foundationally secure by the purists." (Andrew Warwick, "Masters of Theory: Cambridge and the rise of mathematical physics", 2003)

"The concept of symmetry (invariance) with its rigorous mathematical formulation and generalization has guided us to know the most fundamental of physical laws. Symmetry as a concept has helped mankind not only to define ‘beauty’ but also to express the ‘truth’. Physical laws tries to quantify the truth that appears to be ‘transient’ at the level of phenomena but symmetry promotes that truth to the level of ‘eternity’." (Vladimir G Ivancevic & Tijana T Ivancevic, "Quantum Leap", 2008)

"What is the basis of this interest in beauty? Is it the same in both mathematics and science? Is it rational, in either case, to expect or demand that the products of the discipline satisfy such a criterion? Is there an underlying assumption that the proper business of mathematics and science is to discover what can be discovered about reality and that truth - mathematical and physical - when seen as clearly as possible, must be beautiful? If the demand for beauty stems from some such assumption, is the assumption itself an article of blind faith? If such an assumption is not its basis, what is?" (Raymond S Nickerson, "Mathematical Reasoning:  Patterns, Problems, Conjectures, and Proofs", 2010)

"The beauty in the laws of physics is the fantastic simplicity that they have." (John A Wheeler)

"When confronted with the order and beauty of the universe and the strange coincidences of nature, it's very tempting to take the leap of faith from science into religion. I am sure many physicists want to. I only wish they would admit it." (Tony Rothman)

Leon M Lederman - Collected Quotes

"A physical system is said to possess a symmetry if one can make a change in the system such that, after the change, the system is exactly the same as it was before. We call the change we are making to the system a symmetry operation or a symmetry transformation. If a system stays the same when we do a transformation to it, we say that the system is invariant under the transformation." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"Although nature suggests a pathway to a mathematical description of everything, it has thus far eluded a final or complete grand mathematical synthesis. […] Mathematics is therefore inspired by nature. But it does not have to conduct experimental observations to proceed. The worlds of mathematics and theoretical physics are therefore distinct - they have different 'mission statements'. Whereas theoretical physics maps the properties of the nature we experience, mathematics builds a map of all possible 'natures' that logic permits to exist." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"Art imitates nature through the incorporation of discrete symmetries, and indeed, reflection symmetry can be found throughout nature." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"Eternal constancy of the laws of physics is a symmetry. What we see as we look back in time, or we peer through telescopes out into space, or we look through our powerful microscopes (particle accelerators), is the same system of laws of physics governing the whole universe at all times and at all places. These are the basic symmetries of the structure of our universe and its contents and, at a deeper level, the symmetries of the laws that govern the universe themselves. Indeed, the symmetries we uncover are the basic principles that define our laws of nature and the laws of physics, hence those that control our universe." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"General relativity explains gravitation as a curvature, or bending, or warping, of the geometry of space-time, produced by the presence of matter. Free fall in a space shuttle around Earth, where space is warped, produces weightlessness, and is equivalent from the observer's point of view to freely moving in empty space where there is no large massive body producing curvature. In free fall we move along a 'geodesic' in the curved space-time, which is essentially a straight-line motion over small distances. But it becomes a curved trajectory when viewed at large distances. This is what produces the closed elliptical orbits of planets, with tiny corrections that have been correctly predicted and measured. Planets in orbits are actually in free fall in a curved space-time!" (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"In the physics of complex systems we can introduce a statistical concept, a measure of randomness, called entropy. In a quiet equilibrium, like hot onion soup sitting in a thermos bottle with no escaping heat, the entropy remains constant in time. However, in violent nonequilibrium processes, like shattering glass or explosions, the entropy always increases. Essentially, entropy, as a measure of randomness, will always increase when a very ordered initial condition leads to a very disordered final state through the normal laws of physics. The fact that entropy at best stays the same in equilibrium, or increases in all other processes, is called the second law of thermodynamics." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004) 

"Mathematicians have evolved a systematic way of thinking about symmetries that is fairly easy to grasp at the outset and a lot of fun to play with. This almost magical subject is known as group theory. […] Group theory is the mathematical language of symmetry, and it is so important that it seems to play a fundamental role in the very structure of nature. It governs the forces we see and is believed to be the organizing principle underlying all of the dynamics of elementary particles. Indeed, in modem physics the concept of symmetry serves as perhaps the most crucial concept of all. Symmetry principles are now known to dictate the basic laws of physics, to control the structure and dynamics of matter, and to define the fundamental forces in nature. Nature, at its most fundamental level, is defined by symmetry." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"Quantum-mechanical effects appear in physical systems that are exceedingly small. A small system means very tiny objects with very tiny amounts of energy, moving around over very short time intervals. Quantum effects show up dramatically once we arrive at length scales the size of the atom, about one ten-thousandth of a millionth of a meter. In fact, we simply cannot understand an atom without quantum mechanics. This is not to say that nature itself suddenly 'switches off'' classical mechanics and 'switches on' quantum mechanics when we enter this new submicroscopic realm. Quantum mechanics is always valid and always holds true at all scales of nature. Rather, quantum effects gradually become more and more pronounced as we descend into the world of atoms. Quantum mechanics is the ultimate set of rules, as far as we know, that governs how nature works" (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"So, a scientist's definition of symmetry would be something like this: symmetry is an invariance of an object or system to a transformation. The invariance is the sameness or constancy of the system in form, appearance, composition, arrangement, and so on, and a transformation is the abstract action we apply to the system that takes it from one state into another, equivalent, one. There are often numerous transformations we can apply on a given system that take it into an equivalent state." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"Suppose that while flipping a coin, a small black hole passed by and ate the coin. As long as we got to see the coin, the probabilities of heads and tails would add to one, but the possibility of a coin disappearing altogether into a black hole would have to be included. Once the coin crosses the event horizon of the black hole, it simply does not meaningfully exist in our universe anymore. Can we simply adjust our probabilistic interpretation to accommodate this outcome? Will we ever encounter negative probabilities?" (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"Symmetry is ubiquitous. Symmetry has myriad incarnations in the innumerable patterns designed by nature. It is a key element, often the central or defining theme, in art, music, dance, poetry, or architecture. Symmetry permeates all of science, occupying a prominent place in chemistry, biology, physiology, and astronomy. Symmetry pervades the inner world of the structure of matter, the outer world of the cosmos, and the abstract world of mathematics itself. The basic laws of physics, the most fundamental statements we can make about nature, are founded upon symmetry." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"The space and time of the universe that we humans inhabit contain symmetries. These are almost obvious yet subtle, even mysterious. Space and time form the stage upon which the dynamics - that is, the motion and interactions of the physical systems, atoms, atomic nuclei, protozoa, and people - are played out. The symmetries of space and time control the dynamics of the physical interactions of matter." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"The subject of mathematics has its own identity, on the other hand, and, in contrast to physicists, mathematicians attempt to create a roadmap of all possible logical systems that could consistently exist, whether they ultimately have anything to do with nature or not. Yet nature provides the basis of abstraction that gives birth to mathematics. " (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"The symmetries that we sense and observe in the world around us affirm the notion of the existence of a perfect order and harmony underlying everything in the universe. Through symmetry we sense an apparent logic at work in the universe, external to, yet resonant with, our own minds. [...] Symmetry gives wings to our creativity. It provides organizing principles for our artistic impulses and our thinking, and it is a source of hypotheses that we can make to understand the physical world." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"Theoretical physics borrows from mathematics (or, if there's none to borrow, they invent new mathematics) in order to create a mathematical roadmap of things that can happen in the real world, in nature. It strives to explain all of the many different phenomena observed in the universe, perhaps ultimately seeking one elegant and economical logical system. However, physicists usually settle for lesser triumphs, in which many physical systems with common and comprehensible behaviors are successfully described. This description is always created in the abstract language of mathematics." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"We have come, in our time, to systematize our understanding of the rules of nature. We say that these rules are the laws of physics. The language of the laws of nature is mathematics. We acknowledge that our understanding of the laws is still incomplete, yet we know how to proceed to enlarge our understanding by means of the 'scientific method' - a logical process of observation and reason that distills the empirically true statements we can make about nature." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

"We often wonder why the more complex systems seem to indicate a preferred direction of time, or an arrow of time, whereas their elementary counterparts do not. […] This has to do with the if-then nature of physics questions. Anything we observe involves laws of motion but also particular initial conditions. […] The initial conditions are what make a situation look peculiar when we time reverse it." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)

On Patterns (1940-1949)

"A mathematician, like a painter or a poet, is a maker of patterns. [...]. The mathematician's patterns, like the painter's or the poet's, must be beautiful; the ideas, like the colours or the words, must fit together in a harmonious way. Beauty is the first test: there is no permanent place in the world for ugly mathematics." (Godfrey H Hardy, "A Mathematician's Apology", 1941)

"It will probably be the new mathematical discoveries which are suggested through physics that will always be the most important, for, from the beginning Nature has led the way and established the pattern which mathematics, the Language of Nature, must follow." (George D Birkhoff, "Mathematical Nature of Physical Theories" American Scientific Vol. 31 (4), 1943)

"One may generalize upon these processes in terms of group equilibrium. The group may be said to be in equilibrium when the interactions of its members fall into the customary pattern through which group activities are and have been organized. The pattern of interactions may undergo certain modifications without upsetting the group equilibrium, but abrupt and drastic changes destroy the equilibrium." (William F Whyte, "Street Corner Society", 1943)

"Those who are content with a positivist conception of the aims of science will feel that he is in an entirely satisfactory position; he has discovered the pattern of events, and so can predict accurately; what more can he want? A mental picture would be an added luxury, but also a useless luxury. For if the picture did not bear any resemblance at all to the reality it would be valueless, and if it did it would be unintelligible […]" (James H Jeans," Physics and Philosophy" 3rd Ed., 1943)

"Without falling into the trap of attempting a precise definition, we may suggest a theory as to the general nature of symbolism, viz. that it is the ability of processes to parallel or imitate each other, or the fact that they can do so since there are recurrent patterns in reality." (Kenneth Craik, "The Nature of Explanation", 1943)

"Science in general […] does not consist in collecting what we already know and arranging it in this or that kind of pattern. It consists in fastening upon something we do not know, and trying to discover it. (Robin G Collingwood, "The Idea of History", 1946)

On Creativity (Mathematics I)

"Creativity is the heart and soul of mathematics at all levels. The collection of special skills and techniques is only the raw material out of which the subject itself grows. To look at mathematics without the creative side of it, is to look at a black-and-white photograph of a Cezanne; outlines may be there, but everything that matters is missing." (Robert C Buck, "Teaching Machines and Mathematics Programs", American Mathematical Monthly 69, 1962)

"There are, roughly speaking, two kinds of mathematical creativity. One, akin to conquering a mountain peak, consists of solving a problem which has remained unsolved for a long time and has commanded the attention of many mathematicians. The other is exploring new territory." (Mark Kac, "Enigmas Of Chance", 1985)

"Music and higher mathematics share some obvious kinship. The practice of both requires a lengthy apprenticeship, talent, and no small amount of grace. Both seem to spring from some mysterious workings of the mind. Logic and system are essential for both, and yet each can reach a height of creativity beyond the merely mechanical." (Frederick Pratter, "How Music and Math Seek Truth in Beauty", Christian Science Monitor, 1995)

"Mathematics is a fascinating discipline that calls for creativity, imagination, and the mastery of rigorous standards of proof." (John Meier & Derek Smith, "Exploring Mathematics: An Engaging Introduction to Proof", 2017)

"Math is the beautiful, rich, joyful, playful, surprising, frustrating, humbling and creative art that speaks to something transcendental. It is worthy of much exploration and examination because it is intrinsically beautiful, nothing more to say. Why play the violin? Because it is beautiful! Why engage in math? Because it too is beautiful!" (James Tanton, "Thinking Mathematics")

"Mathematics is the summit of human thinking. It has all the creativity and imagination that you can find in all kinds of art, but unlike art-charlatans and all kinds of quacks will not succeed there." (Meir Shalev)

"No discovery has been made in mathematics, or anywhere else for that matter, by an effort of deductive logic; it results from the work of creative imagination which builds what seems to be truth, guided sometimes by analogies, sometimes by an esthetic ideal, but which does not hold at all on solid logical bases. Once a discovery is made, logic intervenes to act as a control; it is logic that ultimately decides whether the discovery is really true or is illusory; its role therefore, though considerable, is only secondary." (Henri Lebesgue)

"The essential feature of mathematical creativity is the exploration, under the pressure of powerful implosive forces, of difficult problems for whose validity and importance the explorer is eventually held accountable by reality." (Alfred Adler)

K C Cole - Collected Quotes

"So much of science consists of things we can never see: light ‘waves’ and charged ‘particles’; magnetic ‘fields’ and gravitational ‘forces’; quantum ‘jumps’ and electron ‘orbits’. In fact, none of these phenomena is literally what we say it is. Light waves do not undulate through empty space in the same way that water waves ripple over a still pond; a field is only a mathematical description of the strength and direction of a force; an atom does not literally jump from one quantum state to another, and electrons do not really travel around the atomic nucleus in orbits. The words we use are merely metaphors." (K C Cole, "On Imagining the Unseeable", Discover Magazine, 1982)

"How deep truths can be defined as invariants – things that do not change no matter what; how invariants are defined by symmetries, which in turn define which properties of nature are conserved, no matter what. These are the selfsame symmetries that appeal to the senses in art and music and natural forms like snowflakes and galaxies. The fundamental truths are based on symmetry, and there’s a deep kind of beauty in that. (K C Cole, "The Universe and the Teacup: The Mathematics of Truth and Beauty", 1997) 

"Math has its own inherent logic, its own internal truth. Its beauty lies in its ability to distill the essence of truth without the messy interference of the real world. It’s clean, neat, above it all. It lives in an ideal universe built on the geometer’s perfect circles and polygons, the number theorist’s perfect sets. It matters not that these objects don’t exist in the real world. They are articles of faith." (K C Cole, "The Universe and the Teacup: The Mathematics of Truth and Beauty", 1997)

"Mathematicians do not see their art as a way of simply calculating or ordering reality. They understand that math articulates, manipulates, and discovers reality. In that sense, it’s both a language and a literature; a box of tools and the edifices constructed from them." (K C Cole, "The Universe and the Teacup: The Mathematics of Truth and Beauty", 1997)

"Mathematics can function as a telescope, a microscope, a sieve for sorting out the signal from the noise, a template for pattern perception, a way of seeking and validating truth. […] A knowledge of the mathematics behind our ideas can help us to fool ourselves a little less often, with less drastic consequences." (K C Cole, "The Universe and the Teacup: The Mathematics of Truth and Beauty", 1997)

"Mathematics is a way of thinking that can help make muddy relationships clear. It is a language that allows us to translate the complexity of the world into manageable patterns. In a sense, it works like turning off the houselights in a theater the better to see a movie. Certainly, something is lost when the lights go down; you can no longer see the faces of those around you or the inlaid patterns on the ceiling. But you gain a far better view of the subject at hand." (K C Cole, "The Universe and the Teacup: The Mathematics of Truth and Beauty", 1997)

"Mathematics seems to have astonishing power to tell us how things work, why things are the way they are, and what the universe would tell us if we could only learn to listen. This comes as a surprise from a branch of human activity that is supposed to be abstract, objective, and devoid of sentiment." (K C Cole, "The Universe and the Teacup: The Mathematics of Truth and Beauty", 1997)

"One of the main reasons that large numbers grow so explosively is that multiplication is a powerful engine for growth - even when the only number you happen to be multiplying is insignificantly puny, like the number two."  (K C Cole, "The Universe and the Teacup: The Mathematics of Truth and Beauty", 1997)

"Another limit imposed by reality is its sheer complexity, which makes it impossible to predict some ordinary things (like weather) at the same time that it’s possible to predict truly extraordinary things (like the fate of the universe)." (K C Cole, "The Universe and the Teacup: The Mathematics of Truth and Beauty", 1997)

"Abstractions are a way to distill the essence from an otherwise unfathomable situation." (K C Cole, "First You Build a Cloud and Other Reflections on Physics as a Way of Life", 1999)

"Imagining the unseeable is hard, because imagining means having an image in your mind. And how can you have a mental image of something you have never seen? Like perception itself, the models of science are embedded inextricably in the current worldview we call culture." (K C Cole, "First You Build a Cloud and Other Reflections on Physics as a Way of Life", 1999)

"Science [...] involves looking mostly at things we can never see." (K C Cole, "First You Build a Cloud and Other Reflections on Physics as a Way of Life", 1999)

"The abstractions of science are stereotypes, as two-dimensional and as potentially misleading as everyday stereotypes. And yet they are as necessary to the process of understanding as filtering is to the process of perception." (K C Cole, "First You Build a Cloud and Other Reflections on Physics as a Way of Life", 1999)

"The subjects of science are not only often unseeable; they are also untouchable, unmeasurable, and sometimes even unimaginable." (K C Cole, "First You Build a Cloud and Other Reflections on Physics as a Way of Life", 1999)

"If two quantum particles are entangled, they become, in effect, two parts of a single unit. What happens to one entangled particle happens to the other, no matter how far apart they are." (K C Cole, "Wormholes Untangle a Black Hole Paradox", 2015) [source] 

"Like many a maturing beauty, string theory has gotten rich in relationships, complicated, hard to handle and widely influential. Its tentacles have reached so deeply into so many areas in theoretical physics, it’s become almost unrecognizable, even to string theorists." (K C Cole, "The Strange Second Life of String Theory", Quanta Magazine", 2016) [source] 

"String theory today looks almost fractal. The more closely people explore any one corner, the more structure they find. Some dig deep into particular crevices; others zoom out to try to make sense of grander patterns. The upshot is that string theory today includes much that no longer seems stringy. Those tiny loops of string whose harmonics were thought to breathe form into every particle and force known to nature (including elusive gravity) hardly even appear anymore on chalkboards at conferences." (K C Cole, "The Strange Second Life of String Theory", Quanta Magazine", 2016) [source]

"[…] Einstein showed, for 'stuff' like space and time, seemingly stable, unchangeable aspects of nature; in truth, it’s the relationship between space and time that always stays the same, even as space contracts and time dilates. Like energy and matter, space and time are mutable manifestations of deeper, unshakable foundations: the things that never vary no matter what." (K C Cole, "The Simple Idea Behind Einstein’s Greatest Discoveries", Quanta Magazine, 2019) [source] 

On Technology III

"Technology means the systematic application of scientific or other organized knowledge to practical tasks." (John K Galbraith, "The New Industrial State", 1967)

"Networks constitute the new social morphology of our societies, and the diffusion of networking logic substantially modifies the operation and outcomes in processes of production, experience, power, and culture. While the networking form of social organization has existed in other times and spaces, the new information technology paradigm provides the material basis for its pervasive expansion throughout the entire social structure." (Manuel Castells, "The Rise of the Network Society", 1996)

"Beauty is more important in computing than anywhere else in technology because software is so complicated. Beauty is the ultimate defense against complexity." (David Gelernter, "Machine Beauty: Elegance And The Heart Of Technolog", 1998)

"Modelling techniques on powerful computers allow us to simulate the behaviour of complex systems without having to understand them.  We can do with technology what we cannot do with science.  […] The rise of powerful technology is not an unconditional blessing.  We have  to deal with what we do not understand, and that demands new  ways of thinking." (Paul Cilliers,"Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems", 1998)

"A primary reason that evolution - of life-forms or technology - speeds up is that it builds on its own increasing order." (Ray Kurzweil, "The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence", 1999) 

"As systems became more varied and more complex, we find that no single methodology suffices to deal with them. This is particularly true of what may be called information intelligent systems - systems which form the core of modern technology. To conceive, design, analyze and use such systems we frequently have to employ the totality of tools that are available. Among such tools are the techniques centered on fuzzy logic, neurocomputing, evolutionary computing, probabilistic computing and related methodologies. It is this conclusion that formed the genesis of the concept of soft computing." (Lotfi A Zadeh, "The Birth and Evolution of Fuzzy Logic: A personal perspective", 1999)

"We do not learn much from looking at a model - we learn more from building the model and manipulating it. Just as one needs to use or observe the use of a hammer in order to really understand its function, similarly, models have to be used before they will give up their secrets. In this sense, they have the quality of a technology - the power of the model only becomes apparent in the context of its use." (Margaret Morrison & Mary S Morgan, "Models as mediating instruments", 1999)

"Periods of rapid change and high exponential growth do not, typically, last long. A new equilibrium with a new dominant technology and/or competitor is likely to be established before long. Periods of punctuation are therefore exciting and exhibit unusual uncertainty. The payoff from establishing a dominant position in this short time is therefore extraordinarily high. Dominance is more likely to come from skill in marketing and positioning than from superior technology itself." (Richar Koch, "The Power Laws", 2000)

"Mythology and science both extend the scope of human beings. Like science and technology, mythology, as we shall see, is not about opting out of this world, but about enabling us to live more intensely within it." (Karen Armstrong, "A Short History Of Myth", 2004)

"In an age when technology is integrating us more tightly together and delivering tremendous flows of innovation, knowledge, connectivity and commerce, the future belongs to those who build webs not walls, who can integrate not separate, to get the most out of these flows." (Thomas L Friedman, The New York Times, 2016)

On Chaos IV

"One of the central problems studied by mankind is the problem of the succession of form. Whatever is the ultimate nature of reality (assuming that this expression has meaning), it is indisputable that our universe is not chaos. We perceive beings, objects, things to which we give names. These beings or things are forms or structures endowed with a degree of stability; they take up some part of space and last for some period of time." (René Thom, "Structural Stability and Morphogenesis", 1972)

"'Disorder' is not mere chaos; it implies defective order." (John M Ziman, "Models of Disorder", 1979)

"Chaos and catastrophe theories are among the most interesting recent developments in nonlinear modeling, and both have captured the interests of scientists in many disciplines. It is only natural that social scientists should be concerned with these theories. Linear statistical models have proven very useful in a great deal of social scientific empirical analyses, as is evidenced by how widely these models have been used for a number of decades. However, there is no apparent reason, intuitive or otherwise, as to why human behavior should be more linear than the behavior of other things, living and nonliving. Thus an intellectual movement toward nonlinear models is an appropriate evolutionary movement in social scientific thinking, if for no other reason than to expand our paradigmatic boundaries by encouraging greater flexibility in our algebraic specifications of all aspects of human life." (Courtney Brown, "Chaos and Catastrophe Theories", 1995)

"[...] chaos and catastrophe theories per se address behavioral phenomena that are consequences of two general types of nonlinear dynamic behavior. In the most elementary of behavioral terms, chaotic phenomena are a class of deterministic processes that seem to mimic random or stochastic dynamics. Catastrophe phenomena, on the other hand, are a class of dynamic processes that exhibit a sudden and large scale change in at least one variable in correspondence with relatively small changes in other variables or, in some cases, parameters." (Courtney Brown, "Chaos and Catastrophe Theories", 1995)

"Nature normally hates power laws. In ordinary systems all quantities follow bell curves, and correlations decay rapidly, obeying exponential laws. But all that changes if the system is forced to undergo a phase transition. Then power laws emerge-nature's unmistakable sign that chaos is departing in favor of order. The theory of phase transitions told us loud and clear that the road from disorder to order is maintained by the powerful forces of self-organization and is paved by power laws. It told us that power laws are not just another way of characterizing a system's behavior. They are the patent signatures of self-organization in complex systems." (Albert-László Barabási, "Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life", 2002)

"Chaos is not pure disorder, it carries within itself the indistinctness between the potentialities of order, of disorder, and of organization from which a cosmos will be born, which is an ordered universe." (Edgar Morin, "Restricted Complexity, General Complexity" [in (Carlos Gershenson et al [Eds.], "Worldviews, Science and Us: Philosophy and Complexity", 2007)])

"Chaos can be understood as a dynamical process in which microscopic information hidden in the details of a system’s state is dug out and expanded to a macroscopically visible scale (stretching), while the macroscopic information visible in the current system’s state is continuously discarded (folding)." (Hiroki Sayama, "Introduction to the Modeling and Analysis of Complex Systems", 2015)

"God has put a secret art into the forces of Nature so as to enable it to fashion itself out of chaos into a perfect world system." (Immanuel Kant)

"Science, like art, music and poetry, tries to reduce chaos to the clarity and order of pure beauty." (Detlev W Bronk)

David Stipp - Collected Quotes

"A transcendental number is defined as a number that isn’t the solution of any polynomial equation with integer constants times the x’s." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"At first glance, the number e, known in mathematics as Euler’s number, doesn’t seem like much. It’s about 2.7, a quantity of such modest size that it invites contempt in our age of wretched excess and relentless hype." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Bombelli’s discovery showed that it was necessary to treat apparently meaningless imaginary-number-based solutions as legitimate numbers in order to find such hidden real-number solutions. That meant the imaginaries could no longer be cavalierly pig-troughed." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"But e is not to be trifled with. It’s one of math’s most versatile superheroes. To begin with, it’s uniquely valuable for mathematically representing growth or shrinkage. That alone makes it a standout. In fact, e’s usefulness for dealing with problems related to the growth of savings via compound interest is what brought about its discovery in the 1600s." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"But here’s a curious thing about modest little e that sets it apart from bombastic numbers that end in scads of zeros: no matter how long you allow the computer to crank away with ever larger numbers for n, you’ll never be able to calculate its exact numerical value. That’s because the digits to the right of e’s decimal point go on forever in a random pattern - Euler actually established this in 1737. In other words, e effectively encapsulates the infinite." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"But the number i is special for a decidedly different sort of reason - it’s math’s version of the ugly duckling. [...] The geometric interpretation of e^iπ is rich with emblematic potential. You could see its suggestion of a 180-degree spin as standing for a soldier’s about-face, a ballet dancer’s half pirouette, a turnaround jump shot, the movement of someone setting out on a long journey who looks back to wave farewell, the motion of the sun from dawn to dusk, the changing of the seasons from winter to summer, the turning of the tide. You could also associate it with turning the tables on someone, a reversal of fortune, turning one’s life around, the transformation of Dr. Jekyll into Mr. Hyde (and vice versa), the pivoting away from loss or regret to face the future, the ugly duckling becoming a beauty, drought giving way to rain. You might even interpret its highlighting of opposites as an allusion to elemental dualities—shadow and light, birth and death, yin and yang." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Clearly e is different from child-safe numbers such as four or 10, which wouldn’t dream of inducing sudden loss of cranial integrity. But this wantonness isn’t peculiar to e. In fact, the number line is chock full of numbers, like e, whose decimal representations are effectively infinite. They’re called irrational numbers." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Euler’s general formula, e^iθ = cos θ + i sin θ, also played a role in bringing about the happy ending of the imaginaries’ ugly duckling story. [...] Euler showed that e raised to an imaginary-number power can be turned into the sines and cosines of trigonometry." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"First, let me frame what I’m calling beautiful. It’s not simply the equation’s neat little string of symbols. Rather, it’s the entire nimbus of meaning surrounding the formula, including its funneling of many concepts into a statement of stunning brevity, its arresting combination of apparent simplicity and hidden complexity, the way its derivation bridges disparate topics in mathematics, and the fact that it’s rich with implications, some of which weren’t apparent until many years after it was proved to be true. I think most mathematicians would agree that the equation’s beauty concerns something like this nimbus." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"However, in contrast to one, which is singularly straightforward, zero is secretly peculiar. If you pierce the obscuring haze of familiarity around it, you’ll see that it is a quantitative entity that, curiously, is really the absence of quantity. It took people a long time to get their minds around that." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"In short, infinity is like a colossal dragon that’s known for inducing madness in those who dare to stare hard at it but which is also known for making an honest living by traveling around the countryside and hiring itself out to pull farmers’ plows." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"[...] mathematicians are always trying to think their way out of boxes." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Negative numbers posed some of the same quandaries that the imaginary numbers did to Renaissance mathematicians - they didn’t seem to correspond to quantities associated with physical objects or geometrical figures. But they proved less conceptually challenging than the imaginaries. For instance, negative numbers can be thought of as monetary debts, providing a readily grasped way to make sense of them." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Raising e to an imaginary-number power can be pictured as a rotation operation in the complex plane. Applying this interpretation to e raised to the "i times π" power means that Euler’s formula can be pictured in geometric terms as modeling a half-circle rotation." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Since it’s impossible to express an irrational number such as π as a fraction, the quest for a fraction equal to π could never be successful. Ancient mathematicians didn’t know that, however. As noted above, it wasn’t until the eighteenth century that the irrationality of π was demonstrated. Their labors weren’t in vain, though. While enthusiastically pursuing their fundamentally doomed enterprise, they developed a lot of interesting mathematics as well as impressively accurate approximations of π." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"The association of multiplication with vector rotation was one of the geometric interpretation's most important elements because it decisively connected the imaginaries with rotary motion. As we'll see, that was a big deal." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"[…] the equation’s five seemingly unrelated numbers (e, i, π, 1, and 0) fit neatly together in the formula like contiguous puzzle pieces. One might think that a cosmic carpenter had jig-sawed them one day and mischievously left them conjoined on Euler’s desk as a tantalizing hint of the unfathomable connectedness of things.[…] when the three enigmatic numbers are combined in this form, e^iπ, they react together to carve out a wormhole that spirals through the infinite depths of number space to emerge smack dab in the heartland of integers." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"The fact that multiplying positive 4i times positive 4i yields negative 16 seems like saying that the friend of my friend is my enemy. Which in turn suggests that bad things would happen if i and its offspring were granted citizenship in the number world. Unlike real numbers, which always feel friendly toward the friends of their friends, the i-things would plainly be subject to insane fits of jealousy, causing them to treat numbers that cozy up to their friends as threats. That might cause a general breakdown of numerical civility." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"The most remarkable thing about π, however, is the way it turns up all over the place in math, including in calculations that seem to have nothing to do with circles." (David Stipp, “A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics”, 2017)

"[…] the story of π is the deeply ironic tale of one thinker after another trying to nail down the size of a number that is fundamentally immeasurable. (Because it’s irrational.)" (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"The trig functions’ input consists of the sizes of angles inside right triangles. Their output consists of the ratios of the lengths of the triangles’ sides. Thus, they act as if they contained phone-directory-like groups of paired entries, one of which is an angle, and the other is a ratio of triangle-side lengths associated with the angle. That makes them very useful for figuring out the dimensions of triangles based on limited information." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"The very idea of raising a number to an imaginary power may well have seemed to most of the era’s mathematicians like asking the ghost of a late amphibian to jump up on a harpsichord and play a minuet." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Then there’s the fact that if you treat infinity like a number and try to do arithmetic with it, you soon find yourself drawing wacky-sounding conclusions like 'infinity plus infinity is equal to infinity, and therefore infinity is twice as big as itself'." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Thus, while feelings may be the essence of subjectivity, they are by no means part of our weaker nature - the valences they automatically generate are integral to our thought processes and without them we’d simply be lost. In particular, we’d have no sense of beauty at all, much less be able to feel (there’s that word again) that we’re in the presence of beauty when contemplating a work such as Euler’s formula. After all, e^iπ + 1 = 0 can give people limbic-triggered goosebumps when they first peer with understanding into its depths." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Today it’s easy to see the beauty of i, thanks, among other things, to its prominence in mathematics’ most beautiful equation. Thus, it may seem strange that it was once regarded as akin to a small waddling gargoyle. Indeed, the simplicity of its definition suggests unpretentious elegance: i is just the square root of −1. But as with many definitions in mathematics, i’s is fraught with provocative implications, and the ones that made it a star in mathematics weren’t apparent until long after it first came on the scene." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Today, Euler’s formula is a tool as basic to electrical engineers and physicists as the spatula is to short-order cooks. It’s arguable that the formula’s ability to simplify the design and analysis of circuits contributed to the accelerating pace of electrical innovation during the twentieth century." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Zero seems as diaphanous as a fairy’s wing, yet it is as powerful as a black hole. The obverse of infinity, it’s enthroned at the center of the number line - at least as the line is usually drawn - making it a natural center of attention. It has no effect when added to other numbers, as if it were no more substantial than a fleeting thought. But when multiplied times other numbers it seems to exert uncanny power, inexorably sucking them in and making them vanish into itself at the center of things. If you’re into stark simplicity, you can express any number (that is, any number that’s capable of being written out) with the use of zero and just one other number, one." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Wessel and his fellow explorers had discovered the natural habitat of Leibniz’s ghostly amphibians: the complex plane. Once the imaginaries were pictured there, it became clear that their meaning could be anchored to a familiar thing - sideways or rotary motion - giving them an ontological heft they’d never had before. Their association with rotation also meant that they could be conceptually tied to another familiar idea: oscillation." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"[…] when the three enigmatic numbers are combined in this form, e^iπ, they react together to carve out a wormhole that spirals through the infinite depths of number space to emerge smack dab in the heartland of integers." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Yet mathematicians have been drawn to infinity through the ages like moths to flames.[…] once you get hooked on something that’s infinite, you just can’t stop." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

Complex Systems VI

"In short, complex adaptive systems are characterized by perpetual novelty." (M Mitchell Waldrop, "Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos", 1992)

"[...] it's essentially meaningless to talk about a complex adaptive system being in equilibrium: the system can never get there. It is always unfolding, always in transition. In fact, if the system ever does reach equilibrium, it isn't just stable. It's dead." (M Mitchell Waldrop, "Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos", 1992)

"If universality is one of the observed characteristics of complex dynamical systems in many fields of study, a second characteristic that flows from the study of these systems is that of emergence. As self-organizing systems go about their daily business, they are constantly exchanging matter and energy with their environment, and this allows them to remain in a state that is far from equilibrium. That allows spontaneous behavior to give rise to new patterns." (Terry Cooke-Davies et al, "Exploring the Complexity of Projects", 2009)

"The difference between complex adaptive systems and self-organizing systems is that the former have the capacity to learn from their experience, and thus to embody successful patterns into their repertoire, although there is actually quite a deep relationship between self-organizing systems and complex adaptive systems. Adaptive entities can emerge at high levels of description in simple self-organizing systems, i.e., adaptive systems are not necessarily self-organizing systems with something extra thrown in." (Terry Cooke-Davies et al, "Exploring the Complexity of Projects", 2009)

"Most systems in nature are inherently nonlinear and can only be described by nonlinear equations, which are difficult to solve in a closed form. Non-linear systems give rise to interesting phenomena such as chaos, complexity, emergence and self-organization. One of the characteristics of non-linear systems is that a small change in the initial conditions can give rise to complex and significant changes throughout the system. This property of a non-linear system such as the weather is known as the butterfly effect where it is purported that a butterfly flapping its wings in Japan can give rise to a tornado in Kansas. This unpredictable behaviour of nonlinear dynamical systems, i.e. its extreme sensitivity to initial conditions, seems to be random and is therefore referred to as chaos. This chaotic and seemingly random behaviour occurs for non-linear deterministic system in which effects can be linked to causes but cannot be predicted ahead of time." (Robert K Logan, "The Poetry of Physics and The Physics of Poetry", 2010)

"Complex systems seem to have this property, with large periods of apparent stasis marked by sudden and catastrophic failures. These processes may not literally be random, but they are so irreducibly complex (right down to the last grain of sand) that it just won’t be possible to predict them beyond a certain level. […] And yet complex processes produce order and beauty when you zoom out and look at them from enough distance." (Nate Silver, "The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail-but Some Don't", 2012)

"We forget - or we willfully ignore - that our models are simplifications of the world. We figure that if we make a mistake, it will be at the margin. In complex systems, however, mistakes are not measured in degrees but in whole orders of magnitude." (Nate Silver, "The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail-but Some Don't", 2012)

"If an emerging system is born complex, there is neither leeway to abandon it when it fails, nor the means to join another, successful one. Such a system would be caught in an immovable grip, congested at the top, and prevented, by a set of confusing but locked–in precepts, from changing." (Lawrence K Samuels, "Defense of Chaos: The Chaology of Politics, Economics and Human Action", 2013) 

"Simplicity in a system tends to increase that system’s efficiency. Because less can go wrong with fewer parts, less will. Complexity in a system tends to increase that system’s inefficiency; the greater the number of variables, the greater the probability of those variables clashing, and in turn, the greater the potential for conflict and disarray. Because more can go wrong, more will. That is why centralized systems are inclined to break down quickly and become enmeshed in greater unintended consequences." (Lawrence K Samuels,"Defense of Chaos: The Chaology of Politics, Economics and Human Action", 2013)

"One of the remarkable features of these complex systems created by replicator dynamics is that infinitesimal differences in starting positions create vastly different patterns. This sensitive dependence on initial conditions is often called the butterfly-effect aspect of complex systems - small changes in the replicator dynamics or in the starting point can lead to enormous differences in outcome, and they change one’s view of how robust the current reality is. If it is complex, one small change could have led to a reality that is quite different." (David Colander & Roland Kupers, "Complexity and the art of public policy : solving society’s problems from the bottom up", 2014)

George Santayana - Collected Quotes

"Symmetry is evidently a kind of unity in variety, where a whole is determined by the rhythmic repetition of similar." (George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty: Being the Outlines of Aesthetic Theory", 1896)

"The scientific value of truth is not, however, ultimate or absolute. It rests partly on practical, partly on aesthetic interests. As our ideas are gradually brought into conformity with the facts by the painful process of selection, - for intuition runs equally into truth and into error, and can settle nothing if not controlled by experience, - we gain vastly in our command over our environment. This is the fundamental value of natural science." (George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty: Being the Outlines of Aesthetic Theory", 1896)

"No system would have ever been framed if people had been simply interested in knowing what is true, whatever it may be. What produces systems is the interest in maintaining against all comers that some favourite or inherited idea of ours is sufficient and right. A system may contain an account of many things which, in detail, are true enough; but as a system, covering infinite possibilities that neither our experience nor our logic can prejudge, it must be a work of imagination and a piece of human soliloquy: It may be expressive of human experience, it may be poetical; but how should anyone who really coveted truth suppose that it was true?" (George Santayana, "The Genteel Tradition in American Philosophy", 1911)

"If all the arts aspire to the condition of music, all the sciences aspire to the condition of mathematics." (George Santayana, Some Turns of Thought in Modern Philosophy: Five Essays, 1933)

"[…] mathematics is like music, freely exploring the possibilities of form. And yet, notoriously, mathematics holds true of things; hugs and permeates them far more closely than does confused and inconstant human perception; so that the dream of many exasperated critics of human error has been to assimilate all science to mathematics, so as to make knowledge safe by making it, as Locke wished, direct perception of the relations between ideas […]" (George Santayana, "The Realm of Truth: Book Third of Realms of Being", 1937)

"Science, then, is the attentive consideration of common experience; it is common knowledge extended and refined. Its validity is of the same order as that of ordinary perception; memory, and understanding. Its test is found, like theirs, in actual intuition, which sometimes consists in perception and sometimes in intent." (George Santayana, "The Life of Reason, or the Phases of Human Progress", 1954)

 "Theory helps us to bear our ignorance of facts." (George Santayana)

On Linearity I

"Today it is no longer questioned that the principles of the analysts are the more far-reaching. Indeed, the synthesists lack two things in order to engage in a general theory of algebraic configurations: these are on the one hand a definition of imaginary elements, on the other an interpretation of general algebraic concepts. Both of these have subsequently been developed in synthetic form, but to do this the essential principle of synthetic geometry had to be set aside. This principle which manifests itself so brilliantly in the theory of linear forms and the forms of the second degree, is the possibility of immediate proof by means of visualized constructions." (Felix Klein, "Riemannsche Flächen", 1906)

"The conception of tensors is possible owing to the circumstance that the transition from one co-ordinate system to another expresses itself as a linear transformation in the differentials. One here uses the exceedingly fruitful mathematical device of making a problem 'linear' by reverting to infinitely small quantities." (Hermann Weyl, "Space - Time - Matter", 1922)

"Any organism must be treated as-a-whole; in other words, that an organism is not an algebraic sum, a linear function of its elements, but always more than that. It is seemingly little realized, at present, that this simple and innocent-looking statement involves a full structural revision of our language […]" (Alfred Korzybski, "Science and Sanity", 1933)

"Beauty had been born, not, as we so often conceive it nowadays, as an ideal of humanity, but as measure, as the reduction of the chaos of appearances to the precision of linear symbols. Symmetry, balance, harmonic division, mated and mensurated intervals - such were its abstract characteristics." (Herbert E Read, "Icon and Idea", 1955)

"We've seen that even in the simplest situations nonlinearities can interfere with a linear approach to aggregates. That point holds in general: nonlinear interactions almost always make the behavior of the aggregate more complicated than would be predicted by summing or averaging." (Lewis Mumford, "The Myth of the Machine" Vol 1, 1967)

"It is sometimes said that the great discovery of the nineteenth century was that the equations of nature were linear, and the great discovery of the twentieth century is that they are not." (Thomas W Körner, "Fourier Analysis", 1988)

"A major clash between economics and ecology derives from the fact that nature is cyclical, whereas our industrial systems are linear. Our businesses take resources, transform them into products plus waste, and sell the products to consumers, who discard more waste […]" (Fritjof Capra, "The Web of Life", 1996)

"The first idea is that human progress is exponential (that is, it expands by repeatedly multiplying by a constant) rather than linear (that is, expanding by repeatedly adding a constant). Linear versus exponential: Linear growth is steady; exponential growth becomes explosive." (Ray Kurzweil, "The Singularity is Near", 2005)

"Without precise predictability, control is impotent and almost meaningless. In other words, the lesser the predictability, the harder the entity or system is to control, and vice versa. If our universe actually operated on linear causality, with no surprises, uncertainty, or abrupt changes, all future events would be absolutely predictable in a sort of waveless orderliness." (Lawrence K Samuels, "Defense of Chaos: The Chaology of Politics, Economics and Human Action", 2013)

"There is no linear additive process that, if all the parts are taken together, can be understood to create the total system that occurs at the moment of self-organization; it is not a quantity that comes into being. It is not predictable in its shape or subsequent behavior or its subsequent qualities. There is a nonlinear quality that comes into being at the moment of synchronicity." (Stephen H Buhner, "Plant Intelligence and the Imaginal Realm: Beyond the Doors of Perception into the Dreaming of Earth", 2014)

On Engineering VI

"Can one think that because we are engineers, beauty does not preoccupy us or that we do not try to build beautiful, as well as solid and long lasting structures? Aren’t the genuine functions of strength always in keeping with unwritten conditions of harmony? [...] Besides, there is an attraction, a special charm in the colossal to which ordinary theories of art do not apply." (Gustave Eiffel, [interview in 'Le Temps'] 1887)

"The characteristic feature of our age results from the wedding of science and engineering. It is the working together of disciplined curiosity and purposeful ingenuity to create new materials, new forces, and new opportunities which powerfully affect our manner of living and ways of thinking." (Karl T Compton, "A Scientist Speaks: Excerpts from Addresses by Karl Taylor Compton - During the Years 1930-1949", 1955)

"[An engineer's] invention causes things to come into existence from ideas, makes world conform to thought; whereas science, by deriving ideas from observation, makes thought conform to existence." (Carl Mitcham, "Types of Technology", Research in Philosophy & Technology Vol. 1, 1978)

"Engineers use knowledge primarily to design, produce, and operate artifacts. [...] Scientists, by contrast, use knowledge primarily to generate more knowledge." (Walter Vincenti, What Engineers Know and How They Know It, 1990)

"Engineering is quite different from science. Scientists try to understand nature. Engineers try to make things that do not exist in nature. Engineers stress invention. To embody an invention the engineer must put his idea in concrete terms, and design something that people can use. That something can be a device, a gadget, a material, a method, a computing program, an innovative experiment, a new solution to a problem, or an improvement on what is existing. Since a design has to be concrete, it must have its geometry, dimensions, and characteristic numbers. Almost all engineers working on new designs find that they do not have all the needed information. Most often, they are limited by insufficient scientific knowledge. Thus they study mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology and mechanics. Often they have to add to the sciences relevant to their profession. Thus engineering sciences are born." (Yuan-Cheng Fung & Pin Tong, "Classical and Computational Solid Mechanics", 2001)

"Engineering isn't about perfect solutions; it's about doing the best you can with limited resources." (Randy Pausch, "The Last Lecture", 2008)

"The central activity of engineering, as distinguished from science, is the design of new devices, processes and systems." (Myron Tribus, "Rational Descriptions, Decisions and Designs", 2016)

"Engineering is a living branch of human activity and its frontiers are by no means exhausted." (Igor I Sikorsky)

"Engineering is not merely knowing and being knowledgeable, like a walking encyclopedia; engineering is not merely analysis; engineering is not merely the possession of the capacity to get elegant solutions to non-existent engineering problems; engineering is practicing the art of the organizing forces of technological change. [...] Engineers operate at the interface between science and society." (Gordon S Brown)

"The scientist describes what is; the engineer creates what never was." (Theodore von Kármán)

From Parts to Wholes (Unsourced)

"By the word symmetry […] one thinks of an external relationship between pleasing parts of a whole; mostly the word is used to refer to parts arranged regularly against one another around a centre. We have […] observed [these parts] one after the other, not always like following like, but rather a raising up from below, a strength out of weakness, a beauty out of ordinariness." (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe)

"Every part is disposed to unite with the whole, that it may thereby escape from its own incompleteness." (Leonardo Da Vinci)

"If nature leads to mathematical forms of great simplicity and beauty - to forms that no one has previously encountered - we cannot help thinking that they are true and that they revealed genuine features of Nature." (Werner K Heisenberg)

"There is a fundamental error in separating the parts from the whole, the mistake of atomizing what should not be atomized. Unity and complementarity constitute reality." (Werner Heisenberg)

"The part always has a tendency to reunite with its whole in order to escape from its imperfection." (Leonardo Da Vinci)

"The whole is simpler than its parts." (Josiah W Gibbs)

"Whatever Nature undertakes, she can only accomplish it in a sequence. She never makes a leap. For example she could not produce a horse if it were not preceded by all the other animals on which she ascends to the horse’s structure as if on the rungs of a ladder. Thus every one thing exists for the sake of all things and all for the sake of one; for the one is of course the all as well. Nature, despite her seeming diversity, is always a unity, a whole; and thus, when she manifests herself in any part of that whole, the rest must serve as a basis for that particular manifestation, and the latter must have a relationship to the rest of the system." (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe)

From Parts to Wholes (1850-1899)

"The world of ideas which it [mathematics] discloses or illuminates, the contemplation of divine beauty and order which it induces, the harmonious connection of its parts, the infinite hierarchy and absolute evidence of the truths with which mathematical science is concerned, these, and such like, are the surest groimds of its title of human regard, and would remain unimpaired were the plan of the universe unrolled like a map at our feet, and the mind of man qualified to take in the whole scheme of creation at a glance.” (James J Sylvester, "A Plea for the Mathematician", Nature 1, 1870)

"Nature creates unity even in the parts of a whole." (Eugène Delacroix, 1857)

"Analysis and synthesis, though commonly treated as two different methods, are, if properly understood, only the two necessary parts of the same method. Each is the relative and correlative of the other. Analysis, without a subsequent synthesis, is incomplete; it is a mean cut of from its end. Synthesis, without a previous analysis, is baseless; for synthesis receives from analysis the elements which it recomposes." (Sir William Hamilton, "Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic: 6th Lecture on Metaphysics", 1858)

"[…] the besetting danger is not so much of embracing falsehood for truth, as of mistaking a part of the truth for the whole." (John S Mill, "Dissertations and Discussions: Political, Philosophical, and Historical”, 1859)

"We have repeatedly observed that while any whole is evolving, there is always going on an evolution of the parts into which it divides itself; but we have not observed that this equally holds of the totality of things, which is made up of parts within parts from the greatest down to the smallest." (Herbert Spencer, "First Principles", 1862)

"The adaptation observed in men, animals and plants [...] one part of this adaptation is explained from a thought-process in the interior of these bodies [...] another part, however, the adaptation of the organism, by a thought-process in a greater whole." (Bernhard Riemann, Gesammelte Mathematische Werke, 1876)

"All things, man included, are parts of one great whole." (Richard M Bucke, "Man's Moral Nature", 1879)

"The old and oft-repeated proposition ‘Totum est majus sua parte’ [the whole is larger than the part] may be applied without proof only in the case of entities that are based upon whole and part; then and only then is it an undeniable consequence of the concepts ‘totum’ and ‘pars’. Unfortunately, however, this ‘axiom’ is used innumerably often without any basis and in neglect of the necessary distinction between ‘reality’ and ‘quantity’, on the one hand, and ‘nnumbe’ and ‘set’, on the other, precisely in the sense in which it is generally false." (Georg Cantor, "Über unendliche, lineare Punktmannigfaltigkeiten", Mathematische Annalen 20, 1882)

"The part always has a tendency to reunite with its whole in order to escape from its imperfection." (Leonardo Da Vinci, "The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci", 1888)

From Parts to Wholes (1900-1909)

"And as the ideal in the whole of Nature moves in an infinite process toward an Absolute Perfection, we may say that art is in strict truth the apotheosis of Nature. Art is thus at once the exaltation of the natural toward its destined supernatural perfection, and the investiture of the Absolute Beauty with the reality of natural existence. Its work is consequently not a means to some higher end, but is itself a final aim; or, as we may otherwise say, art is its own end. It is not a mere recreation for man, a piece of by-play in human life, but is an essential mode of spiritual activity, the lack of which would be a falling short of the destination of man. It is itself part and parcel of man's eternal vocation." (George H Howison, "The Limits of Evolution, and Other Essays, Illustrating the Metaphysical Theory of Personal Idealism", 1901) 

"Mathematical science is in my opinion an indivisible whole, an organism whose vitality is conditioned upon the connection of its parts. For with all the variety of mathematical knowledge, we are still clearly conscious of the similarity of the logical devices, the relationship of the ideas in mathematics as a whole and the numerous analogies in its different departments." (David Hilbert, "Mathematical Problems", Bulletin American Mathematical Society Vol. 8, 1901-1902)

"For if society lacks the unity that derives from the fact that the relationships between its parts are exactly regulated, that unity resulting from the harmonious articulation of its various functions assured by effective discipline and if, in addition, society lacks the unity based upon the commitment of men's wills to a common objective, then it is no more than a pile of sand that the least jolt or the slightest puff will suffice to scatter.“ (Émile Durkheim, 1903)

"From that time, the universe has steadily become more complex and less reducible to a central control. With as much obstinacy as though it were human, it has insisted on expanding its parts; with as much elusiveness as though it were feminine, it has evaded the attempt to impose on it a single will. Modern science, like modern art, tends, in practice, to drop the dogma of organic unity. Some of the mediaeval habit of mind survives, but even that is said to be yielding before the daily evidence of increasing and extending complexity. The fault, then, was not in man, if he no longer looked at science or art as an organic whole or as the expression of unity. Unity turned itself into complexity, multiplicity, variety, and even contradiction." (Henry Adams, "Mont Saint Michel and Chartres", 1904)

"Reduced to their most pregnant difference, empiricism means the habit of explaining wholes by parts, and rationalism means the habit of explaining parts by wholes. Rationalism thus preserves affinities with monism, since wholeness goes with union, while empiricism inclines to pluralistic views. No philosophy can ever be anything but a summary sketch, a picture of the world in abridgment, a foreshortened bird's-eye view of the perspective of events. And the first thing to notice is this, that the only material we have at our disposal for making a picture of the whole world is supplied by the various portions of that world of which we have already had experience. We can invent no new forms of conception, applicable to the whole exclusively, and not suggested originally by the parts." (William James, "A Pluralistic Universe", 1908)

"A system is a whole which is composed of various parts. But it is not the same thing as an aggregate or heap. In an aggregate or heap, no essential relation exists between the units of which it is composed. In a heap of grain, or pile of stones, one may take away part without the other part being at all affected thereby. But in a system, each part has a fixed and necessary relation to the whole and to all the other parts. For this reason we may say that a building, or a peace of mechanisme, is a system. Each stone in the building, each wheel in the watch, plays a part, and is essential to the whole." (James E Creighton, "An Introductory Logic"‎, 1909)

On Spacetime (1875-1899)

"With every simple act of thinking, something permanent, substantial, enters our soul. This substantial somewhat appears to us as a unit but (in so far as it is the expression of something extended in space and time) it seems to contain an inner manifoldness; I therefore name it ‘mind-mass’. All thinking is, accordingly, formation of new mind masses." (Bernhard Riemann," Gesammelte Mathematische Werke", 1876)

"In infinite time, in infinite matter, in infinite space, is formed a bubble organism, and that bubble lasts a while and bursts, and that bubble is Me." (Lev Tolstoy, "Anna Karenina", 1877)

"She [Nature] works with reference to no measure of time, no limit of space, and with an abundance of material not expressed by exhaustless." (John Burroughs, "Birds and Poets With Other Papers", 1884)

"Time is but the space between our memories; as soon as we cease to perceive this space, time has disappeared." (Henri-Frédéric Amiel, "Amiel's Journal", 1884)

"We may conceive our space to have everywhere a nearly uniform curvature, but that slight variations of the curvature may occur from point to point, and themselves vary with the time. These variations of the curvature with the time may produce effects which we not unnaturally attribute to physical causes independent of the geometry of our space. We might even go so far as to assign to this variation of the curvature of space 'what really happens in that phenomenon which we term the motion of matter'." (William K Clifford, Richard C Rowe & Karl Pearson,"The Common Sense of the Exact Sciences", 1885) 

"Properly speaking the world is not composed of 'things' as its elements, but colors, tones, pressures, spaces, times, in short what we ordinarily call individual sensations." (Ernst Mach, "The Science of Mechanics", 1893)

"Modern mathematics, that most astounding of intellectual creations, has projected the mind's eye through infinite time and the mind's hand into boundless space." (Nicholas M Butler, "What Knowledge is of Most Worth?", 1895)

"There are really four dimensions, three which we call the three planes of Space, and a fourth, Time. There is, however, a tendency to draw an unreal distinction between the former three dimensions and the latter, because it happens that our consciousness moves intermittently in one direction along the latter from the beginning to the end of our lives. [...] Really this is what is meant by the Fourth Dimension, though some people who talk about the Fourth Dimension do not know they mean it. It is only another way of looking at Time. There is no difference between Time and any of the three dimensions of Space except that our consciousness moves along it." (Herbert G Wells,"The Time Machine", 1895) 

"The world is chiefly a mental fact. From mind it receives the forms of time and space, the principle of causality, color, warmth, and beauty. Were there no mind, there would be no world." (John L Spalding, "Means and Ends of Education", 1895)