"It is not surprising, in view of the polydynamic constitution of the genuinely mathematical mind, that many of the major heros of the science, men like Desargues and Pascal, Descartes and Leibnitz, Newton, Gauss and Bolzano, Helmholtz and Clifford, Riemann and Salmon and Plücker and Poincaré, have attained to high distinction in other fields not only of science but of philosophy and letters too. And when we reflect that the very greatest mathematical achievements have been due, not alone to the peering, microscopic, histologic vision of men like Weierstrass, illuminating the hidden recesses, the minute and intimate structure of logical reality, but to the larger vision also of men like Klein who survey the kingdoms of geometry and analysis for the endless variety of things that flourish there, as the eye of Darwin ranged over the flora and fauna of the world, or as a commercial monarch contemplates its industry, or as a statesman beholds an empire; when we reflect not only that the Calculus of Probability is a creation of mathematics but that the master mathematician is constantly required to exercise judgment. - judgment, that is, in matters not admitting of certainty - balancing probabilities not yet reduced nor even reducible perhaps to calculation; when we reflect that he is called upon to exercise a function analogous to that of the comparative anatomist like Cuvier, comparing theories and doctrines of every degree of similarity and dissimilarity of structure; when, finally, we reflect that he seldom deals with a single idea at a tune, but is for the most part engaged in wielding organized hosts of them, as a general wields at once the division of an army or as a great civil administrator directs from his central office diverse and scattered but related groups of interests and operations; then, I say, the current opinion that devotion to mathematics unfits the devotee for practical affairs should be known for false on a priori grounds. And one should be thus prepared to find that as a fact Gaspard Monge, creator of descriptive geometry, author of the classic Applications de l’analyse à la géométrie; Lazare Carnot, author of the celebrated works, Géométrie de position, and Réflections sur la Métaphysique du Calcul infinitesimal; Fourier, immortal creator of the Théorie analytique de la chaleur; Arago, rightful inheritor of Monge’s chair of geometry; Poncelet, creator of pure projective geometry; one should not be surprised, I say, to find that these and other mathematicians in a land sagacious enough to invoke their aid, rendered, alike in peace and in war, eminent public service." (Cassius J Keyser, "Lectures on Science, Philosophy and Art", 1908)
"He [Henri Poincaré] penetrates at once the divine simplicity of the perfectly general case, and thence descends, as from Olympus, to the special concrete earthly particulars. A combination of seemingly extremely simple analytic and geometric concepts gave necessary general conclusions of immense scope from which sprang a disconcerting wilderness of possible deductions. And so he leaves a noble, fruitful heritage.." (George B Halsted, 1913)
"Poincaré was a vigorous opponent of the theory that all mathematics can be rewritten in terms of the most elementary notions of classical logic; something more than logic, he believed, makes mathematics what it is." (Eric T Bell, "Men of Mathematics", 1937)
"Poincaré was the last man to take practically all mathematics, pure and applied, as his province. […] Few mathematicians have had the breadth of philosophic vision that Poincaré had, and none is his superior in the gift of clear exposition." (Eric T Bell, "Men of Mathematics", 1937)
"Of course, there are a number of important problems left in differential topology that do not reduce in any sense to homotopy theory and topologists can never rest until these are settled. But, on the other hand, it seems that differential topology has reached such a satisfactory stage that, for it to continue its exciting pace, it must look toward the problems of analysis, the sources that led Poincare to its early development." (Steven Smale, "A survey of some recent developments in differential topology", 1961)
"In a Newtonian view, space and time are separate and different. Symmetries of the laws of physics are combinations of rigid motions of space and an independent shift in time. But... these transformations do not leave Maxwell's equations invariant. Pondering this, the mathematicians Henri Poincaré and Hermann Minkowski were led to a new view of the symmetries of space and time, on a purely mathematical level. If they had described these symmetries in physical terms, they would have beaten Einstein to relativity, but they avoided physical speculations. They did understand that symmetries in the laws of electromagnetism do not affect space and time independently but mix them up. The mathematical scheme describing these intertwined changes is known as the Lorentz group, after the physicist, Hendrik Lorentz." (Ian Stewart, "Why Beauty Is Truth: The History of Symmetry", 2008)
"It has been said that Poincaré did not invent topology, but that he gave it wings. This is surely true, and verges on understatement. His six great topological papers created, almost out of nothing, the field of algebraic topology." (Donal O'Shea, "The Poincaré Conjecture: In Search of the Shape of the Universe", 2008)
"When real numbers are used as coordinates, the number of coordinates is the dimension of the geometry. This is why we call the plane two-dimensional and space three-dimensional. However, one can also expect complex numbers to be useful [...]. What is remarkable is that complex numbers are if anything more appropriate for spherical and hyperbolic geometryth an for Euclidean geometry. With hindsight, it is even possible to see hyperbolic geometry in properties of complex numbers that were studied as early as 1800, long before hyperbolic geometry was discussed by anyone. This was noticed by the third great contributor to non-Euclidean geometry after Beltrami and Klein - the French mathematician Henri Poincaré [...]" (John Stillwell, "Yearning for the Impossible: The Surprising Truths of Mathematics" 2nd Ed., 2018)
No comments:
Post a Comment