On Complex Numbers XVIII

"I consider it as one of the most important steps made by Analysis in the last period, that of not being bothered any more by imaginary quantities, and to be able to submit them to calculus, in the same way as the real ones." (Joseph-Louis de Lagrange, [letter to Antonio Lorgna] 1777)

"What should one understand by ∫ ϕx · dx for x = a + bi? Obviously, if we want to start from clear concepts, we have to assume that x passes from the value for which the integral has to be 0 to x = a + bi through infinitely small increments (each of the form x = a + bi), and then to sum all the ϕx · dx. Thereby the meaning is completely determined. However, the passage can take placein infinitely many ways: Just like the realm of all real magnitudes can be conceived as an infinite straight line, so can the realm of all magnitudes, real and imaginary, be made meaningful by an infinite plane, in which every point, determined by abscissa = a and ordinate = b, represents the quantity a+bi. The continuous passage from one value of x to another a+bi then happens along a curve and is therefore possible in infinitely many ways. I claim now that after two different passages the integral ∫ ϕx · dx acquires the same value when ϕx never becomes equal to ∞ in the region enclosed by the two curves representing the two passages."(Carl F Gauss, [letter to Bessel] 1811)

"Without doubt one of the most characteristic features of mathematics in the last century is the systematic and universal use of the complex variable. Most of its great theories received invaluable aid from it, and many owe their very existence to it." (James Pierpont, "History of Mathematics in the Nineteenth Century", Congress of Arts and Sciences Vol. 1, 1905)

"There is thus a possibility that the ancient dream of philosophers to connect all Nature with the properties of whole numbers will some day be realized. To do so physics will have to develop a long way to establish the details of how the correspondence is to be made. One hint for this development seems pretty obvious, namely, the study of whole numbers in modern mathematics is inextricably bound up with the theory of functions of a complex variable, which theory we have already seen has a good chance of forming the basis of the physics of the future. The working out of this idea would lead to a connection between atomic theory and cosmology." (Paul A M Dirac, [Lecture delivered on presentation of the James Scott prize] 1939)

"The real numbers are one of the most audacious idealizations made by the human mind, but they were used happily for centuries before anybody worried about the logic behind them. Paradoxically, people worried a great deal about the next enlargement of the number system, even though it was entirely harmless. That was the introduction of square roots for negative numbers, and it led to the 'imaginary' and 'complex' numbers. A professional mathematican should never leave home without them […]" (Ian Stewart, "Nature's Numbers: The unreal reality of mathematics", 1995)

"Beyond the theory of complex numbers, there is the much greater and grander theory of the functions of a complex variable, as when the complex plane is mapped to the complex plane, complex numbers linking themselves to other complex numbers. It is here that complex differentiation and integration are defined. Every mathematician in his education studies this theory and surrenders to it completely. The experience is like first love." (David Berlinski, "Infinite Ascent: A short history of mathematics", 2005)

"Algebraic geometry uses the geometric intuition which arises from looking at varieties over the complex and real case to deduce important results in arithmetic algebraic geometry where the complex number field is replaced by the field of rational numbers or various finite number fields." (Raymond O Wells Jr, "Differential and Complex Geometry: Origins, Abstractions and Embeddings", 2017)

"The primary aspects of the theory of complex manifolds are the geometric structure itself, its topological structure, coordinate systems, etc., and holomorphic functions and mappings and their properties. Algebraic geometry over the complex number field uses polynomial and rational functions of complex variables as the primary tools, but the underlying topological structures are similar to those that appear in complex manifold theory, and the nature of singularities in both the analytic and algebraic settings is also structurally very similar." (Raymond O Wells Jr, "Differential and Complex Geometry: Origins, Abstractions and Embeddings", 2017)

"The very idea of raising a number to an imaginary power may well have seemed to most of the era’s mathematicians like asking the ghost of a late amphibian to jump up on a harpsichord and play a minuet." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

"Today it’s easy to see the beauty of i, thanks, among other things, to its prominence in mathematics’ most beautiful equation. Thus, it may seem strange that it was once regarded as akin to a small waddling gargoyle. Indeed, the simplicity of its definition suggests unpretentious elegance: i is just the square root of −1. But as with many definitions in mathematics, i’s is fraught with provocative implications, and the ones that made it a star in mathematics weren’t apparent until long after it first came on the scene." (David Stipp, "A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics", 2017)

On Real Numbers II

"To describe how quantum theory shapes time and space, it is helpful to introduce the idea of imaginary time. Imaginary time sounds like something from science fiction, but it is a well-defined mathematical concept: time measured in what are called imaginary numbers. […] Imaginary numbers can then be represented as corresponding to positions on a vertical line: zero is again in the middle, positive imaginary numbers plotted upward, and negative imaginary numbers plotted downward. Thus imaginary numbers can be thought of as a new kind of number at right angles to ordinary real numbers. Because they are a mathematical construct, they don't need a physical realization […]" (Stephen W Hawking, "The Universe in a Nutshell", 2001)

"A sudden change in the evolutive dynamics of a system (a ‘surprise’) can emerge, apparently violating a symmetrical law that was formulated by making a reduction on some (or many) finite sequences of numerical data. This is the crucial point. As we have said on a number of occasions, complexity emerges as a breakdown of symmetry (a system that, by evolving with continuity, suddenly passes from one attractor to another) in laws which, expressed in mathematical form, are symmetrical. Nonetheless, this breakdown happens. It is the surprise, the paradox, a sort of butterfly effect that can highlight small differences between numbers that are very close to one another in the continuum of real numbers; differences that may evade the experimental interpretation of data, but that may increasingly amplify in the system’s dynamics." (Cristoforo S Bertuglia & Franco Vaio, "Nonlinearity, Chaos, and Complexity: The Dynamics of Natural and Social Systems", 2003)

"When real numbers are used as coordinates, the number of coordinates is the dimension of the geometry. This is why we call the plane two-dimensional and space three-dimensional. However, one can also expect complex numbers to be useful, knowing their geometric properties." (John Stillwell,"Yearning for the impossible: the surpnsing truths of mathematics", 2006)

"The complex numbers extend the real numbers by throwing in a new kind of number, the square root of minus one. But the price we pay for being able to take square roots of negative numbers is the loss of order. The complex numbers are a complete system but are spread out across a plane rather than aligned in a single orderly sequence." (Ian Stewart, "Why Beauty Is Truth", 2007)

"A complex number is just a pair of real numbers, manipulated according to a short list of simple rules. Since a pair of real numbers is surely just as ‘real’ as a single real number, real and complex numbers are equally closely related to reality, and ‘imaginary’ is misleading." (Ian Stewart, "Why Beauty Is Truth", 2007)

"Quantum theory may be formulated using Hilbert spaces over any of the three associative normed division algebras: the real numbers, the complex numbers and the quaternions. Indeed, these three choices appear naturally in a number of axiomatic approaches. However, there are internal problems with real or quaternionic quantum theory. Here we argue that these problems can be resolved if we treat real, complex and quaternionic quantum theory as part of a unified structure. Dyson called this structure the ‘three-fold way’ […] This three-fold classification sheds light on the physics of time reversal symmetry, and it already plays an important role in particle physics." (John C Baez, "Division Algebras and Quantum Theory", 2011)

"[…] the symmetry group of the infinite logarithmic spiral is an infinite group, with one element for each real number . Two such transformations compose by adding the corresponding angles, so this group is isomorphic to the real numbers under addition." (Ian Stewart, "Symmetry: A Very Short Introduction", 2013)

"Complex numbers seem to be fundamental for the description of the world proposed by quantum mechanics. In principle, this can be a source of puzzlement: Why do we need such abstract entities to describe real things? One way to refute this bewilderment is to stress that what we can measure is essentially real, so complex numbers are not directly related to observable quantities. A more philosophical argument is to say that real numbers are no less abstract than complex ones, the actual question is why mathematics is so effective for the description of the physical world." (Ricardo Karam, "Why are complex numbers needed in quantum mechanics? Some answers for the introductory level", American Journal of Physics Vol. 88 (1), 2020)

On Real Numbers I

"Because all conceivable numbers are either greater than zero or less than 0 or equal to 0, then it is clear that the square roots of negative numbers cannot be included among the possible numbers [real numbers]. Consequently we must say that these are impossible numbers. And this circumstance leads us to the concept of such numbers, which by their nature are impossible, and ordinarily are called imaginary or fancied numbers, because they exist only in the imagination." (Leonhard Euler, "Vollständige Anleitung zur Algebra", 1768-69)

"[…] with few exceptions all the operations and concepts that occur in the case of real numbers can indeed be carried over unchanged to complex ones. However, the concept of being greater cannot very well be applied to complex numbers. In the case of integration, too, there appear differences which rest on the multplicity of possible paths of integration when we are dealing with complex variables. Nevertheless, the large extent to which imaginary forms conform to the same laws as real ones justifies the introduction of imaginary forms into geometry." (Gottlob Frege, "On a Geometrical Representation of Imaginary forms in the Plane", 1873)

"Mathematics is a study which, when we start from its most familiar portions, may be pursued in either of two opposite directions. The more familiar direction is constructive, towards gradually increasing complexity: from integers to fractions, real numbers, complex numbers; from addition and multiplication to differentiation and integration, and on to higher mathematics. The other direction, which is less familiar, proceeds, by analyzing, to greater and greater abstractness and logical simplicity." (Bertrand Russell, "Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy", 1919)

"There is more to the calculation of π to a large number of decimal places than just the challenge involved. One reason for doing it is to secure statistical information concerning the 'normalcy' of π. A real number is said to be simply normal if in its decimal expansion all digits occur with equal frequency, and it is said to be normal if all blocks of digits of the same length occur with equal frequency. It is not known if π (or even √2, for that matter) is normal or even simply normal." (Howard Eves, "Mathematical Circles Revisited", 1971)

"Surreal numbers are an astonishing feat of legerdemain. An empty hat rests on a table made of a few axioms of standard set theory. Conway waves two simple rules in the air, then reaches into almost nothing and pulls out an infinitely rich tapestry of numbers that form a real and closed field. Every real number is surrounded by a host of new numbers that lie closer to it than any other 'real' value does. The system is truly 'surreal.'" (Martin Gardner, "Mathematical Magic Show", 1977)

"If explaining minds seems harder than explaining songs, we should remember that sometimes enlarging problems makes them simpler! The theory of the roots of equations seemed hard for centuries within its little world of real numbers, but it suddenly seemed simple once Gauss exposed the larger world of so-called complex numbers. Similarly, music should make more sense once seen through listeners' minds." (Marvin Minsky, "Music, Mind, and Meaning", 1981)

“The letter ‘i’ originally was meant to suggest the imaginary nature of this number, but with the greater abstraction of mathematics, it came to be realized that it was no more imaginary than many other mathematical constructs. True, it is not suitable for measuring quantities, but it obeys the same laws of arithmetic as do the real numbers, and, surprisingly enough, it makes the statement of various physical laws very natural.” (John A Paulos, “Beyond Numeracy”, 1991)

"A real number that satisfies (is a solution of) a polynomial equation with integer coefficients is called algebraic. […] A real number that is not algebraic is called transcendental. There is nothing mystic about this word; it merely indicates that these numbers transcend (go beyond) the realm of algebraic numbers."  (Eli Maor, "e: The Story of a Number", 1994)

"The real numbers are one of the most audacious idealizations made by the human mind, but they were used happily for centuries before anybody worried about the logic behind them. Paradoxically, people worried a great deal about the next enlargement of the number system, even though it was entirely harmless. That was the introduction of square roots for negative numbers, and it led to the 'imaginary' and 'complex' numbers. A professional mathematican should never leave home without them […]" (Ian Stewart, "Nature's Numbers: The unreal reality of mathematics", 1995)

Misquoted: Jacque Hadamard on Complex Numbers

"The shortest path between two truths in the real domain passes through the complex domain." 

Probably this is one of the most known quotes on complex numbers as it easy to remember and reflects the fact that important problems in algebra, analysis, geometry, number theory and physics can be simplified by considering them into the complex plane. Even if the quote reflects pretty good the idea, the actual quote comes from Jacque Hadamard’s "An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field" published in 1945:

"It has been written that the shortest and best way between two truths of the real domain often passes through the imaginary one."

[French: "On a pu écrire depuis que la voie la plus courte et la meilleure entre deux vérités du domaine réel passe souvent par le domaine imaginaire." (Jacques Hadamard, "Essai sur la psychologie de l'invention dans le domaine mathématique", 1945)]

Here Hadamard refers to Paul Painlevé, who in his "Analyse des travaux scientifiques" published in 1900 wrote as follows:

"The natural development of this work soon led the geometers in their studies to embrace imaginary as well as real values of the variable. The theory of Taylor series, that of elliptic functions, the vast field of Cauchy analysis, caused a burst of productivity derived from this generalization. It came to appear that, between two truths of the real domain, the easiest and shortest path quite often passes through the complex domain."

Actually, "la voie" can be translated as "the way" as well as "the path", the latter being closer to Painlevé’s quote, to whom the metaphor can be attributed to. Painlevé is not the first who stressed this important advantage of the complex numbers over the real ones, however his metaphor captures this aspect the best. 

"At the beginning I would ask anyone who wants to introduce a new function in analysis to clarify whether he intends to confine it to real magnitudes (real values of the argument) and regard the imaginary values as just vestigial - or whether he subscribes to my fundamental proposition that in the realm of magnitudes the imaginary ones a+b√−1 = a+bi have to be regarded as enjoying equal rights with the real ones. We are not talking about practical utility here; rather analysis is, to my mind, a self-sufficient science. It would lose immeasurably in beauty and symmetry from the rejection of any fictive magnitudes. At each stage truths, which otherwise are quite generally valid, would have to be encumbered with all sorts of qualifications." (Carl F Gauss, [letter to Bessel] 1811)

"The origin and the immediate purpose for the introduction of complex number into mathematics is the theory of creating simpler dependency laws (slope laws) between complex magnitudes by expressing these laws through numerical operations. And, if we give these dependency laws an expanded range by assigning complex values to the variable magnitudes, on which the dependency laws are based, then what makes its appearance is a harmony and regularity which is especially indirect and lasting." (Bernhard Riemann, "Grundlagen für eine allgemeine Theorie der Funktionen einer veränderlichen complexen Grösse", 1851)

"The conception of the inconceivable [imaginary], this measurement of what not only does not, but cannot exist, is one of the finest achievements of the human intellect. No one can deny that such imaginings are indeed imaginary. But they lead to results grander than any which flow from the imagination of the poet. The imaginary calculus is one of the master keys to physical science. These realms of the inconceivable afford in many places our only mode of passage to the domains of positive knowledge. Light itself lay in darkness until this imaginary calculus threw light upon light. And in all modern researches into electricity, magnetism, and heat, and other subtile physical inquiries, these are the most powerful instruments." (Thomas Hill, “The Imagination in Mathematics”, North American Review Vol. 85, 1857)

||>> Next Post 

On Complex Numbers X (Quantum Mechanics I)

"Meantime, there is no doubt a certain crudeness in the use of a complex wave function. If it were unavoidable in principle, and not merely a facilitation of the calculation, this would mean that there are in principle two wave functions, which must be used together in order to obtain information on the state of the system. [...] Our inability to give more accurate information about this is intimately connected with the fact that, in the pair of equations [considered], we have before us only the substitute - extraordinarily convenient for the calculation, to be sure - for a real wave equation of probably the fourth order, which, however, I have not succeeded in forming for the non-conservative case."(Edwin Schrödinger, "Quantisation as a Problem of Proper Values" , Annalen der Physik Vol. 81 (4), 1926)

"Our bra and ket vectors are complex quantities, since they can be multiplied by complex numbers and are then of the same nature as before, but they are complex quantities of a special kind which cannot be split up into real and pure imaginary parts. The usual method of getting the real part of a complex quantity, by taking half the sum of the quantity itself and its conjugate, cannot be applied since a bra and a ket vector are of different natures and cannot be added." (Paul Dirac, "The Principles of Quantum Mechanics", 1930)

"In his desire to consider at any cost the propagation phenomenon of the waves ψ as something real in the classical sense of the word, the author had refused to acknowledge that the whole development of the theory increasingly tended to highlight the essential complex nature of the wave function." (Edwin Schrödinger. "Mémoires sur la mécanique ondulatoire", 1933) [author‘s comment in the French translation] 

"One might think one could measure a complex dynamical variable by measuring separately its real and pure imaginary parts. But this would involve two measurements or two observations, which would be alright in classical mechanics, but would not do in quantum mechanics, where two observations in general interfere with one another - it is not in general permissible to consider that two observations can be made exactly simultaneously, and if they are made in quick succession the first will usually disturb the state of the system and introduce an indeterminacy that will affect the second." (Ernst C K Stückelberg, "Quantum Theory in Real Hilbert Space", 1960) 

"It has been generally believed that only the complex numbers could legitimately be used as the ground field in discussing quantum-mechanical operators. Over the complex field, Frobenius' theorem is of course not valid; the only division algebra over the complex field is formed by the complex numbers themselves. However, Frobenius' theorem is relevant precisely because the appropriate ground field for much of quantum mechanics is real rather than complex." (Freeman Dyson, "The Threefold Way. Algebraic Structure of Symmetry Groups and Ensembles in Quantum Mechanics" , Journal of Mathematical Physics Vol. 3, 1962)

"Quantum theory may be formulated using Hilbert spaces over any of the three associative normed division algebras: the real numbers, the complex numbers and the quaternions. Indeed, these three choices appear naturally in a number of axiomatic approaches. However, there are internal problems with real or quaternionic quantum theory. Here we argue that these problems can be resolved if we treat real, complex and quaternionic quantum theory as part of a unified structure. Dyson called this structure the ‘three-fold way’ […] This three-fold classification sheds light on the physics of time reversal symmetry, and it already plays an important role in particle physics." (John C Baez, "Division Algebras and Quantum Theory", 2011)

"It is particularly helpful to use complex numbers to model periodic phenomena, especially to operate with phase differences. Mathematically, one can treat a physical quantity as being complex, but address physical meaning only to its real part. Another possibility is to treat the real and imaginary parts of a complex number as two related (real) physical quantities. In both cases, the structure of complex numbers is useful to make calculations more easily, but no physical meaning is actually attached to complex variables." (Ricardo Karam, "Why are complex numbers needed in quantum mechanics? Some answers for the introductory level", American Journal of Physics Vol. 88 (1), 2020)

"What is essentially different in quantum mechanics is that it deals with complex quantities (e.g. wave functions and quantum state vectors) of a special kind, which cannot be split up into pure real and imaginary parts that can be treated independently. Furthermore, physical meaning is not attached directly to the complex quantities themselves, but to some other operation that produces real numbers (e.g. the square modulus of the wave function or of the inner product between state vectors)." (Ricardo Karam, "Why are complex numbers needed in quantum mechanics? Some answers for the introductory level", American Journal of Physics Vol. 88 (1), 2020) 

5 Books 10 Quotes IV: On Complex Numbers IV

Ian Stewart, "Why Beauty Is Truth: The History of Symmetry", 2007
	“A complex number is just a pair of real numbers, manipulated according to a short list of simple rules. Since a pair of real numbers is surely just as ‘real’ as a single real number, real and complex numbers are equally closely related to reality, and ‘imaginary’ is misleading.”
“The complex numbers extend the real numbers by throwing in a new kind of number, the square root of minus one. But the price we pay for being able to take square roots of negative numbers is the loss of order. The complex numbers are a complete system but are spread out across a plane rather than aligned in a single orderly sequence.”
David Mumford, Caroline Series & David Wright, "Indra’s Pearls: The Vision of Felix Klein", 2002
	“Complex numbers are really not as complex as you might expect from their name, particularly if we think of them in terms of the underlying two dimensional geometry which they describe. Perhaps it would have been better to call them 'nature's numbers'. Behind complex numbers is a wonderful synthesis between two dimensional geometry and an elegant arithmetic in which every polynomial equation has a solution.”
“Ordinary numbers have immediate connection to the world around us; they are used to count and measure every sort of thing. Adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing all have simple interpretations in terms of the objects being counted and measured. When we pass to complex numbers, though, the arithmetic takes on a life of its own. Since -1 has no square root, we decided to create a new number game which supplies the missing piece. By adding in just this one new element √-1. we created a whole new world in which everything arithmetical, miraculously, works out just fine.”
Paul J Nahin, "An Imaginary Tale: The History of √-1", 1998
	“The discovery of complex numbers was the last in a sequence of discoveries that gradually filled in the set of all numbers, starting with the positive integers (finger counting) and then expanding to include the positive rationals and irrational reals, negatives, and then finally the complex.”
“When we try to take the square root of -1 (a real number), for example, we suddenly leave the real numbers, and so the reals are not complete with respect to the square root operation. We don’t have to be concerned that something like that will happen with the complex numbers, however, and we won’t have to invent even more exotic numbers (the ‘really complex’!) Complex numbers are everything there is in the two-dimensional plane.”
Jerry R Muir Jr., “Complex Analysis: A Modern First Course in Function Theory”, 2015
	“Complex analysis should never be underestimated as simply being calculus with complex numbers in place of real numbers and is distinguished from being so at every possible opportunity.”
“The upgrade from the real numbers to the complex numbers has both algebraic and analytic motivation. The real numbers are not algebraically complete, meaning there are polynomial equations such as x^2 = −1 with no solutions. The incorporation of  √-1 […] is a direct response to this.”
Tobias Dantzig, “Number: The Language of Science”, 1930
	“[…] extensions beyond the complex number domain are possible only at the expense of the principle of permanence. The complex number domain is the last frontier of this principle. Beyond this either the commutativity of the operations or the rôle which zero plays in arithmetic must be sacrificed.”
“And so it was that the complex number, which had its origin in a symbol for a fiction, ended by becoming an indispensable tool for the formulation of mathematical ideas, a powerful instrument for the solution of intricate problems, a means for tracing kinships between remote mathematical disciplines.” Previous Post <<||>> Next Post See also: More Quotes on Complex Numbers III More Quotes on Complex Numbers II More Quotes on Complex Numbers I Complex Numbers

On Complex Numbers III

"[geometrical representation of complex numbers] completely established the intuitive meaning of complex numbers, and more is not needed to admit these quantities into the domain of arithmetic." (Carl F Gauss, 1831) 

“Nearly fifty years had passed without any progress on the question of analytic representation of an arbitrary function, when an assertion of Fourier threw new light on the subject. Thus a new era began for the development of this part of Mathematics and this was heralded in a stunning way by major developments in mathematical Physics.” (Bernhard Riemann, 1854)

"I recall my own emotions: I had just been initiated into the mysteries of the complex number. I remember my bewilderment: here were magnitudes patently impossible and yet susceptible of manipulations which lead to concrete results. It was a feeling of dissatisfaction, of restlessness, a desire to fill these illusory creatures, these empty symbols, with substance. Then I was taught to interpret these beings in a concrete geometrical way. There came then an immediate feeling of relief, as though I had solved an enigma, as though a ghost which had been causing me apprehension turned out to be no ghost at all, but a familiar part of my environment." (Tobias Dantzig, “The Two Realities”, 1930)

“[…] imaginary numbers made their own way into arithmetical calculation without the approval, and even against the desires of individual mathematicians, and obtained wider circulation only gradually and the extent to which they showed themselves useful.” (Felix Klein, “Elementary Mathematics from an Advanced Standpoint”, 1945)

“The sweeping development of mathematics during the last two centuries is due in large part to the introduction of complex numbers; paradoxically, this is based on the seemingly absurd notion that there are numbers whose squares are negative.” (Emile Borel, 1952)

"For centuries [the concept of complex numbers] figured as a sort of mystic bond between reason and imagination.” (Tobias Dantzig)

"The whole apparatus of the calculus takes on an entirely different form when developed for the complex numbers." (Keith Devlin) "There can be very little of present-day science and technology that is not dependent on complex numbers in one way or another." (Keith Devlin)

 “[…] to the unpreoccupied mind, complex numbers are far from natural or simple and they cannot be suggested by physical observations. Furthermore, the use of complex numbers is in this case not a calculational trick of applied mathematics but comes close to being a necessity in the formulation of quantum mechanics.” (Eugene Wigner, “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences”, 1960)

“Nothing in our experience suggests the introduction of [complex numbers]. Indeed, if a mathematician is asked to justify his interest in complex numbers, he will point, with some indignation, to the many beautiful theorems in the theory of equations, of power series, and of analytic functions in general, which owe their origin to the introduction of complex numbers. The mathematician is not willing to give up his interest in these most beautiful accomplishments of his genius.” (Eugene P Wigner, “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences”, Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13 (1), 1960) 

“The letter ‘i’ originally was meant to suggest the imaginary nature of this number, but with the greater abstraction of mathematics, it came to be realized that it was no more imaginary than many other mathematical constructs. True, it is not suitable for measuring quantities, but it obeys the same laws of arithmetic as do the real numbers, and, surprisingly enough, it makes the statement of various physical laws very natural.” (John A Paulos, “Beyond Numeracy”, 1991)

"The only reason that we like complex numbers is that we don't like real numbers." (Bernd Sturmfels)

See also:
5 Books 10 Quotes: Complex Numbers
Complex Numbers IV
Complex Numbers II
Complex Numbers I

On Complex Numbers II

“I have obtained these values by a singular analogy based on the passages from the real to the imaginary, passages that can be considered as a means of discovery.” (Pierre-Simon Laplace)

“I did not understand how such a quantity could be real, when imaginary or impossible numbers were used to express it.” (Gottfried W Leibniz) 

“But it is just that the Roots of Equations should be often impossible (complex), lest they should exhibit the cases of Problems that are impossible as if they were possible." (Isaac Newton, “Universal Mathematic” 2nd Ed., 1728)

"Complete knowledge of the nature of an analytic function must also include insight into its behavior for imaginary values of the arguments. Often the latter is indispensable even for a proper appreciation of the behavior of the function for real arguments. It is therefore essential that the original determination of the function concept be broadened to a domain of magnitudes which includes both the real and the imaginary quantities, on an equal footing, under the single designation complex numbers." (Carl F Gauss, cca. 1831)

“[…] such numbers, which by their natures are impossible, are ordinarily called imaginary or fanciful numbers, because they exist only in the imagination.”  (Leohnard Euler, 1732)

“We completely repudiate the symbol √-1, abandoning it without regret because we do not know what this alleged symbolism signifies nor what meaning to give to it.” (Augustin-Louis Cauchy, 1847)

“Analysis […] would lose immensely in beauty and balance and would be forced to add very hampering restrictions to truths which would hold generally otherwise, if […] imaginary quantities were to be neglected.” (Garrett Birkhoff, 1973)

"It is a curious fact that the first introduction of the imaginaries occurred in the theory of cubic equations, in the case where it was clear that real solutions existed though in an unrecognizable form, and not in the theory of quadratic equations, where our present textbooks introduce them." (Dirk J Struik, “A Concise History of Mathematics” Vol. I, 1948)

"We have shown the symbol √-1 to be void of meaning, or rather self-contradictory and absurd. Nevertheless, by means of such symbols, a part of algebra is established which is of great utility. It depends upon the fact, which must be verified by experience, that the common rules of algebra may be applied to these expressions without leading to any false results." (Augustus De Morgan)

"The word ‘imaginary’ is the great algebraical calamity, but it is too well established for mathematicians to eradicate. It should never have been used. Books on elementary algebra give a simple interpretation of imaginary numbers in terms of rotations. […] Although the interpretation by means of rotations proves nothing, it may suggest that there is no occasion for anyone to muddle himself into a state of mystic wonderment over nothing about the grossly misnamed ‘imaginaries’." (Philip E B Jourdain, "The Nature of Mathematics" in [James R Newman, “The World of Mathematics” Vol. I, 1956])

See also:
5 Books 10 Quotes: Complex Numbers V
Complex Numbers IV
Complex Numbers III
Complex Numbers I

On Complex Numbers I

“[…] neither the true roots nor the false are always real; sometimes they are, however, imaginary; namely, whereas we can always imagine as many roots for each equation as I have predicted, there is still not always a quantity which corresponds to each root so imagined. Thus, while we may think of the equation x^3 - 6xx + 13x - 10 = 0 as having three roots, yet there is just one real root, which is 2, and the other two [2+i and 2-i]], however, increased, diminished, or multiplied them as we just laid down, remain always imaginary.” (René Descartes, “Gemetry”, 1637)

“We have before had occasion (in the Solution of some Quadratick and Cubick Equations) to make mention of Negative Squares, and Imaginary Roots, (as contradistinguished to what they call Real Roots, whether affirmative or Negative) […].These ‘Imaginary’ Quantities (as they are commonly called) arising from ‘Supposed’ Root of a Negative Square, (when they happen) are reputed to imply that the Case proposed is Impossible.” (John Wallis, "A Treatise of Algebra, Both Historical and Practical", 1673)

“Imaginary numbers are a fine and wonderful refuge of the divine spirit almost an amphibian between being and non-being.” (Gottfried Leibniz, 1702)

"That this subject [imaginary numbers] has hitherto been surrounded by mysterious obscurity, is to be attributed largely to an ill adapted notation. If, for example, +1, -1, and the square root of -1 had been called direct, inverse and lateral units, instead of positive, negative and imaginary (or even impossible), such an obscurity would have been out of the question." (Carl Friedrich Gauss)

“All such expressions as √-1, √-2, etc., are consequently impossible or imaginary numbers, since they represent roots of negative quantities; and of such numbers we may truly assert that they are neither nothing, nor greater than nothing, nor less than nothing, which necessarily constitutes them imaginary or impossible.” (Euler, Algebra, 1770)

“In particular, in introducing new numbers, mathematics is only obliged to give definitions of them, by which such a definiteness and, circumstances permitting, such a relation to the older numbers are conferred upon them that in given cases they can definitely be distinguished from one another. As soon as a number satisfies all these conditions, it can and must be regarded as existent and real in mathematics. Here I perceive the reason why one has to regard the rational, irrational, and complex numbers as being just as thoroughly existent as the finite positive integers.” (Georg Cantor)

“One might think this means that imaginary numbers are just a mathematical game having nothing to do with the real world. From the viewpoint of positivist philosophy, however, one cannot determine what is real. All one can do is find which mathematical models describe the universe we live in. It turns out that a mathematical model involving imaginary time predicts not only effects we have already observed but also effects we have not been able to measure yet nevertheless believe in for other reasons. So what is real and what is imaginary? Is the distinction just in our minds?” (Stephen W Hawking, “The Universe in a Nutshell”, 2001).

“The shortest path between two truths in the real domain passes through the complex domain." (Jacque Hadamard [misquoted])

“The origin and immediate purpose of the introduction of complex magnitudes into mathematics lie in the theory of simple laws of dependence between variable magnitudes expressed by means of operations on magnitudes. If we enlarge the scope of applications of these laws by assigning to the variables they involve complex values, then there appears an otherwise hidden harmony and regularity.” (Heinz-Dieter Ebbinghaus et al., “Numbers”, 1983)

“The more science I studied, the more I saw that physics becomes metaphysics and numbers become imaginary numbers. The farther you go into science, the mushier the ground gets. You start to say, 'Oh, there is an order and a spiritual aspect to science.’” (Dan Brown)

"Adam and Eve are like imaginary number, like the square root of minus one… If you include it in your equation, you can calculate all manners of things, which cannot be imagined without it." (Philip Pullman)

See also:
5 Books 10 Quotes: Complex Numbers
More Quotes on Complex Numbers III
More Quotes on Complex Numbers II
More Quotes on Complex Numbers I